1
|
Factors helping pregnant multiparas cope with fear of birth: A qualitative study. Midwifery 2023; 125:103803. [PMID: 37659151 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study describes factors helping pregnant multiparas cope with their fear of birth and aims to contribute insight into measures that could be taken to support and develop care for multiparas with fear of birth. METHODS Purposive sampling was used for collecting data from closed discussion forums. An electronic questionnaire included structured background questions and qualitative open-ended questions related to the factors multiparas had found helped them cope with their fear of birth. After excluding respondents in early pregnancy (n = 20), the data consisted of answers from 78 pregnant multiparas from Finland. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS The factors helping pregnant multiparas to cope with their fear of birth included obtaining information, planning ahead, receiving empathic support, dealing with emotions in different ways, and focusing on the positive. CONCLUSIONS The support multiparas receive for their fear of birth from healthcare providers is insufficient and the quality and content of care varies widely. As a result, multiparas have been left to personally take responsibility for coping with their fear. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The care for treating fear of birth in multiparas needs to be improved. This requires a critical evaluation of the maternity system, policies, and competence of healthcare professionals who work with pregnant people.
Collapse
|
2
|
Health literacy among fathers and fathers-to-be: a multi-country, cross-sectional survey. Health Promot Int 2023; 38:daad131. [PMID: 37851463 PMCID: PMC10583760 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daad131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
During pregnancy and early fatherhood, men are at higher risk of poor health, exacerbated by low engagement by healthcare services. Yet the transition to fatherhood presents an opportunity for men to improve their health and health behaviours. Health literacy refers to individuals' competence in accessing and applying health information. Poor health literacy is associated with poor health and low help-seeking. The aim of this study was to identify health literacy strengths, needs and profiles among fathers. Men who were expecting a baby ('antenatal') or had become fathers in the past 18 months ('postnatal') were recruited through an international, online paid survey platform. The survey included the nine-scale Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Of 889 survey respondents (n = 416, 46.5% antenatal; n = 473, 53.5% postnatal), 274 (31.0%) were residing in the USA and 239 (27.0%) in the UK. Relatively higher scores were reported for HLQ scales relating to having sufficient information and finding and understanding this information, as well as social support for health. Relatively lower scores were obtained for scales relating to actively managing one's own health and navigating the health care system. Three scale scores were significantly lower among nulliparous than multiparous men. Seven health literacy profiles were identified. In conclusion, while fathers have some health literacy strengths, they also experience some barriers, particularly first-time fathers. Awareness of diverse health literacy profiles among fathers may assist in developing strategies to strengthen health services' capacity to meet fathers' needs and reduce risks to their health at this critical juncture in families' lives.
Collapse
|
3
|
Child and maternal benefits and risks of caseload midwifery - a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:663. [PMID: 37715118 PMCID: PMC10504769 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05967-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been reported that caseload midwifery, which implies continuity of midwifery care during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period, improves the outcomes for the mother and child. The aim of this study was to review benefits and risks of caseload midwifery, compared with standard care comparable to the Swedish setting where the same midwife usually provides antenatal care and the checkup postnatally, but does not assist during birth and the first week postpartum. METHODS Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library were searched (Nov 4th, 2021) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Retrieved articles were assessed and pooled risk ratios calculated when possible, using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE. RESULTS In all, 7,594 patients in eight RCTs were included, whereof five RCTs without major risk of bias, including 5,583 patients, formed the basis for the conclusions. There was moderate certainty of evidence for little or no difference regarding the risk of Apgar ≤ 7 at 5 min, instrumental birth, and preterm birth. There was low certainty of evidence for little or no difference regarding the risk of perinatal mortality, neonatal intensive care, perineal tear, bleeding, and acute caesarean section. Caseload midwifery may reduce the overall risk of caesarean section. Regarding breastfeeding after hospital discharge, maternal mortality, maternal morbidity, health-related quality of life, postpartum depression, health care experience/satisfaction and confidence, available studies did not allow conclusions (very low certainty of evidence). For severe child morbidity and Apgar ≤ 4 at 5 min, there was no literature available. CONCLUSIONS When caseload midwifery was compared with models of care that resembles the Swedish one, little or no difference was found for several critical and important child and maternal outcomes with low-moderate certainty of evidence, but the risk of caesarean section may be reduced. For several outcomes, including critical and important ones, studies were lacking, or the certainty of evidence was very low. RCTs in relevant settings are therefore required.
