Coronary artery disease in adults with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery

Single Coronary Origin From Right Coronary Sinus With Intraseptal Course: How to Make Diagnosis by Echocardiography

We describe a rare case of a male adolescent with anomalous aortic origin of the left coronary artery from the right sinus with intraseptal course (L-ACAO-IS), which was diagnosed at transthoracic echocardiography. The case we presented confirms how echocardiography is accurate in the diagnosis of even challenging coronary artery origin anomalies such as L-ACO-IS. Coronary artery origin evaluation should be an integral part of echocardiography examinations in infants, children, and young adults, especially those undergoing physical activity. We also remark the importance of using multiple views including short axis, long axis, and modified (anteriorized) 4-chamber view which is very helpful for a better evaluation of coronary artery origin and their proximal course.

Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery: Results from a Single Surgical Team in Spain

OBJECTIVES

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery is a rare congenital lesion in which a coronary artery arises from an anomalous location within the aorta. Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery has been associated with myocardial ischemia and it is considered the second most common cause of sudden cardiac arrest in young athletes. When surgical repair is indicated, surgical unroofing is the most commonly employed technique. Our objective is to describe the outcomes of our surgically treated patients.

METHODS

We present a series of 16 adult patients who underwent surgical repair of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery. Patients were treated in three different institutions by the same surgeon. Surgical unroofing of the anomalous coronary artery was the surgical technique chosen in the majority of the patients. Follow-up was performed.

RESULTS

Unroofing of an intramural anomalous coronary artery was the procedure performed in 11 patients. Three patients underwent neo-ostium creation; one patient underwent a David procedure with coronary reimplantation; and one patient was treated with coronary bypass grafting due to severe coronary atheromatous lesions. There were no perioperative deaths, and no major postoperative complications. Follow-up period was 73.8 months, the survival rate was 100%, and there were neither ischemia or heart failure reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical repair of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery by coronary unroofing or neo-ostium creation has demonstrated excellent early and late outcomes. Late survival was excellent. The follow-up period revealed no significant morbidity or complications.

Pathophysiology and Treatment of Intraseptal-Course Left Coronary Anomaly: Surgery for All?

Intraseptal-course, ectopic coronary anomalies are not well characterized as to anatomy, function, prognosis, and treatment. Recently, a revolutionary but unsupported new theory is claiming that most patients with a Left Anomalous Coronary Artery originating from the Opposite Sinus with anomalous Intra-Septal course (L-ACAOS-IS)-even small children-have significant stenoses and require open-heart surgery to prevent acute myocardial infarction and death. This surprising view has spurred ongoing discussions among adult and pediatric cardiologists and cardiac surgeons, compelling us (the conservative party in the discussion) to offer an in-depth and comprehensive review of this anomaly, based on objective but opposite data. We and other adult cardiologists have followed numerous L-ACAOS-IS patients for many years and have observed none of the claimed catastrophes. Rather, we have consistently found that L-ACAOS-IS generally has a benign clinical prognosis. We present the general principle of coronary artery dysfunction in anatomical congenital anomalies (that only significant luminal coronary stenosis can have clinical repercussions). We then review anatomical and functional details of L-ACAOS-IS related to prognosis and treatment indications, which could explain many of the clinical presentations recently mentioned. Finally, we encourage our more liberal colleagues to recognize that, compared with normal coronary arteries, those with anomalies of origin and course are associated with frequent coronary spasm. In particular, we underscore that some of the ischemic manifestations and other results might actually be caused by pressure wire-induced artifacts (rigid wires tend to cause coronary spasm when advanced into tortuous coronary arteries).

Prevalence and location of coronary artery disease in anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and location of coronary artery disease (CAD) in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) remain poorly documented in adults. We sought to assess the presence of CAD in proximal (or ectopic) and distal (or nonectopic) segments of AAOCA. We hypothesized that the representation of CAD may differ among the different courses of AAOCA.

METHODS

The presence of CAD was analyzed on coronary angiography and/or coronary computed tomography angiography in 390 patients (median age 64 years; 73% male) with AAOCA included in the anomalous coronary arteries multicentric registry.

RESULTS

AAOCA mainly involved circumflex artery (54.4%) and right coronary artery (RCA) (31.3%). All circumflex arteries had a retroaortic course; RCA mostly an interarterial course (98.4%). No CAD was found in the proximal segment of interarterial AAOCA, whereas 43.8% of retroaortic AAOCA, 28% of prepulmonic AAOCA and 20.8% subpulmonic AAOCA had CAD in their proximal segments ( P  < 0.001). CAD was more prevalent in proximal than in distal segments of retroaortic AAOCA (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.8-5.4, P  < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, a retroaortic course was associated with an increased prevalence of CAD in the proximal segment (adjusted OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.3-10.7, P  = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Increased prevalence of CAD was found in the proximal segment of retroaortic AAOCA compared to the proximal segments of other AAOCA, whereas no CAD was observed in the proximal segment of interarterial AAOCA. The mechanisms underlying these differences are not yet clearly identified.

