Memory and motor control in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

The imprint of dissociative seizures on the brain

BACKGROUND

Increased resting state functional connectivity between regions involved in emotion control with regions with other specializations, e.g. motor control (emotional hyperconnectivity) is one of the most consistent imaging findings in persons suffering from dissociative seizures (DS). The overall goal of this study was to better characterize DS-related emotional hyperconnectivity using dynamic resting state analysis combined with brainstem volumetry to investigate 1. If emotional hyperconnectivity is restricted to a single state. 2. How volume losses within the modulatory and emotional motor subnetworks of the neuromodulatory system influence the expression of the emotional hyperconnectivity.

METHODS

13 persons with dissociative seizures (PDS) (f/m:10/3, mean age (SD) 44.6 (11.5)) and 15 controls (CON) (f/m:10/5, mean age (SD) 41.7 (13.0)) underwent a mental health test battery and structural and functional imaging at 3 T. Deformation based morphometry was used to assess brain volume loss by extracting the mean Jacobian determinants from 457 brain, forebrain and brainstem structures. The bold signals from 445 brainstem and brain rois were extracted with CONN and a dynamic fMRI analysis combined with graph and hierarchical analysis was used to identify and characterize 9 different brain states. Welch's t tests and Kendall tau tests were used for group comparisons and correlation analyses.

RESULTS

The duration of Brain state 6 was longer in PDS than in CON (93.1(88.3) vs. 23.4(31.2), p = 0.01) and positively correlated with higher degrees of somatization, depression, PTSD severity and dissociation. Its global connectivity was higher in PDS than CON (90.4(3.2) vs 86.5(4.2) p = 0.01) which was caused by an increased connectivity between regions involved in emotion control and regions involved in sense of agency/body control. The brainstem and brainstem-forebrain modulatory and emotional motor subnetworks of the neuromodulatory system were atrophied in PDS. Atrophy severity within the brainstem-forebrain subnetworks was correlated with state 6 dwell time (modulatory: tau = -0.295, p = 0.03; emotional motor: tau = -0.343, p = 0.015) and atrophy severity within the brainstem subnetwork with somatization severity (modulatory: tau = -0.25, p = 0.036; emotional motor: tau = -0.256, p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

DS-related emotional hyperconnectivity was restricted to state 6 episodes. The remaining states were not different between PDS and CON. The modulatory subnetwork synchronizes brain activity across brain regions. Atrophy and dysfunction within that subnetwork could facilitate the abnormal interaction between regions involved in emotion control with those controlling sense of agency/body ownership during state 6 and contribute to the tendency for somatization in PDS. The emotional motor subnetwork controls the activity of spinal motoneurons. Atrophy and dysfunction within this subnetwork could impair that control resulting in motor symptoms during DS. Taken together, these findings indicate that DS have a neurophysiological underpinning.

Structural and functional changes associated with functional/dissociative seizures: A review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The term 'functional/dissociative seizures (FDS)' refers to a paroxysmal, transient clinical manifestation that may include motor, sensory, vegetative, psychological and cognitive signs, similar to the manifestations observed in epileptic seizures. In recent years, there has been an increase of literature in the field of brain imaging research on functional neurological disorders and, more specifically, on FDS. However, most of the studies have been carried out on limited samples. We propose an update of this review work by performing a systematic review of studies performed since 2017 in the field of neuroimaging in patients with FDS.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature using the PRISMA methodology and reproduced most of the methodological elements of the latest systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Our work over the last five years has identified 14 articles. It is still difficult to isolate a distinct structure or network specifically involved in the mechanism of FDS. However, certain structures are recurrently involved in imaging studies, notably the amygdala, the orbitofrontal cortex, and the anterior cingulate cortex.

CONCLUSION

The contribution of neuroimaging may allow a more precise explanation of the disorder for patients, avoiding the stigma frequently associated with this diagnosis. as with other 'conversion' phenomena which have traditionally been considered only as 'medically unexplained'. In the longer term and beyond a better understanding of the physiopathology of the disorder, the challenge of this neuroimaging work would be to identify specific imaging biomarkers for a diagnosis of FDS.

