Growth hormone-releasing hormone stimulates GH release while inhibiting ghrelin- and sGnRH-induced LH release from goldfish pituitary cells

Regulation of ovarian function by growth hormone: Potential intervention of ovarian aging

Growth hormone (GH) is mainly secreted by eosinophils of anterior pituitary gland. GH plays an important role in regulating the growth and development of many tissues and cells, so it is used in the treatment of many diseases. In recent years, the regulation of GH on ovarian function has attracted much attention. GH has been applied in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, particularly in the patients with advanced age, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and poor ovarian response (POR). GH can directly bind to the growth hormone receptor (GHR) on the ovary to promote the growth, maturation and ovulation of follicles, as well as to inhibit follicular atresia. GH so as to promote the occurrence of early follicles, enhance the sensitivity of follicles to gonadotropins, accelerate the maturation of oocyte nucleus, improve mitochondrial activity and the quality of oocytes through the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system, which is an indirect regulation. The deep-seated effects of GH on human reproduction and ovarian aging need further basic research and clinical practice.

The gonadotropin-releasing hormones: Lessons from fish

Fish have been of paramount importance to our understanding of vertebrate comparative neuroendocrinology and the mechanisms underlying the physiology and evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormones (GnRH) and their genes. This review integrates past and recent knowledge on the Gnrh system in the fish model. Multiple Gnrh isoforms (two or three forms) are present in all teleosts, as well as multiple Gnrh receptors (up to five types), which differ in neuroanatomical localization, pattern of projections, ontogeny and functions. The role of the different Gnrh forms in reproduction seems to also differ in teleost models possessing two versus three Gnrh forms, Gnrh3 being the main hypophysiotropic hormone in the former and Gnrh1 in the latter. Functions of the non-hypothalamic Gnrh isoforms are still unclear, although under suboptimal physiological conditions (e.g. fasting), Gnrh2 may increase in the pituitary to ensure the integrity of reproduction under these conditions. Recent developments in transgenesis and mutagenesis in fish models have permitted the generation of fish lines expressing fluorophores in Gnrh neurons and to elucidate the dynamics of the elaborate innervations of the different neuronal populations, thus enabling a more accurate delineation of their reproductive roles and regulations. Moreover, in combination with neuronal electrophysiology, these lines have clarified the Gnrh mode of actions in modulating Lh and Fsh activities. While loss of function and genome editing studies had the premise to elucidate the exact roles of the multiple Gnrhs in reproduction and other processes, they have instead evoked an ongoing debate about these roles and opened new avenues of research that will no doubt lead to new discoveries regarding the not-yet-fully-understood Gnrh system.

Hypothalamic- and pituitary-derived growth and reproductive hormones and the control of energy balance in fish

Most endocrine systems in the body are influenced by the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Within this axis, the hypothalamus delivers precise signals to the pituitary gland, which in turn releases hormones that directly affect target tissues including the liver, thyroid gland, adrenal glands and gonads. This action modulates the release of additional hormones from the sites of action, regulating key physiological processes, including growth, metabolism, stress and reproduction. Pituitary hormones are released by five distinct hormone-producing cell types: somatotropes (which produce growth hormone), thyrotropes (thyrotropin), corticotropes (adrenocorticotropin), lactotropes (prolactin) and gonadotropes (follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone), each modulated by specific hypothalamic signals. This careful and distinct organization of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis has been classically associated with the existence of many lineal axes (e.g., the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis) in charge of the control of the different physiological processes. While this traditional concept is valid, it is becoming apparent that hormones produced by the hypothalamo-pituitary axis have diverse effects. For instance, gonadotropin-releasing hormone II has been associated with a suppressive effect on food intake in fish. Likewise, growth hormone has been shown to influence appetite, swimming activity and aggressive behavior in fish. This review will focus on the hypothalamic and pituitary hormones classically involved in regulating growth and reproduction, and will attempt to provide a general overview of the current knowledge on their actions on energy balance and appetite in fish. It will also give a brief perspective of the role of some of these peptides in integrating feeding, metabolism, growth and reproduction.

Ghrelin stimulates growth hormone release from the pituitary via hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing hormone neurons in the cichlid, Oreochromis niloticus

Ghrelin, a gut-brain peptide hormone, is implicated in a multiplicity of biological functions, including energy homeostasis and reproduction. Neuronal systems that are involved in energy homeostasis as well as reproduction traverse the hypothalamus; however, the mechanism by which they control energy homeostasis is not fully understood. The present study analyzes the anatomical relationship of neurons expressing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in a cichlid, tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Additionally, we examine in vivo effects of ghrelin on these hypothalamic neurons and plasma growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels. Double-immunofluorescence showed neuronal fiber associations between GnRH, NPY and GHRH in the brain and pituitary. Intracerebroventricular injection of ghrelin had no effect on numbers, soma size, or optical density of GnRH and NPY neurons, whereas the number of GHRH neurons was significantly decreased in the animals injected with ghrelin when compared to controls, which may indicate administered ghrelin promoted GHRH release. Plasma GH and pituitary GH mRNA levels were significantly increased in the animals injected with ghrelin. These results suggest that central administration of ghrelin primarily act on hypothalamic GHRH neurons to stimulate GH release from the pituitary in the tilapia.

Diethylstilbestrol arrested spermatogenesis and somatic growth in the juveniles of yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco), a fish with sexual dimorphic growth

In fish, spermatogenesis and somatic growth are mainly regulated by hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) and hypothalamic-pituitary-somatic (HPS) axes, respectively. Xenoestrogens have been reported to impair spermatogenesis in some fishes, and arrest somatic growth in some others, whereas, whether xenoestrogens are capable of disrupting spermatogenesis and somatic growth simultaneously in fish that exhibits sexual dimorphic growth is little known, and the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, male juveniles of yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco), which exhibits a sexual dimorphic growth that favors males, were exposed to diethylstilbestrol (DES) for 28 days. After exposure, DES significantly disrupted the spermatogenesis (decreased gonadal-somatic index (GSI) and germ cell number) and arrested the somatic growth (declined body weight) of the catfish juveniles. Gene expression and plasma steroid analyses demonstrated the suppressed mRNA levels of genes in HPG axis (gnrh-II, fshβ, and lhβ in the brain and dmrt1, sf1, fshr, cyp17a1, cyp19a1a, and cyp11b2 in the testis) and decreased 17β-estrodial (E2) and 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) levels in plasma. Further analysis revealed the arrested germ cell proliferation (cyclin d1), meiosis (dmc1, sycp3), and enhanced apoptosis (decreased bcl-2 and elevated bax/bcl-2 ratio) in the testis. Besides, DES also suppressed the mRNA levels of genes in HPS axis (ghrh, gh, and prl in the brain and ghr, igf1, igf2a, and igf2b in the liver). The suppressed HPG and HPS axes were thus supposed to disturb spermatogenesis and arrest somatic growth in yellow catfish. The present study greatly extended our understanding on the mechanisms underlying the toxicity of DES on spermatogenesis and somatic growth of fish.

Facing the Challenges of Neuropeptide Gene Knockouts: Why Do They Not Inhibit Reproduction in Adult Teleost Fish?

Genetic manipulation of teleost endocrine systems started with transgenic overexpression of pituitary growth hormone. Such strategies enhance growth and reduce fertility, but the fish still breed. Genome editing using transcription activator-like effector nuclease in zebrafish and medaka has established the role of follicle stimulating hormone for gonadal development and luteinizing hormone for ovulation. Attempts to genetically manipulate the hypophysiotropic neuropeptidergic systems have been less successful. Overexpression of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (gnrh) antisense in common carp delays puberty but does not block reproduction. Knockout of Gnrh in zebrafish does not impact either sex, while in medaka this blocks ovulation in females without affecting males. Spawning success is not reduced by knockout of the kisspeptins and receptors, agouti-related protein, agouti signaling peptide or spexin. Hypotheses for the lack of effect of these genome edits are presented. Over evolutionary time, teleosts have lost the median eminence typical of mammals. There is consequently direct innervation of gonadotrophs, with the possibility of independent regulation by >20 neurohormones. Removal of a few may have minimal impact. Neuropeptide knockout could leave co-expressed stimulators of gonadotropins functionally intact. Genetic compensation in response to loss of protein function may maintain sufficient reproduction. The species differences in hypothalamo-hypophysial anatomy could be an example of compensation over the evolutionary timescale as teleosts diversified and adapted to new ecological niches. The key neuropeptidergic systems controlling teleost reproduction remain to be uncovered. Classical neurotransmitters are also regulators of luteinizing hormone release, but have yet to be targeted by genome editing. Their essentiality for reproduction should also be explored.

Why goldfish? Merits and challenges in employing goldfish as a model organism in comparative endocrinology research

Goldfish has been used as an unconventional model organism to study a number of biological processes. For example, goldfish is a well-characterized and widely used model in comparative endocrinology, especially in neuroendocrinology. Several decades of research has established and validated an array of tools to study hormones in goldfish. The detailed brain atlas of goldfish, together with the stereotaxic apparatus, are invaluable tools for the neuroanatomic localization and central administration of endocrine factors. In vitro techniques, such as organ and primary cell cultures, have been developed using goldfish. In vivo approaches using goldfish were used to measure endogenous hormonal milieu, feeding, behaviour and stress. While there are many benefits in using goldfish as a model organism in research, there are also challenges associated with it. One example is its tetraploid genome that results in the existence of multiple isoforms of endocrine factors. The presence of extra endogenous forms of peptides and its receptors adds further complexity to the already redundant multifactorial endocrine milieu. This review will attempt to discuss the importance of goldfish as a model organism in comparative endocrinology. It will highlight some of the merits and challenges in employing goldfish as an animal model for hormone research in the post-genomic era.

Melatonin modulates monochromatic light-induced GHRH expression in the hypothalamus and GH secretion in chicks

To study the mechanism by which monochromatic lights affect the growth of broilers, a total of 192 newly hatched broilers, including the intact, sham-operated and pinealectomy groups, were exposed to white light (WL), red light (RL), green light (GL) and blue light (BL) using a light-emitting diode (LED) system for 2 weeks. The results showed that the GHRH-ir neurons were distributed in the infundibular nucleus (IN) of the chick hypothalamus. The mRNA and protein levels of GHRH in the hypothalamus and the plasma GH concentrations in the chicks exposed to GL were increased by 6.83-31.36%, 8.71-34.52% and 6.76-9.19% compared to those in the chicks exposed to WL (P=0.022-0.001), RL (P=0.002-0.000) and BL (P=0.290-0.017) in the intact group, respectively. The plasma melatonin concentrations showed a positive correlation with the expression of GHRH (r=0.960) and the plasma GH concentrations (r=0.993) after the various monochromatic light treatments. After pinealectomy, however, these parameters decreased and there were no significant differences between GL and the other monochromatic light treatments. These findings suggest that melatonin plays a critical role in GL illumination-enhanced GHRH expression in the hypothalamus and plasma GH concentrations in young broilers.

