Intraoperative ticagrelor removal via hemoadsorption during on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Intraoperative Hemoadsorption in Heart Transplant Surgery: A 5-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Hyperimmune response and cytokine release post-reperfusion might occur after orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx). Intraoperative hemoadsorption (HA) has been introduced to remove such elevated cytokines. We aimed to analyze the effect of intraoperative HA in patients undergoing orthotopic HTx.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2022, 40 consecutive orthotopic HTx patients who underwent intraoperative hemoadsorption HA integrated into the cardiopulmonary bypass were compared to 41 historical controls. Primary outcome measures included postoperative hemodynamic stability and blood product requirements, while secondary outcomes were the incidence of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI-d) and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) did not significantly differ between the groups. However, the use duration for milrinone and dobutamine was shortened by one day compared to controls. The HA group had fewer red blood cell transfusions (765 vs. 1330 mL, p = 0.01) and lower fresh frozen plasma requirements (945 vs. 1200 mL, p = 0.04). Mechanical ventilation duration was reduced (22 vs. 28 h, p = 0.02). AKI-d rates were similar, and 30-day mortality favored non-significantly the HA group (5% vs. 14.6%, p = ns). No device-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that intraoperative HA might improve immediate postoperative outcomes; however, further validation in larger randomized controlled trials is warranted.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for coronary thrombosis treatment: where are we today?

INTRODUCTION

Advances in pharmacotherapy for coronary thrombosis treatment and prevention have transformed the clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease but increased the complexity of therapeutic decision-making. Improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention techniques and stent design have reduced the incidence of thrombotic complications, which consequently has increased the challenge of adequately powering clinical trials of novel antithrombotic strategies for efficacy outcomes. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of coronary thrombosis and the characteristics of antithrombotic drugs can help with therapeutic decisions.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the pathophysiology of coronary thrombosis and the mechanisms of action of drugs developed for its treatment, provides an overview of the key issues in decision-making, and highlights key areas for further work in order to guide clinicians on how to individualize risk management and address gaps in the evidence base.

EXPERT OPINION

Individualization of antithrombotic therapy regimens has become a vital part of optimizing risk management in people with coronary thrombosis. A critical appraisal of the strengths and limitations of available drugs and the evidence supporting the use of different antithrombotic combinations is intended to provide direction to clinicians and point the way toward further improvements in pharmacotherapy for coronary thrombosis treatment and prevention.

Dual Blood Purification with CytoSorb and oXiris in Managing Recurrent Septic Shock: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Extracorporeal blood purification strategies were recently developed as adjunctive treatments for sepsis. CytoSorb® is an approved medical device designed to reduce blood levels of inflammatory cytokines. The oXiris high-adsorption membrane filter is used in continuous hemofiltration adsorption. We describe the case of a 67-year-old man with recurrent septic shock, requiring treatment with antibiotics, vasopressors, inotropes, mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and adjunctive treatment with an oXiris filter and hemadsorption using the CytoSorb device. CASE REPORT A 67-year-old man was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with septic shock. He received antibiotics, fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes and was mechanically ventilated. Acute kidney failure was treated with CRRT. His condition improved, and he was transferred to the general ward. On day 3 in the ward, he developed a new episode of septic shock and was readmitted to ICU. Standard therapy with fluids, vasopressors, and empiric antibiotics was started. Despite treatment, his condition deteriorated dramatically. CRRT with an oXiris filter in combination with hemoadsorption using CytoSorb was started. After CRRT initiation and integration of the CytoSorb adsorber, rapid improvement in the patient's condition was observed. Daily laboratory test results showed significant decreases in procalcitonin and CRP. The patient was discharged from ICU on day 5 after initiation of CytoSorb therapy. CONCLUSIONS Although no guidelines and large clinical trial data are yet available to support the use of CytoSorb and oXiris, this report supports the findings from previous reports and small studies, that they can be considered as adjunctive treatments for patients with sepsis.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulant removal by intraoperative hemoadsorption in CABG and/or single valve surgery: interim analysis of the International Safe and Timely Antithrombotic Removal (STAR) registry

OBJECTIVE

Patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at high risk of perioperative bleeding complications. Intraoperative hemoadsorption is a novel strategy to reduce perioperative bleeding in patients on DOACs undergoing non-deferable cardiac surgery. The international STAR-registry reports real-world clinical outcomes associated with this application.

