Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study

Comparison of the efficacy of sucroferric oxyhydroxide and lanthanum carbonate in the hyperphosphatemia of maintainable Hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) and lanthanum carbonate (LC) in the treatment of hemodialysis hyperphosphatemia.

METHODS

A total of 60 hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism combined with hyperphosphatemia from January 2024 to April 2024 in China Rongtong Medical & Healthcare Group Tai'an 88 Hospital were selected. All patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. One group was treated with SFOH, and the other with LC. Patients in the 2 groups were treated for 3 months continuously, and clinical outcomes, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels were compared before treatment, and at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

When compared with before treatment, the serum phosphorus levels of both groups of patients decreased significantly after 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months of treatment, with statistical significance (P < 0.01). The degree of serum phosphorus decrease in SFOH group was higher than that in LC group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the effect of serum calcium between the two groups (P > 0.05). Both groups of patients showed a significant decrease in iPTH after treatment, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01). The degree of iPTH decrease in SFOH group was more pronounced than in LC group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the serum hosphorus compliance rates of SFOH group and LC Group were 80% and 53.3%, respectively, and the difference in effective rates between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SFOH was superior to LC in lowering patients' blood phosphorus and iPTH levels in patients with maintenance hemodialysis hyperphosphatemia combined with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Health Economic Benefits of Introducing Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide in the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease under Dialysis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Hyperphosphatemia is an electrolyte disorder highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD) that usually requires treatment with oral phosphate binders (PBs). Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) is a calcium-free, iron-based PB indicated for the control of serum phosphorus. In the real-world setting, SO has shown clinical effectiveness with a lower pill burden and has also been associated with reduced hospital admission rates. This study aims to assess the potential economic benefits resulting from the introduction of SO to the health-care setting of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). An economic analysis using data from a retrospective real-world study that compared HD patients with uninterrupted SO prescriptions with patients who discontinued SO and switched to other PBs (oPBs). Annual drug costs for the estimated PB-eligible population in KSA were quantified. Costs per responder were estimated for all treatments. Hospital admissions' incidence rates were converted into annual inpatient cost savings and were deducted from drug costs to estimate the annual economic effect of SO versus oPBs. Sensitivity and breakeven analyses were also conducted. The eligible population for PB therapy in KSA was estimated at n = 14,748. Treating therapy-eligible populations exclusively with SO was estimated to generate annual inpatient cost-savings of SAR 107.4-119.4 million compared to treating the population with oPBs. The estimated economic effect signified overall annual savings ranging from SAR 82.8 to SAR 94.8 million when the population is treated with SO. Sensitivity analyses showed persistent cost savings. The estimated benefit-cost ratios showed that for every SAR 1 spent on SO, the expected return on investment was SAR 4.4-4.9. SO is an effective therapy that may result in substantial cost savings from reducing hospital admission costs that are attributable to hyperphosphatemia among HD patients.

A real-world analysis of the influence of age on maintenance hemodialysis patients: managing serum phosphorus with sucroferric oxyhydroxide as part of routine clinical care

OBJECTIVE

Despite the growing number of elderly hemodialysis patients, the influence of age on nutritional parameters, serum phosphorus (sP), and use of phosphate-binder (PB) medications has not been well characterized. We aimed to describe age-related differences in patient characteristics in a large, real-world cohort of maintenance hemodialysis patients, and to examine the impact of age on sP management with sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed de-identified data from 2017 adult, in-center hemodialysis patients who switched from another PB to SO monotherapy as part of routine clinical care. Changes in baseline PB pill burden, sP levels, and nutritional and dialytic clearance parameters were assessed across varying age groups through 6 months.

RESULTS

At baseline, older patients had lower mean sP, serum albumin, and pre-dialysis weights compared with younger patients. Prescription of SO was associated with a 62% increase in the proportion of patients achieving sP ≤ 5.5 mg/dl and a 42% reduction in daily pill burden. The proportion of patients achieving sP ≤ 5.5 mg/dl after transitioning to SO increased by 113, 96, 68, 77, 61, 37 and 40% among those aged 19-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥ 80 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients had worse nutritional parameters, lower pill burden, and lower sP at baseline versus younger counterparts. Prescription of SO was associated with improved sP control and reduced pill burden across all ages.

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide for hyperphosphatemia: a review of real-world evidence

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in dialysis-dependent patients with chronic kidney disease. Most dialysis-dependent patients need oral phosphate binder therapy to control serum phosphorus concentrations. Most phosphate binders have a high daily pill burden, which may reduce treatment adherence and impair phosphorus control. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is a potent iron-based phosphate binder approved for use in dialysis-dependent patients in 2013. A randomized controlled trial of sucroferric oxyhydroxide demonstrated its efficacy for reduction of serum phosphorus with a lower pill burden than sevelamer carbonate. Clinical trials carefully select patients, monitor adherence, and routinely titrate medications to a protocol-defined goal. Consequently, trials may not reflect real-world use of medications. Since its approval, we and others have performed retrospective and prospective analyses of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in real-world clinical practice in > 6400 hemodialysis and approximately 500 peritoneal dialysis patients in the USA and Europe. Consistent with the clinical trial data, real-world observational studies have demonstrated that sucroferric oxyhydroxide can effectively reduce serum phosphorus with a lower daily pill burden than most other phosphate binders. These studies have also shown sucroferric oxyhydroxide provides effective serum phosphorus control in different treatment settings, including as monotherapy in phosphate binder-naïve patients, in patients switching from other phosphate binders, or when used in combination with other phosphate binders. These observational studies indicate a favorable safety and tolerability profile, and minimal, if any, systemic iron absorption. This article reviews the key results from these observational studies of sucroferric oxyhydroxide and evaluates its role in the management of hyperphosphatemia in clinical practice.

