1
|
Lee Y, Trenchfield D, Berthiaume E, Tomlak A, Narayanan R, Brush P, Heard J, Maddy K, Issa T, Lambrechts M, Kaye ID, Mangan J, Grasso G, Canseco J, Vaccaro A, Kepler C, Schroeder G, Hilibrand A. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy. Clin Spine Surg 2024:01933606-990000000-00326. [PMID: 38884360 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE To compare patient-reported outcomes and surgical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. BACKGROUND Treatment options for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy include ACDF and cervical laminoplasty. Given that the literature has been mixed regarding the optimal approach, especially in patients without kyphosis, there is a need for additional studies investigating outcomes between ACDF and cervical laminoplasty. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients undergoing 3 or 4-level surgery. Patients with preoperative kyphosis based on C2-C7 Cobb angles were excluded. The electronic medical record and institutional databases were reviewed for baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS A total of 101 patients who underwent ACDF and 52 patients who underwent laminoplasty were included in the study. The laminoplasty cohort had a higher overall Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.10 ± 1.43 vs 2.39 ± 1.57, P = 0.011). Both groups had a comparable number of levels decompressed, C2-C7 lordosis, and diagnosis of myelopathy versus myeloradiculopathy. Patients who underwent laminoplasty had a longer length of stay (2.04 ± 1.15 vs 1.48 ± 0.70, P = 0.003) but readmission, complication, and revision rates were similar. Both groups had similar improvement in myelopathy scores (∆modified Japanese Orthopedic Association: 1.11 ± 3.09 vs 1.06 ± 3.37, P = 0.639). ACDF had greater improvement in Neck Disability Index (∆Neck Disability Index: -11.66 ± 19.2 vs -1.13 ± 11.2, P < 0.001), neck pain (∆Visual Analog Scale-neck: -2.69 ± 2.78 vs -0.83 ± 2.55, P = 0.003), and arm pain (∆Visual Analog Scale-arm: -2.47 ± 3.15 vs -0.48 ± 3.19, P = 0.010). These findings persisted in multivariate analysis except for Neck Disability Index. CONCLUSION ACDF and cervical laminoplasty appear equally efficacious at halting myelopathic progression. However, patients who underwent ACDF had greater improvements in arm pain at 1 year postoperatively. Longitudinal studies evaluating the efficacy of laminoplasty to mitigate adjacent segment disease are indicated to establish a robust risk-benefit assessment for these 2 procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunsoo Lee
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Delano Trenchfield
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily Berthiaume
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alexa Tomlak
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rajkishen Narayanan
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Parker Brush
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeremy Heard
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Krisna Maddy
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Tariq Issa
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark Lambrechts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ian David Kaye
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John Mangan
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Giovanni Grasso
- Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Neurosurgical Clinic, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, Palermo, Italy
| | - Jose Canseco
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alexander Vaccaro
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher Kepler
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Gregory Schroeder
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alan Hilibrand
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng B, Zhao X, Wang XL, Wang J, Xu C, Lei W. Does the novel artificial cervical joint complex resolve the conflict between stability and mobility after anterior cervical surgery? a finite element study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1400614. [PMID: 38887613 PMCID: PMC11180832 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1400614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Our group has developed a novel artificial cervical joint complex (ACJC) as a motion preservation instrument for cervical corpectomy procedures. Through finite element analysis (FEA), this study aims to assess this prosthesis's mobility and stability in the context of physiological reconstruction of the cervical spine. Materials and methods A finite element (FE)model of the subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7) was established and validated. ACJC arthroplasty, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), and two-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) were performed at C4-C6. Range of motion (ROM), intervertebral disc pressure (IDP), facet joint stress (FJS), and maximum von Mises stress on the prosthesis and vertebrae during loading were compared. Results Compared to the intact model, the ROM in all three surgical groups demonstrated a decline, with the ACCF group exhibiting the most significant mobility loss, and the highest compensatory motion in adjacent segments. ACJC and artificial cervical disc prosthesis (ACDP) well-preserved cervical mobility. In the ACCF model, IDP and FJS in adjacent segments increased notably, whereas the index segments experienced the most significant FJS elevation in the CDA model. The ROM, IDP, and FJS in both index and adjacent segments of the ACJC model were intermediate between the other two. Stress distribution of ACCF instruments and ACJC prosthesis during the loading process was more dispersed, resulting in less impact on the adjacent vertebrae than in the CDA model. Conclusion The biomechanical properties of the novel ACJC were comparable to the ACCF in constructing postoperative stability and equally preserved physiological mobility of the cervical spine as CDA without much impact on adjacent segments and facet joints. Thus, the novel ACJC effectively balanced postoperative stability with cervical motion preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Meng
