Center Volume and Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Pediatric Patients

The State of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation in India: A Survey-based Analysis of Practices, Challenges, and Educational Needs

Background

Technical and immunological advancements have improved patient and graft survival rates in pediatric kidney transplantation (PKT). However, the landscape of PKT in India remains underexplored. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey among Indian pediatric surgeons to delineate contemporary trends in PKT.

Methods

The online survey comprised 10 questions assessing pediatric surgeons' involvement in PKT, existing challenges, and educational needs.

Results

Of 610 surveyed pediatric surgeons, 120 responded (19.67% response rate). Majority of the respondents were affiliated with teaching programs, either in the public sector (61.18%) or in corporate setups (25.21%). While 65.83% of respondents managed pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease, only 10% had PKT programs at their institutes. Most of the respondents (67.5%) believed that pediatric surgeons should perform PKTs. Despite this, only 15.83% were part of the renal transplantation team at their institute and only 2.5% routinely performed PKTs. Most of the respondents (63.33%) advocated for mandatory KT exposure during postdoctoral training.

Conclusion

Despite enthusiasm among pediatric surgeons, actual involvement remains low. Dedicated PKT programs are necessary to address these challenges along with improved training by integrating transplantation sciences into the pediatric surgical curriculum. The study underscores the need for pediatric surgeons to specialize in transplantation and advocates for policy changes to address the prevailing challenges.

Pediatric kidney transplantation in Europe, a clinical snapshot pilot

Background

Pediatric kidney transplantations are rarely performed, and there is limited knowledge about the diversity in current clinical practices across Europe. This study aims to explore the utility of clinical snapshot studies in identifying these disparities, establishing a foundation for future snapshot studies and standardization efforts.

Methods

A pilot clinical snapshot study was conducted, with invitations extended to all 109 pediatric kidney transplant centres in Europe. Each participating centre provided pre-, peri-, and postoperative data concerning their most recent thirty transplantations. The primary outcomes encompassed the evaluation of disparities in donor-recipient selection, surgical techniques, post-operative drainage procedures, and immunosuppressive therapy protocols. Secondary outcomes involved the analysis of rejection rates, incidence of infections, and graft survival.

Results

The study involved 439 patients from fifteen centres (14%) in twelve countries, with varying transplant volumes (range 1-29 transplantations per year) and follow-up periods. Significant differences were found among centres in terms of donor types, cold and warm ischemia time, pre-emptive transplant rates, and kidney transplant drainage methods. The rate of living donors varied between 3% and 90% and the median duration of cold ischemia ranged was 770 min after deceased donation and 147 min after living donation. Basiliximab was the dominant induction therapy, yet steroid withdrawal varied widely. Infection, rejection, and graft survival rates also varied significantly between centres.

Conclusion

This study revealed substantial variation in clinical practices among European centres performing pediatric kidney transplantations. These findings could serve as a stimulus for international dialogue and collaboration.

"Long-term effects of center volume on transplant outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients"

BACKGROUND

The influence of center volume on kidney transplant outcomes is a topic of ongoing debate. In this study, we employed competing risk analyses to accurately estimate the marginal probability of graft failure in the presence of competing events, such as mortality from other causes with long-term outcomes. The incorporation of immunosuppression protocols and extended follow-up offers additional insights. Our emphasis on long-term follow-up aligns with biological considerations where competing risks play a significant role.

METHODS

We examined data from 219,878 adult kidney-only transplantations across 256 U.S. transplant centers (January 2001-December 2015) sourced from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry. Centers were classified into quartiles by annual volume: low (Q1 = 28), medium (Q2 = 75), medium-high (Q3 = 121), and high (Q4 = 195). Our study investigated the relationship between center volume and 5-year outcomes, focusing on graft failure and mortality. Sub-population analyses included deceased donors, living donors, diabetic recipients, those with kidney donor profile index >85%, and re-transplants from deceased donors.

RESULTS

Adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (aCHR) for Five-Year Graft Failure and Patient Death were examined by center volume, with low-volume centers as the reference standard (aCHR: 1.0). In deceased donors, medium-high and high-volume centers showed significantly lower cause-specific hazard ratios for graft failure (medium-high aCHR = 0.892, p<0.001; high aCHR = 0.953, p = 0.149) and patient death (medium-high aCHR = 0.828, p<0.001; high aCHR = 0.898, p = 0.003). Among living donors, no significant differences were found for graft failure, while a trend towards lower cause-specific hazard ratios for patient death was observed in medium-high (aCHR = 0.895, p = 0.107) and high-volume centers (aCHR = 0.88, p = 0.061).

CONCLUSION

Higher center volume is associated with significantly lower cause-specific hazard ratios for graft failure and patient death in deceased donors, while a trend towards reduced cause-specific hazard ratios for patient death is observed in living donors.

Capacity for the management of kidney failure in the International Society of Nephrology North America and the Caribbean region: report from the 2023 ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA)

The International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas charts the availability and capacity of kidney care globally. In the North America and the Caribbean region, the Atlas can identify opportunities for kidney care improvement, particularly in Caribbean countries where structures for systematic data collection are lacking. In this third iteration, respondents from 12 of 18 countries from the region reported a 2-fold higher than global median prevalence of dialysis and transplantation, and a 3-fold higher than global median prevalence of dialysis centers. The peritoneal dialysis prevalence was lower than the global median, and transplantation data were missing from 6 of the 10 Caribbean countries. Government-funded payments predominated for dialysis modalities, with greater heterogeneity in transplantation payor mix. Services for chronic kidney disease, such as monitoring of anemia and blood pressure, and diagnostic capability relying on serum creatinine and urinalyses were universally available. Notable exceptions in Caribbean countries included non-calcium-based phosphate binders and kidney biopsy services. Personnel shortages were reported across the region. Kidney failure was identified as a governmental priority more commonly than was chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury. In this generally affluent region, patients have better access to kidney replacement therapy and chronic kidney disease-related services than in much of the world. Yet clear heterogeneity exists, especially among the Caribbean countries struggling with dialysis and personnel capacity. Important steps to improve kidney care in the region include increased emphasis on preventive care, a focus on home-based modalities and transplantation, and solutions to train and retain specialized allied health professionals.

Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant-Does Hospital Experience With Heart Transplant or Kidney Transplant Have a Greater Impact on Patient Outcomes?

High institutional transplant volume is associated with improved outcomes in isolated heart and kidney transplant. The aim of this study was to assess trends and outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHKT) nationally, as well as the impact of institutional heart and kidney transplant volume on survival. All adult patients who underwent SHKT between 2005-2019 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Annual institutional volumes in single organ transplant were determined. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to assess the impact of demographics, comorbidities, and institutional transplant volumes on 1-year survival. 1564 SHKT were identified, increasing from 54 in 2005 to 221 in 2019. In centers performing SHKT, median annual heart transplant volume was 35.0 (IQR 24.0-56.0) and median annual kidney transplant volume was 166.0 (IQR 89.5-224.0). One-year survival was 88.4%. In multivariable analysis, increasing heart transplant volume, but not kidney transplant volume, was associated with improved 1-year survival. Increasing donor age, dialysis requirement, ischemic times, and bilirubin were also independently associated with reduced 1-year survival. Based on this data, high-volume heart transplant centers may be better equipped with managing SHKT patients than high-volume kidney transplant centers.

Geographic barriers to children's surgical care: A systematic review of existing evidence

BACKGROUND

Ensuring that children have access to timely and appropriate surgical care is a vital component of comprehensive pediatric care. This study systematically reviews the existing evidence related to geographic barriers in children's surgery.

METHODS

Medline and Scopus databases were searched for any English language studies that examined associations between geographic burden (rural residence or distance to care) and a quantifiable outcome within pediatric surgical subspecialties. Two independent reviewers extracted data from each study.

RESULTS

From 6331 studies screened, 22 studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective analyses and conducted in the U.S. or Canada (14 and three studies, respectively); five were conducted outside North America. In transplant surgery (seven studies), greater distance from a transplant center was associated with higher waitlist mortality prior to kidney and liver transplantation, although graft outcomes were generally similar. In congenital cardiac surgery (five studies), greater travel was associated with higher neonatal mortality and older age at surgery but not with post-operative outcomes. In general surgery (eight studies), rural residence was associated with increased rates of perforated appendicitis, higher frequency of negative appendectomy, and increased length of stay after appendectomy. In orthopedic surgery (one study), rurality was associated with decreased post-operative satisfaction. No evidence for disparate outcomes based upon distance or rurality was identified in neurosurgery (one study).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial evidence suggests that geographic barriers impact the receipt of surgical care among children, particularly with regard to transplantation, congenital cardiac surgery, and appendicitis.

Center Variability in Acute Rejection and Biliary Complications After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Transplant center performance and practice variation for pediatric post-liver transplantation (LT) outcomes other than survival are understudied. This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric LT recipients who received transplants between January 1, 2006, and May 31, 2017, using United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data that were merged with the Pediatric Health Information System database. Center effects for the acute rejection rate at 1 year after LT (AR1) using UNOS coding and the biliary complication rate at 1 year after LT (BC1) using inpatient billing claims data were estimated by center-specific rescaled odds ratios that accounted for potential differences in recipient and donor characteristics. There were 2216 pediatric LT recipients at 24 freestanding children's hospitals in the United States during the study period. The median unadjusted center rate of AR1 was 36.92% (interquartile range [IQR], 22.36%-44.52%), whereas that of BC1 was 32.29% (IQR, 26.14%-40.44%). Accounting for recipient case mix and donor factors, 5/24 centers performed better than expected with regard to AR1, whereas 3/24 centers performed worse than expected. There was less heterogeneity across the center effects for BC1 than for AR1. There was no relationship observed between the center effects for AR1 or BC1 and center volume. Beyond recipient and allograft factors, differences in transplant center management are an important driver of center AR1 performance, and less so of BC1 performance. Further research is needed to identify the sources of variability so as to implement the most effective solutions to broadly enhance outcomes for pediatric LT recipients.