Unmet Medical Need as a Driver for Pharmaceutical Sciences - A Survey Among Scientists

Conditional Funding Recommendations for Drugs in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Before listing by drug plans, new drugs that receive regulatory bodies' approval are assessed by the Health Technology Assessment agencies, including the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Considering the impact of CADTH recommendations on payers' listing decisions, the growing number of high-cost drugs, and conditional listings, conditional recommendations have increasingly been of interest to the users of CADTH recommendations. This study aims to review the conditional reimbursement recommendations issued by CADTH and explores the reasons for those recommendations.

METHODS

All final drug reimbursement recommendations posted on the CADTH website since 1 January, 2003 were reviewed. Recommendations were included if accepted for review by 1 May, 2021 and completed before 1 January, 2022. The complete records excluding 'requests for advice' were categorized into 'reimburse,' 'do not reimburse,' and 'reimburse with criteria/condition(s)'. The identified variables were extracted and analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Of the 889 submissions, 785 (88.6%) completed recommendations were considered relevant to the study purpose. Of 750 recommendations, excluding 35 (4.5%) 'requests for advice,' 500 (66.6%) were 'reimburse with criteria/condition(s)'. 'Clinical criteria' at 481 (96.2%), 'cost-effectiveness improvement to an acceptable level' at 132 (26.4%), and 'the treatment cost not to exceed the cost of the alternative option(s)' at 118 (23.6%) were the most frequently reported conditions. The most frequent reasons for conditional reimbursement were 'clinical benefit and economic evaluation' at 304 (60.8%). Of conditional recommendations, 468 (93.6%) included more than one reason.

CONCLUSIONS

CADTH has facilitated patient access to innovative drugs even with limited evidence by conditional recommendations. The clinical criteria are the cornerstone of conditional recommendations. CADTH has developed the assessment process over time.

Pharmaceutical Scientists' Perspectives on Capacity Building in Pharmaceutical Sciences

With the anticipated health challenges brought by demographic and technological changes, ensuring capacity in underlying workforce in place is essential for addressing patients' needs. Therefore, a timely identification of important drivers facilitating capacity building is important for strategic decisions and workforce planning. In 2020, internationally renowned pharmaceutical scientists (N = 92), largely from the academia and pharmaceutical industry, with mostly pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences educational background were approached (through a questionnaire) for their considerations on influencing drivers to facilitate meeting current capacity in pharmaceutical sciences research. From a global view, based on the results of the questionnaire, the top drivers were better alignment with patient needs as well as strengthening education - both through continuous learning and deeper specialisation. The study also showed that capacity building is more than simply increasing the influx of graduates. Pharmaceutical sciences are being influenced by other disciplines, and we can expect more diversity in scientific background and training. Capacity building of pharmaceutical scientists should allow flexibility for rapid change driven by the clinic and need for specialised science and it should be underpinned by lifelong learning.

A pan-serotype antiviral to prevent and treat dengue: A journey from discovery to clinical development driven by public-private partnerships

While progress has been made in fighting diseases disproportionally affecting underserved populations, unmet medical needs persist for many neglected tropical diseases. The World Health Organization has encouraged strong public-private partnerships to address this issue and several public and private organizations have set an example in the past showing a strong commitment to combat these diseases. Pharmaceutical companies are contributing in different ways to address the imbalance in research efforts. With this review, we exemplify the role of a public-private partnership in research and development by the journey of our dengue antiviral molecule that is now in early clinical development. We detail the different steps of drug development and outline the contribution of each partner to this process. Years of intensive collaboration resulted in the identification of two antiviral compounds, JNJ-A07 and JNJ-1802, the latter of which has advanced to clinical development.

Il bisogno insoddisfatto: definizioni, evidenze di letteratura e implicazioni per l’HTA

The present paper illustrates the definition of unmet need provided by the peer-reviewed literature and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) authorities across Europe in the assessment and appraisal process and within the early access schemes for medicines.

The analysis relied on a descriptive review of the peer-reviewed literature and HTA documents on the definition of need (disease severity) and the way it is satisfied (existence and validity of alternatives).

HTA agencies were found using (i) a narrow definition of need, focused on the clinical impact and the impact on health-related quality of life of the disease and (ii) a broad definition of comparators, including treatments used off-label in the clinical practice. Most of the contributions of the literature advocated for a broader definition of need, including additional dimensions (for example, the socio-economic impact of the disease) and the effects of existing treatments beyond their risk-benefit profile (for example, acceptability to patients).

On the one hand, these contributions should be considered by HTA agencies, considering its multi-disciplinary and multi-stakeholder nature. On the other one, the explicit inclusion of the unmet need domains, at present disregarded, should depend on the decisions taken on the ground of the assessment.

[Unmet medical need in otorhinolaryngology: A challenge for otorhinolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons]

BACKGROUND

Otorhinolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons are predestined to scientifically analyze and prioritize the medical needs in ENT medicine under the umbrella of the German Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC). This medical need assessment is important for targeting research and development of medical innovations to improve ENT patients' care with these needs and to trigger respective research and innovation funding programs at an early stage.

METHODS

This is to recommend that the DGHNO-KHC and its working groups and task forces in their specialty disciplines address the issue. The goal is a comprehensive medical need assessment for the fields of otolaryngology as well as head and neck surgery. The parameterization of medical needs is based on the unmet medical need (UMN) concept. Criteria for prioritization should follow the method of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).

RECOMMENDATION

The working groups of the DGHNO-KHC familiarize themselves with the concept of UMN. Subsequently, suggestions on ENT diseases with UMN in diagnostics and therapy will be collected considering the medical evidence. The suggestions are evaluated in a standardized way according to MCDA and a ranking is established. The results will be published and used to make research funding institutions aware of UMN in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery.

DISCUSSION

The work will contribute to the further development of the UMN concept and will also be able to provide a basis to investigate the evidence of the concept to define the UMN. Through this work, the DGHNO-KHC will be perceived as an important scientific player for the development of need-driven medical innovations in Germany.

Meeting the Need for a Discussion of Unmet Medical Need

As Europe and the world continue to battle against COVID, the customary complacency of society over future threats is clearly on display. Just 30 months ago, such a massive disruption to global lives, livelihoods and quality of life seemed unimaginable. Some remedial European Union action is now emerging, and more is proposed, including in relation to tackling “unmet medical need” (UMN). This initiative—directing attention to the future of treating disease and contemplating incentives to stimulate research and development—is welcome in principle. But the current approach being considered by EU officials merits further discussion, because it may prove counter-productive, impeding rather than promoting innovation. This paper aims to feed into these ongoing policy discussions, and rather than presenting research in the classical sense, it discusses the key elements from a multistakeholder perspective. Its central concern is over the risk that the envisaged support will fail to generate valuable new treatments if the legislation is phrased in a rigidly linear manner that does not reflect the serpentine realities of the innovation process, or if the definition placed on unmet medical need is too restrictive. It cautions that such an approach presumes that “unmet need” can be precisely and comprehensively defined in advance on the basis of the past. It cautions that such an approach can reinforce the comfortable delusion that the future is totally predictable—the delusion that left the world as easy prey to COVID. Instead, the paper urges reflection on how the legislation that will shortly enter the pipeline can be phrased so as to allow for the flourishing of a culture capable of rapid adaptation to the unexpected.