Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Case Series

Clinical Characteristics and Mortality of Intensive Care Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage and COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, many studies have reported severe neurologic effects of the infection on the brain. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a particular pathology that can result in these devastating neurologic effects.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of our study is to investigate the possible difference in the clinical and laboratory characteristics of ICH between patients with positive COVID-19 tests and those with negative tests. The potential effect of this difference on the prognosis of the patients during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a secondary aim of the study.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort review, our data were collected from the electronic medical database of the Benghazi Medical Center (BMC) for the period from January 2021 to June 2022. We depended mainly on the admission paper information documented by emergency doctors, and mortality was measured depending on the clinical status after discharge from the ICU.

RESULTS

This study included a sample of 72 patients, 34 patients (47.2%) were considered COVID-19 positive, and 38 patients (52.8%) were COVID-19 negative. The difference between groups was significant in ICH score ≥3 (higher in positive patients), INR (lower in positive patients), the incidence of new-onset hypertension (higher in positive patients), location of hematoma (infratentorial in positive patients), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) extension (more in positive patients). Also, COVID-19 was significantly associated with ICH score ≥3 (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.2 - 18.6, p = 0.03, R2 = 0.16), INR (𝛃 = 0.35, 95% CI 0.09 - 0.62, p < 0.003, R2 = 0.136), risk of ventilation (OR 14.1, 95% CI 3.5 - 56.9, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.26), hydrocephalus (OR 9.41, 95% CI 2.72 - 32.5, p = 0.001, R2 = 0.19), infratentorial location (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1 - 12.5, p = 0.04, R2 = 0.14), IVH extension (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2 - 10.4, p = 0.03, R2 = 0.09), new-onset hypertension (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.5 - 11.9, p = 0.007, R2 = 0.10), and mortality (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.6 - 15.3, p = 0.04, R2 = 0.15). The difference in survivability between groups was statistically insignificant (X2 = 0.41, log-rank, P = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrates, with sufficient evidence, that COVID-19 infection causes a significant change in some critical baseline characteristics like INR values, location, and IVH extension that influence the prognosis of ICH in ICU patients.

Topographical Distribution of Neuroanatomical Abnormalities Following COVID-19 Invasion : A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE

This systematic review is aimed at synthesising the literature base to date on the frequency and topographical distribution of neuroanatomical changes seen on imaging following COVID-19 invasion with a focus on both the acute and chronic phases of the disease.

METHODS

In this study, 8 databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published from December 2019 to March 2022 and supplemented with a manual reference search. Data were extracted from the included studies and narrative synthesis was employed to integrate the findings.

RESULTS

A total of 110 studies met the inclusion criteria and comprised 119,307 participants (including 31,073 acute and 143 long COVID-19 patients manifesting neurological alterations) and controls. Considerable variability in both the localisation and nature of neuroanatomical abnormalities are noted along the continuum with a wide range of neuropathologies relating to the cerebrovascular/neurovascular system, (sub)cortical structures (including deep grey and white matter structures), brainstem, and predominant regional and/or global alterations in the cerebellum with varying degrees of spinal involvement.

CONCLUSION

Structural regional alterations on neuroimaging are frequently demonstrated in both the acute and chronic phases of SARS-CoV‑2 infection, particularly prevalent across subcortical, prefrontal/frontal and cortico-limbic brain areas as well as the cerebrovascular/neurovascular system. These findings contribute to our understanding of the acute and chronic effects of the virus on the nervous system and has the potential to provide information on acute and long-term treatment and neurorehabilitation decisions.

Neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2: A Pathological Examination of Neurosurgical Specimens

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neurological manifestations may occur in more than 80% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection, including severe disruptions of the central nervous system (CNS), such as strokes, encephalitis, or seizures. Although the primary pathophysiological mechanism for the effects of COVID-19 in CNS remains unknown, evidence exists for both direct injury from neuroinvasion and indirect effects from disruptions in systemic inflammatory and coagulation pathways. In this study, we analyzed CNS tissue from living patients to better understand these processes.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval and patient consent, samples that would be otherwise discarded from patients with active or recent (within 6 days of surgery) COVID-19 infection undergoing neurosurgical intervention were collected and tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, electron microscopy, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Five patients with perioperative mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection met inclusion criteria (2 male, 3 female; mean age 38.8 ± 13.5 years). Neurosurgical diagnoses included a glioblastoma, a ruptured arteriovenous malformation, a ruptured posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm, a middle cerebral artery occlusion, and a hemorrhagic pontine cavernous malformation. Samples analyzed included the frontal lobe cortex, olfactory nerve, arteriovenous malformation/temporal lobe parenchyma, middle cerebral artery, cerebellum, and cavernous malformation/brainstem parenchyma. Testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 was negative in all samples.

CONCLUSION

The CNS is likely not a significant viral reservoir during mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection, although direct neuroinvasion is not definitively excluded. Additional testing to help elucidate the relative contributions of direct and indirect pathways for CNS injury from COVID is warranted.

Persistent intracranial hyper-inflammation in ruptured cerebral aneurysm after COVID-19: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The systemic manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include hyperinflammatory reactions in various organs. Recent studies showed evidence for the frequent involvement of central nervous system in affected patients; however, little is known about clinical features of cerebrovascular diseases in childhood-onset COVID-19.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 10-year-old boy recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection without complication. On 14 days after infection, he presented with loss of consciousness. A head computed tomography detected a ruptured cerebral aneurysm at the left posterior cerebral artery accompanying subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Immediate surgical intervention did not rescue the patient, resulting in the demise 7 days after admission. Serological and genetic tests excluded the diagnosis of vasculitis and connective tissue disorders. Retrospective analysis showed markedly higher levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 in the cerebrospinal fluid than the serum sample concurrently obtained. A review of literature indicated that adult patients with COVID-19 have a risk for the later development of SAH during the convalescent phase of COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

SAH is a severe complication of COVID-19 in children and adults who have asymptomatic cerebrovascular aneurysms. The markedly high levels of cytokines detected in the cerebrospinal fluid suggested that intracranial hyperinflammatory condition might be one of the possible mechanisms involved in the rupture of a preexisting cerebrovascular aneurysms.

Confidence Interval: Advantages, Disadvantages and the Dilemma of Interpretation

Confidence interval (CI) is one of the important reporting tools for research data as it not only provides valuable information about the effect size along with its width but also possible clinical significance. Unfortunately, this approach is not being utilized to its fullest extent. Determining point estimate always includes an element of uncertainty due to associated sampling error. A confidence interval may be an appropriate tool to measure this uncertainty. Further, the P value does not convey information about the magnitude of an effect and the error associated with it. Thus, in an ideal situation effect size should preferably be associated with a confidence interval to assess precision. Not only does CI let us assess likely effects but also decides whether the intervention applied could have clinical utility. In contrast, the p-value limits our option to either reject any differences that are not significant or accept those that are. However, confidence intervals are commonly misinterpreted. It is imperative to understand that the CI is not the range of effects that 95% of patients in the population exhibit. Moreover, it would also be erroneous to say that there is a 95% probability that the CI includes the true population effect. Interpretation is usually based on the context in which the confidence interval is being looked at. From a utility point of view and like other statistical tools confidence interval approach does have several advantages as well as disadvantages and is far beyond being a perfect statistical tool.

Early recanalization and vasospasm after endovascular treatment in a case of ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm associated with COVID-19

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant structural changes in acute care hospitals. COVID-19-associated stroke has gained attention, with abnormal coagulation and vascular endothelial damage being recognized. While ischemic cases are commonly reported, hemorrhagic cases have also been reported. This report presents a case of ruptured vertebral artery dissection aneurysm associated with COVID-19, resulting in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The treatment course, challenges in managing cerebral vasospasm, and early recanalization achieved through endovascular therapy are described.

Case Description

A 67-year-old male patient was brought to our hospital for emergency treatment of impaired consciousness that occurred while recovering from COVID-19. He underwent endovascular internal trapping using coils, and although the rupture did not recur, he required long-term tracheal management, which resulted in a cerebral infarction caused by cerebral vasospasm. In addition, early recanalization was seen, which required retreatment.

Conclusion

This case highlights the challenges in managing COVID-19-associated SAH and emphasizes the need for infection control measures and proper postoperative care. Establishing protocols for detecting and managing cerebral vasospasm is essential.

Increased prevalence of blister aneurysm formation during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Intracranial blister aneurysms are a rare and an historically difficult to treat subset of aneurysms. They are distinct from typical saccular aneurysms with different pathophysiology and treatment options.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients was queried for those presenting prior to the pandemic (2017-2019), and those presenting during the height of the pandemic in our locality (2021). Aneurysm characteristics and patient demographics associated with rupture risk/formation were collected.

RESULTS

334 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were reviewed. 86 of these patients presented in 2021, with a statistically significant increase in the proportion of ruptured ICA blister aneurysms as compared to 2017-2019 (7/86, 8% vs 5/248, p = .02). Mean patient age, presenting grade, other aneurysm location proportions, aneurysm size, and incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with SAH during the height of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2021 were more likely to have ICA blister type aneurysms.

Role of Inflammatory Processes in Hemorrhagic Stroke

Hemorrhagic stroke is the deadliest form of stroke and includes the subtypes of intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. A common cause of hemorrhagic stroke in older individuals is cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage both lead to the rapid collection of blood in the central nervous system and generate inflammatory immune responses that involve both brain resident and infiltrating immune cells. These responses are complex and can contribute to both tissue recovery and tissue injury. Despite the interconnectedness of these major subtypes of hemorrhagic stroke, few reviews have discussed them collectively. The present review provides an update on inflammatory processes that occur in response to intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and the role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related hemorrhage. The goal is to highlight inflammatory processes that underlie disease pathology and recovery. We aim to discuss recent advances in our understanding of these conditions and identify gaps in knowledge with the potential to develop effective therapeutic strategies.

Characteristics of subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and descriptive analysis

OBJECTIVE

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has been reported as a neurological manifestation in 0.1% of COVID-19 patients. This systematic review investigated the outcomes and predictive factors of SAH in patients with COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to 10th September 2021. Studies reporting SAH in COVID-19 patients were included. Demographic characteristics, risk factors for disease, severity of COVID-19, and mortality of SAH in COVID-19 patients were analyzed. Subgroup analyses stratified by COVID-19 severity and mortality were conducted.

RESULTS

17 case reports, 11 case series, and 2 retrospective cohort studies, with a total of 345 cases of SAH in COVID-19 patients, were included for analysis. Most published cases were reported in the US. Mean age was 55±18.4 years, and 162 patients (48.5%) were female. 242 patients (73.8%) had severe-to-critical COVID-19, 56.7% had aneurysmal SAH, 71.4% were on anticoagulation, and 10.8% underwent surgical treatment. 136 out of 333 patients (40.8%) died. Among patients with severe-to-critical COVID-19, 11 out of 18 (61.1%) died, and 8 out of 8 (100.0%) were non-aneurysmal SAH.

CONCLUSIONS

SAH is a rare but morbid occurrence in COVID-19. The mortality rate of COVID-SAH patients was 40.8%, with a higher prevalence of severe-to-critical COVID-19 (100% versus 53.8%) and non-aneurysmal SAH (85.7% versus 44.6%) among COVID-SAH deaths. Given the changing landscape of COVID-19 variants, further studies investigating the association between COVID-19 and SAH may be warranted to identify the long-term effects of COVID-19.

Vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm rupture under severe COVID-19

Objective

We report a rare case of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) caused by a ruptured vertebral artery (VA) dissecting aneurysm (DA) under severe COVID-19 treatment, and discuss the potential relationships.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old woman with COVID-19 fell into severe pneumonia needing mechanical ventilation at 10 days post-onset (day 10). The patient had no risk factors for DA or stroke other than COVID-19 infection. At day 17 when weaning ventilatory management, her systolic blood pressure was transiently elevated, and her consciousness did not recover thereafter. Computed tomography (CT) at day 21 revealed SAH with modified Fisher grade 4, and CT angiography revealed a DA in the right VA just distal to the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). The DA was treated emergently with internal trapping by endovascular coiling, while the right PICA was preserved. Postoperative course was uneventful, and 2-time negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR results were obtained at day 45. The patient recovered to 4-month modified Rankin Scale 2.

Conclusions

Although it is not clear from the present case alone whether SARS-CoV-2 infection causes SAH by a ruptured VA DA, the accumulation of more cases and further studies are warranted to clarify the relationships between SARS-CoV-2 infection and ruptured intracranial DAs.

Exacerbation of Pre-existing Neurological Symptoms With COVID-19 in Patients With Chronic Neurological Diseases: An Updated Systematic Review

The neurotropism of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can potentially explain the worsening of symptoms in patients with a history of neurological conditions such as stroke, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's, and epilepsy. Several studies have reported that these pre-existing conditions may worsen with a higher frequency of flare-ups, thus resulting in a more significant risk of patient mortality. In this review, we sought to provide an overview of the relationship between pre-existing neurological disorders and COVID-19, focusing on whether the initial infection directly influenced the severity of symptoms. We systematically searched the electronic database PubMed (MEDLINE) and used specific keywords related to our aims from January 2020 to July 2022. All articles published on COVID-19 with keywords pertaining to pre-existing neurological diseases were retrieved and subsequently analyzed. After independent review, the data from 107 articles were selected and evaluated. After analyzing the data from selected articles reviewing the effect of COVID-19 on neurological conditions, we have documented the relationship between said pre-existing neurological diseases, showing an increased risk of hospitalization, admission length, worsening of symptoms, and even mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Clinical features of thrombosis and bleeding in COVID-19

Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, resulting in COVID-19 disease, has presented a unique scenario associated with high rates of thrombosis. The risk of venous thrombosis is some three- to sixfold higher than for patients admitted to a hospital for other indications, and for patients who have thrombosis, mortality appears to increase. Thrombosis may be a presenting feature of COVID-19. Pulmonary thrombi are the most frequent events, some related to deep vein thrombosis, but also to in situ microvascular and macrovascular thrombosis. Other venous thromboses include catheter- and circuit-associated in patients requiring hemofiltration and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Arterial thrombosis is less commonly documented, with 3% of patients in intensive care units having major arterial strokes and up to 9% having myocardial infarction, both of which are most likely multifactorial. Risk factors for thrombosis above those already documented in hospital settings include duration of COVID-19 symptoms before admission to the hospital. Laboratory parameters associated with higher risk of thrombosis include higher D-dimer, low fibrinogen, and low lymphocyte count, with higher factor VIII and von Willebrand factor levels indicative of more severe COVID-19 infection. All patients should receive thromboprophylaxis when admitted with COVID-19 infection, but the dose and length of treatment are still debated. Thrombosis continues to be treated according to standard VTE guidelines, but adjustments may be needed depending on other factors relevant to the patient's admission.

The relationship between COVID-19 infection and intracranial hemorrhage: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

In addition to the deleterious effects Covid-19 has on the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, COVID-19 can also result in damage to the nervous system. This review aims to explore current literature on the association between COVID-19 and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of PubMed for literature published on COVID-19 and ICH. Ninety-four of 295 screened papers met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The literature addressed incidence and mortality of ICH associated with Covid-19. It also revealed cases of COVID-19 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, subdural hematomas, and hemorrhage secondary to cerebral venous thrombosis and ischemic stroke. ICH during COVID-19 infections was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for ICH appeared to be therapeutic anticoagulation, ECMO, and mechanical ventilation. Outcomes varied widely, depending on the severity of COVID-19 infection and neurologic injury.

CONCLUSION

Although treatment for severe Covid-19 infections is often aimed at addressing acute respiratory distress syndrome, vasculopathy, and coagulopathy, neurologic injury can also occur. Evidence-based treatments that improve COVID-19 mortality may also increase risk for developing ICH. Providers should be aware of potential neurologic sequelae of COVID-19, diagnostic methods to rule out other causes of ICH, and treatment regimens.

Low-Pressure Hydrocephalus in Spontaneous Angiogram-Negative Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Following COVID-19 Infection

A preliminary report warned that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) could have neuro-invasive potential as it was observed that some patients showed neurologic symptoms such as headache, nausea, and vomiting. Following early speculation there have been reports of neurologic manifestations involving both the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system including reports that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may increase the risk of acute ischemic stroke. Here we present a patient with recent COVID-19 infection who experienced low-pressure hydrocephalus requiring high-output cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion following spontaneous angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage. We hypothesize that patients who are either currently or who have recently been infected with SARS-CoV-2 may have altered ventricular compliance and/or altered CSF hydrodynamics from mechanisms that are not yet understood but potentially related to previously described pathophysiologic mechanisms of the virus and associated inflammatory reaction.