METHODS

The hemoadsorption device was incorporated into the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit and active for the duration of the pump run. Patients on DOACs undergoing CABG and/or single valve surgery before completing the recommended washout were included. Outcome measurements included bleeding events according to standardized definitions and 24-hour chest-tube-drainage (CTD).

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were included from 7 institutions in Austria, Germany, Sweden, and the UK (mean age 69.9 ± 7.5years, 71% male). Approximately half were on apixaban and the other half was split between rivaroxaban and edoxaban with 21% of patients also on aspirin. Surgery occurred at a median time of 28.9 h since the last DOAC dose with single valve surgery accounting for 2/3 of cases. Mean CPB duration was 118.6 ± 46.4 min. Severe bleeding (UDPB ≥ 3) occurred in 4.8%, and BARC-4 bleeding occurred in 3.2% of the patients. Only one patient (1.6%) required reoperation for bleeding control. The mean 24-hour CTD was 771.3 ± 482.79mL. No device-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This interim report of the ongoing STAR-registry shows that, in patients on DOAC undergoing non-deferable CABG and/or single valve surgery, the use of intraoperative hemoadsorption is associated with low rates of severe perioperative bleeding complications. Further prospective studies in larger cohorts are needed to validate the efficacy of this method.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05077124.

Intraoperative haemoadsorption for antithrombotic drug removal during cardiac surgery: initial report of the international safe and timely antithrombotic removal (STAR) registry

Intraoperative antithrombotic drug removal by haemoadsorption is a novel strategy to reduce perioperative bleeding in patients on antithrombotic drugs undergoing cardiac surgery. The international STAR registry reports real-world clinical outcomes associated with this application. All patients underwent cardiac surgery before completing the recommended washout period. The haemoadsorption device was incorporated into the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit. Patients on P2Y12 inhibitors comprised group 1, and patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) group 2. Outcome measurements included bleeding events according to standardised definitions and 24-hour chest-tube-drainage (CTD). 165 patients were included from 8 institutions in Austria, Germany, Sweden, and the UK. Group 1 included 114 patients (62.9 ± 11.6years, 81% male) operated at a mean time of 33.2 h from the last P2Y12 inhibitor dose with a mean CPB duration of 117.1 ± 62.0 min. Group 2 included 51 patients (68.4 ± 9.4years, 53% male), operated at a mean time of 44.6 h after the last DOAC dose, with a CPB duration of 128.6 ± 48.4 min. In Group 1, 15 patients experienced a BARC-4 bleeding event (13%), including 3 reoperations (2.6%). The mean 24-hour CTD was 651 ± 407mL. In Group 2, 8 patients experienced a BARC-4 bleeding event (16%) including 4 reoperations (7.8%). The mean CTD was 675 ± 363mL. This initial report of the ongoing STAR registry shows that the intraoperative use of a haemoadsorption device is simple and safe, and may potentially mitigate the expected high bleeding risk of patients on antithrombotic drugs undergoing cardiac surgery before completion of the recommended washout period.Clinical registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05077124.

Antithrombotic drug removal with hemoadsorption during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Patients requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are often loaded with antithrombotic drugs (AT) and are at an increased risk for perioperative bleeding complications. Active AT removal by a hemoadsorption cartridge integrated in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit is increasingly used in this setting to reduce bleeding, and herein we describe the extension of this application in patients on AT undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB).

METHODS

Ten patients (80% male; mean age: 67.4 ± 9.2years) were treated with ticagrelor (eight patients), rivaroxaban and ticagrelor (one patient), and rivaroxaban (one patient) prior to OPCAB surgery. AT's were discontinued one day before surgery in nine patients and on the day of surgery in one patient, and all patients were also on aspirin. The cohort mean EuroSCORE-II was 2.9 ± 1.5%. A hemoadsorption cartridge was integrated into a dialysis device (n=4) or a stand-alone apheresis pump (n=6) periprocedural, for a treatment time of 145 ± 33 min. Outcome measures included bleeding according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-4 and 24-hour chest-tube-drainage (CTD).

RESULTS

Mean operation time was 184 ± 35 min. All patients received a left internal thoracic artery with a mean of 2.3 ± 0.9 total grafts. One patient had a BARC-4 bleeding event and there were no surgical re-explorations for bleeding. Mean 24-hours CTD was 680 ± 307mL. During follow-up of 19.5 ± 17.0 months, none of the patients died or required further reinterventions. No device-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemoadsorption via a stand-alone apheresis pump during OPCAB surgery was feasible and safe. This innovative and new approach showed favorable bleeding rates in patients on antithrombotic drugs requiring bypass surgery.