Stopping antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery: a survey of U.S. epilepsy center neurologists

Seizures in brain tumors: pathogenesis, risk factors and management (Review)

Seizures in the context of brain tumors are a relatively common symptom, with higher occurrence rates observed in glioneuronal tumors and gliomas. It is a serious burden that can have a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients and influence the disease's prognosis. Brain tumor‑related epilepsy (BTRE) is a challenging entity because the pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully understood yet. Nonetheless, neuroinflammation is considered to play a pivotal role. Next to neuroinflammation, findings on the pathogenesis of BTRE have established that certain genetic mutations are involved, of which the most known would be IDH mutations in gliomas. Others discussed more thoroughly in the present review include genes such as PTEN, TP53, IGSF3, and these findings all provide fresh and fascinating insights into the pathogenesis of BTRE. Treatment for BTRE presents unique challenges, mainly related to burdens of polytherapy, debated necessity of anti‑epileptic prophylaxis, and overall impact on the QoL. In fact, there are no established anti‑seizure medications (ASMs) of choice for BTRE, nor is there any protocol to guide the use of these medications at every step of disease progression. Treatment strategies aimed at the tumor, that is surgical procedures, radio‑ and chemotherapy appear to influence seizure control. Conversely, some ASMs have also shown antitumor properties. The present review summarizes and retrospectively analyzes the literature on the pathogenesis and management of BTRE to provide an updated comprehensive understanding. Furthermore, the challenges and opportunities for developing future therapies aimed at BTRE are discussed.

Preliminary observation on clinical outcome and safety of surgery in early infants (<12 months) with drug-resistant epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of surgery in infants (< 12 months of age) with drug-resistant epilepsy, clarify surgical indications, and select appropriate surgical methods.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of infants with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery and were followed up for > 6 months at the Epilepsy Center of Shenzhen Children's Hospital. Clinical data included etiology, seizure type, surgical procedure, preoperative auxiliary examinations, pathological findings, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on postoperative seizure frequency, antiseizure medicines (ASMs) use, and neurocognitive development. Intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, postoperative complications, and duration of intensive care were evaluated to assess the safety of epilepsy surgery. Univariate and logistic analyses were performed to explore the factors influencing prognosis.

RESULTS

Epilepsy surgery was performed on 44 infants with drug-resistant epilepsy, including 7 patients who underwent two operations. The age of seizure onset ranged from 1 day to 11 months (median: 1 month, interquartile range (IQR): 0.1-3.8), the disease course was 1-11 months (median: 4 months, IQR: 2-7), and the age at surgery was 6.9 ± 3.6 months. Twenty-three patients underwent hemispherectomy (52.3 %), and two underwent subtotal hemispherectomy. Five patients underwent multilobar disconnection, five underwent frontal lobotomy, and the remaining nine underwent focal resection. The surgical duration was 7.5 ± 2 h. Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 50 to 1800 ml (median: 275 ml, IQR: 200-500), with all patients receiving an intraoperative blood transfusion of 0.5-6 U (median: 1.5 U, IQR: 1.5-3). The intensive care unit stay was 1-4 days (median: 1 day, IQR: 1-2). The postoperative complication rate was 13.6 % (6/44; two cases of hydrocephalus with intracranial infection, two isolated hydrocephalus, and two subdural hematomas). Excluding one child who died of severe lung infection approximately one year after surgery and one child lost to follow-up after surgery, all other cases were regularly followed up for 10 -49 months (median: 30 months, IQR: 16.5-36). After surgery, patients were treated with 0-3 ASMs (median: 1 ASM, IQR: 0-2); 27.9 % (12/43) stopped taking ASMs and 51.2 % (22/43) had reduced number of ASMs. Engel I was achieved in 76.7 % (33/43) of the patients at the last follow-up. In 17 cases with complete developmental quotient follow-up data, the preoperative and postoperative developmental quotient means were 28.8 ± 21 and 43.2 ± 20.1, showing statistically significant differences (p<0.05) SIGNIFICANCE: Epilepsy surgery in infants under 12 months of age is safe and effective. Early preoperative evaluation is crucial for identifying structural lesions and suitable candidates for surgery among infants with drug-resistant epilepsy. The timeliness of surgery is essential for achieving favorable clinical outcomes.

Postoperative interictal epileptiform discharges predict seizure recurrence after antiepileptic drug withdrawal regardless of concordance with surgical site

Objective

The study aimed to explore the association between the site of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) on postoperative electroencephalogram (EEG) and seizure recurrence after antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal. The study hypothesizes that the concordance of IED sites with surgical sites indicates incomplete resection of epileptic focus, while non-concordance of IED sites with surgical sites indicates postoperative changes or cortical stimulation. The former has a higher risk of seizure recurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative EEG pattern of 182 consecutive children who underwent resection surgery. To identify the risk factors for seizure recurrence, we compared the attributes of seizure recurred and seizure-free groups by univariate and multivariate analyses. AED tapering was standardized, involving a 25% reduction in the dose of a single type of AED every 2 weeks, independent of the presurgical AED load.