Procedural characteristics of coronary angiography in patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery

BACKGROUND

Anomalous coronary arteries (ACA) are seen in 1-5 % of patients undergoing coronary angiography, and their presence may increase procedural difficulty. We aimed to compare procedural outcomes of coronary angiography in ACA patients by anatomy and prior knowledge of the ACA.

METHODS

This was a single-center review of ACA patients undergoing coronary angiography between October 2013 and February 2022. Primary endpoints were contrast volume, fluoroscopy dose, time, and dose-area product (DAP). Comparisons were made between groups based on ACA anatomy and based on prior knowledge of the ACA.

RESULTS

We found 176 diagnostic coronary angiograms among ACA patients. Anomalies of the right coronary artery (RCA) comprised 77 %, followed by left circumflex (LCX) at 16 % and left main or left anterior descending (LMCA/LAD) at 7 %. There was significantly more contrast use among patients with RCA (mean 110.5 mL) or LMCA/LAD (115.6 mL) anomalies than LCX (76.2 mL; p = 0.01). There was no difference in fluoroscopy dose, time, or DAP. Prior knowledge of the anomaly was recorded in 61 (35 %) cases. Contrast volume (mean difference 27.1 mL, 95 % confidence interval: 12.5-41.8) and all fluoroscopy measures decreased if the ACA was previously known to the operators.

CONCLUSION

Different types of ACAs are associated with increased contrast use but not fluoroscopy exposure. Prior knowledge of ACA is associated with decreased contrast use and fluoroscopy exposure. Thorough review of prior catheterizations and knowledge of catheter selection is important for reducing contrast use and fluoroscopy exposure in patients with ACA.

Anatomical Variants of the Origin of the Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence

PURPOSE

The most common anomaly is an anomalous left coronary artery originating from the pulmonary artery. These variants can be different and depend on the location as well as how they present themselves in their anatomical distribution and their symptomatological relationship. For these reasons, this review aims to identify the variants of the coronary artery and how they are associated with different clinical conditions.

METHODS

The databases Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and LILACS were researched until January 2024. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction. Methodological quality was evaluated using an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). Pooled prevalence was estimated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies met the established selection criteria. In this study, 21 articles with a total of 578,868 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The coronary artery origin variant was 1% (CI = 0.8-1.2%). For this third sample, the funnel plot graph showed an important asymmetry, with a p-value of 0.162, which is directly associated with this asymmetry.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that patients whose diagnosis was made incidentally and in the absence of symptoms undergo periodic controls to prevent future complications, including death. Finally, we believe that further studies could improve the anatomical, embryological, and physiological understanding of this variant in the heart.

Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery

BACKGROUND

Although anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is associated with risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), there is a spectrum of disease, with the appropriate management for many remaining unclear. Increasing data warrant review for an updated perspective on management.

METHODS

A panel of congenital cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, and imaging practitioners reviewed the current literature related to AAOCA and its management. Survey of relevant publications from 2010 to the present in PubMed was performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AAOCA is 0.4% to 0.8%. Anomalous left coronary artery is 3 to 8 times less common than anomalous right coronary, but carries a much higher risk of SCA. Nevertheless, anomalous right coronary is not completely benign; 10% demonstrate ischemia, and it remains an important cause of SCA. Decision-making regarding which patients should be recommended for surgical intervention includes determining anatomic features associated with ischemia, evidence of ischemia on provocative testing, and concerning cardiovascular symptoms. Ischemia testing continues to prove challenging with low sensitivity and specificity, but the utility of new modalities is an active area of research. Surgical interventions focus on creating an unobstructed path for blood flow and choosing the appropriate surgical technique given the anatomy to accomplish this. Nontrivial morbidity has been reported with surgery, including new-onset ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

A proportion of patients with AAOCA demonstrate features and ischemia that warrant surgical intervention. Continued work remains to improve the ability to detect inducible ischemia, to risk stratify these patients, and to provide guidance in terms of which patients warrant surgical intervention.

Anomalous origin of the coronary artery: prevalence and coronary artery disease in adults undergoing coronary tomographic angiography

BACKGROUND

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is a rare congenital coronary anomaly with the potential to cause adverse cardiac events. However, there is limited data on the association between AAOCA and coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and symptoms of patients with AAOCA, as well as investigate the correlation between AAOCA and CAD in a population referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutive patients who underwent CTA from 2010 to 2021 were included. Characteristics, symptoms, coronary related adverse events and CTA information were reviewed by medical records. Separate multivariable cumulative logistic regressions were performed, using the stenosis severity in each of the four coronaries as individual responses and as a combined patient clustered response. Finally, we identified 207 adult patients with AAOCA, the prevalence of AAOCA is 0.23% (207/90,501). Moreover, this study found no significant association between AAOCA and CAD. AAOCA did not contribute to higher rates of hospitalization or adverse cardiac events, including calcification.

