Outcomes of Stage I/II vulvar cancer patients after negative superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy

Superficial versus deep inguinal nodal dissection for vulvar cancer staging

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the rate of groin recurrence among women undergoing superficial or deep inguinal lymph node dissections in suspected early-stage vulvar carcinoma. Secondary objectives included comparison of overall survival and post-operative morbidity between the study groups.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 233 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vulva who underwent an inguinal lymph node dissection at two major academic institutions from 1999 to 2017 were analyzed. Demographic, surgical, recurrence, survival, and post-operative morbidity data were collected for 233 patients, resulting in a total of 400 groin node dissections analyzed.

RESULTS

Rates of overall primary recurrence of disease between superficial and deep inguinal LND (42.5 vs. 39.8%, p = 0.70) and rates of inguinal recurrence (3.4 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.16) were similar. Overall rates of postoperative morbidity were significantly higher in the cohort undergoing deep LND (70.3% vs 44.3%, p < 0.01). Rates of lymphedema (42.4 vs 15.9%, p < 0.01), readmission (26.3 vs 6.8%, p < 0.01), and infection (40.7 vs 14.8%, p < 0.01) were all significantly higher among patients undergoing deep LND. There was no significant difference noted in overall survival between the study groups when adjusting for stage and age (HR 1.08, p = 0.84).

CONCLUSION

Superficial inguinal LND had no significant difference in rate of recurrence or overall survival when compared to deep inguinal LND in patients with vulvar SCC. Those who received a deep LND had a significant increase in overall morbidity, including lymphedema, readmission, and infection. For patients who cannot undergo or fail sentinel lymph node mapping, a superficial inguinal lymph node dissection may have similar outcomes in recurrence and overall survival with a reduction in overall morbidity as compared to a complete, or deep, lymph node dissection.

History and Updates of the GROINSS-V Studies

Surgical management of vulvar cancer is associated with high morbidity rates. The main aim of the GROINSS-V studies is reducing treatment-related morbidity by finding safe alternative treatment options in early-stage vulvar cancer patients. This article reviews the history, results, and updates of the GROINSS-V studies. The first GROINSS-V study was a multicenter observational study (from 2000 to 2006), which investigated the safety and clinical applicability of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with early-stage vulvar cancer. GROINSS-V-I showed that omitting inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was safe in early-stage vulvar cancer patients with a negative sentinel lymph node, with an impressive reduction in treatment-related morbidity. GROINSS-V-II, a prospective multicenter phase II single-arm treatment trial (from 2005 to 2016) investigated whether radiotherapy could be a safe alternative for inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in patients with a metastatic sentinel lymph node. This study showed that radiotherapy in patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases (≤2 mm) was safe in terms of groin recurrence rate and with less treatment-related morbidity. These results, published in August 2021, should be implemented in (inter)national treatment guidelines for vulvar cancer. GROINSS-V-III recently started including patients. This study investigates the effectiveness and safety of chemoradiation in patients with a macrometastasis (>2 mm) in the sentinel lymph node.

The role of brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) for primary and/or recurrent vulvar cancer: a Gemelli Vul.Can multidisciplinary team systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our systematic review was to assess the role of interventional radiotherapy (IRT, brachytherapy) in the management of primary and/or recurrent vulvar carcinoma.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane library was performed. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. Only full-text English-language articles related to IRT for treatment of primary or recurrent VC were identified and reviewed. Conference paper, survey, letter, editorial, book chapter and review were excluded. Time restriction (1990-2018) as concerns the years of the publication was considered.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Primary disease: the median 5-year LC was 43.5% (range 19-68%); the median 5-year DFS was 44.5% (range 44-81%); the median 5-year OS was 50.5% (range 27-85%). Recurrent disease: the median 5-year DFS was 64% (range 56-72%) and the median 5-year OS was 45% (range 33%-57%). Acute ≥ grade 2 toxicity was reported in three patients (1.6%). The severe late toxicity rates (grade 3-4) ranged from 0% to 14.3% (median 7.7%).

CONCLUSION

IRT as part of primary treatment for primary and/or recurrent vulvar cancer is associated with promising clinical outcomes.

Survey of the clinical practice pattern of using sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with gynecological cancers in Japan: the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology study

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy is essential for evaluating survival and minimal treatment-related morbidity associated with cervical, endometrial, and vulvar cancer in Japan. As such, our aim in this study was to evaluate the current practice pattern of using SN biopsy for cervical, endometrial, and vulvar cancer in Japan.

METHODS

We deployed a 47-question survey on the use of SN biopsy for gynecological cancers to 216 gynecological oncology training facilities. The survey included information on the use of SN biopsy for uterine (cervical and endometrial) and vulvar cancers; details on the type, timing, and concentration of tracers used; surgical approach used for SN biopsy; method of biopsy and pathological examination; and facilities' experience with clinical research on SN biopsy.

RESULTS

The response rate was 84% (181/216), with 40 facilities (22%) having experience in SN biopsy for gynecological cancers, 34 (85%) for uterine cancers, and 15 (37%) for vulvar cancers. Radioisotope, indocyanine green (ICG), and blue dyes were available for the detection of uterine cancers in 21 (52%), 25 (62%), and 19 (48%) facilities and for vulvar cancers in 9 (22%), 3 (7%), and 11 (27%) facilities, respectively. Thirty-four facilities (85%) used intraoperative frozen section procedure for diagnosis when possible, with 24 (71%) of these facilities using 2-mm specimen cuts. Diagnosis included pathological examination (85%), immunostaining (57%), and one-step nucleic acid amplification (5%).

CONCLUSION

Increasing research evidence, providing insurance coverage for radioisotope tracers, and increasing the availability of training are expected to increase the use of SN biopsy in Japan.

New Directions in Vulvar Cancer Pathology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to provide clinicians and pathologists with an understanding of the aetiopathology, pathogenesis and classification of vulval neoplasia and their molecular correlates.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is an increased understanding of subcellular changes in vulvar malignancies. These provide the direction for further research and aid personalised treatment for patients. The article explores concepts of the aetiology of vulvar cancer and updates the reader with the equivalence of terminology of preneoplastic vulval disease. The differential diagnosis of squamous neoplasia and their clinicopathological correlation is detailed. The salient findings from recent literature into the understanding of the disease of squamous cell neoplasia and rare vulvar malignancies are summarised.

Number of Nodes Removed With Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy and Risk of Isolated Groin Recurrence in Women With FIGO Stage IB–II Squamous Cell Vulvar Cancer

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate if the lymph node count from inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy impacted the risk of isolated groin recurrence in patients with node-negative squamous cell vulvar cancer.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of women with squamous cell vulvar cancer (stage IB–II according to the 2009 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system) who underwent primary radical vulvar surgery and groin lymphadenectomy between January 2005 and December 2014. Patients' sociodemographic characteristics, the disease characteristics, the number of nodes removed from each groin, and the oncologic outcome were evaluated. A cutoff value of at least 6 nodes removed from each groin was used to define the adequacy of inguinofemoral dissection.

Results

Seventy-six patients, fulfilling the study inclusion criteria, were considered. The mean number of nodes removed (bilaterally) was 14.5 (±5.3, SD), with a range of 2 to 29 nodes. Thirty-three women (43.4%) had less than 6 nodes removed from each groin. In the whole study cohort, 4 cases of isolated groin recurrence (5.3%) were detected, and all these recurrences developed in patients with less than 6 nodes removed. Considering the demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics potentially related to the risk of groin recurrence, only the number of nodes removed showed a significant correlation.

Conclusions

Women treated for vulvar cancer in which less than 6 nodes are removed from each groin are at higher risk of groin recurrence.

Long-term oncological outcomes of patients with negative sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer. Comparative study with conventional lymphadenectomy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare oncological outcomes and morbidity in patients with early-stage vulvar cancer with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy vs negative inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study with retrospectively collected data in patients with squamous cell vulvar carcinomas ≤ 4 cm without suspected inguinofemoral lymph node metastases. Only patients with negative nodes after histopathology procedure were followed. Patients who underwent only SLN were compared with patients who underwent IFL ± SLN to compare recurrences, survival rates and morbidity.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were eligible for follow up: 42 with negative SLN and 51 with negative IFL ± SLN. The median follow-up period was 60.4 months (range 6.7-160.7). The rate of isolated first groin recurrence was 4.8% in patients with negative SLN and 2.0% in patients with negative IFL ± SLN (P = 0.587) and the rates of first isolated local recurrence were 28.6% and 31.4%, respectively (P = 0.823). Only 1 patient (2.4%) in the group of negative SLN had distant recurrence. The disease-specific survival rate at 5 years was 83.3% in the negative SLN group and 92.2% in the negative IFL ± SLN group (P = 0.214). We observed a higher rate of wound breakdown and infection after IFL than SLN biopsy (17.6% vs 10.6%; P = 0.020) and lymphedema (33.3% vs 0%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We report in the same population of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer that SLN biopsy does not have significantly higher rates of groin recurrences or lower survival rates compared with IFL. Moreover, the SLN procedure has less morbidity, which should encourage gynecologists to abandon IFL.

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2015 for the treatment of vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer

BACKGROUND

Vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer are relatively rare tumors, and there had been no established treatment principles or guidelines to treat these rare tumors in Japan. The first version of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guidelines for the treatment of vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer was published in 2015 in Japanese.

OBJECTIVE

The JSGO committee decided to publish the English version of the JSGO guidelines worldwide, and hope it will be a useful guide to physicians in a similar situation as in Japan.

METHODS

The guideline was created according to the basic principles in creating the guidelines of JSGO.

RESULTS

The guidelines consist of five chapters and five algorithms. Prior to the first chapter, basic items are described including staging classification and history, classification of histology, and definition of the methods of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy to give the reader a better understanding of the contents of the guidelines for these rare tumors. The first chapter gives an overview of the guidelines, including the basic policy of the guidelines. The second chapter discusses vulvar cancer, the third chapter discusses vaginal cancer, and the fourth chapter discusses vulvar Paget's disease and malignant melanoma. Each chapter includes clinical questions, recommendations, backgrounds, objectives, explanations, and references. The fifth chapter provides supplemental data for the drugs that are mentioned in the explanation of clinical questions.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the objective of these guidelines is to clearly delineate the standard of care for vulvar and vaginal cancer with the goal of ensuring a high standard of care for all women diagnosed with these rare diseases.

Vulvar carcinoma: dilemma, debates, and decisions

Vulvar carcinoma is a rare and aggressive gynecological malignancy. It affects elderly females, with the mean age at diagnosis being 55-60 years. Regional metastasis to inguinal lymph nodes is common. There is a high incidence of pelvic node involvement, especially in those with pathologically positive inguinal nodes. Surgery appears to be the only curative treatment option in the early stages of the disease. But in most patients, surgery is associated with considerable morbidities and psychosexual issues. Hence, in the quest for a less morbid form of treatment, multimodality approaches with various combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have been suggested for advanced vulvar cancers. Due to the low incidence of the disease, the level of evidence for the success of these treatment modalities is poor. In countries like India, a heterogeneous incidence of vulvar carcinoma exists across the country, with patients presenting at advanced stages when the option of surgery is often supplemented or replaced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In this review, we attempt to study the available published literature and trials and discuss the treatment options in various stages of vulvar carcinoma.

Treatment outcomes of curative radiotherapy in patients with vulvar cancer: results of the retrospective KROG 1203 study

PURPOSE

We evaluated the prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of 56 patients with vulvar cancer treated with curative radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed retrospectively. Prognostic factors evaluated included age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, TNM classification, tumor size, treatment modality, RT duration, and RT field. The association between the tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) status and survival was analyzed in 35 patients.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 2.8 years (range, 0.3 to 18.9 years), 21 patients (37.5%) experienced treatment failure. Fifteen patients (27%) had local failure: nine (16%) local failure only, three (5%) locoregional failure, two (4%) local and distant failure, and one (2%) locoregional and distant failure. Of 56 patients, seven (13%) had persistent disease at the first follow-up at 2 months and all but one died within a year after completing RT. The 5-year OS and DFS were 51.6% and 44.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, clinical size ≥3 cm predicted a poor prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.040) and age (≥70 years) was poor prognostic for DFS (p = 0.032) and OS (p = 0.048). Patients with HPV-positive tumors tended to have better 5-year OS and DFS, but the differences were not significant statistically.

