The multiple roles of caudal in early development of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus

Same rule, different genes: Blimp1 is a pair-rule gene in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus

Morphological features of organismal body plans are often highly conserved within large taxa. For example, segmentation is a shared and defining feature of all insects. Screens in Drosophila identified genes responsible for the development of body segments, including the "pair-rule" genes (PRGs), which subdivide embryos into double-segment units in a previously unexpected pre-patterning step. Here we show that the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus also uses a pair rule for embryo subdivision but Oncopeltus employs different genes for this process. We identified the gene Blimp1 as an Oncopeltus PRG based on its expression pattern, tested its function with RNA interference and CRISPR-Cas9, and generated the first PR mutant in this species. Although it does not have PR function in Drosophila, like Drosophila PRGs, Blimp1 encodes a transcription factor required for embryonic viability. Thus, pair-rule subdivision of the insect body plan is more highly conserved than the factors mediating this process, suggesting a developmental constraint on this pre-patterning step.

Early embryonic development of the German cockroach Blattella germanica

BACKGROUND

Early embryogenesis is characterized by dramatic cell proliferation and movement. In most insects, early embryogenesis includes a phase called the uniform blastoderm, during which cells evenly cover the entirety of the egg. However, the embryo of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica, like those of many insects within the super order Polyneoptera, does not have a uniform blastoderm; instead, its first cells condense rapidly at the site of a future germband. We investigated early development in this species in order to understand how early gene expression is or is not conserved in these insect embryos with distinct early cell behaviors.

RESULTS

We present a detailed time series of nuclear division and distribution from fertilization through germband formation and report patterns of expression for the early patterning genes hunchback, caudal, and twist in order to understand early polarization and mesoderm formation. We show a detailed time course of the spatial expression of two genes involved in the segmentation cascade, hedgehog and even-skipped, and demonstrate two distinct dynamics of the segmentation process.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite dramatic differences in cell distribution between the blastoderms of many Polyneopteran insects and those of more well-studied developmental models, expression patterns of early patterning genes are mostly similar. Genes associated with axis determination in other insects are activated relatively late and are probably not maternally deposited. The two phases of segmentation-simultaneous and sequential-might indicate a broadly conserved mode of morphological differentiation. The developmental time course we present here should be of value for further investigation into the causes of this distinct blastoderm type.

The organizing role of Wnt signaling pathway during arthropod posterior growth

Wnt signaling pathways are recognized for having major roles in tissue patterning and cell proliferation. In the last years, remarkable progress has been made in elucidating the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie sequential segmentation and axial elongation in various arthropods, and the canonical Wnt pathway has emerged as an essential factor in these processes. Here we review, with a comparative perspective, the current evidence concerning the participation of this pathway during posterior growth, its degree of conservation among the different subphyla within Arthropoda and its relationship with the rest of the gene regulatory network involved. Furthermore, we discuss how this signaling pathway could regulate segmentation to establish this repetitive pattern and, at the same time, probably modulate different cellular processes precisely coupled to axial elongation. Based on the information collected, we suggest that this pathway plays an organizing role in the formation of the body segments through the regulation of the dynamic expression of segmentation genes, via controlling the caudal gene, at the posterior region of the embryo/larva, that is necessary for the correct sequential formation of body segments in most arthropods and possibly in their common segmented ancestor. On the other hand, there is insufficient evidence to link this pathway to axial elongation by controlling its main cellular processes, such as convergent extension and cell proliferation. However, conclusions are premature until more studies incorporating diverse arthropods are carried out.

The Nasonia pair-rule gene regulatory network retains its function over 300 million years of evolution

Insect segmentation is a well-studied and tractable system with which to investigate the genetic regulation of development. Though insects segment their germband using a variety of methods, modelling work implies that a single gene regulatory network can underpin the two main types of insect segmentation. This means limited genetic changes are required to explain significant differences in segmentation mode between different insects. This idea needs to be tested in a wider variety of species, and the nature of the gene regulatory network (GRN) underlying this model has not been tested. Some insects, e.g. Nasonia vitripennis and Apis mellifera segment progressively, a pattern not examined in previous studies of this segmentation model, producing stripes at different times progressively through the embryo, but not from a segment addition zone. Here, we aim to understand the GRNs patterning Nasonia using a simulation-based approach. We found that an existing model of Drosophila segmentation ( Clark, 2017) can be used to recapitulate the progressive segmentation of Nasonia, if provided with altered inputs in the form of expression of the timer genes Nv-caudal and Nv-odd paired. We predict limited topological changes to the pair-rule network and show, by RNAi knockdown, that Nv-odd paired is required for morphological segmentation. Together this implies that very limited changes to the Drosophila network are required to simulate Nasonia segmentation, despite significant differences in segmentation modes, implying that Nasonia use a very similar version of an ancestral GRN used by Drosophila, which must therefore have been conserved for at least 300 million years.

Patterning with clocks and genetic cascades: Segmentation and regionalization of vertebrate versus insect body plans

Oscillatory and sequential processes have been implicated in the spatial patterning of many embryonic tissues. For example, molecular clocks delimit segmental boundaries in vertebrates and insects and mediate lateral root formation in plants, whereas sequential gene activities are involved in the specification of regional identities of insect neuroblasts, vertebrate neural tube, vertebrate limb, and insect and vertebrate body axes. These processes take place in various tissues and organisms, and, hence, raise the question of what common themes and strategies they share. In this article, we review 2 processes that rely on the spatial regulation of periodic and sequential gene activities: segmentation and regionalization of the anterior-posterior (AP) axis of animal body plans. We study these processes in species that belong to 2 different phyla: vertebrates and insects. By contrasting 2 different processes (segmentation and regionalization) in species that belong to 2 distantly related phyla (arthropods and vertebrates), we elucidate the deep logic of patterning by oscillatory and sequential gene activities. Furthermore, in some of these organisms (e.g., the fruit fly Drosophila), a mode of AP patterning has evolved that seems not to overtly rely on oscillations or sequential gene activities, providing an opportunity to study the evolution of pattern formation mechanisms.