Results

We attempted AED withdrawal in 116 (63.7%) children. Twenty-eight (24.1%) children experienced seizure recurrence during or after AED withdrawal. A greater number of AEDs used at the time of surgery (p=0.005), incomplete resection (p=0.001), and presence of IED on postoperative EEG (p=0.011) are predictors of seizure recurrence. The completeness of resection and seizure recurrence after AED withdrawal were related to the presence of IED on the EEG, but not to the concordance of IED with surgical sites.

Conclusion

For children with abnormal EEG, the decision to discontinue AED should be made more cautiously, regardless of the relative location of the discharge site and the surgical site.

Early antiseizure medication withdrawal and risk of seizure recurrence in children after epilepsy surgery: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The timing of antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal in children after epilepsy surgery remains controversial and lacks recognized standards. Given the various negative effects of ASM on development in children, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early ASM withdrawal after epileptic resection surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the seizure outcomes and ASM profiles of children who had undergone epileptic resection surgery between August 2015 and August 2020 and attempted ASM reduction in the early postoperative phase. Tapering the dose of ASM was attempted when children were seizure-free with no interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) on electroencephalogram (EEG) for at least 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

This study included 145 children with a median follow-up duration of 40 months. Early ASM tapering was attempted postoperatively in 99 (68.3 %) children. Postoperative ASM discontinuation was attempted in 87 (60.0 %) children. Nine (9.1 %) children experienced seizure recurrence during the ASM reduction stage, and 10 (11.5 %) experienced recurrence after ASM discontinuation. Incomplete resection (P = 0.003) and postoperative seizures before ASM tapering (P = 0.003) were independent predictors of seizure recurrence during and after early ASM withdrawal.

SIGNIFICANCE

ASM withdrawal is viable and safe to be initiated in children who are seizure-free postoperatively and have no IEDs on the scalp EEG for at least 6 months. Children with incomplete resection and postoperative seizures before ASM withdrawal are at a higher risk of seizure recurrence and may need to continue ASM for a longer period.

Medical and surgical treatment of epilepsy in older adults: A national survey

OBJECTIVE

There are no clinical guidelines dedicated to the treatment of epilepsy in older adults. We investigated physician opinion and practice regarding the treatment of people with epilepsy aged 65 years or older. We also sought to study how our opinion and practice varied between geriatricians, general neurologists, and epilepsy neurologists (i.e., epileptologists).

METHODS

We initially piloted our survey to measure test-retest reliability. Once finalized, we disseminated the survey via two rounds of facsimiles, and then conventional mail, to eligible individuals listed in a national directory of Canadian physicians. We used descriptive statistics such as stacked bar charts and tables to illustrate our findings.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four physicians (104 general neurologists, 25 geriatricians, and 15 epileptologists) answered our survey in its entirety (overall response rate of 13.2%). Levetiracetam and lamotrigine were the preferred antiseizure medications (ASMs) to treat older adults with epilepsy. Two thirds of epileptologists and almost half of general neurologists would consider prescribing lacosamide in >50% of people aged >65 years; only one geriatrician was of the same opinion. More than 40% of general neurologists and geriatricians erroneously believed that none of the ASMs mentioned in our survey was previously studied in randomized controlled trials specific to the treatment of epilepsy in older adults. Epileptologists were more likely as compared to general neurologists and geriatricians to recommend epilepsy surgery (e.g., 66.6% vs. 22.9%-37.5% among older adults).

SIGNIFICANCE

Therapeutic decisions for older adults with epilepsy are heterogeneous between physician groups and sometimes misalign with available clinical evidence. Our surveyed physicians differed in their approach to ASM choice as well as perception of surgery in older adults with epilepsy. These findings likely reflect the lack of clinical guidelines dedicated to this population and the deficient implementation of best practices.

Clinical and Surgical Approach for Cerebral Cortical Dysplasia

The present article describes pathophysiological and clinical aspects of congenital malformations of the cerebral tissue (cortex and white matter) that cause epilepsy and very frequently require surgical treatment. A particular emphasis is given to focal cortical dysplasias, the most common pathology among these epilepsy-related malformations. Specific radiological and surgical features are also highlighted, so a thorough overview of cortical dysplasias is provided.

Reduction in anti-seizure medications use in pediatric patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy submitted to surgical treatment

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyze the potential for postoperative (PO) medication suspension and reduction, emphasizing passive withdrawal.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients under 18 years old submitted to surgical treatment for pharmacoresistant epilepsy and classified as Engel I during the first year of PO follow-up. Therapeutic management was evaluated through discontinuation or reduction of medications, both in terms of the number of ASM prescribed and in daily maintenance dosages in mg/kg.

