Hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a case report

Case report: mixed large-cell neuroendocrine and hepatocellular carcinoma of the liver

Background

Cases of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are very rare. Based on the microscopic characteristics, mixed HCC-NEC tumors can be divided into collision type and combined type. We report a patient with both collision and combined type HCC-NEC tumor at the same time.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old man with hepatitis B and cirrhosis was found to have two masses in segment 5 and segment 8 of the liver, respectively. Preoperative imaging diagnosis was primary liver cancer. Indocyanine green retention test (ICG R15) <10% suggested that the patient can tolerate surgery. Partial hepatectomy was performed under the guidance of 3D reconstruction. Postoperative pathology showed that most of the tumors in S5 were large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (90%), and a small part were hepatocellular carcinoma (10%). The tumor in S8 of the liver was diagnosed as HCC combined with immunohistochemistry. After surgery, the patient underwent genetic testing, which indicated mutations in TP53 gene. The test of immune markers of the sample suggest that the patient may benefit little from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy protocol to the patient following their surgery. Eight month later after the operation, Enhanced CT showed there was no recurrence or metastasis of the tumor.

Conclusion

The case at hand augments the understanding of HCC-NEC mixed tumors, offering pivotal insights into their precise diagnosis and treatment modalities. Furthermore, we document a favorable prognosis, marked by an absence of recurrence signs thus far-a rarity in comparable instances. This enlightenment stands to facilitate the handling of ensuing cases and enhance patient prognoses.

P53 and VEGF are promising biomarkers for sorafenib efficacy in an experimental model of NASH-related HCC

The efficacy of systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is poorly understood. In this study we evaluated the effects of sorafenib based on the expression of molecular markers related to major hepatocarcinogenesis pathways and angiogenesis in a NASH-related HCC model. Forty male rats were submitted to NASH-HCC induction through the combination of a high-fat and choline deficient diet and diethylnitrosamine (100 mg/L) administration in the drinking water for 13 and 16 weeks. After the induction period, the rats received daily gavage administration of saline solution (control) or Sorafenib (5 mg/kg/day) for 3 weeks. Thereafter, the animals were euthanized and samples from liver nodules were collected for histopathological analysis and immunohistochemical assessment of HEP-PAR-1, glutamine-synthetase, VEGF, survivin, β-catenin and p53. A semi-quantitative score was used for VEGF, survivin and β-catenin analysis. For p53, the percentage of positive cells was determined. Results were processed by Wilcoxon's test or Student's t-test. Both protocols efficiently induced HCC, most of them being moderately to poorly differentiated. Sorafenib-treated animals showed a decreased expression of VEGF and p53 in HCCs generated at 13 weeks when compared to control animals (p = 0.03; p = 0.04, respectively). No significant difference in β-catenin and survivin were observed. There was a significant decrease in VEGF and p53 expression when comparing the two control groups (13 vs. 16 weeks, p < 0.01). p53 and VEGF are promising biomarkers for assessment of efficacy of Sorafenib, whereas survivin and β-catenin were not found useful. Decreased immunohistochemical expression of p53 and VEGF in the 16 week control group may indicate a different metabolic status of HCC.

Mixed Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review

Mixed hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine carcinoma (HCC-NEC) is extremely rare, comprising about 0.46% of primary hepatic tumors. A 63-year-old man who was a chronic alcoholic presented with a nine-centimeter-sized hepatic mass. His serum alpha-fetoprotein and protein induced by vitamin K antagonist-II levels were 22,815 ng/mL and 183 mAU/mL, respectively. The patient underwent a right hemihepatectomy, including the middle hepatic vein. The tumor consisted of poorly differentiated HCC (20%) and large- and small-cell-type NEC (80%) components as per the pathological examination. Immunohistochemically chromogranin and synaptophysin were positive in the areas of NEC and negative in the areas of HCC. Adjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of cisplatin and etoposide was administered after surgery. At postoperative 5 months, the patient complained of right flank pain, and CT showed a new mass measuring 7.3 cm in the right adrenal gland. Postoperatively, after 6.5 months, more recurred masses were noted on the posterior aspect of the right kidney and both lungs. Although the regimen was changed from etoposide to irinotecan, additional recurred masses were developed in the liver, lung, and brain. He passed away 12 months after the surgery. After reviewing and analyzing previous literature, the 1 and 2 year overall survival rates are 57.3 and 43.6%, respectively, and the 1 and 2 year disease-free survival rates are 36.2 and 29.0%, respectively. Mixed HCC-NEC is a very rare tumor, and the surgical outcome is poor.

Patient-derived tumor organoids for personalized medicine in a patient with rare hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a case report

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (HCC-NED) is a very rare subtype of primary liver cancer. Treatment allocation in these patients therefore remains a challenge.

Methods

We report the case of a 74-year-old man with a HCC-NED. The tumor was surgically removed in curative intent. Histopathological work-up revealed poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (Edmondson-Steiner grade IV) with diffuse expression of neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin. Three months after resection, multifocal recurrence of the HCC-NED was observed. In the meantime, tumor organoids have been generated from the resected HCC-NED and extensively characterized. Sensitivity to a number of drugs approved for the treatment of HCC or neuroendocrine carcinomas was tested in vitro.

Results

Based on the results of the in vitro drug screening, etoposide and carboplatin are used as first line palliative combination treatment. With genomic analysis revealing a NTRK1-mutation of unknown significance (kinase domain) and tumor organoids found to be sensitive to entrectinib, a pan-TRK inhibitor, the patient was treated with entrectinib as second line therapy. After only two weeks, treatment is discontinued due to deterioration of the patient’s general condition.

Conclusion

The rapid establishment of patient-derived tumor organoids allows in vitro drug testing and thereby personalized treatment choices, however clinical translation remains a challenge. To the best of our knowledge, this report provides a first proof-of-principle for using organoids for personalized medicine in this rare subtype of primary liver cancer.

Tumors that simultaneously display features of liver, nerve and hormone-producing cells are very rare. In such cases, the most appropriate treatment choice is not well defined. Here, we describe the generation of three-dimensional miniature tumors, called organoids, from the patient’s tumor tissue, that can be grown and studied in a culture dish. These organoids closely mimic the patient’s tumor and allowed us to test different drugs to identify the most effective therapy for informed treatment choice. What we describe in this study is an emerging approach for a practice known as personalized medicine, that aims to provide a more tailored treatment to patients. In summary, we demonstrate that this approach can be useful in a rare cancer type and that it holds significant potential to guide treatment decision in other patients with aggressive cancers.

Meier, Nuciforo, Coto-Llerena et al. report a rare case of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. The authors establish organoids that recapitulate the genetic features of the patient’s tumor and are used for ex vivo drug testing to guide therapy selection in the patient.

The prognostic significance of neuroendocrine markers and somatostatin receptor 2 in hepatocellular carcinoma

Prostatic and colon carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation are reported to behave more aggressively than those without such differentiation. In hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), however, only a few studies have reported the expression status of neuroendocrine markers and somatostatin receptor 2, the main target of a somatostatin analog. Furthermore, the prognostic significance of the markers in HCCs has not been fully explored. We evaluated the expression of the neuroendocrine makers (chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56) and somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) in 95 HCCs, and investigated the correlation between the expression of these markers and clinicopathological findings. Chromogranin A was immunolocalized in 2 cases, synaptophysin in 15 cases, CD56 in 11 cases, and SSTR2 in 19 cases. Immunoreactivity of synaptophysin and CD56 were the significant unfavorable prognostic factors in terms of 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and the overall survival (OS) along with a high nuclear mitosis level (>10/10 high-power field), a larger tumor size (>5 cm), the presence of vascular and/or biliary invasion, and high TNM stage (III/IV). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified synaptophysin as an independent prognostic factor for 2-year DFS and OS. Synaptophysin expression can be used to predict an unfavorable prognosis in patients with HCC.

Giant Primary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Liver: Report of 2 Cases With Molecular Characterization

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the liver have occasionally been reported in the liver, though many reports do not convincingly exclude metastases. In this article, we report 2 “giant” hepatic neuroendocrine lesions without evidence of a primary elsewhere after clinical workup. One occurred in a 21-year-old male; the lesion was a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma measuring 24 cm. The patient died of disease in 10 months. The other occurred in a 25-year-old patient, was 18 cm wide, and was diagnosed as a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, World Health Organization grade 3. The patient died of disease after 30 months. Molecular testing demonstrated only the presence of TP53 mutations in common. These cases expand our knowledge of seemingly primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the liver, in particular, giant cases measuring more than 8 cm. Guidelines for clinical workup and therapy for these lesions remain unclear, but future thorough workup of such cases is necessary for specific characterization.

Update on the pathology of liver neoplasms

Many advances have developed in the pathology of liver tumors in the recent decade. Examples of these advances include the use of glutamine synthetase in the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia, subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas using molecular and immunohistochemical methods, the unraveling of the fusion transcript between the DNAJB1 gene and the PRKACA gene in fibrolamellar carcinoma, and the more unified classification and terminology in intrahepatic bile duct tumors and their precursor lesions. Nevertheless, challenges still remain, e.g., the differential diagnosis between well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular adenoma; distinction among poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic neoplasm; terminology of the combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma, etc. This review aims to address updates in the pathologic diagnosis and clinical relevance of tumors of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts in adults and their differential diagnosis and diagnostic pitfalls.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review

Background

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC) is extremely rare. The diagnosis of PHNEC remains challenging—partly due to its rarity, and partly due to its lack of unique clinical features. Available treatment options for PHNEC include surgical resection of the liver tumor(s), radiotherapy, liver transplant, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and administration of somatostatin analogues.

Case presentation

We report two male PHNEC cases and discuss the diagnosis and treatment options. Both cases presented with abdominal pain; case two also presented with symptoms of jaundice. The initial diagnosis for both cases was poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, based on imaging characteristics and the pathology of liver biopsies. Final diagnoses of PHNEC were arrived at by ruling out non-hepatic origins. Case one presented with a large tumor in the right liver lobe, and the patient was treated with TACE. Case two presented with tumors in both liver lobes, invasions into the left branch of hepatic portal vein, and metastasis in the hepatic hilar lymph node. This patient was ineligible for TACE and was allergic to the somatostatin analogue octreotide. This limited treatment options to supportive therapies such as albumin supplementation for liver protection. Patient one and two died at 61 and 109 days, respectively, following initial hospital admission.

Conclusions

We diagnosed both cases with poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC through imaging characteristics, immunohistochemical staining of liver biopsies, and examinations to eliminate non-hepatic origins. Neither TACE nor liver protection appeared to significantly extend survival time of the two patients, suggesting these treatments may be inadequate to improve survival of patients with poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC. The prognosis of poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC is poor due to limited and ineffective treatment options.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12907-018-0070-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.