Leading up to saying "yes": A qualitative study on the experience of patients with refractory epilepsy regarding presurgical investigation for resective surgery

The lived experience of the burden of normality: Explored through the lens of art therapy

Within the clinical and research spheres, there is increasing recognition of the importance of understanding the lived experience of ongoing illness and incorporating this voice into research and clinical practice. The current paper provides insights into the lived experience of undergoing epilepsy surgery, explored through the lens of art therapy. Six pieces of self-portraiture are presented that highlight key features of the burden of normality as experienced by joint first author Sarah Brown (SB) after her epilepsy surgery. Self-reflections from SB about her artwork are integrated with findings from the empirical literature that detail experiences of post-operative adjustment, providing novel insights into the post-operative adjustment process from the lived experience perspective. This approach highlights ways in which key findings from the research literature, which summates experiences at the group level, can be applied to the individual situation. The study also underscores the potential value of art therapy as a complementary therapy for holistic post-operative rehabilitation practices.

Bridging the conversational gap in epilepsy: Using large language models to reveal insights into patient behavior and concerns from online discussions

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to explore the experiences and concerns of people living with epilepsy by analyzing discussions in an online epilepsy community, using large language models (LLMs) to identify themes, demographic patterns, and associations with emotional distress, substance use, and suicidal ideation.

METHODS

We analyzed 56 970 posts and responses to them from 21 906 users on the epilepsy forum (subreddit) of Reddit and 768 504 posts from the same users in other subreddits, between 2010 and 2023. LLMs, validated against human labeling, were used to identify 23 recurring themes, assess demographic differences, and examine cross-posting to depression- and suicide-related subreddits. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to assess the association between specific themes and activity in mental health forums.

RESULTS

Prominent topics included seizure descriptions, medication management, stigma, drug and alcohol use, and emotional well-being. The posts on topics less likely to be discussed in clinical settings had the highest engagement. Younger users focused on stigma and emotional issues, whereas older users discussed medical treatments. Posts about emotional distress (HR = 1.3), postictal state (HR = 1.4), surgical treatment (HR = .7), and work challenges (HR = 1.6) predicted activity in a subreddit associated with suicidal ideation, whereas emotional distress (HR = 1.5), surgical treatment (HR = .6), and stigma (HR = 1.3) predicted activity in the depression subreddit. Substance use discussions showed a temporal pattern of association with seizure descriptions, implying possible opportunities for intervention.

SIGNIFICANCE

LLM analysis of online epilepsy communities provides novel insights into patient concerns often overlooked in clinical settings. These findings may improve patient-provider communication, inform personalized interventions, and support the development of patient-reported outcome measures. Additionally, hazard models can help identify at-risk individuals, offering opportunities for early mental health interventions.

Experiences of adults living with refractory epilepsy and their views and expectations on receiving results from whole genome sequencing

INTRODUCTION

Researchers, clinicians and patients are turning to new innovations in research and clinical practice to further their knowledge in the genetic domain and improve diagnostics or treatment. However, with increased knowledge in genetics, societal issues may arise. Being conscious of these issues is crucial in order to implement standardized and efficient testing on a wider scale that is accessible to a greater number of individuals while simultaneously returning test results, including incidental findings, in a timely manner.

METHODS

Within the framework of a genomics research project, we invited 20 participants who suffer from refractory epilepsy to provide insight on their personal experiences with epilepsy, as well as their thoughts on receiving Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) results and with whom they would feel comfortable sharing these results with.

RESULTS

All participants had their own unique experience with epilepsy, such as how they handled their diagnosis, their struggles following the diagnosis, the healthcare services they received, how they shared their diagnosis with others, and how they managed stigmatization from others. Most participants would be eager to know their WGS results, whether the results be related to epilepsy (n = 19), response to pharmaceutical drugs including AEDs (n = 16), comorbidities (n = 19) and incidental findings (n = 15).

CONCLUSION

Our findings reinforce the need to improve access to genetic testing for epilepsy patients in clinical settings. Furthermore, while acquiring more genetic knowledge (i.e. WGS) about epilepsy can provide answers for the affected population, it also requires the simultaneous involvement of several medical disciplines, with greater emphasis on genetic and psychological counseling.

The Patient Lived-Experience of Ventral Capsulotomy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis of Neuroablative Psychiatric Neurosurgery

Ventral Capsulotomy (VC) is a surgical intervention for treatment-resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Despite clinical studies, little is known about patient perception and lived experience after neurosurgery for severe OCD. To examine the lived experiences of patients who have undergone VC for severe, treatment-resistant OCD through qualitative analysis. We conducted semi-structured interviews with six participants treated with VC for OCD. Interviews were analyzed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. The following themes emerged: (1) After years of conventional treatments, patients felt neurosurgery was their “last hope” and described themselves as “desperate,” (2) While some described the surgery as a “supernatural experience,” patients also demonstrated understanding of the scientific procedure, its risks and potential benefits, (3) The surgical experience itself was positive or neutral, which was linked to trust in the clinical team, (4) Post-surgery, participants described months of heightened fear as they awaited lesion formation and functional improvement. (5) Patients consistently contextualized outcome in the context of their own life goals. Patients undergoing VC have positive views of this neurosurgical intervention, but psychiatric neurosurgical teams should anticipate patient discomfort with the time needed to achieve behavioral improvement following surgery and emphasize the importance of post-operative psychiatric care.

Peer support and social network groups among people living with epilepsy: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Peer support is a unique connection formed between people who share similar experiences of illness. It is distinct from, but complementary to other forms of support or care provided by family and friends, healthcare professionals, and other service providers. The role of peer support in contributing to the wellbeing and care of people living with epilepsy (PLWE) is increasingly recognized, including via online networks and group therapy. However, little overall synthesis is available to map and conceptualize the different ways peer support contributes to the wellbeing or care of PLWE, or how it occurs via formally and informally organized social network settings.

METHODS

A scoping review of peer-reviewed literature published between 1998 and 2021 was conducted using Medline, Psychinfo, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Included studies comprised empirical research that involved people with epilepsy as the primary participants; included 'peer social support' in the study question or study setting, and included outcome measures related to peer social support or peer-related groupings.

RESULTS

A total of 17 articles were included in the review. The functions of peer support for PLWE can be described as either emotional or instrumental. Emotional peer support includes a sense of empathy and encouragement gained from another person with a shared experience of illness, which can help to improve confidence for those challenged by isolation and stigma. Instrumental peer support refers to the more practical and tangible support provided by peers about treatment and support services, which can improve self-management and clarify misinformation. The mechanisms by which peer support and peer social networks materialize includes face-to-face meetings, online group gatherings, and telephone calls. As well as through organized channels, peer support can be fostered incidentally through, for example, research participation, or in clinical settings. Barriers to PLWE receiving opportunities for peer support include the perceived stigma of living with epilepsy, the high cost of transportation, or poor access to the internet to reach and meet others; enablers include the anonymity afforded by online forums and perceived trust in one's peers or forum organizers.

CONCLUSIONS

This nuanced conceptualization of the different types of peer support and peer support networks, as well as the variety of barriers and enablers of peer support for PLWE, will serve to inform more effectively designed clinical care practices and service delivery tailored to the needs of PLWE. This review will inform future research in peer support as an important and emerging area of investigation.

Surgery in intractable epilepsy-physicians' recommendations and patients' decisions

OBJECTIVES

To identify demographic and clinical variables independently associated with patients' decisions against their physicians' recommendations for resective epilepsy surgery or further scalp video-EEG monitoring (sca-VEM), semi-invasive (sem-)VEM with foramen ovale and/or peg electrodes, and invasive (in-)VEM.

METHODS

Consecutive patients, who underwent presurgical assessment with at least one sca-VEM between 2010 and 2014, were included into this retrospective analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent variables associated with patients' decisions.

RESULTS

Within the study period, 352 patients underwent 544 VEM sessions comprising 451 sca-, 36 sem-, and 57 in-VEMs. Eventually, 96 patients were recommended resective surgery, and 106 were ineligible candidates; 149 patients denied further necessary VEMs; thus, no decision could be made. After sca- or additional sem-VEM, nine out of 51 eligible patients (17.6%) rejected resection. One hundred and ten patients were recommended in-VEM, 52 of those (47.2%) declined. Variables independently associated with rejection of in-VEM comprised intellectual disability (OR 4.721, 95% CI 1.047-21.284), extratemporal focal aware non-motor seizures ("aura") vs. no "aura" (OR 0.338, 95% CI 0.124-0.923), and unilateral or bilateral vs. no MRI lesion (OR 0.248, 95% CI 0.100-0.614 and 0.149, 95% CI 0.027-0.829, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

During and after presurgical evaluation, patients with intractable focal epilepsy declined resections and intracranial EEGs, as recommended by their epileptologists, in almost 20% and 50% of cases. This calls for early and thorough counseling of patients on risks and benefits of epilepsy surgery. Future prospective studies should ask patients in depth for specific reasons why they decline their physicians' recommendations.

Determining the role and responsibilities of the Australian epilepsy nurse in the management of epilepsy: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a common neurological condition affecting between 3% and 3.5% of the Australian population at some point in their lifetime. The effective management of chronic and complex conditions such as epilepsy requires person-centred and coordinated care across sectors, from primary to tertiary healthcare. Internationally, epilepsy nurse specialists are frequently identified as playing a vital role in improving the integration of epilepsy care and enhancing patient self-management. This workforce has not been the focus of research in Australia to date.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multistage mixed-method study examines the role and responsibilities of epilepsy nurses, particularly in primary and community care settings, across Australia, including through the provision of a nurse helpline service. A nationwide sample of 30 epilepsy nurses will be purposively recruited via advertisements distributed by epilepsy organisations and through word-of-mouth snowball sampling. Two stages (1 and 3) consist of a demographic questionnaire and semistructured interviews (individual or group) with epilepsy nurse participants, with the thematic data analysis from this work informing the areas for focus in stage 3. Stage 2 comprises of a retrospective descriptive analysis of phone call data from Epilepsy Action Australia's National Epilepsy Line service to identify types of users, their needs and reasons for using the service, and to characterise the range of activities undertaken by the nurse call takers.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval for this study was granted by Macquarie University (HREC: 52020668117612). Findings of the study will be published through peer-reviewed journal articles and summary reports to key stakeholders, and disseminated through public forums and academic conference presentations. Study findings will also be communicated to people living with epilepsy and families.

Addressing the epilepsy surgery gap: Impact of community/tertiary epilepsy center collaboration

•

Collaboration agreements can improve epilepsy surgery referral volumes.

•

Standardized referral pathways may help address epilepsy surgery gap.

•

Internal and external process changes can improve referral process.

•

Sociodemographic variables continue to influence referral completion.

To assess whether a formal collaboration between a non-surgical, community epilepsy center and a surgical, tertiary-care epilepsy center can improve patient progress throughout the pre-surgical referral process, and to elucidate predictors of referral completion among inter-center referrals.

The inter-center referral process was tracked, and the number of patients completing surgical conference (primary outcome) and epilepsy surgery at the tertiary center were collected and compared in the 45-month immediate pre/post-collaboration periods. Demographic and clinical variables were collected on post-collaboration inter-center patient referrals to explore factors associated with completion of the referral process.

Compared to the pre-collaboration period, the proportion of tertiary center epilepsy surgery conference patients referred from the community epilepsy center increased from 3/88 to 14/113 (263% increase, p = .01) during the post-collaboration period. The proportion of patients completing surgery via the community to tertiary referral process increased from 2/63 pre-collaboration to 8/71 post-collaboration (254% increase, p = .04). Referral completion was associated with higher seizure frequency, shorter travel distance, private insurance status and positive employment status (p < 0.05).

Collaboration agreements between community and tertiary-care epilepsy centers may improve patient completion of the epilepsy surgery referral process. Implementation of similar programs at other centers may be beneficial in reducing the epilepsy surgery gap.

Identification and referral of patients with refractory epilepsy from the primary to the tertiary care interface in New South Wales, Australia

OBJECTIVES

This mixed-method feasibility study conducted in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, aimed to explore clinical practices around the identification of patients with refractory epilepsy and referral from primary care to Tertiary Epilepsy Centers. The perceptions of general practitioners, neurologists, and adults living with refractory epilepsy were considered.

METHODS

Fifty-two data collection events were achieved through 22 semi-structured interviews with six neurologists and 12 adults who currently have, or have had refractory epilepsy, and four family members, 10 clinical observations of patient consultations and 20 surveys with general practitioners. A thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data alongside assessment of observational fieldnotes and survey data.

FINDINGS

Two main themes emerged: 1) Patient healthcare pathways and care experiences highlighted the complex and deeply contextualized experiences of both patients and healthcare professionals, from first identification of people's seizures, in primary and community care settings, to referral to Tertiary Epilepsy Centers, shedding light on a fragmented, nonstandardized referral process, influenced by both individual and shared-care practices. 2) Factors impacting referrals and patient pathways indicated that onward referral to a Tertiary Epilepsy Center is affected by the knowledge, or the lack thereof, of healthcare professionals regarding treatment options. Barriers include limited person-centered care, shared decision-making, and refractory epilepsy education for healthcare professionals, which can delay patients' disease identification and can hinder speedy referral pathways and processes, in Australia for up to 17 years. In addition, person-centered communication around care pathways is affected by relationships between clinicians, patients, and family members.