RESULTS

ASM withdrawal started in the first year PO and occurred in 1.2% of cases, with a significant yearly reduction in the number of ASM during follow-up (p < 0.001). A comparison of the most commonly used ASM in daily mg/kg between the preoperative period (preop) and PO showed a reduction of ASM maintenance dosages during PO. Even though recurrence of seizures was observed 5 years after surgery, 125 patients (85%) were still classified as Engel I, albeit a higher number of ASM per patient was observed. Most patients showed no changes in cognitive and adaptive behavior evaluation between preop and PO, even in those who were able to reduce ASM.

CONCLUSION

Significant reduction observed both in the number and daily maintenance dosages of ASM following each year of PO may be an indirect measure of the effectiveness of epilepsy surgery.

Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal Following Epilepsy Surgery

As pediatric epilepsy surgery cases increase in number and complexity, there remains a paucity of data regarding how, when, and in whom to discontinue antiseizure medications postoperatively. The "TimeToStop" data has been influential to clinical practice, revealing that while early discontinuation of antiseizure medications may reveal surgical failures earlier, it does not ultimately lead to a change in long-term seizure outcomes. The authors of other studies have also shown cognitive improvements in children for whom medications were discontinued postoperatively. Survey results over the last 2 decades have shown that clinicians have started to discontinue antiseizure medications earlier. This is an individualized decision with numerous factors to consider. Further research is needed to explore the optimal timing of medication discontinuation in this heterogeneous population of children undergoing epilepsy surgery.

When should we obtain a routine EEG while managing people with epilepsy?

More than eight decades after its discovery, routine electroencephalogram (EEG) remains a safe, noninvasive, inexpensive, bedside test of neurological function. Knowing when a routine EEG should be obtained while managing people with epilepsy is a critical aspect of optimal care. Despite advances in neuroimaging techniques that aid diagnosis of structural lesions in the central nervous system, EEG continues to provide critical diagnostic evidence with implications on treatment. A routine EEG performed after a first unprovoked seizure can support a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy and differentiate those without epilepsy, classify an epilepsy syndrome to impart prognosis, and characterize seizures for antiseizure management. Despite a current viral pandemic, EEG services continue, and the value of routine EEG is unchanged.

Impact of epilepsy surgery on quality of life and burden of caregivers in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of pediatric epilepsy surgery on the quality of life (QOL), determining whether patients improve, worsen, or maintain their preoperative patterns, as it relates to the burden of caregivers, as well as evaluating potential related factors, from both the children and caregivers perspectives.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of children and adolescents who underwent epilepsy surgery and were evaluated through clinical data, videoelectroencephalogram (V-EEG), neuroimaging findings, neuropsychological testing, and aspects of QOL. These assessments were performed prior to surgery and after six months and two years of follow-up. Quality of life was assessed with epilepsy-specialized questionnaires, namely Questionnaire health-related quality of life for children with epilepsy (QVCE-50), Autoquestionnaire Qualité de Vie Enfant Image Scale (AUQUEI), Quality of life in epilepsy inventory for adolescents (QOLEI-AD-48); and burden of caregivers with Burden Interview - ZARIT scale. Postoperative changes in QVCE-50 were quantified using measures of the analysis of variance (ANOVA MR) for comparison of the difference between the three times of the scale and domains.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled. Of these, 27 (54%) were male, with a mean age at surgery of 8.2 years (range: 1-18 years). Thirty-five patients (70%) were Engel I and one was Engel II (2%) at six months of follow-up, whereas 28 (56%) were Engel I and 32 (64%) were Engel I or II at two years of follow-up. Preoperatively, 21 (42%) presented with moderate or severe intellectual disability. Postoperative cognitive evaluations at the two-year follow-up showed 18 (36%) maintained similar deficits. The QVCE-50 showed postoperative improvement in the two-year follow-up period, but not at six months after surgery. Postoperative improvements were associated mainly with better seizure outcome. Autoperception evaluations were limited because of the clinical and cognitive severity of patients. The burden of caregivers was quoted as mild to moderate and remained unchanged postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Children and adolescents with surgically treated epilepsy reach a good seizure outcome, stabilize in intellectual and adaptive functions, and have an increase in QOL, from the caregiver's perspective. Nevertheless, their burden remains unchanged. Seizure outcome is the main factor for improvement in the QOL. The upgrading of structured questionnaires and QOL instruments specific to pediatric epilepsy can be helpful to assess patient- and caregiver-reported surgical outcomes, allowing for better planning of therapeutic approaches.