Collapse
|
4
|
The impact of midwifery continuity of care on maternal mental health: A narrative systematic review. Midwifery 2023; 116:103546. [PMID: 36375410 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews have shown that midwifery continuity of care programs lead to improvements in birth outcomes for women and babies, but no reviews have focused specifically on the impact of midwifery continuity of care on maternal mental health outcomes. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the available evidence on the impact of midwifery continuity of care on maternal mental health during the perinatal period. METHOD A systematic search of published literature available through to March 2021 was conducted. A narrative approach was used to examine and synthesise the literature. RESULTS The search yielded eight articles that were grouped based on the mental health conditions they examined: fear of birth, anxiety, and depression. Findings indicate that midwifery continuity of care leads to improvements in maternal anxiety/worry and depression during the perinatal period. CONCLUSION There is preliminary evidence showing that midwifery continuity of care is beneficial in reducing anxiety/worry and depression in pregnant women during the antenatal period. As the evidence stands, midwifery continuity of care may be a preventative intervention to reduce maternal anxiety/worry and depression during the perinatal period.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to investigate birth outcome and birth experience in relation to women's emotional health. An additional aim was to explore the relationship between emotional health, continuity with a known midwife, and the birth experience. METHODS A prospective longitudinal cohort study of 243 women enrolled in a continuity of care project in a rural area in Sweden. Profiles were constructed from instruments measuring depressive symptoms, worries, fear of birth, and sense of coherence. Antenatal and birth records and questionnaires were used to collect data. RESULT Women were categorized into two cluster profiles: "emotionally healthy" vs. "emotionally unhealthy". Women in the "emotionally unhealthy" cluster had a less positive birth experience (p = 0.006). The total score of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire was highest in women who had had a known midwife assisting at birth. Babies born to women in the "emotionally unhealthy" cluster were more likely to have a severe neonatal diagnosis. CONCLUSION There were few differences in birth outcome between the clusters, while there were explicit differences in the childbirth experience. Having a known midwife is important to warrant women a more positive childbirth experience. Screening with validated instruments during antenatal care could be a first step to further investigate women's emotional well-being and provide targeted psychosocial support.
Collapse
|
6
|
“Never let a good crisis go to waste”: Positives from disrupted maternity care in Australia during COVID-19. Midwifery 2022; 110:103340. [PMID: 35504154 PMCID: PMC9013427 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a number of changes to maternity care were rapidly introduced in all countries, including Australia, to reduce the risk of infection for pregnant women and their care providers. While many studies have reported on the negative effects of these changes, there is a paucity of evidence on factors which women and their providers perceived as positive and useful for future maternity care. Design Data was analysed from the Birth in the time of COVID-19 (BITTOC 2020) study survey. Conventional content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data and examine which aspects of COVID-amended care women experienced as positive. Data from women were compared to data from midwives. Setting This project took place in Australia in 2020-2021. Participants The survey was distributed to women who gave birth and midwives who worked in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 onwards). Measurements and findings Women reported a variety of positives from their maternity care during COVID-19. These included both care-related factors as well as contextual factors. The most commonly mentioned positives for pregnant and postnatal women were care-related, namely fewer visitors in hospital, having increased access to telehealth services. These were also the most commonly reported positives by midwives. Having midwifery continuity of care models, giving birth at home and having their partner work from home were also highlighted by women as positives. Key conclusions Despite the negative effect of COVID-19-related restrictions on maternity care, a variety of changes were viewed as positive by both women and midwives, with strong agreement between the two groups. Implications for practice These findings provide evidence to support the inclusion of these positive elements of care and ensure that the lessons learned from the pandemic are utilised to improve maternity care in Australia going forward.