CONCLUSION

Clinical size ≥3 cm was a significant prognostic factor for DFS. However, age was the most important prognostic factor for DFS and OS in patients treated with curative RT. Further studies are needed to determine which treatment should be considered for old age ≥70 years.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the costs and outcomes of inguinal-femoral lymph node dissection (IF-LND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the management of early-stage vulvar cancer.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model compared 2 different strategies for the management of early-stage vulvar cancer: (1) vulvectomy and SLNB and (2) vulvectomy and IF-LND. Probabilities of inguinal-femoral node metastases and recurrence rates associated with each strategy were estimated from published data. Actual payer costs of surgery and radiation therapy were obtained using 2012 CPT codes and Medicare payment information. Rates and costs of postoperative complications including lymphedema, lymphocyst formation, and infection were estimated and included in a separate model. Cost-effectiveness ratios were determined for each strategy. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate pertinent uncertainties in the models.

RESULTS

For the estimated 3000 women diagnosed annually with early-stage vulvar cancer in the United States, the annual cost of the SLNB strategy is $65.2 million compared with $76.8 million for the IF-LND strategy. Three-year inguinal-femoral recurrence-free survival was similar between groups (96.9% vs 97.3%). This translates into a lower cost-effectiveness ratio for the SLNB strategy ($22,416), compared with the IF-LND strategy ($26,344). When adding complication costs to the model, cost-effectiveness ratios further favor the SLNB strategy ($23,711 vs $31,198). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the SLNB strategy remained cost-effective until the recurrence rate after a negative sentinel lymph node approaches 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the most cost-effective strategy for the management of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer due to lower treatment costs and lower costs due to complications.

Vulvar cancer and sentinel lymph nodes: a new standard of care?

The treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer has remained surgical over time. Fortunately, less invasive surgical options have emerged, decreasing the significant morbidity associated with treatment. In the past decade, sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection alone in select patients with vulvar cancer has been shown to be safe, feasible and has decreased surgical morbidity. In addition, multiple recent studies have reported low groin recurrence rates in women that underwent SLN dissection alone, which are similar to groin recurrence rates seen among women that underwent complete inguinal lymph node dissection. We believe SLN dissection should be the standard of care in select patients at institutions with surgeons experienced in the SLN technique. We feel caution should be used when performing SLN dissections in large vulvar lesions and in midline lesions. Further information is needed regarding the appropriate treatment of positive sentinel lymph nodes and, in particular, on the management of micrometastases.

Long-term follow-up of vulvar cancer patients evaluated with sentinel lymph node biopsy alone

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine SLN evaluation alone in women with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vulva and evaluate the inguinal recurrence and complication rates.

METHODS

An IRB approved prospective study enrolled patients with SCC of the vulva. Peritumoral injection of Tc-99 sulfur colloid and blue dye was used to identify SLNs intraoperatively. Patients with negative SLN for metastasis were followed clinically without further treatment. Patients with metastasis to a SLN underwent full groin node dissection followed by standard treatment protocols.

RESULTS

A total of 73 women were enrolled onto protocol with 69 patients undergoing SLN dissection. Mean age was 66.9years (range: 29-91) with 47 stage I, 12 stage II, 9 stage III, 2 stage IV and 3 unstaged patients. SLN dissections were successful in 63 patients. Of the 111 groins evaluated with a SLN dissection 93% had a SLN identified with an average of 2 SLN per groin. There were 92 groins with negative SLN and 11 groins with positive SLN. 57 patients had negative SLN and underwent conservative management with the median follow-up of 58.3months. Three patients experienced groin recurrences (2 unilateral, 1 bilateral) for a recurrence rate of 5.2% (3/57). The complication rate for the inguinal incisions was 17.5% (1 cellulitis, 1 abscess, 2 lymphoceles, 5 lymphedema and leg pain).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated SLN dissection alone has a low inguinal recurrence rate with decreased complications and should be considered as an option for women with SCC of the vulva.

Groin recurrence in patients with early vulvar cancer following superficial inguinal node dissection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the causes of groin recurrence in patients with vulval cancer who previously had negative nodes following superficial inguinal node dissection (SIND).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva (stage I or II) were operated upon. The primary treatment was wide local excision with 2 cm safety margin and superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy. Six patients had ipsilateral and one patient had bilateral groin recurrence. Those patients were subjected to deep inguinal node dissection (one patient required bilateral node dissection).

