Caregivers' impression of epilepsy surgery in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex

Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring: The Switch from Subdural Electrodes to Stereoelectroencephalography

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has experienced an explosion in use due to a shifting understanding of epileptic networks and wider application of minimally invasive epilepsy surgery techniques. Both subdural electrode (SDE) monitoring and SEEG serve important roles in defining the epileptogenic zone, limiting functional deficits, and formulating the most effective surgical plan. Strengths of SEEG include the ability to sample difficult to reach, deep structures of the brain without a craniotomy and without disrupting the dura. SEEG is complementary to minimally invasive epilepsy treatment options and may reduce the treatment gap in patients who are hesitant about craniotomy and surgical resection. Understanding the strengths and limitations of SDE monitoring and SEEG allows epileptologists to choose the best modality of invasive monitoring for each patient living with drug-resistant seizures.

Overview of therapeutic options for epilepsy

Tuberous sclerosis (TSC) epilepsy includes infantile spasms and focal seizures before the age of 2 years, whereas focal seizures are predominant over 2 years and generalized seizures may occasionally be part of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The better and earlier the seizure control, the better the child's subsequent cognitive and behavioral prognosis. As for epilepsy of other causes, therapeutic options depend on the type of seizure/epilepsy, age and drug resistance, but there are significant specificities for TSC. (1) As first-line treatment, vigabatrin is unanimously recommended for infantile spasms and focal seizures before 2 years and is also widely used for seizures over 2 years, as are levetiracetam and carbamazepine. (2) If seizures persist (about 40% of children and adolescents), cannabidiol and everolimus, an inhibitor of the mTOR pathway, have recently been approved as adjunctive therapy to the arsenal of antiseizure medications authorized for this age group and to the ketogenic diet. (3) Surgery is an essential treatment option in cases of drug resistance and should be discussed as soon as two treatments have failed. Presurgical investigations and operating techniques have recently progressed spectacularly, for example laser thermocoagulation with stereotactic location. A particularity of TSC is the possibility of sequential interventions on several epileptogenic tubers. (4) Finally, the innovative principle of initiating "pre-seizure" treatment with vigabatrin from the first months of life has just proven effective on the subsequent development of epilepsy in TSC. © 2022 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Satisfaction and seizure outcomes of epilepsy surgery in tuberous sclerosis: A Swedish population-based long-term follow-up study

PURPOSE

We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in a Swedish population.

METHODS

Demographic and seizure data was retrieved from the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Registry and medical records. Patient reported outcome measurements (PROM) were determined by telephonic interviews at long term follow-up.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 6 y 8 m (range, 3-15 y 1 m) for tuberectomies (n = 15) and 3 y 6 m (range 2-10 y) for callosotomies (n = 7). Eight of the 15 tuberectomy participants were seizure-free. Four out of seven callosotomies were free from drop attacks. PROMs were provided by caregivers of 18/20 participants (data missing for two callosotomies). In the tuberectomy group, 6/8 patients were seizure-free and 3/7 had continued seizures; surgery was considered satisfactory and beneficial. Overall, satisfaction was high, even among patients who did not achieve remission; 13/15 tuberectomy responders recommended surgery to others with TSC and refractory epilepsy. None of the patients considered the surgery harmful. In the callosotomy group, satisfaction was low and congruent with the seizure outcome. All patients with continued drop attacks were unsatisfied; one considered surgery to be harmful. One participant, who would not recommend surgery to others, still perceived the surgery to be beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that both tuberectomy and callosotomy are effective treatment options for TSC. Factors other than seizure outcomes seemed to have a major influence on satisfaction and perception of the benefit of surgery.