Collapse
|
7
|
Postpartum bonding and association with depressive symptoms and prenatal attachment in women with fear of birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:66. [PMID: 35078403 PMCID: PMC8788067 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04367-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Co-morbidity is prevalent in women with fear of birth. Depressive symptoms and lack of prenatal attachment might influence the postpartum bonding between the mother and the new-born. Aim To examine the underlying dimensions of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire and to investigate associations between depressive symptoms, prenatal attachment and postpartum bonding in women with fear of birth. Methods A longitudinal study comprising 172 women with fear of birth. Data were collected by questionnaires in mid- and late pregnancy and two months after birth. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depressive Scale, Prenatal Attachment Inventory and Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire were investigated. Results Two factors of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire were identified: Factor 1 mirrored caring activities and the women’s perceptions of motherhood, whereas Factor 2 reflected negative feelings towards the baby. The Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire was negatively correlated with the Prenatal Attachment Inventory and positively with The Edinburgh Postnatal Depressive Scale. Women with fear of birth and depressive symptoms both during pregnancy and postpartum showed the highest risk of impaired bonding after birth. Primiparity and being single were also associated with impaired bonding. Conclusion A focus on women’s mental health during pregnancy is necessary in order to avoid the negative effects of impaired bonding on the infant. Depressive symptoms could be concurrent with fear of birth and, therefore, it is important to determine both fear of birth and depressive symptoms in screening procedures during pregnancy. Caregivers who meet women during pregnancy need to acknowledge prenatal attachment and thereby influence adaptation to motherhood.
Collapse
|
8
|
Depressive symptoms during pregnancy and after birth in women living in Sweden who received treatments for fear of birth. Arch Womens Ment Health 2022; 25:473-484. [PMID: 35190877 PMCID: PMC8921011 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-022-01213-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of depressive symptoms and associated factors in women who underwent treatments for fear of birth; internet-based cognitive therapy, counseling with midwives, continuity with a known midwife or standard care. A secondary analysis was performed using data collected from four samples of women identified with fear of birth and receiving treatment with different methods. A questionnaire was used to collect data in mid-pregnancy and at follow-up 2 months after birth. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depressive Scale. In mid-pregnancy, 32% of the 422 women with fear of birth also reported a co-morbidity with depressive symptoms. At postpartum follow-up, 19% reported depressive symptoms 2 months after birth, and 12% showed continued or recurrent depressive symptoms identified both during pregnancy and postpartum. A history of mental health problems was the strongest risk factor for presenting with depressive symptoms. None of the treatment options in this study was superior in reducing depressive symptoms. This study showed a significant co-morbidity and overlap between fear of birth and depressive symptoms. Screening for depressive symptoms and fear of birth during pregnancy is important to identify women at risk and offer specific treatment.
Collapse
|
9
|
Women's Experiences of Care During Pregnancy in a Continuity of Midwifery Care Project in Rural Sweden. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDBIRTH 2021. [DOI: 10.1891/ijcbirth-d-20-00048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDIn antenatal care, health checkups, information, and support is provided to women. Midwifery continuity models of care provide women access to evidence-based care.OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to evaluate women's experiences of pregnancy and antenatal care in a continuity of midwifery care project, as well as to gauge the impact the project had on the women's emotional well-being and satisfaction.METHODThis was a cohort study of 226 women enrolled in a continuity of care project in rural Sweden. Profiles of the women were created based on levels of depressive symptoms, worries, fear of birth, and sense of coherence. Data was collected through questionnaires. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated between the clusters for the explanatory variables.RESULTWomen in the two clusters differed in some background characteristics. Women in Cluster 2 had more visits to a doctor. They also received more counseling due to fear of birth and viewed the number of midwives as “too many.” They were less satisfied with the medical, emotional, and overall aspects of their antenatal care. Perceived health, preparedness for birth, and parenthood were rated lower by women in Cluster 2.CONCLUSIONThis study found that women's assessment of their antenatal care was associated with their emotional health. Negative feelings toward changes in pregnancy were often found in women with poorer emotional health, and these women reported being less prepared for birth and parenthood. Thus, it is important to identify women with emotional distress and to provide them additional support and continuity.