RESULTS

The mean age at time of diagnosis was 59 years (range 51-68). The median follow-up period for all patients was 63 months (range 24-71) and that of the recurrent cases was 20 months (range 12-38). The mean depth of invasion of the recurrent cases was 5.5mm (range 5-5.9 mm) and the mean diameter of the primary tumor in recurrent cases was 3.8 cm (range 3-4.5 cm). All recurrent cases had a high grade of the primary tumor. The median interval to recurrence was 21 months (range 12-57). The groin recurrence rate after negative SIND was 17% (7/41 patients).The mean number of nodes resected per groin was eight (range 1-17). The nodes ranged in size from 0.2 to 4.0 cm.

CONCLUSION

Carcinoma of the vulva with the following criteria (size of tumor is greater than 3 cm, depth of invasion greater than 5mm, and high grade tumors) is at high risk of recurrence.

Reliability of sentinel node assay in vulvar cancer: the first Croatian validation trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability of sentinel node assay in early stage vulvar cancer patients by using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy.

METHODS

Technetium-99m colloid albumin was injected intradermally around the tumor for lymphoscintigraphic mapping and intraoperative hand-held gamma probe detection of sentinel nodes. For all patients, sentinel node biopsy was followed by inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, regardless of the sentinel lymph node status.

RESULTS

From December 2008 until May 2011, 25 consecutive patients with T1 or T2 stage of vulvar squamous cell cancer were enrolled. The median age of patients was 69 years (range, 48-79). The detection of sentinel lymph node was successful in all 25 patients. A total of 36 sentinel lymph nodes were harvested and metastatic carcinoma was identified in 12 sentinel nodes from 8 patients. There was 1 patient with metastatic non-sentinel lymph node despite the negative sentinel node. Two patients with negative sentinel nodes proven by routine histopathological examination were positive by immunohistochemical staining. The sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of sentinel node assay with immunohistochemistry included were 89%, 100%, and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy under gamma-detecting probe guidance proved to be an easy and reliable method for the detection of sentinel node in early vulvar cancer. Immunohistochemical analysis improves the sensitivity for the detection of regional micrometastases. The sentinel node assay is highly accurate in predicting the status of the remaining inguinofemoral lymph nodes. Our results indicate that patients best suited to SLN assay have had a simple punch biopsy to confirm the diagnosis rather than a previous tumor excision. This technique represents a true advance in the selection of patients for less radical surgery.

Selective inguinal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

En bloc radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy has now been replaced by radical wide excision and selective inguinal lymphadenectomy based on the stage and location of invasive vulvar cancer. Early stage lateral cancers can be effectively treated by radical wide excision and ipsilateral superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy. Lymph node mapping using perilesional injection of radiocolloid and blue dye may identify sentinel lymph nodes which can be removed, thereby avoiding the morbidity of full inguinal lymphadenectomy in selected patients with early stage disease.

A prospective study of sentinel lymph node detection in vulval carcinoma: is it time for a change in clinical practice?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in vulval carcinoma and to report the reliability and safety of this procedure.

METHODS/MATERIALS

For a period of 6 years, we recruited women undergoing surgery for vulval carcinoma. All women had a preoperative biopsy confirming the depth of invasion greater than 1 mm. Sentinel lymph node detection was performed using the combined method (Tc-99m and methylene-blue dye). The standard management included complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. When inguinofemoral lymph nodes were found grossly to be enlarged, these nodes were debulked, and the women subsequently treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. During the last 2 years of the study, a selected group of women had an SLN dissection alone. The SLNs were ultrastaged when they were negative on routine hematoxylin and eosin examination.

RESULTS

Among 60 women undergoing SLN detection, SLN was detected in 59 women (98.3%) with combined method. Blue dye did not detect an SLN in 3 women resulting in a 93.3% detection rate. The median SLN count was 2 nodes (range, 1-9). Of the 60 women, 41 had inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, 4 had only enlarged inguinofemoral nodes debulked, and 15 had the SLN only removed. The non-SLN count was 9 nodes (range, 3-17). There were no false-negative SLNs. Twenty-one women (35%) had positive nodes on final histology. Ultrastaging increased detection of metastases in 6.9% of nodes relative to routine hematoxylin and eosin examination and upstaged 12% of women. The median follow-up was 24 months (range, 2-66 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymph node detection is safe and accurate in assessing lymph node status in women with vulval cancer undergoing staging. The combined method using Tc-99m and methylene blue dye injection for SLN detection has the best detection rate. Routine ultrastaging of negative SLN improves the detection of nodal metastases.

