Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Enhanced Recovery With Aggressive Ambulation Decreases Length of Stay in Lung Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic Enhanced Recovery with Ambulation after Surgery (T-ERAS) protocol at our institution includes ambulation into the operating room and 250-feet ambulation within 1 hour of extubation. We compared the average length of stay (LOS) between T-ERAS patients and that predicted using a validated surgical risk calculator.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing lung cancer resection with minimally invasive approach from 2012 to 2022. Patients aged ≥ 18 were included if early ambulation was documented. Patient information were entered into the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator (NSQIP) to obtain the predicted LOS. Descriptive statistics, comparisons of observed versus predicted LOS (O/P ratio), and nonparametric testing were conducted.

RESULTS

Of 940 patients reviewed, 886 met eligibility. For the study cohort, average age was 68, and 514 (58.0%) were female. By procedure, there were 631(71.2%) lobectomy, 204 (23.0%) wedge, 26 (2.9%) segmentectomy, 20 (2.3%) bilobectomy, and 5 (0.6%) pneumonectomy. The average LOS observed for the entire cohort was 1.2 days (median 1.0 day) compared to the predicted LOS of 3.4 days with the NSQIP (median 4.0). Overall, 842 (95%) of patients had LOS better than predicted (O/P ratio < 1), 19 (2.1%) had LOS as predicted (O/P ratio = 1), and 25 (2.8%) had LOS longer than predicted (O/P ratio > 1). The mean O/P ratio was 0.34.

CONCLUSION

Average LOS with T-ERAS protocol was 1.2 days compared to the predicted average of 3.6 days in patients undergoing minimally invasive lung cancer resections. Our study provides a potential protocol to shorten the LOS beyond what is predicted by NSQIP.

Comparative Outcomes and Toxicity in Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Trimodality Therapy With Step-and-Shoot Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: The MD Anderson Experience

AIMS

To evaluate outcomes and toxicity after intensity-modulated radiation therapy given as step-and-shoot (SS) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with trimodality therapy (i.e. neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients consecutively treated with trimodality therapy including IMRT in 2001-2022 (n = 449) were retrospectively reviewed, and 106 pairs of propensity-matched SS and VMAT patients were identified. Survival, recurrence, surgery-related prognostic factors, and chemoradiation-related toxicities were evaluated between groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were balanced between both groups except for body mass index, history of other cancer, clinical disease stage, and use of induction chemotherapy. Median follow-up time was 40 months. Relative to SS, VMAT led to higher 3-year overall survival (OS; P = 0.028, hazard ratio [HR] 0.645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.436-0.954) but not progression-free, locoregional recurrence-free, or distant metastasis-free survival. No predictor of excellent OS by SS versus VMAT was identified in multivariable analyses. However, VMAT was associated with reduced odds of postoperative cardiac complications (P < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.296, 95% CI 0.148-0.591), pulmonary complications (P = 0.048, OR 0.539, 95% CI 0.292-0.994), pathologic partial response or worse (≥10% viable cells; P = 0.003, OR 0.418, 95% CI 0.235-0.743), and positive/close margins (P = 0.023, OR 0.346, 95% CI 0.138-0.867) relative to SS. VMAT was also associated with reduced rates of chemoradiation therapy-related weight loss (33.0% versus 79.2%, P < 0.001), fatigue (40.6% versus 68.9%, P < 0.001), nausea (31.1% versus 58.5%, P < 0.001) and cardiac toxicity (0% versus 6.6%, P = 0.007) than SS.

CONCLUSION

Based on this single institution, retrospective study with a 40-month median follow-up, VMAT utilization in trimodality treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer appears to be associated with improved OS and rates of concurrent chemoradiation therapy-related toxicity and reduced initial 12-month postoperative complications relative to SS IMRT. Multi-institutional prospective trials addressing the limitations of this study and with longer follow-ups are warranted to validate these findings.