Collapse
|
10
|
Anxiety and depressive symptoms in women with fear of birth: A longitudinal cohort study. Eur J Midwifery 2021; 5:32. [PMID: 34396062 PMCID: PMC8328228 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/138941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anxiety and depression during pregnancy could imply difficulties in the attachment to the unborn baby. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and change in anxiety and depressive symptoms in pregnant women with fear of birth. Another aim was to explore associations between symptoms of anxiety and depression on prenatal attachment. METHODS This is a longitudinal cohort study of 77 pregnant women with fear of birth in three hospitals in Sweden. Data were collected by three questionnaires in mid and late pregnancy and two months after birth. RESULTS Anxiety symptoms were more often reported than depressive symptoms, significantly decreasing over time in both conditions. Anxiety symptoms were associated with low education level, negative feelings towards the upcoming birth, and levels of fear of birth. Depressive symptoms were associated with levels of fear of birth. One in five women presented with fear of birth, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, suggesting that co-morbidity was quite common in this sample. Depressive symptoms and co-morbidity were negatively associated with prenatal attachment. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that symptoms of anxiety and depression in women with fear of birth vary over time and that co-morbidity is quite common. Lack of emotional well-being was related to prenatal attachment. Healthcare professionals must identify and support women with anxiety and depressive symptoms and fear of birth so that difficulties in the relationship between the mother and the newborn baby might be reduced.
Collapse
|
11
|
Being Known: A Grounded Theory Study of the Meaning of Quality Maternity Care to People of Color in Boston. J Midwifery Womens Health 2021; 66:452-458. [PMID: 34240539 PMCID: PMC8456935 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Experiences of people of color with maternity care are understudied but understanding them is important to improving quality and reducing racial disparities in birth outcomes in the United States. This qualitative study explored experiences with maternity care among people of color to describe the meaning of quality maternity care to the cohort and, ultimately, to inform the design of a freestanding birth center in Boston. METHODS Using a grounded theory design and elements of community-based participatory research, community activists developing Boston's first freestanding birth center and academics collaborated on this study. Semistructured interviews and focus groups with purposefully sampled people of color were conducted and analyzed using a constant comparative method. Interviewees described their maternity care experiences, ideas about perfect maternity care, and how a freestanding birth center might meet their needs. Open coding, axial coding, and selective coding were used to develop a local theory of what quality care means. RESULTS A total of 23 people of color participated in semistructured interviews and focus groups. A core phenomenon arose from the narratives: being known (ie, being seen or heard, or being treated as individuals) during maternity care was an important element of quality care. Contextual factors, including interpersonal and structural racism, power differentials between perinatal care providers and patients, and the bureaucratic nature of hospital-based maternity care, facilitated negative experiences. People of color did extra work to prevent and mitigate negative experiences, which left them feeling traumatized, regretful, or sad about maternity care. This extra work came in many forms, including cognitive work such as worrying about racism and behavioral changes such as dressing differently to get health care needs met. DISCUSSION Being known characterizes quality maternity care among people of color in our sample. Maternity care settings can provide personalized care that helps clients feel known without requiring them to do extra work to achieve this experience.