Node count and groin recurrence in early vulvar cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if low node count from superficial groin dissection correlated with first recurrence in the groin for patients with early vulvar cancer.

METHODS

The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted a trial for patients with early stage squamous vulvar cancer, lesions <2 cm in size and <5 mm in depth. All fatty tissue below the inguinal ligament, medial to the sartorious and lateral to the adductor longus was removed. Incision of the fascia and skeletonizing the femoral vessels were not required. For this secondary analysis, we reviewed the records of all patients to assess node counts.

RESULTS

Of the 113 patients eligible for the study, 104 patients (with 117 dissected groins) did not have a first recurrence in the groin. The median number of negative nodes was 9 (range: 1-26). Nine patients (with 9 dissected groins) suffered a first recurrence in the groin. The median number of negative nodes removed per groin was 7 (range: 4-22). There were no significant differences between patients with first recurrence in the groin and those without (p value=0.7475). There was a broad overlap of the confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to show that groin failure after superficial lymphadenectomy was a result of low lymph node count. The small number of recurrences made firm conclusions impossible. Variations in anatomy and other factors may make node counting an unreliable measure of surgical quality.

Validation of the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with vulvar cancer: results of a multicenter study in Germany

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the sentinel node procedure in patients with vulvar cancer, a multicenter study was launched in Germany in 2003 involving 7 oncology centers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2003 and 2006, 127 women with primary T1-T3 vulvar cancer were entered in the study and treated with sentinel node removal after application of (99m)Technetium labeled nanocolloid and/or blue dye. Subsequently, in all women a complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy and the adequate vulvar operation were performed. Sentinel lymph nodes were examined by routine pathologic examination (H&E), followed by step-sectioning and immunhistochemistry if negative.

RESULTS

The sentinel node procedure was successful in 125 out of 127 cases, in 2 cases no sentinel nodes were detected. 21 patients received unilateral lymphadenectomy, 103 women were operated on both groins. In 39 women out of 127, positive lymph nodes in one or both groins were identified (30.7%). In 36 women, the sentinel nodes were also positive (sensitivity 92.3%). We had three cases with a false negative sentinel node (false negative rate: 7.7%), all of these women presenting with tumors in midline position. One tumor was a T1 tumor (10 mm), 2 tumors being classified as T2 (40 and 56 mm, respectively). In one additional case (18 mm T1 tumor, midline position), the sentinel was positive in the right groin, but false negative on the left side.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that identification of SLN in squamous cell cancer of the vulva is feasible, however not highly accurate depending on tumor localization and size. The false negative rate seems to be acceptable if the procedure is restricted to stage 1 tumors with clinically negative lymph node status. Tumors situated in or close to the midline seem to be less suitable for this procedure. Implementation of SLNB into clinical practice should be performed with care and only by experienced teams as to avoid preventable groin relapses.

Sentinel node dissection is safe in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and clinical utility of the sentinel node procedure in early-stage vulvar cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter observational study on sentinel node detection using radioactive tracer and blue dye was performed in patients with T1/2 (< 4 cm) squamous cell cancer of the vulva. When the sentinel node was found to be negative at pathologic ultrastaging, inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was omitted, and the patient was observed with follow-up for 2 years at intervals of every 2 months. Stopping rules were defined for the occurrence of groin recurrences.

RESULTS

From March 2000 until June 2006, a sentinel node procedure was performed in 623 groins of 403 assessable patients. In 259 patients with unifocal vulvar disease and a negative sentinel node (median follow-up time, 35 months), six groin recurrences were diagnosed (2.3%; 95% CI, 0.6% to 5%), and 3-year survival rate was 97% (95% CI, 91% to 99%). Short-term morbidity was decreased in patients after sentinel node dissection only when compared with patients with a positive sentinel node who underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (wound breakdown in groin: 11.7% v 34.0%, respectively; P < .0001; and cellulitis: 4.5% v 21.3%, respectively; P < .0001). Long-term morbidity also was less frequently observed after removal of only the sentinel node compared with sentinel node removal and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (recurrent erysipelas: 0.4% v 16.2%, respectively; P < .0001; and lymphedema of the legs: 1.9% v 25.2%, respectively; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In early-stage vulvar cancer patients with a negative sentinel node, the groin recurrence rate is low, survival is excellent, and treatment-related morbidity is minimal. We suggest that sentinel node dissection, performed by a quality-controlled multidisciplinary team, should be part of the standard treatment in selected patients with early-stage vulvar cancer.

Carcinoma of the vulva

The objective of this review is to summarize the published data about squamous carcinoma of the vulva and to identify promising areas for future investigation. Rather than the routine use of complete radical vulvectomy, a radical wide excision of the vulvar lesion to achieve at least a 1-cm gross margin appears sufficient to treat the primary lesion. A surgical assessment of the groin is required for all patients who have invasion greater than 1 mm. Ipsilateral groin node dissection can be performed through a separate incision. All the nodal tissue medial to the vessels and above the fascia should be removed. Sentinel node evaluation may be a significant step forward, but the false-negative rate is not well enough defined to consider this a standard. Patients with positive inguinal nodes at groin dissection should receive radiation therapy to the ipsilateral groin and hemipelvis. For those patients who have unresectable primary disease or if nodes are palpably suspicious, fixed, and/or ulcerated preoperatively, chemoradiation is the preferred option. Exenterative procedures may rarely be required. Chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic disease has not been proven to be of value. Although survival rates are high for those with negative nodes, the morbidity associated with standard radical techniques has prompted innovation. Adequately powered trials aimed at further reducing morbidity without compromising survival are underway.

The treatment of lateral T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva confined to the labium majus or minus

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pattern of lymph node metastases, recurrence rate, and survival of patients with lateral T1 and T2 squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the vulva treated by radical vulvectomy or hemivulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

An institutional review was performed to identify lateral T1 and T2 SCC of the vulva confined to the labium majus and minus.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with lateral T1 and 61 patients with lateral T2 SCC of the vulva were treated from 1963 to 2003. Radical vulvectomy (RV) was performed in 60 patients, and radical hemivulvectomy (RHV) in 62 patients. Seven of 61 patients (11%) with T1 lesions had ipsilateral superficial inguinal lymph node (SIL) metastases, but none had deep inguinal lymph (DIL) node metastases. Nineteen of 61 patients (31%) with T2 lesions had ipsilateral SIL metastases, and 8 had ipsilateral DIL metastases. No patient had contralateral SIL or DIL metastases. Six patients (10%) with T1 lesions and seven patients (11%) with T2 lesions developed recurrence to the ipsilateral vulva and were treated by re-excision. All patients are alive with no evidence of disease 10-195 months after treatment. One patient with T1 and three patients with T2 SCC developed distant recurrence and died of disease (DOD) 10-15 months after surgery. Disease-free survival of patients with T1 lesions was 98% at 2 years and 98% at 5 years, and with T2 lesions was 95% at 2 years and 93% at 5 years. Local or distant recurrence was not more common in patients treated by RHV than in those treated by RV.

CONCLUSION

Lateral T1 and T2 squamous cell cancers of the vulva spread to the ipsilateral inguinal lymph nodes and can be treated effectively with RHV and ipsilateral SIL dissection. Deep inguinal lymphadenectomy is indicated only when the SIL are positive.

Patterns and frequency of recurrences of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

OBJECTIVE

To analyze patterns and frequency of recurrences of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vulva after wide local excision (WLE) and superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy with separate incisions and to identify prognostic factors for the development of recurrences.

METHODS

Between January 1985 and December 1999, all 125 consecutive patients with primary SCC of the vulva, treated with WLE and superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy, were retrospectively analyzed. Recurrences were registered by localization as: local, skin bridge, groin or distant.

RESULTS

A local recurrence was diagnosed in 29 (23%) patients, 11 (9%) developed a groin and 4 (3%) a distant recurrence. No skin bridge recurrences were identified. The 5 years local relapse-free survival was 70%. After a first local recurrence, 72% of these patients developed a second local recurrence. Adjusted for other predictors, older age (>74 years) is an independent risk factor for local recurrences (HR: 2.38; 95%-C.I.: 1.08-5.23) and stage III/IV cancer for developing groin/distant recurrences (HR: 3.03; 95%-C.I.: 1.0-9.18).

CONCLUSION

WLE and superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy with separate incisions result in a high groin recurrence rate in this study; superficial lymphadenectomy should be replaced by deep inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. After a local recurrence, 72% of the patients developed a second local recurrence. These patients are at high risk and need a close follow-up.