Novel Lateral Approach for MIS Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis: An Assessment of Feasibility and Outcomes

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain causes significant disability and impairment to quality of life (QOL). Minimally invasive SI joint fusion is increasingly used to relieve chronic SI joint pain among patients who do not respond to nonsurgical treatment.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the existing literature to assess the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive SI joint fusion.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and a clinical trial registry from database inception to June 30, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies were primary research studies published in the English language, enrolled adults with SI joint pain, and compared SI joint fusion to nonsurgical interventions or alternative minimally invasive procedures. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled cohort studies (CCSs) that reported effectiveness (pain, physical function, QOL, opioid use) or safety outcomes (adverse events [AEs], revision surgeries) and uncontrolled studies that reported safety outcomes.

DATA ABSTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were abstracted into structured forms; two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias using standard instruments; certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE.

RESULTS

Forty studies (2 RCTs, 3 CCSs, and 35 uncontrolled studies) were included. Minimally invasive SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System appeared to result in larger improvements in pain (two RCTs: mean difference in visual analog scale -40.5 mm, 95% CI, -50.1 to -30.9; -38.1 mm, p<.0001) and larger improvements in physical function (mean difference in Oswestry Disability Index -25.4 points, 95% CI, -32.5 to -18.3; -19.8 points, p<.0001) compared to conservative management at 6 months. Improvements in pain and physical function for the RCTs appeared durable at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Findings were similar in one CCS. The two RCTs also found significant improvements in QOL at 6 months and 1 year. Opioid use may be improved at 6 months and 1 to 2 years. AEs appeared higher in the fusion group at 6 months. The incidence of revision surgery varied by study; the highest was 3.8% at 2 years. Two CCSs compared the effectiveness of alternative minimally invasive fusion procedures. One CCS compared iFuse to the Rialto SI Fusion System and reported no differences in pain, function, QOL, and revision surgeries from 6 months to 1 year. One CCS compared iFuse to percutaneous screw fixation and reported significantly fewer revisions among iFuse participants (mean difference -61.0%, 95% CI, -78.4% to -43.5%). The 35 uncontrolled studies had serious limitations and reported heterogeneous safety outcomes. Two of the larger studies reported a 13.2% incidence of complications from minimally invasive SI joint fusion at 90 days using an insurance claims database and a 3.1% incidence of revision surgery over 2.5 years using a postmarket surveillance database.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients meeting diagnostic criteria for SI joint pain and who have not responded to conservative care, minimally invasive SI joint fusion is probably more effective than conservative management for reducing pain and opioid use and improving physical function and QOL. Fusion with iFuse and Rialto appear to have similar effectiveness. AEs appear to be higher for minimally invasive SI joint fusion than conservative management through 6 months. Based on evidence from uncontrolled studies, serious AEs from minimally invasive SI joint fusion may be higher in usual practice compared to what is reported in trials. The incidence of revision surgery is likely no higher than 3.8% at 2 years. Limited evidence is available that compares different minimally invasive devices.

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Robotic Navigation: Technical Note and Case Series

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing sacroiliac (SI) fusion can oftentimes experience significant improvements in pain and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel application of robotic navigation to assist with minimally invasive SI joint fusion.

METHODS

Patients undergoing stand-alone SI joint fusion with ExcelsiusGPS robotic navigation from July 2020 through June 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Baseline demographic and perioperative variables including radiation exposure, postoperative pain scores, and narcotic requirements in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded. Length of stay and any postoperative complications were also noted.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients (64.4 ± 8.2 years, body mass index 28.7 ± 4.8 kg/m2) met inclusion criteria. Seven patients (70.0%) were female, and there was a 6:4 split between left-sided and right-sided SI joint fusion. The total operative time was 54 ± 9 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 21.0 ± 16.7 mL. The intraoperative radiation exposure was 13.7 ± 6.2 mGy, and there were no complications. The average pain score in PACU was 5.2 ± 1.0, and the average opioid administration in PACU was 27.6 ± 10.3 morphine equivalents. Length of stay was 0.4 ± 0.7 days, with 7 of 10 patients discharged on the same day as surgery. There were no readmissions. The average length of follow-up was 4.3 ± 2.5 months. At the last follow-up, patients reported an average of 73.1% ± 30.1% improvement in their preoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

Robot-navigated SI joint fusion is a feasible and reproducible method for addressing refractory SI joint disease. Further investigation on clinical outcomes and long-term fusion rates is needed, as are studies comparing robot-navigated SI joint fusion with more traditional techniques.

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion-a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sacroiliac dysfunction is an important cause of low back pain with significant impact on quality of life and daily activities. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MIS SI fusion) is an effective treatment for patients who failed non-surgical strategies. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical outcomes and complications of this surgical technique.

RECENT FINDINGS

For patients with SI joint dysfunction, MIS SI fusion reduced pain and disability as measured by Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Index and improved quality of life as measured by Short-Form 36 and EuroQol-5D questionnaires. Satisfaction rates were higher in the SI fusion group when compared to the conservative management. In recent clinical trials, adverse events occurred with a similar rate in the first 6 months for patients assigned in the conservative management versus patients assigned to MIS SI fusion. MIS SI fusion is an effective and safe procedure for patients with sacroiliac dysfunction who failed non-surgical strategies. This procedure provides rapid as well as sustained pain relief, improvement in back function, high patient satisfaction, with low rate of complications.