UV-chlorine advanced oxidation for potable water reuse: A review of the current state of the art and research needs

Abating a micropollutant epinastine by UV-based advanced oxidation processes: Comparison for UV/hydrogen peroxide, UV/persulfate, and UV/chlorine, impacts of bromide contents, and formation of DBPs during post-chlorination

Anthropogenic organic compounds, such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products, contaminate water, posing toxicological risks caused by either their parent compounds or transformation products. This study compares ultraviolet (UV)-based advanced oxidation processes (UV/hydrogen peroxide, UV/persulfate, and UV/chlorine) for the abatement of an antihistamine drug epinastine. UV light at 254 nm was irradiated upon solutions containing 10 μM epinastine and 100 μM oxidant. UV/chlorine degraded epinastine most effectively at pH 6.0-8.0; considerable contributions by reactive chlorine species and hydroxyl radicals were quantified using probe compounds. Furthermore, the degradation efficiency of the UV/chlorine treatment persisted with a halved chlorine dosage. Additionally, the types and concentrations of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) produced during UV/chlorine treatment with or without post-chlorination varied depending on the concentrations of chlorine or bromide. By comparing estimated DBP formations at a constant degradation rate of epinastine, UV/chlorine formed smaller concentrations of DBPs. Consequently, this study experimentally revealed that UV/chlorine is superior to UV/hydrogen peroxide and UV/persulfate for degrading epinastine at the possible pH and bromide content in the environment and controlling toxicological risks caused by disinfection DBPs formation by optimising chlorine dosage and UV fluence.

Combination of oxidative and reductive effects of phenolic compounds on the degradation of aniline disinfection by-products by free radicals

In this study, we selected 13 phenolic compounds containing -COOH, -CHO, -OH, and -COCH3 functional groups as model compounds for dissolved organic matter (DOM), and explored the redox reactions during the co-degradation of phenolic compounds with aniline disinfection by-products (DBPs) at the molecular level. When phenolic compounds and aniline DBPs were degraded, phenoxy radicals and aniline radicals were the most important intermediates. Phenoxy radicals can degrade aniline DBPs via hydrogen atom abstraction (HAA) reactions, and the reaction rates were related to the reduction potentials of the compounds. Compounds containing electron-withdrawing groups were more likely to oxidize aniline DBPs. Aniline DBPs were more easily degraded by phenoxy radicals when they contained electron-donating groups, and the increase in the number of chlorine atoms inhibited the reaction rates of aniline DBPs degradation by phenoxy radicals. Although phenolic compounds can reduce aniline DBPs, there was no significant correlation between the reaction rates and the reduction potentials of the compounds. Considering the redox effects of phenolic compounds on aniline DBPs, co-degradation simulations showed that phenolics inhibited the degradation efficiency of aniline DBPs. This work provided new insights into the transformation mechanisms and degradation efficiencies of DOM and aniline DBPs when they were co-degraded.

A novel route for urea abatement in UPW production: Pre-chlorination/VUV/UV under acidic circumstances and its enhancement mechanisms

Urea abatement has been a prominent challenge for UPW production. This research proposed a productive strategy combining pre-chlorination and VUV/UV processes under acidic conditions to settle this problem. This study first revealed the reaction kinetics between urea and free chlorine in a large pH range from 2.5 to 9.6, where the reaction constant rate varied from 0.06 to 0.46 M-1·s-1. Substitution reaction mediated by Cl2 was the dominant process at low pH (pH<3). The differences of dominant pathways resulted in the differences in reaction products: The detected concentration of dichloramine at pH 2.5 was twice that at pH 4.5 and 6.5. Further, this study found that pre-chlorination/VUV/UV process could achieve the thorough removal of 2-mg/L urea with chlorination of less than 5 min and VUV/UV irradiation of less than 200 mJ/cm2. Chloride ions, low pH, and higher chlorine dosage were found to be the positive factors to improve urea removal efficiency in pre-chlorination/VUV/UV process. The reaction rate constants between chlorourea with·OH and·Cl were calculated to be 3.62 × 107 and 2.26 × 109 L·mol-1·s-1, respectively.·Cl,·OH and photolysis contributed 60.5 %, 22.9 % and 16.6 % in chlorourea degradation, respectively. Pre-chlorination/VUV/UV achieved a DOC removal efficiency of 78.5 %. And nitrogen in urea was converted into inorganic nitrogenous compounds. Finally, compared with direct VUV/UV/chlorine and VUV/UV/persulfate processes, this process saved more than 70 % of energy in VUV/UV unit.

Advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment - Guidance for systematic future research

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are a growing research field with a large variety of different process variants and materials being tested at laboratory scale. However, despite extensive research in recent years and decades, many variants have not been transitioned to pilot- and full-scale operation. One major concern are the inconsistent experimental approaches applied across different studies that impede identification, comparison, and upscaling of the most promising AOPs. The aim of this tutorial review is to streamline future studies on the development of new solutions and materials for advanced oxidation by providing guidance for comparable and scalable oxidation experiments. We discuss recent developments in catalytic, ozone-based, radiation-driven, and other AOPs, and outline future perspectives and research needs. Since standardized experimental procedures are not available for most AOPs, we propose basic rules and key parameters for lab-scale evaluation of new AOPs including selection of suitable probe compounds and scavengers for the measurement of (major) reactive species. A two-phase approach to assess new AOP concepts is proposed, consisting of (i) basic research and proof-of-concept (technology readiness levels (TRL) 1-3), followed by (ii) process development in the intended water matrix including a cost comparison with an established process, applying comparable and scalable parameters such as UV fluence or ozone consumption (TRL 3-5). Subsequent demonstration of the new process (TRL 6-7) is briefly discussed, too. Finally, we highlight important research tools for a thorough mechanistic process evaluation and risk assessment including screening for transformation products that should be based on chemical logic and combined with complementary tools (mass balance, chemical calculations).