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Xiong Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Xin-Li Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of NCO School of Army Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Chao Xu
- Department of Knee Joint Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
- Department of Health Statistics, Faculty of Preventive Medicine, the Air Force Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wei Lei
- Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Changoor S, Farshchian J, Patel N, Coban D, Abdelmalek G, Sinha K, Hwang K, Emami A. Comparing outcomes between anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Spine J 2024; 24:800-806. [PMID: 38185140 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) have emerged as two increasingly popular alternatives to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the management of cervical radiculopathy. Both techniques provide advantages of segmental motion preservation and lower rates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) compared to ACDF. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing ACDR or MI-PCF for the treatment of unilateral cervical radiculopathy. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective Cohort Review. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 152 patients were included (86 ACDR and 66 MI-PCF). OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Patient demographics; (2) perioperative data; (3) rates of complications and revisions; (5) visual analogue scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores. METHODS A retrospective cohort review was performed to identify all patients at a single institution between 2012-2020 who underwent 1- or 2- level ACDR or MI-PCF from C3-C7 with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patient demographics, perioperative data, postoperative complications, and revisions were analyzed. Patient reported outcome measures including VAS and NDI scores were compared. RESULTS The ACDR group had a significantly greater mean operative time (99.8 minutes vs 79.2 minutes, p<.001), but comparable estimated blood loss and length of stay following surgical intervention (p=.899). The overall complication rate was significantly greater in the ACDR group than the MI-PCF group (24.4% vs 6.2%; p=.003) but was largely driven by approach-related dysphagia in 20.9% of ACDR patients. The MI-PCF group had significantly greater revision rates (13.6% vs 1.2%; p=.002) with an average time to revision of 20.7 months in the MI-PCF group compared to 40.3 months in the ACDR group. The ACDR cohort had significantly greater improvements in NDI scores at the final follow-up (25.0 vs 21.3, p<.001). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that ACDR offer clinically relevant advantages over MI-PCF in terms of long-term revision rates despite an increased approach-related risk of transient postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, patients in the ACDR cohort achieved greater mean improvements in NDI scores but these results may have limited clinical significance due to inability to reach minimally clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Changoor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, 07503 USA
| | - Joseph Farshchian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, 07503 USA
| | - Neil Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, 07503 USA
| | - Daniel Coban
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, 07503 USA
| | - George Abdelmalek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, 07503 USA
| | - Kumar Sinha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, 07503 USA
| | - Ki Hwang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, 07503 USA
| | - Arash Emami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, 07503 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hirvonen T, Hämäläinen M, Konsti J, Antinheimo J, Numminen J, Siironen J, Koski-Palkén A, Niemelä M. Comparable long-term outcomes in patients undergoing total disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and noninstrumented fusion. Spine J 2023; 23:1817-1829. [PMID: 37660896 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the leading surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. However, ACDF surgery has been suggested for to accelerate the degeneration of the adjacent cervical discs, which causes so-called adjacent segment disease (ASD). Over the past 2 decades, total disc replacement (TDR)/cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an increasingly common method for treating degenerative cervical diseases. The rationale is that a synthetic disc prosthesis may preserve motion at the operated level, which is expected to lead to reduced stress on the other cervical levels and thus decrease the risk of developing ASD. However, since the method was first introduced in the early 2000s, the long-term outcome after it is still not completely understood. PURPOSE Our goal was to compare the long-term outcomes of TDR and ACDF procedures. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLE All patients who underwent TDR due to degenerative cervical disease at Helsinki University Hospital between 2006 and 2012 (38 patients) and matched control patients who underwent ACDF during this period (76 patients) for degenerative disc disease. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the rate of reoperations and further cervical surgeries. Secondary outcome measures included neck symptoms (Neck Disability Index, or NDI), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), satisfaction with the surgery, radiological outcomes, and employment status. METHODS The medical records of all patients who underwent TDR due to degenerative cervical disease at Helsinki University Hospital between 2006 and 2012 and those of the matched control patients were analyzed retrospectively. Questionnaires were sent to all available patients at the end of the follow-up (median 14 years) to evaluate their employment status, levels of satisfaction with the surgery, current neck symptoms, and health-related quality of life. Radiological outcomes were evaluated from the cervical plain radiographs, which were taken either at the end of the follow-up as a part of the present study or earlier on for other clinical reasons, but at least 2 years after index surgery. RESULTS The total rate of reoperations and further cervical surgeries during the follow-up of a median of 14 years was 7/38 (18%) in the TDR group and 6/76 (8%) in the ACDF group (p=.096, ns.). Total disc replacement patients were reoperated earlier, and the 5-year reoperation rate was significantly higher in the TDR group (11% vs 1.3%, p=.026). None of the TDR patients underwent further cervical surgery more than 6 years after index surgery, whereas 5/6 (83%) of the reoperated ACDF patients were reoperated after that time. There were no significant differences in the NDIs between the patient groups. The employment rate and health-related quality of life were slightly higher in the TDR group, but the differences were statistically nonsignificant. TDR was significantly better at maintaining the angular range of motion at the operated level, and the fusion rate was significantly lower among this group. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in the long-term outcomes of ACDF and TDR when measured by reoperation rates, employment status, NDI, EuroQoL, and satisfaction with surgery. Reoperation rate and, on the other hand, employment rate and health-related quality of life, were higher in the TDR group, but the differences were statistically nonsignificant. However, TDR patients were reoperated earlier, and the 5-year reoperation rate was significantly higher in the TDR group. Randomized long-term studies in which these methods are compared are needed to further clarify the differences between them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuomas Hirvonen
- University of Helsinki and Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Mathias Hämäläinen
- University of Helsinki and Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Centre, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juho Konsti
- University of Helsinki and Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Centre, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jussi Antinheimo
- University of Helsinki and Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jussi Numminen
- University of Helsinki and Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Centre, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jari Siironen
- University of Helsinki and Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anniina Koski-Palkén
- University of Helsinki and Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika Niemelä
- University of Helsinki and Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Muralidharan A, Gong D, Piche JD, Al-Saidi N, Hey HWD, Aleem I. Multilevel Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: Moving Beyond Two Levels. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:363-368. [PMID: 37684714 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) is well-studied for 1-level and 2-level cervical pathology. There is an increasing trend towards its utilization for greater than 2-level disease as an alternative to the gold standard, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The number of high-level, prospective studies or randomized trials regarding multilevel CDA is limited but continues to grow as the procedure gains popularity. In appropriately indicated patients with multilevel disease caused by disk herniations or spondylosis without extensive facet arthropathy, CDA shows promising results. Multilevel CDA should be avoided in patients with prior spinal trauma, significant degenerative spondylolisthesis with translation, arthrodesis without mobility, severely incompetent facet joints, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, or kyphotic deformity. With overall similar risk profiles to ACDF but lower theoretical rates of pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease, multilevel CDA has been shown to preserve, or perhaps even increase, preoperative cervical range of motion. There are negligible differences in postoperative neck and arm pain, VAS scores, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, and Neck Disability Index scores when comparing multilevel CDA and ACDF. Despite current indications for multilevel CDA largely being based on single and 2-level data, careful patient selection is critical. Expansion of indications can be expected as literature continues to emerge regarding outcomes and complications in multilevel CDA, as well as with improvements in prosthesis design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davin Gong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Joshua D Piche
