Reporting reproducible imaging protocols

Harmonizing the Generation and Pre-publication Stewardship of FAIR bioimage data

Together with the molecular knowledge of genes and proteins, biological images promise to significantly enhance the scientific understanding of complex cellular systems and to advance predictive and personalized therapeutic products for human health. For this potential to be realized, quality-assured bioimage data must be shared among labs at a global scale to be compared, pooled, and reanalyzed, thus unleashing untold potential beyond the original purpose for which the data was generated. There are two broad sets of requirements to enable bioimage data sharing in the life sciences. One set of requirements is articulated in the companion White Paper entitled "Enabling Global Image Data Sharing in the Life Sciences," which is published in parallel and addresses the need to build the cyberinfrastructure for sharing bioimage data (arXiv:2401.13023 [q-bio.OT], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.13023). Here, we detail a broad set of requirements, which involves collecting, managing, presenting, and propagating contextual information essential to assess the quality, understand the content, interpret the scientific implications, and reuse bioimage data in the context of the experimental details. We start by providing an overview of the main lessons learned to date through international community activities, which have recently made generating community standard practices for imaging Quality Control (QC) and metadata (Faklaris et al., 2022; Hammer et al., 2021; Huisman et al., 2021; Microscopy Australia, 2016; Montero Llopis et al., 2021; Rigano et al., 2021; Sarkans et al., 2021). We then provide a clear set of recommendations for amplifying this work. The driving goal is to address remaining challenges and democratize access to common practices and tools for a spectrum of biomedical researchers, regardless of their expertise, access to resources, and geographical location.

Autofluorescence-based tissue characterization enhances clinical prospects of light-sheet-microscopy

Light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) is a transformative imaging method that enables the visualization of non-dissected specimen in real-time 3D. Optical clearing of tissues is essential for LSFM, typically employing toxic solvents. Here, we test the applicability of a non-hazardous alternative, ethyl cinnamate (ECi). We comprehensively characterized autofluorescence (AF) spectra in diverse murine tissues-ocular globe, knee, and liver-employing LSFM under various excitation wavelengths (405-785 nm) to test the feasibility of unstained samples for diagnostic purposes, in particular regarding percutaneous biopsies, as they constitute to most harvested type of tissue sample in clinical routine. Ocular globe structures were best discerned with 640 nm excitation. Knee tissue showed complex variation in AF spectra variation influenced by tissue depth and structure. Liver exhibited a unique AF pattern, likely linked to vasculature. Hepatic tissue samples were used to demonstrate the compatibility of our protocol for antibody staining. Furthermore, we employed machine learning to augment raw images and segment liver structures based on AF spectra. Radiologists rated representative samples transferred to the clinical assessment software. Learning-generated images scored highest in quality. Additionally, we investigated an actual murine biopsy. Our study pioneers the application of AF spectra for tissue characterization and diagnostic potential of optically cleared unstained percutaneous biopsies, contributing to the clinical translation of LSFM.

Virtual staining for pixel-wise and quantitative analysis of single cell images

Immunocytochemical staining of microorganisms and cells has long been a popular method for examining their specific subcellular structures in greater detail. Recently, generative networks have emerged as an alternative to traditional immunostaining techniques. These networks infer fluorescence signatures from various imaging modalities and then virtually apply staining to the images in a digital environment. In numerous studies, virtual staining models have been trained on histopathology slides or intricate subcellular structures to enhance their accuracy and applicability. Despite the advancements in virtual staining technology, utilizing this method for quantitative analysis of microscopic images still poses a significant challenge. To address this issue, we propose a straightforward and automated approach for pixel-wise image-to-image translation. Our primary objective in this research is to leverage advanced virtual staining techniques to accurately measure the DNA fragmentation index in unstained sperm images. This not only offers a non-invasive approach to gauging sperm quality, but also paves the way for streamlined and efficient analyses without the constraints and potential biases introduced by traditional staining processes. This novel approach takes into account the limitations of conventional techniques and incorporates improvements to bolster the reliability of the virtual staining process. To further refine the results, we discuss various denoising techniques that can be employed to reduce the impact of background noise on the digital images. Additionally, we present a pixel-wise image matching algorithm designed to minimize the error caused by background noise and to prevent the introduction of bias into the analysis. By combining these approaches, we aim to develop a more effective and reliable method for quantitative analysis of virtually stained microscopic images, ultimately enhancing the study of microorganisms and cells at the subcellular level.

Prevalence and practices of immunofluorescent cell image processing: a systematic review

Background

We performed a systematic review that identified at least 9,000 scientific papers on PubMed that include immunofluorescent images of cells from the central nervous system (CNS). These CNS papers contain tens of thousands of immunofluorescent neural images supporting the findings of over 50,000 associated researchers. While many existing reviews discuss different aspects of immunofluorescent microscopy, such as image acquisition and staining protocols, few papers discuss immunofluorescent imaging from an image-processing perspective. We analyzed the literature to determine the image processing methods that were commonly published alongside the associated CNS cell, microscopy technique, and animal model, and highlight gaps in image processing documentation and reporting in the CNS research field.

Methods

We completed a comprehensive search of PubMed publications using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and other general search terms for CNS cells and common fluorescent microscopy techniques. Publications were found on PubMed using a combination of column description terms and row description terms. We manually tagged the comma-separated values file (CSV) metadata of each publication with the following categories: animal or cell model, quantified features, threshold techniques, segmentation techniques, and image processing software.

Results

Of the almost 9,000 immunofluorescent imaging papers identified in our search, only 856 explicitly include image processing information. Moreover, hundreds of the 856 papers are missing thresholding, segmentation, and morphological feature details necessary for explainable, unbiased, and reproducible results. In our assessment of the literature, we visualized current image processing practices, compiled the image processing options from the top twelve software programs, and designed a road map to enhance image processing. We determined that thresholding and segmentation methods were often left out of publications and underreported or underutilized for quantifying CNS cell research.

Discussion

Less than 10% of papers with immunofluorescent images include image processing in their methods. A few authors are implementing advanced methods in image analysis to quantify over 40 different CNS cell features, which can provide quantitative insights in CNS cell features that will advance CNS research. However, our review puts forward that image analysis methods will remain limited in rigor and reproducibility without more rigorous and detailed reporting of image processing methods.

Conclusion

Image processing is a critical part of CNS research that must be improved to increase scientific insight, explainability, reproducibility, and rigor.