The Characteristic of Light Sources and Fluorescence in the 3-Dimensional Digital Exoscope "ORBEYE" for 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Induced Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Compared with a Conventional Microscope

Exoscopic versus Microscopic Surgery in 5-ALA-Guided Resection of High-Grade Gliomas

Background: Glioma surgery has been remarkably enhanced in the past 2 decades, with improved safety and limited but improved life expectations. The fluorescence-guided resection of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) plays a central role in this sense, allowing a greater extent of resection (EOR). The introduction of exoscopic-guided surgery may be considered in implementing fluorescence techniques over traditional microscopes. We present the application and the advantages of exoscopic-guided surgery compared to microscopic surgery in tumor resection guided by 5-ALA fluorescence in patients with HGGs. Methods: Ten consecutive patients underwent surgery for HGG resection. The surgery was performed via an exoscopic-guided procedure (Olympus ORBEYE) and after the oral administration of Gliolan 5 h before the procedure. During surgery, the procedure shifted to using a microscopic (Kinevo 900, Zeiss) view. The intensity of the fluorescence under the two different procedures was subjectively measured in different picture samples during the surgery on a 1 to 5 (from minimum to maximum) scale. The brightness of the surgical field and the detailing of the anatomy were also analyzed comparatively. Results: Among the ten patients, the histopathological diagnosis was an high-grade glioma in all cases. In nine cases, it was possible to achieve gross total resection. There was no perioperative mortality. The median fluorescence intensity, on a scale of 1-5, was 4.5 in the exoscope group and 3.5 in the microscope group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The exoscopic-guided surgery adds advantages to traditional fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid. Beyond the important advantage of low cost and the possibility to perform collaborative surgeries, it adds a plain and continuous visualization of the tumor and offers advantages in the surgical field of fluorescence-guided glioma surgery compared to the microscopic-guided one.

The New Era of Spinal Surgery: Exploring the Use of Exoscopes as a Viable Alternative to Operative Microscopes-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The growing interest in exoscopic (EX) technology has prompted a comprehensive evaluation of its clinical, functional, and financial outcomes in neurosurgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the utilization of EX in spine surgery and assess their safety, efficacy, and impact on surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A thorough literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study focused on articles concerning the application of EXs in spinal surgical procedures. The inclusion criteria encompassed various study designs presenting clinical data and intraoperative experiences related to EX utilization in spine surgery.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included studies examining various aspects of EX utilization, such as intraoperative complications, video/image quality, surgical field visualization, ease of manipulation, ergonomic characteristics, educational utility, surgical duration, and team involvement. Findings indicated that EXs offered superior video quality and favorable ergonomic features. Comparable outcomes were observed in surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, time to discharge, and postoperative pain levels between EX and conventional microscope approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into the utilization of EXs in spine surgery, demonstrating their potential advantages and comparable outcomes with conventional microscopes.

Exoscopic Microsurgery: A Change of Paradigm in Brain Tumor Surgery? Comparison with Standard Operative Microscope

BACKGROUND

The exoscope is a high-definition telescope recently introduced in neurosurgery. In the past few years, several reports have described the advantages and disadvantages of such technology. No studies have compared results of surgery with standard microscope and exoscope in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

METHODS

Our retrospective study encompassed 177 patients operated on for GBM (WHO 2021) between February 2017 and August 2022. A total of 144 patients were operated on with a microscope only and the others with a 3D4K exoscope only. All clinical and radiological data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been estimated in the two groups and compared by the Cox model adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, gross total resection, MGMT methylated promoter, and operator's experience).

RESULTS

IDH was mutated in 9 (5.2%) patients and MGMT was methylated in 76 (44.4%). Overall, 122 patients received a gross total resection, 14 patients received a subtotal resection, and 41 patients received a partial resection. During follow-up, 139 (73.5%) patients experienced tumor recurrence and 18.7% of them received a second surgery. After truncation to 12 months, the median PFS for patients operated on with the microscope was 8.82 months, while for patients operated on with the exoscope it was >12 months. Instead, the OS was comparable in the two groups. The multivariable Cox model showed that the use of microscope compared to the exoscope was associated with lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.66-7.56, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The exoscope has proven efficacy in terms of surgical resection, which was not different to that of the microscope. Furthermore, patients operated on with the exoscope had a longer PFS. A comparable OS was observed between microscope and exoscope, but further prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed.