Estimated GFR Accuracy When Cystatin C and Creatinine-Based Estimates Are Discrepant in Older Adults

Albuminuria as a diagnostic criterion and a therapeutic target in heart failure and other cardiovascular disease

The high disease burden and bidirectional relationship of chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure (HF) and other cardiovascular disease (CVD) necessitate the need for early diagnosis of these diseases. While current screening and detection methods are recommended by CKD and CVD guidelines, their adoption in practice is low. Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) is recognized as a diagnostic marker for CKD and a prognostic marker for CKD progression, HF and CVD outcomes, therefore albuminuria changes have been accepted as a surrogate outcome for kidney and cardiovascular endpoints. Furthermore, clinical trials investigating guideline-directed medical therapies have shown that uACR reductions are accompanied by risk reductions for cardiovascular, HF and other CKD outcomes. However, uACR is not routinely measured in patients at risk of kidney and heart disease, and its utility for detection, risk stratification and prediction models may not be fully appreciated in routine clinical practice. This review will discuss the effectiveness and implications of uACR screening as a method for heart and kidney disease diagnosis and risk assessment.

Discordant Results Between Creatinine- and Cystatin C-based Equations for Estimating GFR

Introduction

Discordant results between cystatin C and creatinine in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are an important medical issue. However, the equation that should be used when GFR estimates are discordant remains unclear.

Methods

This cross-sectional analysis included 15,485 participants with GFR measured by the clearance of an exogenous marker, serum creatinine, and cystatin C. We studied the proportion of discordant results defined as an absolute (> 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2) or relative (> 20%) difference between creatinine-based estimated GFR (eGFR, eGFRcrea) and cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFRcys) using different equations (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI], European Kidney Function Consortium [EKFC], and reexpressed Lund-Malmö [r-LMR]). We also researched for the best estimating equations to be used in subjects with concordant or discordant results to estimate measured GFR (mGFR).

Results

In the total cohort, the proportion of subjects with discordant results (absolute or relative) was larger for CKD-EPI (35.1 and 40.6%) than for EKFC (21.9 and 31.7%) or r-LMR (22.8 and 32.8%) equations. Among discrepant results, the proportion of eGFRcys < eGFRcrea was significantly higher than the proportion of eGFRcrea < eGFRcys for the CKD-EPI equations, whereas the occurrence of discrepancy was similar in the 2 discrepant groups for EKFC or r-LMR. For the EKFC and r-LMR equations, but not for the CKD-EPI, the equation combining creatinine and cystatin C was consistently the closest to the mGFR in the discrepant groups.

Conclusion

Based on the lower discrepancy proportion, better balance between eGFRcrea and eGFRcys, and better concordance with mGFR, the EKFC, and r-LMR equations should be preferred over the CKD-EPI to estimate GFR.

Population-based reference values for kidney function and kidney function decline in 25- to 95-year-old Germans without and with diabetes

Understanding normal aging of kidney function is pivotal to help distinguish individuals at particular risk for chronic kidney disease. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is typically estimated via serum creatinine (eGFRcrea) or cystatin C (eGFRcys). Since population-based age-group-specific reference values for eGFR and eGFR-decline are scarce, we aimed to provide such reference values from population-based data of a wide age range. In four German population-based cohorts (KORA-3, KORA-4, AugUR, DIACORE), participants underwent medical exams, interview, and blood draw up to five times within up to 25 years. We analyzed eGFRcrea and eGFRcys cross-sectionally and longitudinally (12,000 individuals, age 25-95 years). Cross-sectionally, we found age-group-specific eGFRcrea to decrease approximately linearly across the full age range, for eGFRcys up to the age of 60 years. Within age-groups, there was little difference by sex or diabetes status. Longitudinally, linear mixed models estimated an annual eGFRcrea decline of -0.80 [95% confidence interval -0.82, -0.77], -0.79 [-0.83, -0.76], and -1.20 mL/min/1.73m2 [-1.33, -1.08] for the general population, "healthy" individuals, or individuals with diabetes, respectively. Reference values for eGFR using cross-sectional data were shown as percentile curves for "healthy" individuals and for individuals with diabetes. Reference values for eGFR-decline using longitudinal data were presented as 95% prediction intervals for "healthy" individuals and for individuals with diabetes, obesity, and/or albuminuria. Thus, our results can help clinicians to judge eGFR values in individuals seen in clinical practice according to their age and to understand the expected range of annual eGFR-decline based on their risk profile.

Large Discordance between Creatinine-Based and Cystatin C-Based eGFRs is Associated with Falls, Hospitalizations, and Death in Older Adults

Key Points

A large eGFR discordance (i.e ., cystatin C–based eGFR >30% lower than creatinine-based eGFR) is common in older adults and increased with age. A large eGFR discordance was associated with increased risk of falls, hospitalization, and death, independent of kidney function. There are multiple ways to measure differences in creatinine and cystatin C; all produce similar associations with aging-related adverse outcomes.

Background

eGFR calculated using creatinine and cystatin C often differ in older adults. We hypothesized that older adults with cystatin C–based eGFR (eGFRcys) values significantly lower than creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr) values may have higher risk of aging-related adverse outcomes, independent of kidney function.

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of adults 65 years and older from the Health and Retirement Study, a cohort of older American adults, to determine the relationship between eGFR discordance and aging-related adverse outcomes. We calculated eGFRcr and eGFRcys using baseline creatinine and cystatin C measurements. A large eGFR discordance was defined as eGFRcys >30% lower than eGFRcr. We assessed four aging-related adverse outcomes over a 2-year follow-up: falls, hip fractures, hospitalizations, and death. We fit separate multivariable regression models to determine the association between having a large eGFR discordance and each outcome adjusting for confounders, including kidney function.

Results

Of 5574 older adults, 1683 (30%) had a large eGFR discordance. Those with a large eGFR discordance were more likely to be older, female, and White. The prevalence of a large eGFR discordance increased with age, from 20% among those 65–69 years to 44% among those 80 years and older. Over a 2-year follow-up, there were 305 deaths (5.5%), 2013 falls (39.2%), 69 hip fractures (1.3%), and 1649 hospitalizations (32.2%). In adjusted analyses, large eGFR discordance was associated with a higher hazard ratio for death (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.82) and significantly higher odds of falls (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.51) and hospitalizations (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.51). A large eGFR discordance was not associated with hip fractures.

Conclusions

In a large, nationally representative cohort of older adults, prevalence of eGFR discordance increased with age and was associated with higher risk of falls, hospitalization, and death, independent of kidney function.

Discovery of genomic and transcriptomic pleiotropy between kidney function and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products using correlated meta-analyses: The Long Life Family Study

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have increased oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, which may escalate the production of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). High soluble receptor for AGE (sRAGE) and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels are associated with CKD and aging. We evaluated whether eGFR calculated from creatinine and cystatin C share pleiotropic genetic factors with sRAGE. We employed whole-genome sequencing and correlated meta-analyses on combined genome-wide association study (GWAS) p-values in 4182 individuals (age range: 24-110) from the Long Life Family Study (LLFS). We also conducted transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) on whole blood in a subset of 1209 individuals. We identified 59 pleiotropic GWAS loci (p < 5 × 10-8) and 17 TWAS genes (Bonferroni-p < 2.73 × 10-6) for eGFR traits and sRAGE. TWAS genes, LSP1 and MIR23AHG, were associated with eGFR and sRAGE located within GWAS loci, lncRNA-KCNQ1OT1 and CACNA1A/CCDC130, respectively. GWAS variants were eQTLs in the kidney glomeruli and tubules, and GWAS genes predicted kidney carcinoma. TWAS genes harbored eQTLs in the kidney, predicted kidney carcinoma, and connected enhancer-promoter variants with kidney function-related phenotypes at p < 5 × 10-8. Additionally, higher allele frequencies of protective variants for eGFR traits were detected in LLFS than in ALFA-Europeans and TOPMed, suggesting better kidney function in healthy-aging LLFS than in general populations. Integrating genomic annotation and transcriptional gene activity revealed the enrichment of genetic elements in kidney function and aging-related processes. The identified pleiotropic loci and gene expressions for eGFR and sRAGE suggest their underlying shared genetic effects and highlight their roles in kidney- and aging-related signaling pathways.

Biomarkers of chronic kidney disease in older individuals: navigating complexity in diagnosis

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in older individuals is a matter of growing concern in the field of public health across the globe. Indeed, prevalence of kidney function impairment increases with advancing age and is often exacerbated by age-induced modifications of kidney function, presence of chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disorders, and increased burden related to frailty, cognitive impairment and sarcopenia. Accurate assessment of CKD in older individuals is crucial for timely intervention and management and relies heavily on biomarkers for disease diagnosis and monitoring. However, the interpretation of these biomarkers in older patients may be complex due to interplays between CKD, aging, chronic diseases and geriatric syndromes. Biomarkers such as serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and albuminuria can be significantly altered by systemic inflammation, metabolic changes, and medication use commonly seen in this population. To overcome the limitations of traditional biomarkers, several innovative proteins have been investigated as potential, in this review we aimed at consolidating the existing data concerning the geriatric aspects of CKD, describing the challenges and considerations in using traditional and innovative biomarkers to assess CKD in older patients, highlighting the need for integration of the clinical context to improve biomarkers' accuracy.

Diagnostic standard: assessing glomerular filtration rate

Creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is imprecise at individual level, due to non-GFR-related serum creatinine determinants, including atypical muscle mass. Cystatin C has the advantage of being independent of muscle mass, a feature that led to the development of race- and sex-free equations. Yet, cystatin C-based equations do not perform better than creatinine-based equations for estimating GFR unless both variables are included together. The new race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation had slight opposite biases between Black and non-Black subjects in the USA, but has poorer performance than that the previous version in European populations. The European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation developed in 2021 can be used in both children and adults, is more accurate in young and old adults, and is applicable to non-white European populations, by rescaling the Q factor, i.e. population median creatinine, in a potentially universal way. A sex- and race-free cystatin C-based EKFC, with the same mathematical design, has also be defined. New developments in the field of GFR estimation would be standardization of cystatin C assays, development of creatinine-based eGFR equations that incorporate muscle mass data, implementation of new endogenous biomarkers and the use of artificial intelligence. Standardization of different GFR measurement methods would also be a future challenge, as well as new technologies for measuring GFR. Future research is also needed into discrepancies between cystatin C and creatinine, which is associated with high risk of adverse events: we need to standardize the definition of discrepancy and understand its determinants.

Cystatin C should be routinely available for estimating kidney function

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this report, we summarize why the availability of cystatin C is important across a variety of clinical scenarios, the recent literature on when, why and in whom cystatin C testing should be considered, and how nephrologists can take practical steps to incorporate cystatin C testing into their practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large intra-individual discrepancies between estimated glomerular filtration rate by creatinine (eGFRcr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate by creatinine eGFRcys (known as eGFRdiff) are observed in at least 1 in 4 people. These differences are seen more commonly among more vulnerable individuals: older adults, females, non-White individuals and those living with multiple medical conditions. A large eGFRdiff, where eGFRcys is lower than eGFRcr, is associated with a plethora of adverse outcomes, including medication-associated adverse events, acute kidney injury, cardiovascular disease, kidney failure and all-cause mortality. Among studies that have measured GFR, eGFRcr-cys usually provides the most accurate estimation of kidney function compared to mGFR, including among participants with large discrepancies between eGFRcr and eGFRcys.

SUMMARY

Cystatin C improves sensitivity and specificity of chronic kidney disease diagnosis, improves detection of harmful acute and chronic changes in kidney function, improves precision of treatment eligibility and safety, and may reduce healthcare inequalities. Better education, curiosity, and motivation among nephrologists could substantially improve the availability and utilization of cystatin C.

Cystatin C- and Creatinine-based Estimated GFR Differences: Prevalence and Predictors in the UK Biobank

Rationale & Objective

Large differences between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on cystatin C (eGFRcys) and creatinine (eGFRcr) occur commonly. A comprehensive evaluation of factors that contribute to these differences is needed to guide the interpretation of discrepant eGFR values.

Study Design

Cohort study.

Setting & Participants

468,969 participants in the UK Biobank.

Exposures

Candidate sociodemographic, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, medication usage, and physical and laboratory predictors.

Outcomes

eGFRdiff, defined as eGFRcys minus eGFRcr, categorized into 3 levels: lower eGFRcys (eGFRdiff, less than -15 mL/min/1.73 m2), concordant eGFRcys and eGFRcr (eGFRdiff, -15 to < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2), and lower eGFRcr (eGFRdiff, ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Analytical Approach

Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of lower eGFRcys or lower eGFRcr. We developed 2 prediction models comprising 375,175 participants: (1) a clinical model using clinically available variables and (2) an enriched model additionally including lifestyle variables. The models were internally validated in an additional 93,794 participants.

Results

Mean ± standard deviation of eGFRcys was 88 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2, and eGFRcr was 95 ± 13 mL/min/1.73 m2; 25% and 5% of participants were in the lower eGFRcys and lower eGFRcr groups, respectively. In the multivariable enriched model, strong predictors of lower eGFRcys were older age, male sex, South Asian ethnicity, current smoker (vs never smoker), history of thyroid dysfunction, chronic inflammatory disease, steroid use, higher waist circumference and body fat, and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio >300 mg/g. Odds ratio estimates for these predictors were largely inverse of those in the lower eGFRcr group. The model's area under the curve was 0.75 in the validation set, with good calibration (1.00).

Limitations

Limited generalizability.

Conclusions

This study highlights the multitude of demographic, lifestyle, and health characteristics that are associated with large eGFRdiff. The clinical model may identify individuals who are likely to have discrepant eGFR values and thus should be prioritized for cystatin C testing.

Discovery of genomic and transcriptomic pleiotropy between kidney function and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products using correlated meta-analyses: The Long Life Family Study (LLFS)

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have increased oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, which may escalate the production of advanced glycation end-products (AGE). High soluble receptor for AGE (sRAGE) and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels are associated with CKD and aging. We evaluated whether eGFR calculated from creatinine and cystatin C share pleiotropic genetic factors with sRAGE. We employed whole-genome sequencing and correlated meta-analyses on combined genomewide association study (GWAS) p -values in 4,182 individuals (age range: 24-110) from the Long Life Family Study (LLFS). We also conducted transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) on whole blood in a subset of 1,209 individuals. We identified 59 pleiotropic GWAS loci ( p <5×10 -8 ) and 17 TWAS genes (Bonferroni- p <2.73×10 -6 ) for eGFR traits and sRAGE. TWAS genes, LSP1 and MIR23AHG , were associated with eGFR and sRAGE located within GWAS loci, lncRNA- KCNQ1OT1 and CACNA1A/CCDC130 , respectively. GWAS variants were eQTLs in the kidney glomeruli and tubules, and GWAS genes predicted kidney carcinoma. TWAS genes harbored eQTLs in the kidney, predicted kidney carcinoma, and connected enhancer-promoter variants with kidney function-related phenotypes at p <5×10 -8 . Additionally, higher allele frequencies of protective variants for eGFR traits were detected in LLFS than in ALFA-Europeans and TOPMed, suggesting better kidney function in healthy-aging LLFS than in general populations. Integrating genomic annotation and transcriptional gene activity revealed the enrichment of genetic elements in kidney function and kidney diseases. The identified pleiotropic loci and gene expressions for eGFR and sRAGE suggest their underlying shared genetic effects and highlight their roles in kidney- and aging-related signaling pathways.

Discordance Between Creatinine-Based and Cystatin C-Based Estimated GFR: Interpretation According to Performance Compared to Measured GFR

Rationale & Objective

Use of cystatin C in addition to creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate (estimated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C [eGFRcys] and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on creatinine [eGFRcr], respectively) is increasing. When eGFRcr and eGFRcys are discordant, it is not known which is more accurate, leading to uncertainty in clinical decision making.

Study Design

Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting & Participants

Four thousand fifty participants with measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) from 12 studies in North America and Europe.

Exposures

Serum creatinine and serum cystatin C.

Outcomes

Performance of creatinine-based and cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate estimating equations compared to mGFR.

Analytical Approach

We evaluated the accuracy of eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and the combination (eGFRcr-cys) compared to mGFR according to the magnitude of the difference between eGFRcr and eGFRcys (eGFRdiff). We used CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate. eGFRdiff was defined as eGFRcys minus eGFRcr and categorized as less than -15, -15 to <15, and ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (negative, concordant, and positive groups, respectively). We compared bias (median of mGFR minus eGFR) and the percentage of eGFR within 30% of mGFR.

Results

Thirty percent of participants had discordant eGFRdiff (21.0% and 9.6% negative and positive eGFRdiffs, respectively). In the concordant eGFRdiff group, all equations displayed similar accuracy. In the negative eGFRdiff groups, eGFRcr had a large overestimation of mGFR (-13.4 [-14.5 to -12.2] mL/min/1.73 m2) and eGFRcys had a large underestimation (9.9 [9.1-11.2] mL/min/1.73m2), with opposite results in the positive eGFRdiff group. In both negative and positive eGFRdiff groups, eGFRcr-cys was more accurate than either eGFRcr or eGFRcys. These results were largely consistent across age, sex, race, and body mass index.

Limitations

Few participants with major comorbid conditions.

Conclusions

Discordant eGFRcr and eGFRcys are common. eGFR using the combination of creatinine and cystatin C provides the most accurate estimates among persons with discordant eGFRcr or eGFRcys.