A safety evaluation of sucroferric oxyhydroxide for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication as chronic kidney disease (CKD) progresses and most patients undergoing dialysis are prescribed oral phosphate binder therapy to control serum phosphate concentrations. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is an iron-based phosphate binder approved for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients on dialysis.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews key safety and effectiveness data for sucroferric oxyhydroxide from both prospective clinical trials and real-world observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide potently binds dietary phosphate in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, resulting in effective reduction of serum phosphate concentrations with a relatively low daily pill burden. Data from clinical trials and real-world observational studies show sucroferric oxyhydroxide has a favorable safety and tolerability profile. The most frequent side effects observed with sucroferric oxyhydroxide are GI-related, mainly discolored (black) stools and mild or moderate transient diarrhea, both of which are manageable. There is minimal systemic iron absorption from sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and therefore the drug is associated with a low risk of iron accumulation. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide also displays low potential for drug-drug interactions with other commonly prescribed oral medications. Overall, sucroferric oxyhydroxide offers an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the management of hyperphosphatemia.

Multidisciplinary Perspectives of Current Approaches and Clinical Gaps in the Management of Hyperphosphatemia

Population-based studies have shown that most patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) do not have optimal phosphate levels. Meta-analyses suggest that there is a morbidity and mortality benefit associated with the lowering of serum phosphate levels. However, to date there is no conclusive evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that lowering serum phosphate levels reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality. However, hyperphosphatemia may pose a risk to patients and treatment should be considered. We therefore sought to conduct a multidisciplinary review to help guide clinical decision-making pending results of ongoing RCTs. Restricting dietary phosphate intake is frequently the first step in the management of hyperphosphatemia. Important considerations when proposing dietary restriction include the patient's socioeconomic status, lifestyle, dietary preferences, comorbidities, and nutritional status. While dietary phosphate restriction may be a valid strategy in certain patients, serum phosphate reductions achieved solely by limiting dietary intake are modest and should be considered in conjunction with other interventions. Conventional dialysis is also typically insufficient; however phosphate removal may be augmented by increased frequency or duration of dialysis, or through enhanced methods such as hemodiafiltration. Phosphate binders have been shown to reduce absorption of dietary phosphate and lower serum phosphate levels. There are several phosphate binders available, and while they all lower phosphate levels to variable degrees, they differ with respect to their pill burden, potential to induce or exacerbate vascular calcification or ectopic calcification, tissue accumulation, safety, and tolerability. The widespread treatment of hyperphosphatemia requires convincing data from RCTs to ascertain whether lowering serum phosphate levels improves patient-important outcomes, as well as the optimal method and degree of phosphate control. In the interim, the decision and approach used to treat hyperphosphatemia should be based on the best available data, as well as patient needs and clinical judgment.

Do we need new phosphate binders in dialysis?

Patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greater risk of mortality than the general population. Fatal cardiovascular events are the most frequent cause of death in CKD patients, especially in the late stages of disease. Derangement of mineral metabolism and hyperphosphataemia are currently accepted as pivotal triggers of these vascular complications. Phosphate binders represent the common strategy to counteract hyperphosphataemia in dialysis patients. Several studies have reported a reduction in mortality risk in dialysis patients receiving phosphate binders compared with untreated patients, independent of the class of binder prescribed.

Estimating hospital inpatient cost-savings with sucroferric oxyhydroxide in patients on chronic hemodialysis in five European countries: a cost analysis

AIMS

Hyperphosphatemia is common among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis. The iron-based phosphate binder (PB), sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO), has a low daily pill burden and is indicated for the control of serum phosphorus in these patients. In a retrospective database study, hemodialysis patients switched to long-term SO therapy had fewer hospitalizations compared with patients switched to other PB therapies. This economic analysis aimed to quantify potential cost-savings of reduced hospitalizations associated with SO for healthcare systems in five European countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All-cause hospital admissions incidence data were sourced from a real-world retrospective database study comparing adult, in-center hemodialysis patients maintained on 2 years of SO therapy (mSO) versus patients who discontinued SO (dSO) within 90 days of their first prescription and switched to other PBs. A literature search was conducted to determine the cost per hospital admission for dialysis patients in the healthcare setting of each European country. A cost-model combined the incidence rate of all-cause hospital admissions and the cost per admission to estimate the country-specific inpatient costs for the mSO and dSO groups.

RESULTS

Annual inpatient cost-savings per patient in the mSO group versus the dSO group were €1,201, €2,097, €2,059, €1,512, and €3,068 in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK, respectively. When annual PB drug costs per patient were considered, the net annual economic cost-savings per patient were €327, €1,585, €1,022, €1,100, and €2,204, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Hospital admissions data used in the analysis were observational in nature and derived from a US hemodialysis patient population; the effect of SO therapy on hospitalization rates for US and European hemodialysis patients may differ. The analysis did not consider indirect healthcare costs associated with hospitalizations.

CONCLUSION

SO therapy may offer substantial inpatient cost-savings by reducing all-cause hospital admissions attributable to uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia.