1
|
Rugnath R, Orzechowicz C, Newell C, Carullo V, Rugnath A. A Literature Review: The Mechanisms and Treatment of Neuropathic Pain-A Brief Discussion. Biomedicines 2024; 12:204. [PMID: 38255308 PMCID: PMC10812949 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Classically, neuropathic pain is described as a pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory system. However, one must note that the presence of somatosensory pathology alone does not guarantee a progression to neuropathic pain. This is due, in part, to the fact that neuropathic pain is a notoriously complex disease process, involving sensitization of both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Its causes are also numerous and varied, including trauma, the compression of a nerve, autoimmune disorders, diabetes, and infections. Due to the various manifestations, causes, and symptoms of neuropathic pain, the treatment of this disease process has proved challenging for generations of physicians. This section aims to elaborate on newly proposed mechanisms for pharmacological and targeted therapies, such as neurostimulation, which aim to reduce the negative somatosensory effects of neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Anesh Rugnath
- Department and Anesthesiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (R.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cooke M, Richards J, Tjondronegoro D, Raj Chakraborty P, Jauncey-Cooke J, Andresen E, Theodoros J, Paterson R, Schults J, Raithatha B, Wilson S, Alcock M. myPainPal: Co-creation of a mHealth app for the management of chronic pain in young people. Inform Health Soc Care 2021; 46:291-305. [PMID: 33784952 DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1892697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Chronic pain is common in young people aged 10-14 years. Interdisciplinary, clinician-delivered treatments, while effective, are often criticized for failing to be readily accessible. Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) have been proposed as effective treatment adjuncts that address these challenges, while meeting the needs of tech-savvy young people. The objectives of this study were to co-create a mHealth app with consumers and health care professionals and evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the resulting mHealth app (myPainPal). A phased, qualitative approach within a consumer engagement framework was employed. Interviews with young people (n = 14), parents (n = 12) and health care professionals (n = 8) identified key health needs that formed the underlying structure of the myPainPal app. Testing showed that the app is an acceptable and feasible platform to facilitate young people's self-management of chronic pain. The myPainPal app has the potential to positively influence young people's experiences of chronic pain. Further testing in controlled settings is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Cooke
- Griffith University, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Julianne Richards
- Queensland Interdisciplinary Paediatric Persistent Pain Service (QIPPPS), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Elizabeth Andresen
- Queensland Interdisciplinary Paediatric Persistent Pain Service (QIPPPS), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joanne Theodoros
- Queensland Interdisciplinary Paediatric Persistent Pain Service (QIPPPS), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rebecca Paterson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jessica Schults
- Griffith University, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.,Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Bhavesh Raithatha
- Queensland Interdisciplinary Paediatric Persistent Pain Service (QIPPPS), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Susan Wilson
- Queensland Interdisciplinary Paediatric Persistent Pain Service (QIPPPS), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mark Alcock
- Queensland Interdisciplinary Paediatric Persistent Pain Service (QIPPPS), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Turner KM, Wilcox G, Nordstokke DW, Dick B, Schroeder M, Noel M. Executive Functioning in Youth With and Without Chronic Pain: A Comparative Analysis. Clin J Pain 2021; 37:102-117. [PMID: 33165021 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Preliminary research in youth with chronic pain suggests differences in attention and working memory, which has been similarly demonstrated in adults with chronic pain. There has been little research on other aspects of executive functioning (EF) in this population despite its critical role in problem solving, school functioning, and coping. This study aimed to examine differences in several aspects of EF between youth with chronic pain and a nonchronic pain comparison group using performance-based neuropsychological tests and a behavior rating scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants completed ratings of pain; physical, emotional, social, and school functioning; sleep quality; medication; and a general intelligence screener. Standardized neuropsychological tests were used to examine EF with a focus on working memory, divided and alternating attention, inhibition, flexibility, incidental memory, and planning. A parent-report and self-report behavior rating of EF was also administered. RESULTS Recruitment from 2 tertiary-care pain clinics resulted in a sample of 26 youth with chronic pain (80.8% girls) and their parents. A comparison group of 30 youth without chronic pain and their parents were recruited from the community. Participants with chronic pain had significantly lower scores on several performance-based tests of working memory/divided attention, inhibition, and flexibility/alternating attention than the comparison group. Statistically significant group differences were also found on behavior ratings of emotion control, shifting, task initiation and completion, working memory, planning and organization, overall emotion and cognitive regulation as well as global EF. Covariate analysis was conducted in all analyses where there were significant group differences and several observed group differences remained. DISCUSSION This study is one of few multidimensional examinations of EF in youth with chronic pain, using a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery combined with behavior ratings. Our findings suggest EF differences in youth with chronic pain, across a variety of domains and may suggest risk for specific cognitive processing weaknesses in this population. Medical and educational teams should work toward identification, treatment, and compensatory support for EF within individualized pain management for youth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kailyn M Turner
- Werklund School of Education, Educational Psychology
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Alberta Children's Hospital
| | - Gabrielle Wilcox
- Werklund School of Education, Educational Psychology
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Alberta Children's Hospital
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Calgary, AB
| | | | - Bruce Dick
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine
- Psychiatry
- Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Melanie Noel
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Alberta Children's Hospital
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Calgary, AB
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hartman ME, Williams CN, Hall TA, Bosworth CC, Piantino JA. Post-Intensive-Care Syndrome for the Pediatric Neurologist. Pediatr Neurol 2020; 108:47-53. [PMID: 32299742 PMCID: PMC7306429 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The number of children who survive critical illness has steadily increased. However, lower mortality rates have resulted in a proportional increase in post-intensive-care morbidity. Critical illness in childhood affects a child's development, cognition, and family functioning. The constellation of physical, emotional, cognitive, and psychosocial symptoms that begin in the intensive care unit and continue after discharge has recently been termed post-intensive-care syndrome. A conceptual model of the post-intensive-care syndrome experienced by children who survive critical illness, their siblings, and parents has been coined post-intensive-care syndrome in pediatrics. Owing to their prolonged hospitalizations, the use of sedative medications, and the nature of their illness, children with primary neurological injury are among those at the highest risk for post-intensive-care syndrome in pediatrics. The pediatric neurologist participates in the care of children with acute brain injury throughout their hospitalization and remains involved after the patient leaves the hospital. Hence it is important for pediatric neurologists to become versed in the early recognition and management of post-intensive-care syndrome in pediatrics. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge regarding post-intensive-care syndrome in pediatrics and its risk factors. We also discuss our experience establishing Pediatric Neurocritical Care Recovery Programs at two large academic centers. Last, we provide a battery of validated tests to identify and manage the different aspects of post-intensive-care syndrome in pediatrics, which have been successfully implemented at our institutions. Dissemination of this "road map" may assist others interested in establishing recovery programs, therefore mitigating the burden of post-intensive-care morbidity in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E. Hartman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Cydni N. Williams
- Pediatric Critical Care and Neurotrauma Recovery Program, Oregon Health & Science University,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical care, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Trevor A. Hall
- Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Christopher C. Bosworth
- Department of Psychology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Juan A. Piantino
- Pediatric Critical Care and Neurotrauma Recovery Program, Oregon Health & Science University,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McConnell B, Duffield T, Hall T, Piantino J, Seitz D, Soden D, Williams C. Post-traumatic Headache After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Association With Neurocognitive Outcomes. J Child Neurol 2020; 35:63-70. [PMID: 31581879 PMCID: PMC7308075 DOI: 10.1177/0883073819876473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Post-traumatic headache is common after pediatric traumatic brain injury and affects thousands of children every year, but little is known about how headache affects recovery after traumatic brain injury in other symptom domains. We aimed to determine the association between headache and other common symptoms after pediatric traumatic brain injury and explore whether subjective complaints of headache are associated with objective deficits on specialized neurocognitive testing. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children ages 3-19 years following traumatic brain injury with a completed Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) questionnaire. Post-traumatic headache was defined by a score more than 2 on the SCAT question for headache and define headache groups for comparison. In our cohort, we analyzed data from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II). Headache was reported in 40 (33%) patients presenting for post-traumatic brain injury care among 121 pediatric traumatic brain injury patients and did not differ by injury severity. Median total SCAT symptom score in the headache group was 5-fold higher compared to patients without headache (median 45.5 vs 9; P < .001). Significantly lower-scaled scores in color naming, matrix reasoning, letter sequencing, and letter switching were also found in the headache group (all P ≤ .03). Our study shows that headache, as reported by patients on the SCAT, is associated with higher symptom scores in all other symptom domains, including sleep, mood, sensory, and cognitive. Headache was also associated with worse objective neurocognitive measures and may identify patients who could benefit from specialized follow-up care and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake McConnell
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tyler Duffield
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Trevor Hall
- Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Juan Piantino
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Dylan Seitz
- Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Daniel Soden
- Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Cydni Williams
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Williams CN, Hartman ME, Guilliams KP, Guerriero RM, Piantino JA, Bosworth CC, Leonard SS, Bradbury K, Wagner A, Hall TA. Postintensive Care Syndrome in Pediatric Critical Care Survivors: Therapeutic Options to Improve Outcomes After Acquired Brain Injury. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2019; 21:49. [PMID: 31559490 DOI: 10.1007/s11940-019-0586-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Children surviving the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with neurologic illness or injury have long-term morbidities in physical, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning termed postintensive care syndrome (PICS). In this article, we review acute and longitudinal management strategies available to combat PICS in children with acquired brain injury. RECENT FINDINGS Few intervention studies in this vulnerable population target PICS morbidities. Small studies show promise for both inpatient- and outpatient-initiated therapies, mainly focusing on a single domain of PICS and evaluating heterogeneous populations. While evaluating the effects of interventions on longitudinal PICS outcomes is in its infancy, longitudinal clinical programs targeting PICS are increasing. A multidisciplinary team with inpatient and outpatient presence is necessary to deliver the holistic integrated care required to address all domains of PICS in patients and families. While PICS is increasingly recognized as a chronic problem in PICU survivors with acquired brain injury, few interventions have targeted PICS morbidities. Research is needed to improve physical, cognitive, emotional, and social outcomes in survivors and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cydni N Williams
- Pediatric Critical Care and Neurotrauma Recovery Program, Oregon Health and Science University, 707 SW Gaines St., CDRC-P, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Mary E Hartman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kristin P Guilliams
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Division of Pediatric and Developmental Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rejean M Guerriero
- Department of Neurology, Division of Pediatric and Developmental Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Juan A Piantino
- Pediatric Critical Care and Neurotrauma Recovery Program, Oregon Health and Science University, 707 SW Gaines St., CDRC-P, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Christopher C Bosworth
- Department of Psychology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Skyler S Leonard
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Psychology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kathryn Bradbury
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Psychology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Amanda Wagner
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Psychology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Trevor A Hall
- Pediatric Critical Care and Neurotrauma Recovery Program, Oregon Health and Science University, 707 SW Gaines St., CDRC-P, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Psychology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaiser P, Kohen DP, Brown ML, Kajander RL, Barnes AJ. Integrating Pediatric Hypnosis with Complementary Modalities: Clinical Perspectives on Personalized Treatment. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2018; 5:E108. [PMID: 30087271 PMCID: PMC6111600 DOI: 10.3390/children5080108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
While pediatric integrative medicine (PIM) emphasizes an "evidence-based practice using multiple therapeutic modalities"; paradoxically, literature reviews examining the prevalence and/or efficacy of such mind⁻body approaches often address PIM modalities separately. Such contributions are relevant, yet documentation of how to deliver combined complementary approaches in children and youth are scarce. Nevertheless, integrative practitioners in clinical practice routinely mix approaches to meet the individual needs of each patient. Best practices are flexible, and include blending and augmenting services within the same session, and/or connecting modalities sequentially for an incremental effect, and/or referring to outside resources for additional interventions. Resonating with integrative medicine's definition, this article's goal is to demonstrate paradigms that "bring together complementary approaches in a coordinated way within clinical practice" by linking clinical hypnosis, the trail-blazer modality in PIM's history, with mindfulness, biofeedback, acupuncture, and yoga. Following the consideration of the overlap of guided imagery with hypnosis and an abridged literature report, this clinical perspective considers the selection of modalities within a collaborative relationship with the child/teen and parents, emphasizing goodness-of-fit with patients' contexts, e.g., symptoms, resources, interests, goals, and developmental stage. Case vignettes illustrate practical strategies for mixing approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Kaiser
- National Pediatric Hypnosis Training Institute (NPHTI), 29 Western Terrace, Minneapolis, MN 55426, USA.
| | - Daniel P Kohen
- National Pediatric Hypnosis Training Institute (NPHTI), 29 Western Terrace, Minneapolis, MN 55426, USA.
- Partners-in-Healing, 10505 Wayzata Blvd #200, Minnetonka, MN 55305, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St SE #353, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
| | - Melanie L Brown
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St SE #353, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
- Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, 2525 Chicago Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.
| | - Rebecca L Kajander
- National Pediatric Hypnosis Training Institute (NPHTI), 29 Western Terrace, Minneapolis, MN 55426, USA.
| | - Andrew J Barnes
- National Pediatric Hypnosis Training Institute (NPHTI), 29 Western Terrace, Minneapolis, MN 55426, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St SE #353, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown ML, Rojas E, Gouda S. A Mind-Body Approach to Pediatric Pain Management. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2017; 4:E50. [PMID: 28632194 PMCID: PMC5483625 DOI: 10.3390/children4060050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Pain is a significant public health problem that affects all populations and has significant financial, physical and psychological impact. Opioid medications, once the mainstay of pain therapy across the spectrum, can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Centers for Disease and Control (CDC) guidelines recommend that non-opioid pain medications are preferred for chronic pain outside of certain indications (cancer, palliative and end of life care). Mindfulness, hypnosis, acupuncture and yoga are four examples of mind-body techniques that are often used in the adult population for pain and symptom management. In addition to providing significant pain relief, several studies have reported reduced use of opioid medications when mind-body therapies are implemented. Mind-body medicine is another approach that can be used in children with both acute and chronic pain to improve pain management and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie L Brown
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA (E.R.).
- Department of Pain, Palliative Care and Integrative Medicine, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.
| | - Enrique Rojas
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA (E.R.).
| | - Suzanne Gouda
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA (E.R.).
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Attention and Working Memory in Female Adolescents With Chronic Pain and Pain-free Female Adolescents: A Preliminary Pilot Study. Clin J Pain 2017; 32:609-16. [PMID: 27275532 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adolescents with chronic pain often report inattention and poor memory. There has been little research on cognitive function in this population. The goal of this preliminary pilot study was to examine differences in cognitive function between adolescents with chronic pain to pain-free adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS All participants completed baseline assessments of pain, school absences, depression, anxiety, and sleep habits. Standardized neurocognitive tests were used to examine cognitive function with a focus on working memory and attention. RESULTS Recruitment from the chronic pain clinic resulted in a female sample of 13 individuals (largely reflective of the clinical population). Pain-free age-matched and sex-matched individuals (n=12) were therefore also recruited as controls. Individuals with chronic pain had significantly lower working memory scores than controls. Differences were found between groups on the most difficult selective attention task and not on tests of sustained attention, divided attention, or attentional switching. In a stepwise regression with baseline characteristics entered in the first step, pain accounted for approximately 15% of the variance in working memory and medication score counted for 49% of the variance. DISCUSSION This pilot study is the first study to examine differences in working memory and attention between participants with chronic pain and pain-free adolescents. Our findings suggest that chronic pain may negatively affect adolescents' working memory function and highlights the risk for cognitive difficulties and problems with educational progression in addition to negative health and social effects associated with chronic pain. The study provides a starting point for more research and has the potential to direct better identification and treatment of these cognitive deficits.