Barriers to epilepsy surgery in pediatric patients: A scoping review

RATIONALE

Up to 40% of pediatric epilepsy cases are drug-resistant and associated with neurocognitive, psychosocial, developmental comorbidities, and risk of early mortality. Epilepsy surgery (ES) may be considered after the failure of two anti-seizure medications (ASM) to provide patients with the opportunity to attain seizure freedom. However, only a small proportion of eligible patients receive surgical treatment. This scoping review aims to elucidate barriers to pediatric ES to understand the reasons for its underutilization.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were searched from inception through August 2022 for the following PICO terms: "pediatric", "parents", "epilepsy", "surgery", and "decision-making". Studies exploring barriers to ES were included and qualitatively synthesized. We adopted an inductive thematical approach, and barriers hindering ES were assigned to four thematic categories. PRISMA Sc-R guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Of 3400 retrieved studies, 17 were included. Barriers to ES were classified into 4 categories. Parental barriers originating from misperception, lack of knowledge regarding surgical outcomes, and emotional vulnerability were highlighted in 76% of included studies. Physician-based barriers, including lack of clinical expertise, trust, and communication, leading to inadequate informed consent and referral to surgical evaluation, were described in 65% of articles. Patient-based barriers were reported in 47% of studies and included clinical characteristics modulating acceptance of ES. Only 18% of studies described healthcare system-based barriers, including intricate insurance policies not adapted to sociodemographic disparities.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the complexity of barriers to pediatric ES. Our findings emphasize the need for multileveled strategies to increase the utilization of ES among eligible pediatric patients.

Physicians' Perspectives on Presurgical Discussion and Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Objective: To qualitatively explore the approach of pediatric epilepsy providers when counseling regarding surgical options for epilepsy, presenting risks and benefits of surgery, overcoming resistance to surgery, and fostering shared decision making with patients and families. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with 11 academic clinicians (5- neurologists, 5- epileptologists, 1- neurosurgeon) from a Level 4 pediatric epilepsy center to explore how physicians communicate and pursue surgical decision-making. Results: A blended inductive-deductive analysis revealed three key themes (with subthemes) of presurgical discussions: (1) Candidate selection and initial discussion about epilepsy surgery (neurologists compared to epileptologists, the timing of the discussion, reluctant families) (2) Detailed individualized counseling about epilepsy surgery (shared decision-making [enablers and barriers] and risk-benefit analysis [balancing risks and benefits, statistical benefit estimation, discussion about SUDEP, prognostication about cognitive and behavioral outcomes, risks of surgery]) (3) Tools to improve decision-making (educational interventions for patients and families and provider- and organization-specific interventions). Significance: Presurgical discussions lack uniformity among physicians who treat epilepsy. Despite general interest in collaborative decision-making, experts raised concern about lack of exposure to communication training and clinical tools for optimizing decision-making, a high number of families who do not feel equipped to share the decision making leaving the decision-making entirely to the physician, and paucity of practical resources for individualized risk-benefit counseling. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed to reduce existing practice variations in presurgical counseling. Further consensus is needed about when and how to initiate the conversation about epilepsy surgery, essential components of the discussion, and the utility of various tools to improve the utilization of epilepsy surgery.

Epilepsy Management in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Existing and Evolving Therapies and Future Considerations

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant condition that affects multiple body systems. Disruption of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway results in abnormal cell growth, proliferation, protein synthesis, and cell differentiation and migration in TSC. In the central nervous system, mTOR disruption is also believed to influence neuronal excitability and promote epileptogenesis. Epilepsy is the most common neurological manifestation of TSC and affects 80% to 90% of individuals with high rates of treatment resistance (up to 75%). The onset of epilepsy in the majority of individuals with TSC occurs before the age of two years, which is a critical time in neurodevelopment. Both medically refractory epilepsy and early-onset epilepsy are associated with intellectual disability in TSC, while seizure control and remission are associated with lower rates of cognitive impairment. Our current knowledge of the treatment of epilepsy in TSC has expanded immensely over the last decade. Several new therapies such as preemptive vigabatrin therapy in infants, cannabidiol, and mTOR inhibitors have emerged in recent years for the treatment of epilepsy in TSC. This review will provide clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies available for the treatment of epilepsy related to TSC.