Differential involvement of signaling pathways in the regulation of growth hormone release by somatostatin and growth hormone-releasing hormone in orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides)

Somatostatin is the most effective inhibitor of GH release, and GHRH was recently identified as one of the primary GH-releasing factors in teleosts. In this study, we analyzed the possible intracellular transduction pathways that are involved in the mechanisms induced by SRIF and GHRH to regulate GH release. Using a pharmacological approach, the blockade of the PLC/IP/PKC pathway reversed the SRIF-induced inhibition of GH release but did not affect the GHRH-induced stimulation of GH release. Furthermore, SRIF reduced the GH release induced by two PKC activators. Inhibitors of the AC/cAMP/PKA pathway reversed both the SRIF- and GHRH-induced effects on GH release. Moreover, the GH release evoked by forskolin and 8-Br-cAMP were completely abolished by SRIF. The blockade of the NOS/NO pathway attenuated the GHRH-induced GH release but had minimal effects on the inhibitory actions of SRIF. In addition, inhibitors of the sGC/cGMP pathway did not modify the SRIF- or GHRH-induced regulation of GH release. Taken together, these findings indicate that the SRIF-induced inhibition of GH release is mediated by both the PLC/IP/PKC and the AC/cAMP/PKA pathways and not by the NOS/NO/sGC/cGMP pathway. In contrast, the GHRH-induced stimulation of GH secretion is mediated by both the AC/cAMP/PKA and the NOS/NO pathways and is independent of the sGC/cGMP pathway and the PLC/IP/PKC system.

Ghrelin gene products, receptors, and GOAT enzyme: biological and pathophysiological insight

Ghrelin is a 28-amino acid acylated hormone, highly expressed in the stomach, which binds to its cognate receptor (GHSR1a) to regulate a plethora of relevant biological processes, including food intake, energy balance, hormonal secretions, learning, inflammation, etc. However, ghrelin is, in fact, the most notorious component of a complex, intricate regulatory system comprised of a growing number of alternative peptides (e.g. obestatin, unacylated ghrelin, and In1-ghrelin, etc.), known (GHSRs) and, necessarily unknown receptors, as well as modifying enzymes (e.g. ghrelin-O-acyl-transferase), which interact among them as well as with other regulatory systems in order to tightly modulate key (patho)-physiological processes. This multiplicity of functions and versatility of the ghrelin system arise from a dual, genetic and functional, complexity. Importantly, a growing body of evidence suggests that dysregulation in some of the components of the ghrelin system can lead to or influence the development and/or progression of highly concerning pathologies such as endocrine-related tumors, inflammatory/cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegeneration, wherein these altered components could be used as diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic targets. In this context, the aim of this review is to integrate and comprehensively analyze the multiple components and functions of the ghrelin system described to date in order to define and understand its biological and (patho)-physiological significance.

Differential modulation of ghrelin-induced GH and LH release by PACAP and dopamine in goldfish pituitary cells

Ghrelin (GRLN) participates in multiple physiological processes, including the regulation of growth hormone (GH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) release. In the goldfish, neuroendocrine control of GH and LH release are multifactorial. In this system, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP)-stimulated GH and LH secretion, as well as dopamine (DA)-induced GH release, are mediated by protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent, but protein kinase C (PKC)-independent, mechanisms. In addition, DA inhibits LH secretion by actions at sites along both PKA and PKC signaling pathways. Recently, goldfish GRLN (gGRLN19) has been shown to induce GH release via PKC, and LH secretion via both PKC and PKA. To further understand the neuroendocrine regulation of goldfish GH and LH release, we examined the effects of DA and PACAP on gGRLN19 actions in primary cultures of goldfish pituitary cells in perifusion and in Ca(2+)-imaging experiments. Consistent with their known intracellular signaling mechanisms in gonadotrophs, DA inhibited gGRLN19-induced LH release while cotreatment of PACAP and gGRLN19 did not produce additive LH responses. When applied prior to gGRLN19, PACAP potentiated gGRLN19-induced GH release and Ca(2+) signals within somatotrophs. In contrast, neither prior treatment with DA followed by gGRLN19 nor pretreatment with gGRLN19 prior to PACAP produced an enhanced GH release response. These observations suggest that PKA activators positively modulate gGRLN19 actions on goldfish somatotrophs in a ligand- and treatment order-specific manner. Results add to our understanding of the complexity of neuroendocrine control of GH and LH release at the pituitary cell level, and our understanding of GRLN action.