White Matter Structural Connectivity and Its Impact on Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures: An Evidence-Based Review

Psychiatric non-epileptic seizure (PNES), also known as a form of functional neurological disorders (FND), is a common but still underrecognized disorder presenting seizure-like symptoms and no electrophysiological abnormality. Despite the significant burden of this disorder, the neurobiological mechanisms are not clearly understood, which hinders the development of better diagnosis and treatment. In the recent neuroimaging research on PNES, brain network analysis has become a relevant topic beyond conventional methodologies. The human brain is a highly intricate system of interconnected regions that collaborate to facilitate a wide range of cognitive and behavioral functions. White matter tracts, which are comprised of bundles of axonal fibers, are the primary means by which information is transmitted between different brain regions. As such, comprehending the organization and structure of the brain's white matter network is critical for gaining insight into its functional architecture. This review article aims to provide an overview of the brain mechanisms underlying PNES, with a special focus on analyzing brain networks.

The Comparison Between Neuropsychological Features of Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures and Epileptic Seizures

Background: Both epileptic seizures (ES) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) are often associated with some degree of cognitive impairment. Video electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring is the gold standard for diagnosing PNES. This diagnostic procedure is costly and available in specific tertiary centers. Neuropsychological assessment can provide clues for the differential diagnosis of PNES and ES and help clarify the nature and etiology of these two disorders. Objectives: Therefore, this study aimed to compare the neuropsychological profiles of PNES and ES patients. Methods: In this analytical cross-sectional study, 30 patients with ES and 31 patients with PNES were compared by neuropsychiatric tests, such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale (WAIS), Addenbrooke’s Cognitive examination (ACE), and California Verbal Learning test (CVLT). Results: There was a female predominance in the PNES group (female-to-male ratio = 4.16/1, P = 0.003). In the PNES group, 77.4% of the patients had a psychiatric disorder versus 66.7% of the patients in the ES group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.34). The mean score of total intelligence was higher in the PNES group (84.77 ± 16.94), compared to the ES group (83.63 ± 10.04); however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.75). Based on the mean subscale scores, the digit symbol score (WAIS-IV subscale) and memory score (ACE subscale) were significantly higher in the PNES group compared to the ES group (P = 0.037 and 0.032, respectively). Conclusions: This study showed that neuropsychological assessments might not differentiate ES from non-epileptic seizures.

Myths and truths about pediatric psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is a neuropsychiatric condition that causes a transient alteration of consciousness and loss of self-control. PNES, which occur in vulnerable individuals who often have experienced trauma and are precipitated by overwhelming circumstances, are a body's expression of a distressed mind, a cry for help. PNES are misunderstood, mistreated, under-recognized, and underdiagnosed. The mindbody dichotomy, an artificial divide between physical and mental health and brain disorders into neurology and psychiatry, contributes to undue delays in the diagnosis and treatment of PNES. One of the major barriers in the effective diagnosis and treatment of PNES is the dissonance caused by different illness perceptions between patients and providers. While patients are bewildered by their experiences of disabling attacks beyond their control or comprehension, providers consider PNES trivial because they are not epileptic seizures and are caused by psychological stress. The belief that patients with PNES are feigning or controlling their symptoms leads to negative attitudes of healthcare providers, which in turn lead to a failure to provide the support and respect that patients with PNES so desperately need and deserve. A biopsychosocial perspective and better understanding of the neurobiology of PNES may help bridge this great divide between brain and behavior and improve our interaction with patients, thereby improving prognosis. Knowledge of dysregulated stress hormones, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, and altered brain connectivity in PNES will better prepare providers to communicate with patients how intangible emotional stressors could cause tangible involuntary movements and altered awareness.

Brain connectivity abnormalities in patients with functional (psychogenic nonepileptic) seizures: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current endeavor was to systematically review the existing evidence on brain connectivity abnormalities in patients with functional seizures (FS).

METHODS

This systematic review was prepared according to the instructions of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE (accessed from PubMed) and Scopus from inception to April 4, 2020 were systematically searched. The following search strategy was implemented and these key words (in the title/abstract) were used: "connectivity" OR "network" AND "psychogenic" OR "dissociative" OR "nonepileptic".

RESULTS

Through the search strategy, we could identify eighteen articles. These studies have applied various methodologies and they could identify a variety of brain connectivity abnormalities in people with FS. However, none of these studies provided a high level of evidence. They were all small studies (none had a sample size of more than 21 patients). In addition, most of the studies did not match their cases and their controls with respect to the psychiatric comorbidities and other significant confounders.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal functional connectivity between emotion processing areas of the brain with regions involved in executive control and cognitive performance, and the functional connections of the anterior cingulate cortex are of major interest and may be involved in the pathophysiology of FS. Pursuing the concept of brain connectivity abnormalities in patients with FS and comparing the findings with well-matched controls in well-designed studies may result in a breakthrough in identifying the exact neurobiological origin of FS.