Regeneration among animals: An evolutionary hypothesis related to aquatic versus terrestrial environment

Wound-Induced Regeneration in Feather Follicles: A Stepwise Strategy to Regenerate Stem Cells

How to elicit and harness regeneration is a major issue in wound healing. Skin injury in most amniotes leads to repair rather than regeneration, except in hair and feathers. Feather follicles are unique organs that undergo physiological cyclic renewal, supported by a dynamic stem cell niche. During normal feather cycling, growth-phase proximal follicle collar bulge stem cells adopt a ring configuration. At the resting and initiation phases, these stem cells descend to the dermal papilla to form papillary ectoderm and ascend to the proximal follicle in a new growth phase. Plucking resting-phase feathers accelerates papillary ectoderm cell activation. Plucking growth-phase feathers depletes collar bulge stem cells; however, a blastema reforms the collar bulge stem cells, expressing KRT15, LGR6, Sox9, integrin-α6, and tenascin C. Removing the follicle base and dermal papilla prevents feather regeneration. Yet, transplanting an exogenous dermal papilla to the follicle base can induce re-epithelialization from the lower follicle sheath, followed by feather regeneration. Thus, there is a stepwise regenerative strategy using stem cells located in the collar bulge, papillary ectoderm, and de-differentiated lower follicle sheath to generate new feathers after different levels of injuries. This adaptable regenerative mechanism is based on the hierarchy of stem cell regenerative capacity and underscores the remarkable resilience of feather follicle regenerative abilities.

Regeneration, Regengrow and Tissue Repair in Animals: Evolution Indicates That No Regeneration Occurs in Terrestrial Environments but Only Recovery Healing

The present, brief review paper summarizes previous studies on a new interpretation of the presence and absence of regeneration in invertebrates and vertebrates. Broad regeneration is considered exclusive of aquatic or amphibious animals with larval stages and metamorphosis, where also a patterning process is activated for whole-body regeneration or for epimorphosis. In contrast, terrestrial invertebrates and vertebrates can only repair injury or the loss of body parts through a variable "recovery healing" of tissues, regengrow or scarring. This loss of regeneration likely derives from the change in genomes during land adaptation, which included the elimination of larval stages and intense metamorphosis. The terrestrial conditions are incompatible with the formation of embryonic organs that are necessary for broad regeneration. In fact, no embryonic organ can survive desiccation, intense UV or ROS exposition on land, and rapid reparative processes without embryonic patterning, such as recovery healing and scarring, have replaced broad regeneration in terrestrial species. The loss of regeneration in land animals likely depends on the alteration of developmental gene pathways sustaining regeneration that occurred in progenitor marine animals. Terrestrial larval stages, like those present in insects among arthropods, only metamorphose using small body regions indicated as imaginal disks, a terrestrial adaptation, not from a large restructuring process like in aquatic-related animals. These invertebrates can reform body appendages only during molting, a process indicated as regengrow, not regeneration. Most amniotes only repair injuries through scarring or a variable recovery healing, occasionally through regengrow, the contemporaneous healing in conjunction with somatic growth, forming sometimes new heteromorphic organs.

Progressive modifications during evolution involving epigenetic changes have determined loss of regeneration mainly in terrestrial animals: A hypothesis

In order to address a biological explanation for the different regenerative abilities present among animals, a new evolutionary speculation is presented. It is hypothesized that epigenetic mechanisms have lowered or erased regeneration during the evolution of terrestrial invertebrates and vertebrates. The hypothesis indicates that a broad regeneration can only occur in marine or freshwater conditions, and that life on land does not allow for high regeneration. This is due to the physical, chemical and microbial conditions present in the terrestrial environment with respect to those of the aquatic environment. The present speculation provides examples of hypothetic evolutionary animal lineages that colonized the land, such as parasitic annelids, terrestrial mollusks, arthropods and amniotes. These are the animals where regeneration is limited or absent and their injuries are only repaired through limited healing or scarring. It is submitted that this loss derived from changes in the developmental gene pathways sustaining regeneration in the aquatic environment but that cannot be expressed on land. Once regeneration was erased in terrestrial species, re-adaptation to freshwater niches could not reactivate the previously altered gene pathways that determined regeneration. Therefore a broad regeneration was no longer possible or became limited and heteromorphic in the derived, extant animals. Only in few cases extensive healing abilities or regengrow, a healing process where regeneration overlaps with somatic growth, have evolved among arthropods and amniotes. The present paper is an extension of previous speculations trying to explain in biological terms the different regenerative abilities present among metazoans.

Mechanisms and translational applications of regeneration in limbs: From renewable animals to humans

BACKGROUND

The regenerative capacity of organisms declines throughout evolution, and mammals lack the ability to regenerate limbs after injury. Past approaches to achieving successful restoration through pharmacological intervention, tissue engineering, and cell therapies have faced significant challenges.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to provide an overview of the current understanding of the mechanisms behind animal limb regeneration and the successful translation of these mechanisms for human tissue regeneration.

RESULTS

Particular attention was paid to the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum), the only adult tetrapod capable of limb regeneration. We will explore fundamental questions surrounding limb regeneration, such as how amputation initiates regeneration, how the limb knows when to stop and which parts to regenerate, and how these findings can apply to mammalian systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the urgent need for regenerative therapies to treat conditions like diabetic foot ulcers and trauma survivors, this review provides valuable insights and ideas for researchers, clinicians, and biomedical engineers seeking to facilitate the regeneration process or elicit full regeneration from partial regeneration events.

Regeneration Abilities among Extant Animals Depend on Their Evolutionary History and Life Cycles

The present brief manuscript summarizes the main points supporting recently proposed hypotheses explaining the different distributions of regenerative capacity among invertebrates and vertebrates. The new hypotheses are based on the evolution of regeneration from marine animals to the terrestrial animals derived from them. These speculations suggest that animals that were initially capable of broad regeneration in the sea underwent epigenetic modifications during terrestrial adaptation that determined the loss of their regenerative abilities in sub-aerial conditions. These changes derived from the requirements of life on land that include variable dry and UV-exposed conditions. Terrestrial conditions do not allow for organ regeneration, especially in arthropods and amniotes. Nematodes, the other main metazoan group unable of regeneration, instead evolved eutely (a fixed number of body cells), a process which is incompatible with regeneration. All these changes involved gene loss, modification and new gene interactions within the genomes of terrestrial adapting animals that gave rise to sophisticated invertebrates and vertebrates adapted to living on land but with low cellular plasticity.