Relationship of Surgical Approach With Financial Toxicity in Patients With Resected Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) reduces lengths of stay, complications, and potentially perioperative hospital costs. However, the impact of MIS on financial toxicity (FT), defined as the costs resulting from oncologic care and their negative effects on quality of life, in patients with lung cancer is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the association between surgical approach and FT in this population.

METHODS

A single-institution study was performed evaluating resected lung cancer patients (2016-2021). FT was assessed using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire. The relationship between surgical approach (MIS vs. thoracotomy) and FT was evaluated using propensity score-matched (PSM) regression analysis. A sensitivity analysis involving the entire cohort was also performed using an inverse probability-weighted generalized linear model.

RESULTS

As reported previously, of 1477 patients surveyed, 463 responded (31.3%) with FT reported in 196 patients (42.3%). Resection was performed by thoracotomy in 53.3% (n = 247), and by MIS in the remainder (n = 216, 46.7%; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS] = 115; robotic-assisted = 101). There was no difference in FT in patients who underwent VATS and robotic-assisted surgery (p = 0.515). In the PSM analysis, MIS was not associated with FT (odds ratio [OR]: 0.980, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.628-1.533, p = 0.929). Similar results were found on sensitivity analysis (OR: 1.488, CI: 0.931-2.378, p = 0.096).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to MIS, thoracotomy was not associated with FT in patients with resected lung cancer. Though there are several benefits from MIS, it does not appear to be a meaningful strategy to alleviate FT in this population.

Early ambulation and chest tube removal are associated with postoperative day one discharge in majority of robotic pulmonary lobectomy patients at an ERAS center

BACKGROUND

Application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in robotic lobectomy have been associated with decreased length of stay (LOS). We evaluated differences in patient characteristics and achievements of ERAS benchmarks by discharge groups at a tertiary referral center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained ERAS database of patients undergoing robotic lobectomy for pulmonary malignancy. Patients were trifurcated into LOS groups, postoperative day 1, 2-3, and 4+. Preoperative and perioperative variables, ERAS achievement, complications, and readmissions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between October 2018 and August 2022, 145 consecutive patients were reviewed. Eighty-two (56.6%) were discharged on POD 1, 50 (34.5%) on POD 2-3, and 13 (9.0%) on POD 4+. Patients achieving POD 1 discharge were associated with better preoperative pulmonary function (FEV1 p = 0.023 and DLCO p = 0.007) and shorter operative times (p < 0.001). Most air leaks (n = 30, 54.5%) were resolved by discharge; however, 25 (17.2%) were discharged with a chest tube. The POD 1 discharge group ambulated earlier (p = 0.005) and experienced no inpatient complications. Multivariate analysis reveals that operative time, time to first ambulation, and postoperative day 1 air leak were negatively associated with POD 1 discharge. Those who experienced a minor inpatient complication ambulated 5.8 h later than those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of ERAS principles can facilitate POD 1 discharge in the majority of patients undergoing robotic assisted lobectomy without an increase in complications or readmissions. Early ambulation and chest tube removal are modifiable elements of ERAS associated with POD 1 discharge.

Relationship between gender and perioperative clinical features in lung cancer patients who underwent VATS lobectomy

OBJECTIVES

Compare the differences in perioperative clinical characteristics of lung cancer patients of different genders who have undergone VATS lobectomy, and explore the impact of these differences on the short-term prognosis of patients.