CONCLUSION

AAOCA is a rare congenital disease that is not associated with increased presence of obstructive CAD in adults.

Caring for the Critically Ill Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to discuss the unique challenges that adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients present in the intensive care unit.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies suggest that ACHD patients make up an increasing number of ICU admissions, and that their care greatly improves in centers with specialized ACHD care. Common reasons for admission include arrhythmia, hemorrhage, heart failure, and pulmonary disease. It is critical that the modern intensivist understand not only the congenital anatomy and subsequent repairs an ACHD patient has undergone, but also how that anatomy can predispose the patient to critical illness. Additionally, intensivists should rely on a multidisciplinary team, which includes an ACHD specialist, in the care of these patients.

Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients With an Anomalous Right Coronary Artery from the Left Sinus of Valsalva

An anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva with an intramural course (R-ACAOS-IM) may cause sudden cardiac death in children and adolescents. However, the natural history and management of patients in whom this anomaly is detected later during adulthood remains uncertain. The goals of this study were to assess the impact of an R-ACAOS-IM on the clinical outcomes in an adult population and to determine if adult patients with this anomaly who do not have significant coronary artery disease (CAD) can be managed safely without surgical intervention. A database review identified patients aged >35 years with anomalous coronary arteries diagnosed by cardiac catheterization or coronary computed tomography angiography. The outcomes of patients with R-ACAOS-IM were compared with patients with anomalous left circumflex coronary arteries with retroaortic course (LCx-RA) (an anomaly not associated with ischemic events). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The study population consisted of 185 patients aged 59 ± 12 years. Clinical characteristics were similar in the R-ACAOS-IM (n = 88) and LCx-RA (n = 97) groups. At a follow-up of 6.6 ± 4.5 years, there was no difference in mortality (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.28, p = 0.20) when adjusted for gender, age, and CAD. A subgroup analysis of 88 patients with no obstructive CAD managed nonoperatively found no difference between the LCx and R-ACAOS-IM groups in mortality (hazard ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 13.40, p = 0.30). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the composite outcome of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or survived cardiac arrest. The outcome of adult patients who have anomalous R-ACAOS-IM are similar to patients who have anomalous LCx-RA with a known benign course. In conclusion, these results suggest that most patients who survive this anomaly into adulthood may be managed conservatively without intervention.

Anomalous origin of left circumflex artery from the right sinus of Valsalva: Clinical outcomes in a consecutive series of master athletes

BACKGROUND

Aim of the study was to collect and describe a case series of consecutive master athletes in whom an anomalous origin of left circumflex artery (LCx) from the right sinus of Valsalva (ALCx) was detected at a clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography CCTA) to establish a focused clinical management and counseling about sport activity in those subjects.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective registry of subjects referred to a clinically indicated CCTA. Information about the clinical status was obtained by previous clinical records and clinical evaluation at time of image acquisition; follow-up allowed to record symptoms, outcomes and downstream testing.

RESULTS

The study population consisted in 14 subjects, of which one competitive athlete and 13 recreational master athletes. Mean age was of 67.2 ± 10.6 years (71% of male); follow-up lasted 6.4 ± 2.6 years. The major high-risk anatomy features (inter-arterial course, intramural segment, high take-off and slit-like ostium) were absent. None had abnormal ostial morphology and all had full retroaortic course; three subjects (21%) presented an acute take-off angle. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was present in 10 patients (71%). Major outcomes (cardiac hospitalization, death for all causes) recorded were not related to the anomalous LCx. Symptoms were most related to atherosclerotic CAD in different vessels whereas two subjects without CAD exhibited cardiac symptoms, without hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the diagnosis of ALCx, being usually associated to low-risk anatomical characteristics, could be considered a benign finding, with scarce or no implications for physically active individuals neither for recreational athletes.

Coronary Artery Anomalies: A Short Case Series and Current Review

Coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) are rare congenital cardiovascular defects that can present in various ways depending on the origin, course, and termination of the abnormal coronary artery fistula. It is sometimes detected incidentally during procedures such as coronary angiography or autopsies. While adults with this condition are often asymptomatic, some may experience angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, ventricular aneurysms, or sudden cardiac death (SCD). In fact, it is the second leading cause of SCD among young athletes and requires more studies to handle such patients efficiently. To illustrate the many possible manifestations of this unusual diagnosis, we present a series of five cases. We have also reviewed the different varieties of this rare congenital anomaly and discussed the latest diagnostic tests and treatment plans.