Resolution of ictal bradycardia and asystole following temporal lobectomy: A case report, and review of available cases using pacemakers

Ictal bradycardia (IB) and ictal asystole (IA) are uncommonly recognized phenomena that increase morbidity in patients with epilepsy by causing syncope and seizure-related falls. These arrhythmias are also suspected to be involved in the pathophysiology of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). We report a case of a 57-year-old male with left temporal lobe epilepsy who experienced both IB and IA. This patient was initially managed with pacemaker implantation, prior to undergoing left temporal lobectomy. Following surgery, the patient had no ongoing IB or IA on his pacemaker recordings, and his seizure control was greatly improved. His pacemaker was removed approximately one year post-operatively and he continued treatment with anti-seizure drugs (ASDs). A literature review of cases of IB and IA that were managed with pacemakers was performed. Pacemaker implantation appears to be quite effective for reducing seizure-related syncope and falls in the setting of IB/IA. Epilepsy surgery also seems to be an effective treatment option for IB/IA, as many patients are able to have their pacemakers removed post-operatively. Further investigations into the pathophysiology of IB and IA and long-term outcomes using different treatment modalities are clearly needed to help formulate treatment guidelines and, potentially, to reduce the occurrence of SUDEP in these patients.

Postoperative seizure outcome and timing interval to start antiepileptic drug withdrawal: A retrospective observational study of non-neoplastic drug resistant epilepsy

This study aimed to investigate the impact of timing interval to start AED withdraw (TIW) after surgery on the seizure outcome in non-neoplastic drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). TIW were divided into three groups (respectively,<1 year, 1-<2 years, and ≥2 years). The seizure outcome at the different time points after starting AED withdrawal were compared among three groups. Other factors that related to seizure recurrence and TIW were included into the multiple analysis to investigate the predictors of seizure-free. Altogether, 205 patients were involved in the study. 102 individuals (50%) had seizure recurrence and 127 (62%) had seizure-free at the final follow up. 115 of them have attempted AED reduction and had not seizure recurrence before AED reduction. The rate of seizure-free had no significant difference among people with different TIW. Multiple analysis indicated that temporal surgery is a favorable predictor of seizure-free at the first year after starting AED withdrawal, and preoperative secondary generalized seizures is an unfavorable predictor of seizure-free at the final follow up. In patients with non-neoplastic DRE, TIW is not the mainly influence factor on seizure outcome, however, preoperative secondary generalized seizures and extra-temporal surgery are negatively associated with seizure-free.

Outcome after seizure recurrence on antiepileptic drug withdrawal following temporal lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

To study the long-term outcome following seizure recurrence on antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal after anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the AED profile of patients who had a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up after anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Only those patients with hippocampal sclerosis or normal MRI were included. AED withdrawal was initiated at 3 months in patients on ≥2 drugs and at 1 year for patients on a single drug.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-four patients with median postoperative follow-up of 12 years (range, 7-17 years) were included. Of them, 316 patients (82.3%) were seizure-free during the terminal 1 year. AED withdrawal was attempted in 326 patients (84.9%). At last follow-up, AEDs were discontinued in 207 patients (53.9%). Seizure recurrence occurred in 92 patients (28.2%) on attempted withdrawal. After a median postrecurrence follow-up of 7 years, 79 (86%) of them were seizure-free during the terminal 2 years. AEDs could be stopped in 17 patients (18.5%) and doses were reduced in another 57 patients (62%). Patients with febrile seizures, normal postoperative EEG at 1 year, and duration of epilepsy of <20 years (FND20 score) had 17% risk of seizure recurrence on attempted AED withdrawal. We also formulated a score to predict the chances of AED freedom for the whole cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with seizure recurrence on AED withdrawal have good outcome with 86% becoming seizure-free and 18% becoming drug-free after initial recurrence. A FND20 score helps in predicting recurrence on AED withdrawal.

Changing the neurology policy landscape in the United States: Misconceptions and facts about epilepsy

Epilepsy has a relatively high prevalence, and diagnosis and treatment are often challenging. Seizure freedom without significant side effects is the ultimate goal for both physicians and patients, but not always achievable. In those cases, the treatment goals of patients and providers may differ. In the United States, many clinicians continue to prescribe older AEDs, even though newer AEDs have a more desirable safety and tolerability profile, fewer drug-drug interactions, and are associated with lower epilepsy-related hospital visits. Newer AEDs are more commonly prescribed by neurologists and epilepsy center physicians, highlighting the importance of access to specialty care. We report that antiepileptic drugs are not the dominant cost driver for patients with epilepsy and costs are considerably higher in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. Poor drug adherence is considered a main cause of unsuccessful epilepsy treatment and is associated with increases in inpatient and emergency department admissions and related costs. Interventions and educational programs are needed to address the reasons for nonadherence. Coverage policies placing a higher cost burden on patients with epilepsy lead to lower treatment adherence, which can result in higher future health care spending. Epilepsy is lagging behind other neurological conditions in terms of funding and treatment innovation. Increased investment in epilepsy research may be particularly beneficial given current funding levels and the high prevalence of epilepsy.