Collapse
|
10
|
Validation and clinical application of a biopsychosocial model of pain intensity and functional disability in patients with a pediatric chronic pain condition referred to a subspecialty clinic. PAIN RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2013; 2013:143292. [PMID: 24251035 PMCID: PMC3819919 DOI: 10.1155/2013/143292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2013] [Accepted: 09/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Background. Pediatric chronic pain is considered to be a multidimensional construct that includes biological, psychological, and social components. Methods. The 99 enrolled study patients (mean age 13.2 years, 71% female, 81% Caucasian) and an accompanying parent completed a series of health-related questionnaires at the time of their initial appointment in a pediatric chronic pain medicine clinic. Results. Significant correlations (r ≥ 0.30, P < 0.05) were observed between pediatric chronic pain intensity and patient anxiety, patient depression, patient pain coping, parent chronic pain intensity, and parent functional disability. Pediatric chronic pain intensity was significantly associated with patient anxiety (P = 0.002). Significant correlations (r ≥ 0.30, P < 0.05) were observed between pediatric functional disability and patient chronic pain intensity, patient anxiety, patient depression, patient pain coping, parent chronic pain intensity, parent functional disability, parent anxiety, parent depression, and parent stress. Pediatric functional disability was significantly associated with patient chronic pain intensity (P = 0.025), patient anxiety (P = 0.021), patient pain coping (P = 0.009), and parent functional disability (P = 0.027). Conclusions. These findings provide empirical support of a multidimensional Biobehavioral Model of Pediatric Pain. However, the practical clinical application of the present findings and much of the similar previously published data may be tenuous.
Collapse
|
11
|
Patient versus parental perceptions about pain and disability in children and adolescents with a variety of chronic pain conditions. Pain Res Manag 2013; 19:7-14. [PMID: 24147272 DOI: 10.1155/2014/736053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cross-informant variance is often observed in patient self-reports versus parent proxy reports of pediatric chronic pain and disability. OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship and merit of the child versus parent perspective. METHODS A total of 99 patients (eight to 17 years of age [mean 13.2 years]; 71% female, 81% Caucasian) and parents completed the Pediatric Pain Questionnaire and Functional Disability Inventory at their initial clinic visit. Patients' and parents' pain intensity and disability scores were analyzed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Bland-Altman plot and Spearman's correlation coefficient. The association between clinical⁄demographic variables and differences in patient⁄parent pain intensity and disability scores was assessed using multivariable regression. RESULTS There was significant agreement between patients' self-reports and parents' proxy reports of their child's pain intensity (ICC=0.52; P<0.001) and disability (ICC=0.57; P=0.004) at the individual level. There were no significant group differences in patient versus parent-proxy pain intensity scores (P=0.40) and disability scores (P=0.54). The difference between patient and parent-proxy pain intensity was associated with patients' self-reported pain intensity (P<0.001). The difference between patient and parent-proxy disability was associated with patient's self-reported pain disability (P<0.001). Bland-Altman plots revealed major inter-rater variation in the Pediatric Pain Questionnaire and Functional Disability Inventory across their score ranges. A significant relationship (r=0.38; P<0.001) was observed between patients' self-reported pain intensity and disability. CONCLUSIONS While equal merit should ideally be given to pediatric chronic pain patients' self-reports and their parents' proxy reports of pain intensity and disability, it would appear that, as needed, pediatric patients or parents can offer a clinically valid, single clinical perspective.
Collapse
|
12
|
Experimental pain responses in children with chronic pain and in healthy children: how do they differ? Pain Res Manag 2012; 17:103-9. [PMID: 22518373 DOI: 10.1155/2012/592108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extant research comparing laboratory pain responses of children with chronic pain with healthy controls is mixed, with some studies indicating lower pain responsivity for controls and others showing no differences. Few studies have included different pain modalities or assessment protocols. OBJECTIVES To compare pain responses among 26 children (18 girls) with chronic pain and matched controls (mean age 14.8 years), to laboratory tasks involving thermal heat, pressure and cold pain. Responses to cold pain were assessed using two different protocols: an initial trial of unspecified duration and a second trial of specified duration. METHODS Four trials of pressure pain and of thermal heat pain stimuli, all of unspecified duration, were administered, as well as the two cold pain trials. Heart rate and blood pressure were assessed at baseline and after completion of the pain tasks. RESULTS Pain tolerance and pain intensity did not differ between children with chronic pain and controls for the unspecified trials. For the specified cold pressor trial, 92% of children with chronic pain completed the entire trial compared with only 61.5% of controls. Children with chronic pain exhibited a trend toward higher baseline and postsession heart rate and reported more anxiety and depression symptoms compared with control children. CONCLUSIONS Contextual factors related to the fixed trial may have exerted a greater influence on pain tolerance in children with chronic pain relative to controls. Children with chronic pain demonstrated a tendency toward increased arousal in anticipation of and following pain induction compared with controls.
Collapse
|