The Growing Need for Ophthalmic Data Standardization

The March to Harmonized Imaging Standards for Retinal Imaging

The adoption of standardized imaging protocols in retinal imaging is critical to overcoming challenges posed by fragmented data formats across devices and manufacturers. The lack of standardization hinders clinical interoperability, collaborative research, and the development of artificial intelligence (AI) models that depend on large, high-quality datasets. The Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard offers a robust solution for ensuring interoperability in medical imaging. Although DICOM is widely utilized in radiology and cardiology, its adoption in ophthalmology remains limited. Retinal imaging modalities such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus photography, and OCT angiography (OCTA) have revolutionized retinal disease management but are constrained by proprietary and non-standardized formats. This review underscores the necessity for harmonized imaging standards in ophthalmology, detailing DICOM standards for retinal imaging including ophthalmic photography (OP), OCT, and OCTA, and their requisite metadata information. Additionally, the potential of DICOM standardization for advancing AI applications in ophthalmology is explored. A notable example is the Artificial Intelligence Ready and Equitable Atlas for Diabetes Insights (AI-READI) dataset, the first publicly available standards-compliant DICOM retinal imaging dataset. This dataset encompasses diverse retinal imaging modalities, including color fundus photography, infrared, autofluorescence, OCT, and OCTA. By leveraging multimodal retinal imaging, AI-READI provides a transformative resource for studying diabetes and its complications, setting a blueprint for future datasets aimed at harmonizing imaging formats and enabling AI-driven breakthroughs in ophthalmology. Our manuscript also addresses challenges in retinal imaging for diabetic patients, retinal imaging-based AI applications for studying diabetes, and potential advancements in retinal imaging standardization.

Insights from the First Five Years of the Prospective Ocular Tumor Study

PURPOSE

Standardized data collection is needed to improve research for rare diseases. In this manuscript, we describe our experience establishing the Prospective Ocular Tumor Study (POTS).

METHODS

The ongoing POTS captures all patients with an ocular tumor seen on the Ocular Oncology Service at Mayo Clinic Rochester and collects patient demographics, tumor features, treatment, and outcomes. This manuscript reports data collected from July 2019-July 2024.

RESULTS

During a 5-year time period, 1,766 patients enrolled in the database, with 975 (55%) females, 1,732 (98%) white race, and mean age 61.5 years. The most frequent tumor types were choroidal melanoma (n = 610 [34%]), choroidal nevus (n = 575 [32%]), iris nevus (n = 95 [5.3%]), iris melanoma (n = 46 [2.6%]), and vitreoretinal lymphoma (n = 46 [2.6%]).

CONCLUSION

The POTS is a valuable source of detailed, longitudinal data on rare ocular tumors. Expanding standardized data collection across multiple centers will facilitate improved outcomes research in ocular oncology.

Global review of publicly available image datasets for the anterior segment of the eye

This study comprehensively reviewed publicly available image datasets for the anterior segment, with a focus on cataract, refractive, and corneal surgeries. The goal was to assess characteristics of existing datasets and identify areas for improvement. PubMED and Google searches were performed using the search terms "refractive surgery," "anterior segment," "cornea," "corneal," "cataract" AND "database," with the related word of "imaging." Results of each of these searches were collated, identifying 26 publicly available anterior segment image datasets. Imaging modalities included optical coherence tomography, photography, and confocal microscopy. Most datasets were small, 80% originated in the U.S., China, or Europe. Over 50% of images were from normal eyes. Disease states represented included keratoconus, corneal ulcers, and Fuchs dystrophy. Most of the datasets were incompletely described. To promote accessibility going forward to 2030, the ESCRS Digital Health Special Interest Group will annually update a list of available image datasets for anterior segment at www.escrs.org .

Exploring Publicly Accessible Optical Coherence Tomography Datasets: A Comprehensive Overview

Artificial intelligence has transformed medical diagnostic capabilities, particularly through medical image analysis. AI algorithms perform well in detecting abnormalities with a strong performance, enabling computer-aided diagnosis by analyzing the extensive amounts of patient data. The data serve as a foundation upon which algorithms learn and make predictions. Thus, the importance of data cannot be underestimated, and clinically corresponding datasets are required. Many researchers face a lack of medical data due to limited access, privacy concerns, or the absence of available annotations. One of the most widely used diagnostic tools in ophthalmology is Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Addressing the data availability issue is crucial for enhancing AI applications in the field of OCT diagnostics. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of all publicly accessible retinal OCT datasets. Our main objective is to compile a list of OCT datasets and their properties, which can serve as an accessible reference, facilitating data curation for medical image analysis tasks. For this review, we searched through the Zenodo repository, Mendeley Data repository, MEDLINE database, and Google Dataset search engine. We systematically evaluated all the identified datasets and found 23 open-access datasets containing OCT images, which significantly vary in terms of size, scope, and ground-truth labels. Our findings indicate the need for improvement in data-sharing practices and standardized documentation. Enhancing the availability and quality of OCT datasets will support the development of AI algorithms and ultimately improve diagnostic capabilities in ophthalmology. By providing a comprehensive list of accessible OCT datasets, this review aims to facilitate better utilization and development of AI in medical image analysis.

Variations in Electronic Health Record-Based Definitions of Diabetic Retinopathy Cohorts: A Literature Review and Quantitative Analysis

Purpose

Use of the electronic health record (EHR) has motivated the need for data standardization. A gap in knowledge exists regarding variations in existing terminologies for defining diabetic retinopathy (DR) cohorts. This study aimed to review the literature and analyze variations regarding codified definitions of DR.

Design

Literature review and quantitative analysis.

Subjects

Published manuscripts.

Methods

Four graders reviewed PubMed and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed studies. Studies were included if they used codified definitions of DR (e.g., billing codes). Data elements such as author names, publication year, purpose, data set type, and DR definitions were manually extracted. Each study was reviewed by ≥ 2 authors to validate inclusion eligibility. Quantitative analyses of the codified definitions were then performed to characterize the variation between DR cohort definitions.

Main Outcome Measures

Number of studies included and numeric counts of billing codes used to define codified cohorts.

Results

In total, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. Half of the included studies used datasets based on structured EHR data (i.e., data registries, institutional EHR review), and half used claims data. All but 1 of the studies used billing codes such as the International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th edition (ICD-9 or ICD-10), either alone or in addition to another terminology for defining disease. Of the 27 included studies that used ICD-9 and the 20 studies that used ICD-10 codes, the most common codes used pertained to the full spectrum of DR severity. Diabetic retinopathy complications (e.g., vitreous hemorrhage) were also used to define some DR cohorts.

Conclusions

Substantial variations exist among codified definitions for DR cohorts within retrospective studies. Variable definitions may limit generalizability and reproducibility of retrospective studies. More work is needed to standardize disease cohorts.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.