Solution-Mediated Phase Transformation of Aripiprazole: Negating the Effect of Crystalline Forms on Dissolution and Oral Pharmacokinetics

Evaluating the Release of Different Commercial Orally Modified Niacin Formulations In Vitro

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the release profile of different modified-release oral formulations of niacin, such as immediate-release (IR) powder and tablets, timed-release (TR) caplets, extended-release (ER) capsules, and controlled-release (CR) tablets, to assure their defined release pattern and correlate this release with their matrix polymers.

SIGNIFICANCE

Niacin is used to manage hyperlipidemia by reducing cutaneous flushing and hepatotoxicity adverse events. The release profiles of different types of modified-release dosage forms depend on the types of coating materials (polymers) used in the matrix formation. Although different types of niacin formulations exist, none of the niacin dissolution profiles have been evaluated and compared in the literature.

METHODS

Four commercial orally modified-release niacin brands were collected from a local CVS pharmacy retail store, in Miami, FL, USA. The in vitro release study was conducted in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) conditions.

RESULTS

The results of the release patterns of four niacin-modified dosage forms (IR, ER, TR, and CR) were aligned with their release definitions. However, the CR dosage form did not follow an ideal release pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The release rate of niacin in vitro was pH dependent, which was confirmed by the similarity factor (f2) results. All the f2 comparison values were below 50 in both the SIF and SGF media, while all the comparisons were below the f2 values for all brands in the SIF media.

A Retrospective Analysis of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacokinetics from Administration of Long-Acting Aqueous Suspensions

Administration of long-acting injectable suspensions is an increasingly common approach to increasing patient compliance and improving therapeutic efficacy through less frequent dosing. While several long-acting suspensions have recently been marketed, parameters modulating drug absorption from suspension-based formulations are not well understood. Further, methods for predicting clinical pharmacokinetic data from preclinical studies are not well established. Together, these limitations hamper compound selection, formulation design and formulation selection through heavy reliance on iterative optimization in preclinical and clinical studies. This article identifies key parameters influencing absorption from suspension-based formulations through compilation and analysis of preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic data of seven compounds marketed as suspensions; achievable margins for predicting the clinical dose and input rate from preclinical studies as a function of the preclinical species, the clinical injection location and the intended therapeutic duration were also established.