Uncertainties from a worldwide survey on antiepileptic drug withdrawal after seizure remission

Background

We sought to determine differences in practice for discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) after seizure remission and stimulate the planning and conduction of withdrawal trials.

Methods

We utilized a worldwide electronic survey that included questions about AED discontinuation for 3 paradigmatic cases in remission: (1) focal epilepsy of unknown etiology, (2) temporal lobe epilepsy after surgery, and (3) juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. We analyzed 466 complete questionnaires from 53 countries, including the United States. Statistical analysis included χ² and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Case 1: responders in practice for <10 years were less likely to taper AEDs: odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) 0.52 (0.32-0.85), p = 0.02. The likelihood of stopping AEDs was higher among doctors treating children: OR (95% CI): 11.41 (2.51-40.13), p = 0.002. Doctors treating children were also more likely to stop after 2 years or less of remission: OR (95% CI): 6.91 (2.62-19.31), p = 0.002, and the same was observed for US physicians: OR (95% CI): 1.61 (1.01-2.57), p = 0.0049. Case 2: responders treating children were more likely to taper after 1 year or less of postoperative remission, with the goal of discontinuing all medications: OR (95% CI): 1.91 (1.09-3.12), p = 0.015, and so were US-based responders: OR (95% CI): 1.73 (1.21-2.41), p = 0.003. Case 3: epileptologists were less likely to withdraw the medication: OR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.39-0.82), p = 0.003, and so were those in practice for 10 or more years: OR (95% CI): 0.54 (0.31-0.95), p = 0.025.

Conclusions

We observed several differences in practice for AED withdrawal after seizure remission that highlight global uncertainty. Trials of AED discontinuation are needed to provide evidence-based guidance.

A classification system for verifying the long-term efficacy of resective surgery for drug-resistant seizures

OBJECTIVE

To verify the long-term efficacy of resective surgery, we created a classification system in which strictly defined patterns of postoperative seizure emergence are incorporated as basic components and the seizure states throughout the entire follow-up period are assessed comprehensively.

METHODS

In our system, Class I has three subclasses (A-C); subclasses A and B are identical to Engel I-A and I-B, respectively. Subclass C comprises patients whose disabling seizures remit within the first 2 years postoperatively. Patients in Class II have only 1-3 days with disabling seizures throughout follow-up after the first 2 years. Patients in Class III have a maximum of 3 seizure days annually, and those in Class IV have ≥4 seizure days annually after the first 2 years. Classes II-IV each have 2 subclasses (A and B): subclass A, late recurrence (i.e., the first seizure occurs after 2 years postoperatively); and subclass B, early recurrence (i.e., first seizure within 2 years). In 646 patients who underwent resective surgery (temporal lobe resection, 74.6%) and were followed for at least 8 years (mean, 14.6 years), we analyzed three patterns of postoperative seizures: early remission, late recurrence, and occasional seizures. In addition, we investigated the differences between the long-term seizure outcomes of the cohort as determined according to our system and the Engel scale.

RESULTS

Overall, 52.9% of the cohort experienced at least one disabling seizure postoperatively throughout the follow-up period; in 1/3 of these patients, the first seizure occurred after 2 years. In 73.8% of the 80 patients who manifested the running-down phenomenon, seizure remission occurred within the first 2 years. In addition, 36.7% of the 283 patients who had disabling seizures after 2 years experienced only 1-3 seizure days. Engel Class I-C included about 30% of the patients who had ≥4 seizure days after 2 years. The long-term seizure outcomes, determined according to our system, were: Class I, 56.2% (C, 9.1%) of the overall cohort; Class II, 16.1% (A, 11.0%); and Class III/IV, 27.7% (A, 6.6%).

CONCLUSION

Our system clarifies the actual effect of resective surgery more precisely than the Engel scale and thus may be useful for comparing outcomes between different surgical procedures or for identifying potential risk factors predicting unfavorable outcome.

Does early postoperative drug regimen impact seizure control in patients undergoing temporal lobe resections?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of postoperative antiepileptic drug (AED) load on seizure control in patients who underwent surgical treatment for pharmacoresistant mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy during the first two postoperative years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

532 consecutive patients (48.7% males and 51.7% females) who underwent surgical treatment for mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy were retrospectively evaluated regarding effects of AED load on seizures control during the first 2 years following epilepsy surgery. We analyzed whether postoperative increases in postoperative AED load are associated with better seizure control in patients initially not seizure free, and if postoperative decreases in postoperative AED load would increase the risk for seizure persistence or recurrence. For statistical analyses, Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon test were applied.

