A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of the Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with Hydrophilic Polymer and Phosphorylcholine-Coated Flow Diverters Under Single Antiplatelet Therapy

The pEGASUS-HPC stent system for intracranial arterial stenosis: a single-center case series

BACKGROUND

Intracranial arterial stenting is a technique for the treatment of symptomatic stenosis. In this single-center retrospective case series we evaluated a novel low profile laser-cut stent with an antithrombogenic hydrophilic polymer coating (pEGASUS-HPC, Phenox GmbH, Bochum, Germany) for the treatment of intracranial stenosis in the setting of acute ischemic stroke and elective cases.

METHODS

All patients treated with pEGASUS-HPC for one or more intracranial arterial stenoses at our institution were retrospectively included. Clinical, imaging and procedural parameters as well as clinical and imaging follow-up data were collected.

RESULTS

We performed 43 interventions in 41 patients with 42 stenoses in our neurovascular center between August 2021 and February 2024. Twenty-one patients (51.2%) were female and the mean±SD age was 71±10.8 years. Thirty-seven (86.1%) procedures were performed in the setting of endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment. Technical or procedural complications occurred in seven patients (16.3%), six in the thrombectomy group and one in the elective group. One stent-related hemorrhagic complication (subarachnoid hemorrhage) occurred in emergency cases and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in one patient treated in an elective setting. Overall stenosis reduction following pEGASUS-HPC stent implantation was 53.0±18.0%. On follow-up imaging, which was available for 16 patients (37.2%) after an average of 32±58.6 days, 62.5% of the stents were patent.

CONCLUSION

Our single-center case series demonstrates the feasibility of using the pEGASUS-HPC stent system, especially in emergency situations when thrombectomy fails.

Enhancing thromboresistance of neurovascular nickel-titanium devices with responsive heparin hydrogel coatings

BACKGROUND

Neurointerventional devices, particularly laser-cut thin-strut stents made of self-expanding nickel-titanium alloy, are increasingly utilized for endovascular applications in intracranial arteries and dural venous sinuses. Preventing thrombosis and stroke necessitates systemic anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies with the risk of bleeding complications. Antithrombotic coatings present a promising solution.

METHODS

In this study, we investigated the potential of hydrogels composed of four-armed poly(ethylene glycol) (starPEG) and heparin, with or without coagulation-responsive heparin release, as coatings for neurovascular devices to mitigate blood clot formation. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of these coatings on neurovascular devices through in vitro Chandler-Loop assays and implantation experiments in the supra-aortic arteries of rabbits.

RESULTS

Stable and coagulation-responsive starPEG-heparin hydrogel coatings exhibited antithrombotic efficacy in vitro, although with a slightly reduced thromboprotection observed in vivo. Furthermore, the hydrogel coatings demonstrated robustness against shear forces encountered during deployment and elicited only marginal humoral and cellular inflammatory responses compared with the reference standards.

CONCLUSION

Heparin hydrogel coatings offer promising benefits for enhancing the hemocompatibility of neurointerventional devices made of self-expanding nickel-titanium alloy. The variance in performance between in vitro and in vivo settings may be attributed to differences in low- and high-shear blood flow conditions inherent to these models. These models may represent the differences in venous and arterial systems. Further optimization is warranted to tailor the hydrogel coatings for improved efficacy in arterial applications.

Flow Diverters with Surface Modification in Patients with Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Flow diverters with surface modification (FDSM) are increasingly being used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (ANs). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety across different devices and antiplatelet therapies using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify original studies of ≥10 patients with intracranial ANs treated with FDSM from database inception through August 2023. Primary effectiveness outcome was the rate of complete AN occlusion at follow-up ≥6 months. Safety outcomes included ischemic stroke, hemorrhage, and in-stent thrombosis, and were stratified by FDSM devices and antiplatelet therapies. Certainty of evidence was evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were included, yielding 2161 patients with 2373 ANs. A total of 70.5% of the ANs were located on the internal carotid artery (ICA). Total 10.3% were acutely ruptured. The complete AN occlusion rate was 72.3% at follow-up ≥6 months. Sensitivity analysis in the ICA AN cohort yielded comparable occlusion rates between Pipeline Flex Embolization Device-Shield (80.4%) and Phenox-hydrophilic polymer-coated (77.5%, P = 0.54), but a lower 66.2% rate for Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device-X (P = 0.02). The rate of in-stent thrombosis and stenosis tended to be higher in Phenox-hydrophilic polymer-coated (3.4%) and Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device-X (4.3%) versus Pipeline Flex Embolization Device-Shield (0.8%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

FDSM were safe with satisfactory effectiveness for intracranial ANs. More specific investigations are warranted to explore their performance in ANs beyond the ICA and optimal antiplatelet therapy.