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Neil Al-Saidi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Ilyas Aleem
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim LJY, Mazur MD, Dailey AT. Mid-term and Long-term Outcomes After Total Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:339-355. [PMID: 37735768 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare mid-term to long-term outcomes of cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA After ACDF to treat symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease, the loss of motion at the index level due to fusion may accelerate adjacent-level disk degeneration. CDA was developed to preserve motion and reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Early-term to mid-term clinical outcomes from RCTs suggest noninferiority of CDA compared with ACDF, but it remains unclear whether CDA yields better mid-term to long-term outcomes than ACDF. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs with at least 60 months of follow-up. The risk ratio or standardized mean difference (and 95% CIs) were calculated for dichotomous or continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS Eighteen reports of 14 RCTs published in 2014-2023 were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the CDA group had a significantly greater improvement in neurological success and Neck Disability Index than the ACDF group. The ACDF group exhibited a significantly better improvement in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary than the CDA group. Radiographic adjacent segment degeneration was significantly lower in the CDA group at 60- and 84-month follow-ups; at 120-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Although the overall rate of secondary surgical procedures was significantly lower in the CDA group, we did not observe any significant difference at 60-month follow-up between the CDA and ACDF group and appreciated statistically significant lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery at 84-month and 108- to 120-month follow-up. The rate of adverse events and the neck and arm pain scores in the CDA group were not significantly different from those of the ACDF group. CONCLUSIONS In this meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with 5- to 10-year follow-up data, CDA resulted in significantly better neurological success and Neck Disability Index scores and lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, secondary surgical procedures, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery than ACDF. ACDF resulted in improved Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary scores. However, the CDA and ACDF groups did not exhibit significant differences in overall changes in neck and arm pain scores or rates of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo J Y Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nguyen AQ, Credille K, Saifi C. Short-term and Long-term Complications of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:404-410. [PMID: 37752635 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A narrative review. OBJECTIVE This review discusses the short and long-term complications associated with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA CDA is a safe and effective motion-sparing alternative to fusion for the treatment of cervical disc pathology in patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Although CDA offers advantages over fusion within a narrower set of indications, it introduces new technical challenges and potential complications. METHODS A systematic search of several large databases, including Cochrane Central, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, was conducted from January 2005 to August 2023 to identify published studies and clinical trials evaluating cervical disc replacement complications and outcomes. RESULTS Short-term complications are primarily related to surgical approach and include dysphagia reported as high as ~70%, laryngeal nerve injury ~0%-1.25%, Horner syndrome ~0.06%, hematoma ~0.01%, gross device extrusion ~0.3%, whereas long-term complications include adjacent segment disease reported at ~3.8%, osteolysis ~44%-64%, heterotopic ossification ~7.3%-69.2%, implant failure ~3.3%-3.7%, and implant wear, which varies depending on design. CONCLUSIONS Approaches for mitigating complications broadly include meticulous dissection, intraoperative techniques, and diligent postoperative follow-up. This review emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding and management of complications to enhance the safety, reproducibility, and success of CDA. As CDA continues to evolve, there remains a critical need for ongoing research to delve deeper into evaluating risk for complications and long-term patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Q Nguyen
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Preston G, Hoffmann J, Satin A, Derman PB, Khalil JG. Preservation of Motion in Spine Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:e356-e365. [PMID: 36877764 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of spinal procedures and spinal fusions continues to grow. Although fusion procedures have a high success rate, they have inherent risks such as pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease. New innovations in spine techniques have sought to eliminate these complications by preserving motion in the spinal column. Several techniques and devices have been developed in the cervical and lumbar spine including cervical laminoplasty, cervical disk ADA, posterior lumbar motion preservation devices, and lumbar disk ADA. In this review, advantages and disadvantages of each technique will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Preston
- From the Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH (Preston and Hoffmann), Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX (Satin and Derman), and William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (Khalil)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tu TH, Wang CY, Chen YC, Wu JC. Multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty: a review of optimal surgical management and future directions. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:372-381. [PMID: 36681966 DOI: 10.3171/2022.11.spine22880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has been recognized as a popular option for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy caused by disc problems that require surgery. There have been prospective randomized controlled trials comparing CDA to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for 1- and 2-level disc herniations. However, the indications for CDA have been extended beyond the strict criteria of these clinical trials after widespread real-world experiences in the past decade. This article provides a bibliometric analysis with a review of the literature to understand the current trends of clinical practice and research on CDA. METHODS The PubMed database was searched using the keywords pertaining to CDA in human studies that were published before August 2022. Analyses of the bibliometrics, including the types of papers, levels of evidence, countries, and the number of disc levels involved were conducted. Moreover, a systematic review of the contents with the emphasis on the current practice of multilevel CDA and complex cervical disc problems was performed. RESULTS A total of 957 articles published during the span of 22 years were analyzed. Nearly one-quarter of the articles (232, 24.2%) were categorized as level I evidence, and 33.0% were categorized as levels I or II. These studies clearly demonstrated the viability and effectiveness of CDA regarding clinical and radiological outcomes, including neurological improvement, maintenance, and preservation of segmental mobility with relatively low risks for several years postoperation. Also, there have been more papers published during the last decade focusing on multilevel CDA and fewer involving the comparison of ACDF. Overall, there was a clustering of CDA papers published from the US and East Asian countries. Based on substantial clinical data of CDA for 1- and 2-level disc diseases, the practice and research of CDA show a trend toward multilevel and complex disease conditions. CONCLUSIONS CDA is an established surgical management procedure for 1- and 2-level cervical disc herniation and spondylosis. The success of motion preservation by CDA-with low rates of complications-has outscored ACDF in patients without deformity. For more than 2-level disc diseases, the surgery shows a trend toward multiple CDA or hybrid ACDF-CDA according to individual evaluation for each level of degeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Hsi Tu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| | - Ching-Ying Wang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| | - Yu-Chun Chen
- 2Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
- 4Big Data Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jau-Ching Wu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Z, Luo G, Yu H, Zhao H, Li T, Yang H, Sun T. Comparison of discover cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials. Front Surg 2023; 10:1124423. [PMID: 36896262 PMCID: PMC9989026 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1124423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety between Discover cervical disc arthroplasty (DCDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in Cervical degenerative disc diseases. Methods Two researchers independently conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following the Cochrane methodology guidelines. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was applied based on different heterogeneity. Review Manager (Version 5.4.1) software was used to perform data analysis. Results A total of 8 RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicate that the DCDA group had a higher incidence of reoperation (P = 0.03) and a lower incidence of ASD (P = 0.04) than the CDA group. There was no significant difference between two groups regarding NDI score (P = 0.36), VAS ARM score (P = 0.73), VAS NECK score (P = 0.63), EQ-5D score (P = 0.61) and dysphagia incidence (0.18). Conclusion DCDA and ACDF have similar results in terms of NDI scores, VAS scores, EQ-5D scores, and dysphagia. In addition, DCDA can reduce the risk of ASD but increases the risk of reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziqi Wang
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Gan Luo
- Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongwei Yu
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hui Zhao
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Tianhao Li
- Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Houzhi Yang
- Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Tianwei Sun
- Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Letter to the Editor Regarding “The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Pathology After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials”. World Neurosurg 2022; 164:457-458. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|