RESULTS

68.9, 64.0 and 59.1% of patients were completely seizure free (Engel Ia) at 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery, respectively. Patients in whom daily drug doses were increased did not have a higher rate of seizure freedom at any of the three follow-up periods. Of 16 patients achieving secondary seizure control at 12 months after surgery, only one did so with an increase in drug load in contrast to 15 patients who experienced a running down of seizures independent of drug load increases. Decreases in drug load did not significantly increase the risk for seizure recurrence. Of postoperatively seizure free patients at 3 months after surgery in whom AED were consequently reduced, 85% remained completely seizure free at 1 year and 76% at 1 year after surgery, respectively, as opposed to 86% each when AED was not reduced (differences n.s.). Mean daily drug load was significantly lower in seizure free patients at 12 and 24 months compared to patients with ongoing seizures.

CONCLUSION

In this large patient cohort stratified to the epilepsy syndrome neither did a postoperative reduction in drug load significantly increase the risk for seizure relapse nor did increases in drug dosages lead to improved seizure control. Mean drug load was on average lower in seizure free- than non-seizure free patients at 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Secondary seizure control after initial postoperative seizures in > 90% of cases occurred as a running down, independent of an AED increase. Thus, the effect of the surgical intervention rather than the postoperative drug regimen was the key determinant for seizure control. This finding supports a curative role of temporal lobe surgery rather than an effect rendering the majority of patients' pharmacoresponsive with a critical role of the antiepileptic drug regime for seizure control.

Early withdrawal of non-anesthetic antiepileptic drugs after successful termination of nonconvulsive seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus

PURPOSE

Multiple antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are often necessary to treat nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). AED polypharmacy places patients at risk for adverse side effects and drug-drug interactions. Identifying the likelihood of seizure relapse when weaning non-anesthetic AEDs may provide guidance in the critical care unit.

METHOD

Ninety-nine adult patients with successful treatment of electrographic-proven NCS or NCSE on continuous critical care EEG (CCEEG) monitoring were identified retrospectively. Patients were determined to undergo an AED wean if the number of non-anesthetic AEDs was reduced at the time of discharge compared to the number of non-anesthetic AEDs at primary seizure cessation. Primary outcome was recurrent seizures either clinically or by CCEEG during hospitalization. Secondary outcome measures included hospital length of stay and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

The rate of recurrent seizures in the wean group was not statistically different when compared to the group that did not undergo an AED wean (17% vs. 13%, respectively; p = 0.77). The wean group had a median value of 4 (IQR: 3-4) non-anesthetic AEDs at the time of primary seizure cessation compared with 3 (IQR: 2-3) in the non-wean group (p < 0.0001). However, both groups had similar values of AEDs at discharge (median of 2 (IQR: 2-3) vs. 3 (IQR: 2-3) for wean and non-wean groups respectively; p = 0.40). Discharge disposition (favorable, acceptable, or unfavorable) was similar between groups (p = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Early weaning of non-anesthetic AEDs does not increase the risk of recurrent seizures in patients treated for NCS or NCSE during their hospitalization.

The withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in patients with low-grade and anaplastic glioma

INTRODUCTION

The withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in World Health Organization (WHO) grade II-III glioma patients with epilepsy is controversial, as the presence of a symptomatic lesion is often related to an increased risk of seizure relapse. However, some glioma patients may achieve long-term seizure freedom after antitumor treatment, raising questions about the necessity to continue AEDs, particularly when patients experience serious drug side effects. Areas covered: In this review, we show the evidence in the literature from 1990-2016 for AED withdrawal in glioma patients. We put this issue into the context of risk factors for developing seizures in glioma, adverse effects of AEDs, seizure outcome after antitumor treatment, and outcome after AED withdrawal in patients with non-brain tumor related epilepsy. Expert commentary: There is currently scarce evidence of the feasibility of AED withdrawal in glioma patients. AED withdrawal could be considered in patients with grade II-III glioma with a favorable prognosis, who have achieved stable disease and long-term seizure freedom. The potential benefits of AED withdrawal need to be carefully weighed against the presumed risk of seizure recurrence in a shared decision-making process by both the clinical physician and the patient.

What do epileptologists recommend about discontinuing antiepileptic drugs for a second time in children?

OBJECTIVE

There is a broad consensus that antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may be withdrawn after two years of seizure freedom for most children with epilepsy. If seizures recur and are, again, completely controlled with AEDs, little is known about discontinuing a second time. We surveyed American and Canadian pediatric epileptologists to understand their current practice.

METHODS

In 2014, a survey was sent via e-mail to 193 pediatric epileptologists to learn about AED discontinuation practices in children. The survey asked direct questions about practice and posed five "real-life" cases where the decision to discontinue might be difficult. Participants were identified through membership lists of several US and Canadian epilepsy organizations.