Parental experience and decision-making for epilepsy surgery: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies

OBJECTIVE

In selected children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), epilepsy surgery is the most effective treatment option, but unfortunately remains highly underutilized. One of the critical obstacles to pursuing surgical therapy is parents/caregivers' decision against surgery or to delay the surgery until no other treatment option exists. Understanding caregiver decision-making around epilepsy surgery can improve patient/caregiver experience and satisfaction while facilitating appropriate decision-making that optimizes clinical outcomes. The current review systematically explores the existing evidence on caregiver experience and the decision-making process toward epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

The study was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic literature review. Databases (PubMed Ovid, PubMed Medline, Web of Science, CINHAL, PsycInfo) were systematically searched in February 2021 using a defined search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Total 1304 articles were screened for titles and abstracts, and 54 full-text articles were retrieved for further assessment. We included 14 articles with critical quality assessment using two different tools for qualitative and questionnaire-based studies. A qualitative content analysis was performed to characterize caregiver experience, perception, and decision-making toward favorable or unfavorable opinions of epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

Four concepts generated from the analysis may act as enablers or barriers to decision-making around epilepsy surgery: 1. Access to knowledge and information, 2. Communication and coordination issues, 3. Caregiver's emotional state, and 4. Socioeconomic effects. Subsequently, we provided a narrative synthesis of practice recommendations and a conceptual framework to adopt multi-pronged interventions to overcome identified diverse barriers to effective caregiver decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Multiple influences impact how caregivers decide about epilepsy surgery for their children, with no single factor identified as the primary driver for or against surgery. However, limited research has explored these influences. Future studies should focus on quantitatively examining factors to identify significant variables most likely to influence caregiver decision-making, ultimately overcoming barriers that limit utilization of epilepsy surgery as a treatment tool.

Epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex in childhood: Long-term outcome in children after epilepsy surgery and children non-eligible for epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

Drug-resistant epilepsy is one of the major disease burdens in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Epilepsy surgery has been shown to be effective in TSC, but making a decision for surgery is often more complex than in other surgically amenable epilepsy syndromes and not all patients with TSC are eligible. We investigated long-term outcomes (after ≥one year; median, 6.4 years) with a special interest in general developmental level, health-related quality of life, parental concerns due to epilepsy, impact on family, and social adaptation in children who underwent epilepsy surgery and in children who were not eligible for surgery.

METHODS

Eighty-five children (median age at intervention: 3.3 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.8-6.3 years) with TSC-related epilepsy had a presurgical investigation, and 34 of this group underwent epilepsy surgery. At follow-up (median age: 11.5 years, IQR: 7.8-15.5 years), we assessed seizure outcome, health-related quality of life, social adaptation, parental concerns due to epilepsy, and general developmental level based on established questionnaires and a standardized interview. Generalized linear models were performed for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 53% (18/34) of the operated patients were seizure free for ≥12 months and 30% (15/50) of the patients non-eligible for epilepsy surgery (p = 0.037). In the surgical group, developmental level was significantly higher in seizure-free patients, in comparison to non-seizure-free patients (p = 0.004); this was also observed in the non-surgical group, but less marked (p = 0.089). Furthermore, developmental level was significantly (p ≤ 0.001) related to quality of life, social adaptation, impact on family, and parental concerns. In both cohorts, parental concerns were less pronounced if children became seizure free (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively).

SIGNIFICANCE

In children with TSC-related epilepsy, quality of life, social adaptation, and impact on family were related to general developmental level, which in turn was significantly related to seizure freedom. Consequent epilepsy management aiming at seizure freedom, including presurgical evaluation and, if indicated, epilepsy surgery in a center specifically experienced with TSC-related epilepsy, is a worthwhile effort to improve quality of life in patients with TSC and their families.

Epilepsy Surgery: Monitoring and Novel Surgical Techniques

Drug-resistant epilepsy warrants referral to an epilepsy surgery center for consideration of alternative treatments including epilepsy surgery. Advances in technology now allow for minimally invasive neurophysiologic monitoring and surgical interventions, approaches that are attractive to families because large craniotomies and associated morbidity are avoided. This work reviews the presurgical evaluation process and discusses the use of invasive stereo-electroencephalography monitoring to localize seizure onset zones. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are described for the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies. These approaches have expanded our capacity to palliate and cure epilepsy in the pediatric population.