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Background Between 5% and 14% of women suffer from fear of childbirth (FOC) which is associated with difficulties during birth and in postnatal psychological adjustment. Therefore, effective interventions are needed to improve outcomes for women. A systematic review and meta-analysis was used to identify effective interventions for treating women with FOC. Methods Literature searches were undertaken on online databases. Hand searches of reference lists were also carried out. Studies were included in the review if they recruited women with FOC and aimed to reduce FOC and/or improve birth outcomes. Data were synthesised qualitatively and quantitatively using meta-analysis. The literature searches provided a total of 4474 citations. Results After removing duplicates and screening through abstracts, titles and full texts, 66 papers from 48 studies were identified for inclusion in the review. Methodological quality was mixed with 30 out of 48 studies having a medium risk of bias. Interventions were categorised into six broad groups: cognitive behavioural therapy, other talking therapies, antenatal education, enhanced midwifery care, alternative interventions and interventions during labour. Results from the meta-analysis showed that most interventions reduced FOC, regardless of the approach (mean effect size = −1.27; z = −4.53, p < 0.0001) and that other talking therapies may reduce caesarean section rates (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.48–0.90). Conclusions Poor methodological quality of studies limits conclusions that can be drawn; however, evidence suggests that most interventions investigated reduce FOC. Future high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed so that clear conclusions can be made.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the "Birth Attitude Profile Scale (BAPS)" in a selected sample of women with fear of birth. Another aim was to develop profiles of women according to their birth attitudes and levels of childbirth fear in relation to background characteristics. METHODS A secondary analysis of data collected in two different samples of women with fear of birth. Data were collected by a questionnaire in gestational week 36 and background data from mid-pregnancy. A principal component analysis and a cluster analysis were performed of the combined sample of 195 women. RESULTS The principal component analysis revealed four domains of the BAPS: "personal impact, birth as a natural event, freedom of choice and safety concerns". When adding the fear of birth scale, two clusters were identified: one with strong attitudes and lower fear, labeled "self-determiners"; and one with no strong attitudes but high levels of fear, labeled "fearful." Women in the "Fearful" cluster more often reported previous and current mental health problems, which were the main difference between the clusters. CONCLUSION The BAPS instrument seems to be useful in identifying birth attitudes in women with fear of birth and could be a basis for discussions and birth planning during pregnancy. Mental health problems were the main difference in cluster membership; therefore, it is important to ask women with fear of childbirth about physical, mental and social aspects of health. In addition, a qualitative approach using techniques such as focus groups or interviews is needed to explore how women come to form their attitudes and beliefs about birth.
Collapse
|
14
|
Turkish midwives' experiences and opinions in promoting normal births: A grounded theory study. Midwifery 2021; 99:103006. [PMID: 33910158 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Worldwide, the biomedical model of maternity care has been dominant, with the overuse of interventions. AIM This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the experiences and opinions of Turkish midwives regarding the promotion of normal births. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 midwives; data were analysed using grounded theory. The data were analysed according to the constant comparative method. FINDINGS The study generated a core category (We want to promote normal births, but have no power to do it), which means all participants wanted to promote normal births. However, they have been disempowered by the medicalised systems of care. There were also three main categories (different ideologies in the labour ward, the midwives have no power, unempowered women). The participants reported that different ideologies in the labour ward were a challenge to promoting normal births. Their working conditions and education level were not enough to support normal birth. The pregnant women were described as unempowered due to a lack of antenatal education and having a fear of childbirth. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Normal birth could be promoted by enhancing the power and responsibilities of midwives. The women need antenatal education to have a normal birth. The normal birth may promote the enhanced readiness of women and midwives.
Collapse
|
15
|
Demanding and rewarding: Midwives experiences of starting a continuity of care project in rural Sweden. Eur J Midwifery 2021; 5:8. [PMID: 33768199 PMCID: PMC7983178 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/133573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The closure of a local labor ward enhanced the possibility to initiate a continuity of midwifery care model project. Continuity models of midwifery care are a cornerstone in midwifery and women-centered care, mainly accessible in metropolitan areas. Australian studies have found continuity of midwifery care to work well in rural areas. The aim of this study is to describe midwives' experiences of developing and working in a continuity of midwifery model of care in a rural setting in Sweden. METHODS We used a qualitative longitudinal interview with a participatory action research approach. The project was subjected to changes over time to allow the midwives to provide the best care options and to develop a model suitable for a rural area in northern Sweden. RESULTS The overarching theme, 'Developing a continuity model of midwifery care - demanding and rewarding with new insights', was based on three themes: 1) A challenging but evolving start, 2) Varying views within the midwifery group, and 3) Visions for the future. It was revealed that the midwives had to handle the grief process of the closure of the labor ward alongside their enthusiasm of being part of a continuity of midwifery care model project. CONCLUSIONS The establishment of the model in light of the labor ward closure was associated with conflict within the community and this had implications for the midwives. Midwives who are attracted to work in continuity models need to understand and incorporate the prerequisites of such models. In addition, long commuting to a labor ward requires enough midwives to maintain safety and security for the women at all times.
Collapse
|
16
|
Can a simple assessment of fear of childbirth in pregnant women predict requests and use of non-urgent obstetric interventions during labour? Midwifery 2021; 97:102969. [PMID: 33691226 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine whether the Wijma Delivery Expectation Questionnaire (W-DEQ-A) and the one-item Fear of Childbirth-Postpartum-Visual Analogue Scale (FOCP-VAS) - measuring high FOC - are useful tools in predicting requested and received non-urgent obstetric interventions in pregnant women. DESIGN A prospective cohort study. POPULATION AND SETTING Self-selected pregnant women from midwifery care settings (n=401). METHODS W-DEQ-A and FOCP-VAS were assessed at two timepoints in pregnancy. Measures of non-urgent obstetric interventions which were derived from medical files were: induction of labour, epidural analgesia, augmentation with oxytocin due to failure to progress and self-requested caesarean section. Hierarchical logistics regression models were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The change in the Nagelkerke R2 was examined for three models predicting two outcome measures: (1) explicitly requested non-urgent obstetric interventions during pregnancy and (2) received non-urgent obstetric interventions during labour. The first model only included participants' characteristics, the second model also included FOCP-VAS ≥5, and in the third model the W-DEQ-A ≥66 was added. RESULTS High FOC measured with FOCP-VAS≥5 predicted requested (pseudo-R2=0.33, X2=59.82, P<0.001) and received non-urgent obstetric interventions (pseudo-R2=0.19, X2=32.81, P<0.001) better than high FOC measured with W-DEQ-A≥66. CONCLUSION This study is the first evaluating self-reported FOC and postpartum based on VAS (subjective outcome) in relation to actual pregnancy and childbirth outcomes derived from medical files (objective outcome). Non-urgent obstetric interventions could already be predicted in the first half of pregnancy by means of a simple FOC assessment with the one-item FOCP-VAS. Implementing this easy to use one-item screening tool in midwifery care is suggested.
Collapse
|
17
|
The effect of internet-based guided self-help cognitive-behavioral therapies on Iranian women's psychological symptoms and preferred method of childbirth. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2021; 57:138-147. [PMID: 32567051 DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The effectiveness of an Internet-based guided self-help cognitive-behavioral therapy (I-GSH-CBT) was assessed in alleviating childbirth fear (CBF), depression, anxiety, and stress of pregnant women during the first delivery. DESIGN AND METHODS In a quasi-experimental study, pregnant women in the intervention group used the I-GSH-CBT program during pregnancy. The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire, and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 42-item (DASS-42) questionnaires were used to collect the psychometric data. FINDINGS Implementing the I-GSH-CBT significantly reduced CBF, DASS-42 scores, and cesarean section preference. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The I-GSH-CBT program effectively decreases the adverse mood symptoms in nulliparous pregnant women.
Collapse
|
18
|
Causal links to missed Australian midwifery care: What is the evidence? Eur J Midwifery 2020; 4:41. [PMID: 33537642 PMCID: PMC7839148 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/127769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidences and types of missed nursing care in the acute care and community sectors are both ubiquitous and quantifiable, however, there are few research studies relating to the type and frequency of missed maternity-based care for mothers and families. The aim of this study is to estimate the incidences and types of Australian missed midwifery care and to identify those factors that have causal links to it. METHODS A non-experimental, descriptive method using a Likert developed MISSCARE scale was used to ascertain consensus estimates made by Australian midwives. Electronic invitations were extended to their membership using an inclusive link to the MISSCARE survey. Inclusion criteria were all ANMF members who were midwives and currently employed within the Australian public and private healthcare systems. Data analysis was undertaken using both Rasch analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. RESULTS The type and frequency of missed Australian midwifery care can be quantified and several demographic factors are significant predictor variables for overall missed midwifery care. The most prevalent aspects of missed care in the Australian midwifery setting are midwives’ hand hygiene, supportive care, perinatal education, and surveillance type midwifery practices. CONCLUSIONS As the frequencies and types of missed midwifery care in Australia have been identified, it is possible for midwives to be mindful of minimising care omissions related to hand hygiene, providing supportive care and education to mothers as well as surveillance-type midwifery practices.
Collapse
|
19
|
A continuity of care project with two on-call schedules: Findings from a rural area in Sweden. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2020; 26:100551. [PMID: 32950811 DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many countries, various continuity models of midwifery care arrangements have been developed to benefit women and babies. In Sweden, such models are rare. AIM To evaluate two on-call schedules for enabling continuity of midwifery care during labour and birth, in a rural area of Sweden. METHOD A participatory action research project where the project was discussed, planned and implemented in collaboration between researchers, midwives and the project leader, and refined during the project period. Questionnaires were collected from participating women, in mid pregnancy and two months after birth. RESULT One of the models resulted in a higher degree of continuity, especially for women with fear of birth. Having a known midwife was associated with higher satisfaction in the medical (aOR 2.02 (95% CI 1.14-4.22) and the emotional (aOR 2.05; 1.09-3.86) aspects of intrapartum care, regardless of the model. CONCLUSION This study presented and evaluated two models of continuity with different on-call schedules and different possibilities for women to have access to a known midwife during labour and birth. Women were satisfied with the intrapartum care, and those who had had a known midwife were the most satisfied. Introducing a new model of care in a rural area where the labour ward recently closed challenged both the midwives' working conditions and women's access to evidence-based care.
Collapse
|
20
|
Role of midwife-supported psychotherapy on antenatal depression, anxiety and maternal health: A meta-analysis and literature review. Exp Ther Med 2020; 20:2599-2610. [PMID: 32765754 PMCID: PMC7401497 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.9011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The onset of depression and anxiety during the antenatal stage of pregnancy is common. Despite the conception of numerous interventions in the past decades, studies show no signs of decline in the prevalence of antenatal depression and anxiety. Recently, the use of midwife-supported psychotherapy to treat these psychosomatic disorders has garnered a lot of attention. However, no attempt to date has been made to synthesize the evidence evaluating the influence of midwife-supported psychotherapy on antenatal depression, anxiety, and overall maternal health-status. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to demonstrate the effectiveness of midwife-supported psychotherapy on depression, anxiety, and maternal health-status outcome during the antenatal stage of pregnancy. A systematic identification of literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on four academic databases: MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and CENTRAL. A meta-analysis evaluated the influence of midwife-supported psychotherapy on depression, anxiety, and maternal health-status outcome as compared to conventional obstetric care. Of the 1,011 records, 17 articles, including 6,193 pregnant women (mean age: 28.9±2.2 years) were included in this meta-analysis. Eleven studies compared the effects of midwife-supported therapy on depression, 14 compared its effects on anxiety and 2 compared its effects on maternal health-status outcome. The meta-analysis reveals the beneficial effects of midwife-supported psychotherapy for reducing depression (Hedge's g: -0.9), anxiety (-0.8) and enhancing maternal health-status outcome (0.1), as compared to conventional obstetric care. The current systematic review and meta-analysis recommend the use of midwife-supported psychotherapy for the reduction of depression, anxiety and enhancing maternal health-status during the antenatal stage of pregnancy.
Collapse
|
21
|
A comparison of the Fear of Childbirth Scale with the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale to identify childbirth-related fear in a sample of Dutch pregnant women: a diagnostic accuracy comparative cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 109:103615. [PMID: 32553993 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the considerable negative effects of women's childbirth-related anxiety, fear and worries, and the time constraints that midwives perceive to assess women's antenatal emotional wellbeing, it is important that midwives can identify women with a more severe fear of birth with an easy to administer, validated tool. OBJECTIVE To investigate the ability of the two-item Fear of Childbirth Scale (FOBS) to discriminate between pregnant women with and without birth-related fear, compared with the 16-item Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale (TPDS). METHODS A diagnostic accuracy comparative cross-sectional study was performed, comparing two screening tests. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy and discriminant property of the FOBS were determined and compared with the TPDS and with the negative affect 11-items TPDS (TPDS-NA) subscale. The TPDS and TPDS-NA were treated as reference standard to establish the discriminative potential of the FOBS for the presence or absence of antenatal birth-related fear. PARTICIPANTS A sample of 396 Dutch women with uncomplicated pregnancies. RESULTS When compared with the 16-items TPDS, the FOBS showed a higher specificity (95%) than sensitivity (70%) to detect fear of childbirth. The FOBS items had a good predictive ability for fear and worries about the forthcoming birth (79%) and a conclusive ability for negative case-finding (92%). The FOBS showed good accuracy (89%). The FOBS discriminated women who were or were not classified as being fearful according to the TPDS (AUC .86). When compared with the 11 items TPDS-NA subscale, the FOBS validity and accuracy decreased: sensitivity: 51%; specificity 92%; positive predictive ability 65%; negative predictive ability 88%; accuracy 83%; AUC .82. CONCLUSION When compared with the 16-items TPDS, the two-item FOBS shows to be an accurate tool for identifying the presence of antenatal birth-related fear in a sample of Dutch women with uncomplicated pregnancies.
Collapse
|
22
|
A modified caseload midwifery model for women with fear of birth, women's and midwives' experiences: A qualitative study. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2020; 24:100504. [PMID: 32120329 DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although fear of birth is common during pregnancy and childbirth, the best treatment for fear of birth in clinical care remain unclear. Strong evidence suggests that continuity models of midwifery care can benefit women and birth outcomes, though such models are rare in Sweden. Because women with fear of birth could benefit from such models, the aim of this qualitative study was to examine how women with fear of birth and their midwives experienced care in a modified caseload midwifery model. METHODS A qualitative interview study using thematic analysis. Participants were recruited from a pilot study in which women assessed to have fear of birth received antenatal and intrapartum care, from a midwife whom they knew. Eight women and four midwives were interviewed. RESULTS An overarching theme-"A mutual relationship instilled a sense of peace and security"-and three themes-"Closeness, continuity, and trust," "Preparation and counselling," and "Security, confidence, and reduced fear"-reflect the views and experiences of women with fear of birth and their midwives after participating in a modified caseload midwifery model. CONCLUSIONS For both women with fear of birth and their midwives, the caseload midwifery model generated trustful woman-midwife relationships, which increased women's confidence, reduced their fear, and contributed to their positive birth experiences. Moreover, the midwives felt better equipped to address women's needs, and their way of working with the women became more holistic. Altogether, offering a continuity model of midwifery care could be an option to support women with fear of birth.
Collapse
|
23
|
|