RESULTS

There were 94 (49%) completed surveys. Sixty-three participants had ≥ 10 years in practice ("more experienced": mean 23 ± 9 years), and 31 had < 10 years ("less experienced": mean 6 ± 2 ). Overall, 62% recommended AED discontinuation for the first time after 2-3 years of seizure freedom, and 61% recommended discontinuation for the second time after 2-3 years. Fifty-six percent of "more experienced" clinicians required a longer seizure-free period prior to a second discontinuation (p < 0.001) compared with 26% of "less experienced" clinicians (p = ns). Overall, most participants suggested an AED taper duration of 2-6 months for the first and second attempts, 52% and 68%, respectively. Both groups wean AEDs more slowly during the second attempt (p < 0.001). There was only 40-60% agreement among participants to discontinue AEDs in four of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Nearly half (46%) of pediatric epileptologists require a longer seizure-free period the second time they attempt to discontinue AEDs compared with the first attempt and wean down AEDs somewhat more slowly. Although a variety of factors influence decision-making, there was a high level of disagreement to discontinue AEDs a second time in "real-life" cases.

Prognostic Tests and Antiepileptic Drug Withdrawal After Epilepsy Surgery

Approximately one in three patients with a successful epilepsy surgery will have seizure recurrence following antiepileptic drugs (AED) withdrawal. The value of postoperative testing for predicting seizure relapse after AED tapering is not clear. The purpose of this study was to review the literature for evidence on the use of postoperative investigations before AED discontinuation after successful epilepsy surgery. We were unable to identify studies on the prognostic value of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and AED blood levels. The literature review yielded seven studies on the predictive value of electroencephalography. Four studies found no association between interictal discharges (IED) and seizure relapse. These studies suffered from various limitations due to their retrospective design and generally small cohorts. Two of the three studies reporting a positive association were prospective and provided strong evidence of an increased risk of seizure recurrence with presence of postoperative IED in successfully operated patients undergoing AED withdrawal.

MULTI-MODALITY IMAGE REGISTRATION FOR SUBDURAL ELECTRODE LOCALIZATION

Surgical treatment has been proved to be an effective way to control seizures for some kinds of intractable epilepsy. The electrocorticogram (ECoG) recorded from subdural electrodes has become an important technique for defining epileptogenic zones before surgery in clinical practice. The exact location of subdural electrodes has to be determined to establish the connection between electrodes and epileptogenic zones. Artifacts caused by the electrodes can severely affect the quality of CT imaging and sequentially image registration. In this paper, we discussed the performance of mean squares and the Mattes mutual information metric methods in multimodal image registration for subdural electrode localization. Since the skull can be regarded as a rigid body, rigid registration is sufficient for the purpose of subdural electrode localization. The vital parameter for the rigid registration is rotation. The translation result depends on the result of rotation. Both the methods performed well in the determination of the rotation center. Rotation angles of different image pairs of the same volume pair fluctuated a lot. Based on the image acquisition process, we assume that the images within the same volume pair should have the same transformation parameters for registration. Results show that the mean rotation angles of images within one dataset are approximate to the manual results that are considered to be the actual result for registration despite their fluctuation range.

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in glioma patients after long-term seizure freedom: design of a prospective observational study

Background

Epilepsy is common in patients with a glioma. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment, but may cause side effects and may negatively impact neurocognitive functioning and quality of life. Besides antiepileptic drugs, anti-tumour treatment, which currently consists of surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, may contribute to seizure control as well. In glioma patients with seizure freedom after anti-tumour therapy the question emerges whether AEDs should be continued, particularly in the case where anti-tumour treatment has been successful. We propose to explore the possibility of AED withdrawal in glioma patients with long-term seizure freedom after anti-tumour therapy and without signs of tumour progression.

Methods/Design

We initiate a prospective, observational study exploring the decision-making process on the withdrawal or continuation of AEDs in low-grade and anaplastic glioma patients with stable disease and prolonged seizure freedom after anti-tumour treatment, and the effects of AED withdrawal or continuation on seizure freedom. We recruit participants through the outpatient clinics of three tertiary referral centers for brain tumour patients in The Netherlands. The patient and the treating physician make a shared decision to either withdraw or continue AED treatment. Over a one-year period, we aim to include 100 glioma patients. We expect approximately half of the participants to be willing to withdraw AEDs. The primary outcome measures are: 1) the outcome of the shared-decision making on AED withdrawal or continuation, and decision related arguments, and 2) seizure freedom at 12 months and 24 months of follow-up. We will also evaluate seizure type and frequency in case of seizure recurrence, as well as neurological symptoms, adverse effects related to AED treatment or withdrawal, other anti-tumour treatments and tumour progression.

Discussion

This study addresses two issues that are currently unexplored. First, it will explore the willingness to withdraw AEDs in glioma patients, and second, it will assess the risk of seizure recurrence in case AEDs are withdrawn in this specific patient population. This study aims to contribute to a more tailored AED treatment, and prevent unnecessary and potentially harmful use of AEDs in glioma patients.

Reducing versus stopping antiepileptic medications after temporal lobe surgery

Objective

To study the safety of antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal after temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery.

Methods

We reviewed patients who underwent TLE surgery from 1995 to 2011, collecting data on doses, dates of AED initiation, reduction, and discontinuation. Predictors of seizure outcome were defined using Cox-proportional hazard modeling and adjusted for, while comparing longitudinal seizure-freedom in patients for whom AEDs were unchanged after resection as opposed to reduced or stopped.

Results

A total of 609 patients (86% adults) were analyzed. Follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 16.7 years. Most (64%) had hippocampal sclerosis. Overall, 229 patients had remained on their same baseline AEDs, while 380 patients stopped (127 cases) or reduced (253 cases) their AEDs. Mean timing of the earliest AED change was shorter in patients with recurrent seizures (1.04 years) compared to those seizure-free at last follow-up (1.44 years; P-value 0.03). Whether AEDs were withdrawn 12 or 24 months after surgery, there was a 10–25% higher risk of breakthrough seizures within the subsequent 2 years. However, 70% of patients with seizure recurrence after AED discontinuation reachieved remission, as opposed to 50% of those whose seizures recurred while reducing AEDs (P = 0.0001). Long-term remission rates were similar in both AED discontinuation and “unchanged” groups (82% remission for AEDs withdrawn after 1 year and 90% for AEDs withdrawn after 2 years), while only 65% of patients whose recurrences started during AED reduction achieved a 2-year remission by last follow-up.

Interpretation

AED withdrawal increases the short-term risk of breakthrough seizures after TLE surgery, and may alter the long-term disease course in some patients.

Surgical treatment of epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article outlines indications for neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy, describes the presurgical workup, summarizes surgical approaches, and details expected risks and benefits.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is class I evidence for the efficacy of temporal lobectomy in treating intractable seizures, and accumulating documentation that successful surgical treatment reverses much of the disability, morbidity, and excess mortality of chronic epilepsy.

SUMMARY

Chronic, uncontrolled focal epilepsy causes progressive disability and increased mortality, but these can be reversed with seizure control. Vigorous efforts to stop seizures are warranted. If two well-chosen and tolerated medication trials do not achieve seizure control, an early workup for epilepsy surgery should be arranged. If this workup definitively identifies the brain region from which the seizures arise, and this region can be removed with a low risk of disabling neurologic deficits, neurosurgery will have a much better chance of stopping seizures than further medication trials.

Survey of current practices among US epileptologists of antiepileptic drug withdrawal after epilepsy surgery

In order to identify the current practices of antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal after epilepsy surgery, a survey was administered to 204 adult and pediatric epileptologists. The responses from 58 epileptologists revealed wide variations regarding the time course and extent of AED withdrawal after successful epilepsy surgery. For most of the epileptologists, the likelihood of the surgery being successful is an important factor in determining whether or not AEDs are tapered. Most of the respondents started to taper AEDs more rapidly than suggested by previous reports. The majority of the epileptologists were able to stop all AEDs completely in a substantial number of patients. The most important factors considered when deciding to taper AEDs were the presence of ongoing auras and the occurrence of postoperative seizures prior to seizure remission. In the absence of data from well-designed prospective trials, such survey results can inform practice and, hopefully, aid in the design of future trials.

Stopping antiepileptic drugs: when and why?

After a patient has initiated an antiepileptic drug (AED) and achieved a sustained period of seizure freedom, the bias towards continuing therapy indefinitely can be substantial. Studies show that the rate of seizure recurrence after AED withdrawal is about two to three times the rate in patients who continue AEDs, but there are many benefits to AED withdrawal that should be evaluated on an individualized basis. AED discontinuation may be considered in patients whose seizures have been completely controlled for a prolonged period, typically 1 to 2 years for children and 2 to 5 years for adults. For children, symptomatic epilepsy, adolescent onset, and a longer time to achieve seizure control are associated with a worse prognosis. In adults, factors such as a longer duration of epilepsy, an abnormal neurologic examination, an abnormal EEG, and certain epilepsy syndromes are known to increase the risk of recurrence. Even in patients with a favorable prognosis, however, the risk of relapse can be as high as 20% to 25%. Before withdrawing AEDs, patients should be counseled about their individual risk for relapse and the potential implications of a recurrent seizure, particularly for safety and driving.

Debate: Should antiepileptic drugs be stopped after successful epilepsy surgery?

There is no consensus on whether or when to stop anticonvulsant drug treatment in patients after apparently successful epilepsy surgery. Although there are compelling reasons to consider antiepileptic drug (AED) discontinuation, there are relatively few data, and no class 1 data, to guide patient and physician decision-making on this topic. This debate lays out a conceptual framework for considering the issue of AED discontinuation, and reviews and critiques the available data. The goal is to provide physicians with the best available data, a context in which to consider it, and a full understanding of its limitations. This article also highlights an area that is ripe for further prospective study.