Comparison of Thromboembolic Events Between Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) Shield and PED/PED Flex: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The pipeline embolization device (PED) Flex with Shield technology is a third-generation flow diverter used for intracranial aneurysm treatment designed to decrease thrombogenicity through a phosphorylcholine coating. Herein, we aim to compare the rate of thromboembolic events in PED with Shield technology and PED without it through propensity score matching.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with PED first-generation/PED Flex and PED with Shield between 2013 and 2023 at a single academic institution. Patients were matched through propensity score by controlling for confounding factors including age, smoking history, diabetes, previous subarachnoid hemorrhage, modified Rankin Scale pretreatment, location, aneurysm size, previous treatment, and clopidogrel or aspirin resistance. After matching, we evaluated for periprocedural and postoperative thromboembolic events. Data analysis was performed using Stata 14.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients with 707 aneurysms treated in 605 procedures were included in the analysis. From these, 156 aneurysms were treated with PED with Shield (22.07%) and 551 (77.93%) without Shield technology. Propensity score matching resulted in 84 matched pairs. The rate of thromboembolic events was 3.57% for PED Shield and 10.71% for PED first-generation/PED Flex (P = .07), while retreatment rates were 2.38% for PED Shield and 8.32% for PED Flex (P = .09). Complete occlusion at first (P = .41) and last imaging follow-up (P = .71), in-stent stenosis (P = .95), hemorrhagic complications (P = .31), and functional outcomes (P = .66) were comparable for both groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study in the literature performing a propensity scored-matched analysis comparing PED with PED with Shield technology. Our study suggests a trend toward lower thromboembolic events for PED Shield, even after controlling for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, and a trend toward lower aneurysm retreatment rates with PED Shield, without reaching statistical significance.

Flow diverter stents for endovascular treatment of aneurysms: a comparative study of efficacy and safety between FREDX and FRED

BACKGROUND

The FRED X flow diverter (FREDX), as the second generation in the FRED series, aims to improve the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. This study compares the efficacy and safety of FREDX with its predecessor, FRED.

METHODS

This prospective registry included patients treated with FRED and FREDX devices. Efficacy was assessed using digital subtraction angiography with 3D volumetric reconstruction at immediate and 1 year follow-ups. Safety was evaluated by recording complications, analyzed through univariate contrasts, generalized mixed models, and Bayesian network analyses.

RESULTS

We treated 287 patients with 385 aneurysms, with 77.9% receiving FRED and 22.1% FREDX. The median age was 55 years (IQR 47-65) and 78.4% were women. The FREDX group showed a higher prevalence of saccular-like aneurysms (70.6% vs 52.7%, P=0.012) and a higher rate of complete occlusion compared with FRED interventions (79.4% vs 59.3%, P=0.022). After adjusting for confounders, these differences represented a 3.04-fold increased likelihood (95% CI 1.44 to 6.41, P=0.003) of achieving complete occlusion at 1 year with FREDX interventions. Regarding safety, two (3.5%) complications (both non-symptomatic) were observed in the FREDX group and 23 (10.4%) in the FRED group (P=0.166). Bayesian network analysis suggested a trend towards fewer complications for FREDX, with a median reduction of 5.5% in the posterior distribution of the prevalence of complications compared with FRED interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The FREDX device shows improved complete occlusion rates at 1 year compared with the FRED device while maintaining a favourable safety profile, indicating its potential advantage in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

Phenox HPC and Phenox flow modulation devices for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surface-modified flow diverters are increasingly used in clinical settings. However, their safety profiles and additional benefits over non-coated devices still need to be explored. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate and compare the clinical outcomes of the uncoated Phenox and coated Phenox HPC flow diverters.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Collected data were pooled and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Outcomes of interest included aneurysm occlusion (>6 months) and complication rates. Additionally, the safety outcomes of prophylactic single (SAPT) and dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) approaches were compared for patients treated with coated Phenox HPC flow diverters.

RESULTS

We included 17 studies with 1238 patients. The overall complete occlusion rates were 80% (95% CI 74.01% to 86.56%) for Phenox HPC and 71.3% (95% CI 59.71% to 85.20%) for non-coated Phenox flow diverters (p=0.24). Ischemic complication rates were 7.3% (95% CI 4.6% to 11.39%) with the Phenox HPC and 5.3% (95% CI 4.07% to 6.91%) with the Phenox (p=0.24). For patients treated with Phenox HPC, the SAPT (5.5%; 95% CI 2.83% to 10.85%) and DAPT (7.1%; 95% CI 1.23% to 41.45%) approaches resulted in comparable ischemic complication rates (p=0.79). The DAPT group (4.8%; 95% CI 1.46% to 16.24%) had higher hemorrhagic complication rates than the SAPT group (1.7%; 95% CI 0.52% to 6.09%), but the difference was not statistically significant for patients treated with Phenox HPC (p=0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that Phenox HPC is equally as safe and effective as non-coated Phenox devices. Additionally, our results suggest that prasugrel monotherapy might effectively prevent ischemic complications in patients treated with Phenox HPC flow diverters.