METHODS

A total of 338 consecutive patients with lung cancer who underwent VATS lobectomy in our hospital from August 2021 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, they were divided into male group and female group. The perioperative characteristics and short-term prognosis of different groups were compared. The multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between male and female patients in age of onset, body surface area (BSA), smoking rate, alcohol consumption rate, hypertension incidence, pulmonary function and clinical stage. There were statistically significant differences between male and female patients in operation time and lymph node dissection. The probability of postoperative complications, such as pulmonary infection, persistent air leakage and severe subcutaneous emphysema, in male patients was significantly higher than that in female patients. The average daily postoperative thoracic drainage volume in male patients was considerably higher than that in female patients, and the postoperative duration of thoracic drainage tube and hospital stay in male patients were significantly longer than those in female patients. After multiple regression analysis, low FEVI values in males was found to be an independent risk factor for postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with female patients, male patients with lung cancer are more likely to have unfavorable factors such as older age, higher smoking rate, poor pulmonary function and late clinical stage of tumors when they undergoing VATS surgery treatment. The appropriate thoracic drainage time can be selected according to gender differences to shorten the length of hospital stay. The incidence of postoperative complications is higher in male patients, especially those with poor pulmonary function, and active perioperative intervention is required to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Cost-consequence analysis of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in major lung resection with minimally invasive technique (VATS)

Background

ERAS is an evidence-based multimodal perioperative protocol focused on stress reduction and promoting a return to function. The aim of this work is to perform a cost-consequence analysis for the implementation of ERAS in major lung resection by means of minimally invasive surgery (VATS) from the public health service perspective, evaluating resource consumption and clinical outcomes with respect to a control group of past patients, which did not adopt an ERAS protocol.

Methods

Outcome differences (re-intervention rates, major and minor intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmissions, and mortality) as well as the costs of preoperative, operative, and postoperative care were estimated. The sample consisted of 64 consecutive patients enrolled in the ERAS programme between April 2021 and August 2022, compared to a control group (historical cohort) comprising 31 patients treated from April 2020 to December 2020, prior to the implementation of the ERAS programme. The study sample comprises patients who fulfil the established ERAS protocol inclusion criteria, including general criteria (acceptance of the protocol, proximity of residence, absence of contraindications to physiotherapy and early mobilisation), surgical criteria (anatomical lung resection up to lobectomy, absence of extensive resection, good possibility of conducting the operation in VATS) and anaesthesiologic criteria (ASA ≤2). Costs were quantified using the national health system perspective.

Results

The average length-of-stay was at least one day shorter in the ERAS group [<0.001. Average total costs including entire pathway healthcare costs were substantially reduced for ERAS-VATS patients (mean: € 5,955.71 vs. €6,529.41 Δ = -573.70 p = 0.018)]. Specifically, the median costs of the admission phase were significantly different between the two groups (median: €4,648.82 vs. €5,596.58, p = 0.008), with a reduction in hospital stay expenditure in the ERAS-VATS group (median: €1,599.62 vs. €2,399.43, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found regarding major clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

The implementation of an ERAS programme is a dominant strategy, representing an intervention capable of reducing overall costs in the context of elective anatomical lung resection with VATS without any significant differences in major complications and re-intervention rates.

Postoperative day 1 discharge following subxiphoid thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection: a single-centre, postoperative enhanced recovery experience

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to assess the safety and quality of recovery (QOR) after discharge on postoperative day (POD) 1 following subxiphoid thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection within an advanced Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. Characteristics, perioperative and outcome data, compliance with ERAS pathways and a home-transition QOR survey were analysed using a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

From January 2020 to January 2022, a total of 201 consecutive patients underwent subxiphoid multiportal thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection, comprising 108 lobectomies and 93 sublobar resections (SLRs) (59 complex SLRs and 34 simple SLRs). Among them, 113 patients (56%) were discharged on POD 1, 49% after a lobectomy, 59% after a simple sublobar resection and 68% after a complex sublobar resection. In the multivariable analysis, age > 74 years and duration of the operation were associated with discharge after POD 1, whereas forced expiratory volume in 1 s and complex SLRs were associated with discharge on POD 1. Chest tube removal was achieved on POD 0 in 58 patients (29%), and 138 patients (69%) were free from a chest tube on POD 1. There were 13% with in-hospital morbidity, 10% with 90-day readmission (7% after POD 1 discharge and 14% in patients discharged after POD 1), and 0.5% with 90-day mortality. Patients discharged on POD 1 showed better compliance with the ERAS pathway with early chest tube removal and opioid-free analgesia. The home-transition QOR survey reported a better experience of returning home after discharge on POD 1 and similar pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative day 1 discharge can be safely achieved in appropriately selected patients after subxiphoid thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection, with excellent outcomes and high quality of recovery, supported by early chest tube removal as a determinant ERAS pathway.

