Neural network classifiers for images of genetic conditions with cutaneous manifestations

Deep Learning Study of Alkaptonuria Spinal Disease Assesses Global and Regional Severity and Detects Occult Treatment Status

Deep learning (DL) is increasingly used to analyze medical imaging, but is less refined for rare conditions, which require novel pre-processing and analytical approaches. To assess DL in the context of rare diseases, we focused on alkaptonuria (AKU), a rare disorder that affects the spine and involves other sequelae; treatments include the medication nitisinone. Since assessing X-rays to determine disease severity can be a slow, manual process requiring considerable expertise, we aimed to determine whether our DL methods could accurately identify overall spine severity, severity at specific regions of the spine, and whether DL could detect whether patients were receiving nitisinone. We evaluated DL performance versus clinical experts using cervical and lumbar spine radiographs. DL models predicted global severity scores (30-point scale) within 1.72 ± 1.96 points of expert clinician scores for cervical and 2.51 ± 1.96 points for lumbar radiographs. For region-specific metrics, we assessed the degree of narrowing, calcium, and vacuum phenomena at each intervertebral space (IVS). Our model's narrowing scores were within 0.191-0.557 points from clinician scores (6-point scale), calcium was predicted with 78-90% accuracy (present, absent, or disc fusion), while vacuum disc phenomenon predictions were less consistent (41-90%). Intriguingly, DL models predicted nitisinone treatment status with 68-77% accuracy, while expert clinicians appeared unable to discern nitisinone status (51% accuracy) (p = 2.0 × 10-9). This highlights the potential for DL to augment certain types of clinical assessments in rare disease, as well as identifying occult features like treatment status.

Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been growing more powerful and accessible, and will increasingly impact many areas, including virtually all aspects of medicine and biomedical research. This review focuses on previous, current, and especially emerging applications of AI in clinical genetics. Topics covered include a brief explanation of different general categories of AI, including machine learning, deep learning, and generative AI. After introductory explanations and examples, the review discusses AI in clinical genetics in three main categories: clinical diagnostics; management and therapeutics; clinical support. The review concludes with short, medium, and long-term predictions about the ways that AI may affect the field of clinical genetics. Overall, while the precise speed at which AI will continue to change clinical genetics is unclear, as are the overall ramifications for patients, families, clinicians, researchers, and others, it is likely that AI will result in dramatic evolution in clinical genetics. It will be important for all those involved in clinical genetics to prepare accordingly in order to minimize the risks and maximize benefits related to the use of AI in the field.

AI in dermatology: a comprehensive review into skin cancer detection

Background

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is significantly transforming dermatology, particularly in early skin cancer detection and diagnosis. This technological advancement addresses a crucial public health issue by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility. AI integration in medical imaging and diagnostic procedures offers promising solutions to the limitations of traditional methods, which often rely on subjective clinical evaluations and histopathological analyses. This study systematically reviews current AI applications in skin cancer classification, providing a comprehensive overview of their advantages, challenges, methodologies, and functionalities.

Methodology

In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the classification of skin cancer. We evaluated publications from three prominent journal databases: Scopus, IEEE, and MDPI. We conducted a thorough selection process using the PRISMA guidelines, collecting 1,156 scientific articles. Our methodology included evaluating the titles and abstracts and thoroughly examining the full text to determine their relevance and quality. Consequently, we included a total of 95 publications in the final study. We analyzed and categorized the articles based on four key dimensions: advantages, difficulties, methodologies, and functionalities.

Results

AI-based models exhibit remarkable performance in skin cancer detection by leveraging advanced deep learning algorithms, image processing techniques, and feature extraction methods. The advantages of AI integration include significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, faster turnaround times, and increased accessibility to dermatological expertise, particularly benefiting underserved areas. However, several challenges remain, such as concerns over data privacy, complexities in integrating AI systems into existing workflows, and the need for large, high-quality datasets. AI-based methods for skin cancer detection, including CNNs, SVMs, and ensemble learning techniques, aim to improve lesion classification accuracy and increase early detection. AI systems enhance healthcare by enabling remote consultations, continuous patient monitoring, and supporting clinical decision-making, leading to more efficient care and better patient outcomes.

Conclusions

This comprehensive review highlights the transformative potential of AI in dermatology, particularly in skin cancer detection and diagnosis. While AI technologies have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility, several challenges remain. Future research should focus on ensuring data privacy, developing robust AI systems that can generalize across diverse populations, and creating large, high-quality datasets. Integrating AI tools into clinical workflows is critical to maximizing their utility and effectiveness. Continuous innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential for fully realizing the benefits of AI in skin cancer detection and diagnosis.

Approximating facial expression effects on diagnostic accuracy via generative AI in medical genetics

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in genomics research and practice, and generative AI has garnered significant recent attention. In clinical applications of generative AI, aspects of the underlying datasets can impact results, and confounders should be studied and mitigated. One example involves the facial expressions of people with genetic conditions. Stereotypically, Williams (WS) and Angelman (AS) syndromes are associated with a "happy" demeanor, including a smiling expression. Clinical geneticists may be more likely to identify these conditions in images of smiling individuals. To study the impact of facial expression, we analyzed publicly available facial images of approximately 3500 individuals with genetic conditions. Using a deep learning (DL) image classifier, we found that WS and AS images with non-smiling expressions had significantly lower prediction probabilities for the correct syndrome labels than those with smiling expressions. This was not seen for 22q11.2 deletion and Noonan syndromes, which are not associated with a smiling expression. To further explore the effect of facial expressions, we computationally altered the facial expressions for these images. We trained HyperStyle, a GAN-inversion technique compatible with StyleGAN2, to determine the vector representations of our images. Then, following the concept of InterfaceGAN, we edited these vectors to recreate the original images in a phenotypically accurate way but with a different facial expression. Through online surveys and an eye-tracking experiment, we examined how altered facial expressions affect the performance of human experts. We overall found that facial expression is associated with diagnostic accuracy variably in different genetic conditions.

Recognition of Genetic Conditions After Learning With Images Created Using Generative Artificial Intelligence

Importance

The lack of standardized genetics training in pediatrics residencies, along with a shortage of medical geneticists, necessitates innovative educational approaches.

Objective

To compare pediatric resident recognition of Kabuki syndrome (KS) and Noonan syndrome (NS) after 1 of 4 educational interventions, including generative artificial intelligence (AI) methods.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This comparative effectiveness study used generative AI to create images of children with KS and NS. From October 1, 2022, to February 28, 2023, US pediatric residents were provided images through a web-based survey to assess whether these images helped them recognize genetic conditions.

Interventions

Participants categorized 20 images after exposure to 1 of 4 educational interventions (text-only descriptions, real images, and 2 types of images created by generative AI).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Associations between educational interventions with accuracy and self-reported confidence.

Results

Of 2515 contacted pediatric residents, 106 and 102 completed the KS and NS surveys, respectively. For KS, the sensitivity of text description was 48.5% (128 of 264), which was not significantly different from random guessing (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.29; P = .71). Sensitivity was thus compared for real images vs random guessing (60.3% [188 of 312]; OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15-2.00; P = .003) and 2 types of generative AI images vs random guessing (57.0% [212 of 372]; OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69; P = .02 and 59.6% [193 of 324]; OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.12-1.94; P = .006) (denominators differ according to survey responses). The sensitivity of the NS text-only description was 65.3% (196 of 300). Compared with text-only, the sensitivity of the real images was 74.3% (205 of 276; OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.08-2.18; P = .02), and the sensitivity of the 2 types of images created by generative AI was 68.0% (204 of 300; OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.77-1.66; P = .54) and 71.0% (247 of 328; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.92-1.83; P = .14). For specificity, no intervention was statistically different from text only. After the interventions, the number of participants who reported being unsure about important diagnostic facial features decreased from 56 (52.8%) to 5 (7.6%) for KS (P < .001) and 25 (24.5%) to 4 (4.7%) for NS (P < .001). There was a significant association between confidence level and sensitivity for real and generated images.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, real and generated images helped participants recognize KS and NS; real images appeared most helpful. Generated images were noninferior to real images and could serve an adjunctive role, particularly for rare conditions.

Generative Methods for Pediatric Genetics Education

Artificial intelligence (AI) is used in an increasing number of areas, with recent interest in generative AI, such as using ChatGPT to generate programming code or DALL-E to make illustrations. We describe the use of generative AI in medical education. Specifically, we sought to determine whether generative AI could help train pediatric residents to better recognize genetic conditions. From publicly available images of individuals with genetic conditions, we used generative AI methods to create new images, which were checked for accuracy with an external classifier. We selected two conditions for study, Kabuki (KS) and Noonan (NS) syndromes, which are clinically important conditions that pediatricians may encounter. In this study, pediatric residents completed 208 surveys, where they each classified 20 images following exposure to one of 4 possible educational interventions, including with and without generative AI methods. Overall, we find that generative images perform similarly but appear to be slightly less helpful than real images. Most participants reported that images were useful, although real images were felt to be more helpful. We conclude that generative AI images may serve as an adjunctive educational tool, particularly for less familiar conditions, such as KS.

Human and computer attention in assessing genetic conditions

Deep learning (DL) and other types of artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly used in many biomedical areas, including genetics. One frequent use in medical genetics involves evaluating images of people with potential genetic conditions to help with diagnosis. A central question involves better understanding how AI classifiers assess images compared to humans. To explore this, we performed eye-tracking analyses of geneticist clinicians and non-clinicians. We compared results to DL-based saliency maps. We found that human visual attention when assessing images differs greatly from the parts of images weighted by the DL model. Further, individuals tend to have a specific pattern of image inspection, and clinicians demonstrate different visual attention patterns than non-clinicians.

Neural Networks for Classification and Image Generation of Aging in Genetic Syndromes

Background: In medical genetics, one application of neural networks is the diagnosis of genetic diseases based on images of patient faces. While these applications have been validated in the literature with primarily pediatric subjects, it is not known whether these applications can accurately diagnose patients across a lifespan. We aimed to extend previous works to determine whether age plays a factor in facial diagnosis as well as to explore other factors that may contribute to the overall diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: To investigate this, we chose two relatively common conditions, Williams syndrome and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. We built a neural network classifier trained on images of affected and unaffected individuals of different ages and compared classifier accuracy to clinical geneticists. We analyzed the results of saliency maps and the use of generative adversarial networks to boost accuracy.

Results: Our classifier outperformed clinical geneticists at recognizing face images of these two conditions within each of the age groups (the performance varied between the age groups): 1) under 2 years old, 2) 2–9 years old, 3) 10–19 years old, 4) 20–34 years old, and 5) ≥35 years old. The overall accuracy improvement by our classifier over the clinical geneticists was 15.5 and 22.7% for Williams syndrome and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, respectively. Additionally, comparison of saliency maps revealed that key facial features learned by the neural network differed with respect to age. Finally, joint training real images with multiple different types of fake images created by a generative adversarial network showed up to 3.25% accuracy gain in classification accuracy.

Conclusion: The ability of clinical geneticists to diagnose these conditions is influenced by the age of the patient. Deep learning technologies such as our classifier can more accurately identify patients across the lifespan based on facial features. Saliency maps of computer vision reveal that the syndromic facial feature attributes change with the age of the patient. Modest improvements in the classifier accuracy were observed when joint training was carried out with both real and fake images. Our findings highlight the need for a greater focus on age as a confounder in facial diagnosis.