CONCLUSION

This study has identified a noticeable lack of standardized care across epilepsy-related healthcare sectors, which recognizes a need for developing and implementing clearer epilepsy-related guidelines and Continuing Professional Development in the primary and community care settings. This, however, requires greater collaboration and commitment in the primary, community, and tertiary care sectors to address the ongoing misconceptions around professional roles and responsibilities to optimize shared-care practices. Ultimately, prioritizing person-centered care on both patients' and professionals' agendas, in order to improve satisfaction with care experiences of people living with complex epilepsy.

Hospital service utilization trajectories of individuals living with epilepsy in New South Wales, Australia, 2012-2016: A population-based study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine five-year trajectories of hospital service utilization among individuals living with epilepsy in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and to identify factors predictive of trajectory group membership.

METHODS

This study used group-based trajectory modeling of hospital admissions over a five-year period for individuals living with epilepsy who had an epilepsy-related hospitalization during 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2012 in NSW, Australia (n = 5762).

RESULTS

The analysis revealed the following five distinct hospital service utilization trajectory groups: "one-off users" (Group 1; 22.9%), "low-chronic users" (Group 2; 47.1%), "moderate-declining users" (Group 3; 10.3%), "moderate-chronic users" (Group 4; 18.3%), and "high-chronic users" (Group 5; 1.5%). There were key features that defined trajectory group membership, in particular the relative proportions of group members with chronic health conditions, other comorbid conditions, refractory epilepsy, and status epilepticus. For instance, "high-chronic users" (Group 5) had higher proportions of individuals with chronic health conditions (34.8%) and refractory epilepsy (19.1%); "moderate-declining users" (Group 3) had higher proportions of individuals with chronic health conditions (35.1%) and status epilepticus (9.8%); and "low-chronic users" (Group 2) had the lowest proportion of individuals with chronic health conditions.

CONCLUSION

It is important to gain a better understanding of hospital service utilization among individuals living with epilepsy. This research has identified trajectory groups of hospital service utilization profiles of individuals living with epilepsy. Identification of predictors of trajectory group membership allows targeting of strategies to reduce hospital admissions, inform healthcare service delivery, and improve the health and wellbeing of individuals living with epilepsy.

Enhancing quality of life among epilepsy surgery patients: Interlinking multiple social and relational determinants

BACKGROUND

Achieving seizure control through resective brain surgery is a major predictor of improved quality of life (QOL) among people with refractory (drug-resistant) epilepsy. Nevertheless, QOL is a comprehensive and dynamic construct, consisting of broad dimensions such as physical health, psychosocial well-being, level of independence, social relationships, and beyond. This study highlights the interlinkage and complementarity of these diverse dimensions, and how in practice, patients, clinicians, and others in a social support system can actively promote QOL among surgery patients.

METHOD

Twenty-one qualitative in-depth interviews with patients with refractory epilepsy who are either undergoing presurgical assessment or postsurgery follow-up were conducted, to consider their perspective on QOL in relation to their experience of illness and surgical treatment. Data were thematically analyzed, resulting in three key thematic findings.

RESULTS

(1) A myriad of QOL dimensions are highly interrelated and interdependent with mutual 'spin-off' effects: Uncontrolled seizures impacted beyond physical and cognitive health, disrupting important social identities such as being successful parents, spouses, and career professionals. The desire for good clinical outcomes from surgery was justified against the need to mitigate these social and personal concerns. (2) In postsurgery care, there were complementary effects of clinical interventions and social factors on patients' QOL. Psychosocial well-being was supported by a combination of improved physical health, self-confidence, psychological interventions, and social support from employers and educators who were sensitive to patients' specialized needs. (3) Engaging in education, employment, and government services influenced not only socioeconomic well-being, but also a sense of social inclusion. Advocacy made on behalf of patients by clinicians and family members has helped to better manage patients' eligibility for social services provision.

CONCLUSION

Quality of life is achieved through a comprehensive and interactive social process, and not simply an outcome measure of clinical treatment. The responses and interactions of many others within the patients' life and treatment process, including family members, clinicians, and social service workers, can culminate to influence QOL, highlighting the importance of a relational and social determinants perspective in patient care.

Patient views about the impact of ulcerative colitis and its management with drug treatment and surgery: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial

Background

A nested qualitative interview study within the CONSTRUCT trial was conducted to explore experiences and perceptions of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis following treatment with infliximab or ciclosporin, surgery, or other medication.

Methods

Two hundred seventy patients with steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis were randomised to either infliximab or ciclosporin. Interviews were conducted with 20 trial participants. Thirty-five data capture events took place in total, 20 interviews conducted 3 months after treatment and a further 15 interviews with the same cohort as second interviews at 12 months.

Results

Disease duration varied but similar stories emerged about how people adjusted to living with ulcerative colitis. Issues raised by patients included; the debilitating effect of the disease on quality of life, living with the unpredictability of symptoms and treatment, dealing with embarrassment and stigma and the desire to share knowledge of the disease with others to combat the private nature of this debilitating illness and bring greater visibility to patient experience of symptoms and outcomes.

Conclusion

Patients were more positive about treatment with infliximab than ciclosporin, mainly due to the cumbersome intravenous regimen required for ciclosporin. Prompt diagnosis is required and early reporting of changes in symptoms is encouraged to ensure appropriate treatment.

Trial registration

This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry; number ISRCTN22663589. The date of registration was 16/05/2008.

Determinants of health and wellbeing in refractory epilepsy and surgery: The Patient Reported, ImpleMentation sciEnce (PRIME) model

This paper offers a new way of understanding the course of a chronic, neurological condition through a comprehensive model of patient-reported determinants of health and wellbeing: The Patient Reported ImpleMentation sciEnce (PRIME) model is the first model of its kind to be based on patient-driven insights for the design and implementation of initiatives that could improve tertiary, primary, and community healthcare services for patients with refractory epilepsy, and has broad implications for other disorders; PRIME focuses on: patient-reported determinants of health and wellbeing, pathways through care, gaps in treatment and other system delays, patient need and expectation, and barriers and facilitators to high-quality care provision; PRIME highlights that in the context of refractory epilepsy, patients value appropriate, clear, and speedy referrals from primary care practitioners and community neurologists to specialist healthcare professionals based in tertiary epilepsy centers. Many patients also want to share in decisions around treatment and care, and gain a greater understanding of their debilitating disease, so as to find ways to self-manage their illness more effectively and plan for the future. Here, PRIME is presented using refractory epilepsy as the exemplar case, while the model remains flexible, suitable for adaptation to other settings, patient populations, and conditions; PRIME comprises six critical levels: 1) The Individual Patient Model; 2) The Patient Relationships Model; 3) The Patient Care Pathways Model; 4) The Patient Transitions Model; 5) The Pre- and Postintervention Model; and 6) The Comprehensive Patient Model. Each level is dealt with in detail, while Levels 5 and 6 are presented in terms of where the gaps lie in our current knowledge, in particular in relation to patients' journeys through healthcare, system intersections, and individuals adaptive behavior following resective surgery, as well as others' views of the disease, such as family members.

Promoting faster pathways to surgery: a clinical audit of patients with refractory epilepsy

Background

Individuals with epilepsy who cannot be adequately controlled with anti-epileptic drugs, refractory epilepsy, may be suitable for surgical treatment following detailed assessment. This is a complex process and there are concerns over delays in referring refractory epilepsy patients for surgery and subsequent treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the different patient pathways, referral and surgical timeframes, and surgical and medical treatment options for refractory epilepsy patients referred to two Tertiary Epilepsy Clinics in New South Wales, Australia.

Methods

Clinical records were reviewed for 50 patients attending the two clinics, in two large teaching hospitals (25 in Clinic 1; 25 in Clinic 2. A purpose-designed audit tool collected detailed aspects of outpatient consultations and treatment. Patients with refractory epilepsy with their first appointment in 2014 were reviewed for up to six visits until the end of 2016. Data collection included: patient demographics, type of epilepsy, drug management, and assessment for surgery. Outcomes included: decisions regarding surgical and/or medical management, and seizure status following surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures to assess anxiety and depression were collected in Clinic 1 only.

Results

Patient mean age was 38.3 years (SD 13.4), the mean years since diagnosis was 17.3 years (SD 9.8), and 88.0% of patients had a main diagnosis of focal epilepsy. Patients were taking an average of 2.3 (SD 0.9) anti-epileptic drugs at the first clinic visit. A total of 17 (34.0%) patients were referred to the surgical team and 11 (22.0%) underwent a neuro-surgical procedure. The average waiting time between visit 1 to surgical referral was 38.8 weeks (SD 25.1), and between visit 1 and the first post-operative visit was 55.8 weeks (SD 25.0).

Conclusion

The findings confirm international data showing significant waiting times between diagnosis of epilepsy and referral to specialist clinics for surgical assessment and highlight different approaches in each clinic in terms of visit numbers and recorded activities. A standardised pathway and data collection, including patient-reported outcome measures, would provide better evidence for whether promoting earlier referral and assessment for surgery improves the lives of this disease group.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12883-019-1255-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.