Anatomic Lung Resection Outcomes After Implementation of a Universal Thoracic ERAS Protocol Across a Diverse Health Care System

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate how implementing a thoracic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol impacted surgical outcomes after elective anatomic lung resection.

BACKGROUND

The effect of implementing the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery thoracic ERAS protocol on postoperative outcomes throughout an entire health care system has not yet been reported.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study within one health care system (January 2019-March, 2023). A thoracic ERAS protocol was implemented on May 1, 2021 for elective anatomic lung resections, and postoperative outcomes were tracked using the electronic health record and Vizient data. The primary outcome was overall morbidity; secondary outcomes included individual complications, length of stay, opioid use, chest tube duration, and total cost. Patients were grouped into pre-ERAS and post-ERAS cohorts. Bivariable comparisons were performed using independent t -test, χ 2 , or Fisher exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

There were 1007 patients in the cohort; 450 (44.7%) were in the post-ERAS group. Mean age was 66.2 years; most patients were female (65.1%), white (83.8%), had a body mass index between 18.5 and 29.9 (69.7%), and were ASA class 3 (80.6%). Patients in the postimplementation group had lower risk-adjusted rates of any morbidity, respiratory complication, pneumonia, surgical site infection, arrhythmias, infections, opioid usage, ICU use, and shorter postoperative length of stay (all P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative outcomes were improved after the implementation of an evidence-based thoracic ERAS protocol throughout the health care system. This study validates the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery guidelines and demonstrates that simultaneous multihospital implementation can be feasible and effective.

Perioperative considerations for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery

Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery is being offered to more patients because it has a number of potential benefits. Awareness of the challenges that this type of surgery brings will allow teams to manage these patients safely in the perioperative period.

Modern fluid management in thoracic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an approach to perioperative fluid management for lung resection patients that incorporates the entire patient pathway in the context of international guidelines on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

RECENT FINDINGS

The concern with intraoperative fluid management is that giving too little or too much fluid is associated with worse outcomes after lung resection. However, it has not emerged as a key care element in thoracic ERAS programs probably due to the influence of other ERAS elements. Carbohydrate loading 2 h before surgery and the allowance of water until just prior to induction ensures the patient is both well hydrated and metabolically normal when they enter the operating room. Consequently, maintaining a euvolemic state during anesthesia can be achieved without goal-directed fluid therapy despite the recommendations of some guidelines. Intravenous fluids can be safely stopped in the immediate postoperative period.

SUMMARY

The goal of perioperative euvolemia can be achieved with the ongoing evolution and application of ERAS principles. A focus on the pre and postoperative phases of fluid management and a pragmatic approach to intraoperative fluid management negates the need for goal-directed fluid therapy in most cases.

Update on guidelines and recommendations for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) has continued its growth in popularity over the past few years, and evidence for its utility is catching up to other specialties. This review will present and examine some of that accumulated evidence since guidelines sponsored by the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) were first published in 2019.

RECENT FINDINGS

The ERAS/ESTS guidelines published in 2019 have not been updated, but new studies have been done and new data has been published regarding some of the individual components of the guidelines as they relate to thoracic and lung resection surgery. While there is still not a consensus on many of these issues, the volume of available evidence is becoming more robust, some of which will be incorporated into this review.

SUMMARY

The continued accumulation of data and evidence for the benefits of enhanced recovery techniques in thoracic and lung resection surgery will provide the thoracic anesthesiologist with guidance on how to best care for these patients before, during, and after surgery. The data from these studies will also help to elucidate which components of ERAS protocols are the most beneficial, and which components perhaps do not provide as much benefit as previously thought.

Enhanced recovery after surgery: comes out to the Sun

ERAS programs aim to reduce the length of hospital stays and lower costs, and minimize the risk of postoperative complications and readmissions while enhancing the overall patient experience. BMC Anesthesiology has initiated a new collection on ERAS, urging investigators to conduct large-scale, high-quality studies that address the existing knowledge gap.

Effect of reduced urinary catheter duration on time to ambulation after VATS lobectomy

Introduction

Faster time to ambulation (TTA) after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is associated with improved outcomes. We hypothesized that reduced urinary catheter duration leads to shorter TTA after VATS lobectomy.

Methods

We studied VATS lobectomy patients from 2014 through 2018. TTA of patients that did not have urinary catheters or whose catheters were removed at the end of the operation (reduced cath) was compared to TTA of those whose catheters were removed the day after surgery (long cath).

Results

Overall, 67 and 234 patients were included in the reduced cath and long cath groups, respectively. Median TTA was shorter in the reduced cath group compared to the long cath group (6.5 h Q1-Q3: 4.8-10.7 vs 11.0 h Q1-Q3: 6.8-18.3, p<0.01). Length of stay, urinary complications, and 30-day readmissions were not significantly different between groups.

Discussion

While it is possible to ambulate with a urinary catheter in place, the presence of such a catheter nevertheless presents an additional barrier to early mobilization among VATS lobectomy patients. Despite other efforts to promote early ambulation within our integrated health system, we have found that avoiding urinary catheter use or removing them immediately post-operatively is associated with shorter times to initial ambulation. Given the known benefits of early ambulation among VATS lobectomy patients, reduction or omission of urinary catheters may provide an additional tool for surgeons to promote early mobilization.

Conclusions

Reduction of urinary catheter duration is associated with reduced TTA after VATS lobectomy.

Enhanced recovery after surgery and chest tube management

This review documents the relationships between enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, chest tube management and patient outcomes following lung resection surgery. ERAS pathways have been introduced to mitigate the harmful stress response that occurs following all major surgery, including lung resection. Improvements to the entire patient pathway, from the preoperative admission clinic through to discharge and beyond, can have additive or synergistic effects and result in improved patient outcomes, reduced length of stay and lower costs. At the same time, there are some key care elements that appear to be more important than others. In the postoperative period, early removal of chest tubes, early mobilization, and limited use of opioids are all independently important factors. These elements of care are all intertwined. Therefore, a focus on proactive chest tube management with the abandonment of conservative chest tube strategies should be a focus of postoperative ERAS pathways. This can be achieved with single tubes, no routine suction, the use of digital drainage systems, and removal of tubes even in the presence of relatively high serous pleural fluid outputs. The goals of early mobilization and opioid-sparing analgesia are more readily achieved once a chest tube has been removed. The result is superior patient outcomes with significantly fewer complications.

How, when and why to establish preoperative surgical risk in thoracic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Emphasizing a systems-based approach, we discuss the timing for referral for perioperative surgical consultation. This review then highlights several types of comorbidities that may complicate thoracic procedures, and references recent best practices for their management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients requiring thoracic surgeries present some of the most challenging cases for both intraoperative and postoperative management. The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has only exacerbated these concerns. Effective preoperative optimization, however, provides for identification of patient comorbidities, allowing for mitigation of surgical risks. This kind of planning is multidisciplinary by nature. We believe patients benefit from early engagement of a dedicated preoperative clinic experienced for caring for complex surgical patients.

SUMMARY

Optimizing patients for thoracic surgery can be challenging for small and large health systems alike. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines can improve care and mitigate risk. As surgical techniques evolve, future research is needed to ensure that perioperative care continues to progress.