1
|
Danziger M, Noble H, Roque DM, Xu F, Rao GG, Santin AD. Microtubule-Targeting Agents: Disruption of the Cellular Cytoskeleton as a Backbone of Ovarian Cancer Therapy. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2024; 1452:1-19. [PMID: 38805122 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-58311-7_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Microtubules are dynamic polymers composed of α- and β-tubulin heterodimers. Microtubules are universally conserved among eukaryotes and participate in nearly every cellular process, including intracellular trafficking, replication, polarity, cytoskeletal shape, and motility. Due to their fundamental role in mitosis, they represent a classic target of anti-cancer therapy. Microtubule-stabilizing agents currently constitute a component of the most effective regimens for ovarian cancer therapy in both primary and recurrent settings. Unfortunately, the development of resistance continues to present a therapeutic challenge. An understanding of the underlying mechanisms of resistance to microtubule-active agents may facilitate the development of novel and improved approaches to this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Danziger
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Helen Noble
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dana M Roque
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fuhua Xu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gautam G Rao
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Billingsley CC, Jacobson SN, Crafton SM, Crim AK, Li Q, Hade EM, Cohn DE, Fowler JM, Copeland LJ, Salani R, Backes FJ, O'Malley DM. Evaluation of the Hematologic Safety of Same Day Versus Standard Administration (24- to 72-Hour Delay) of Pegfilgrastim in Gynecology Oncology Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:1331-6. [PMID: 26067861 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed the safety and efficacy of administration of pegfilgrastim on the same day compared with standard administration 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing pegfilgrastim to mitigate the myelosuppressive consequences of chemotherapy. The primary outcome was incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia following pegfilgrastim for same-day administration (D1) versus standard administration (D2+). Secondary outcomes included dose delay, regimen change, hospitalization due to neutropenia, and incidence of febrile neutropenia. RESULTS Four hundred twenty-one patients with 2071 administrations of pegfilgrastim were included. Five hundred six administrations of pegfilgrastim were given on D1 compared with 1565 administrations on D2+. The most common malignancy was ovarian cancer (79.1%), followed by endometrial (14.5%). Comparing the D1 and D2+ cohorts, noninferiority was not established for the incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (2.6% vs 1.8%, adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.6; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-3.2) or dose modification (6.5% vs 4.9%; aRR, 1.3; 90% CI, 0.9-1.8). However, the rate of treatment delays (7.3% vs 9.4%; aRR, 0.8; 90% CI, 0.6-1.1) in the D1 and D2+ groups suggested that delays in the D1 group were not more common than in the D2+ group. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of hematologic toxicities and dose modification in patients receiving same-day pegfilgrastim were not as low as in those undergoing standard administration. However, treatment delays were found to be no more frequent in those receiving same-day pegfilgrastim versus standard administration. Same-day administration of pegfilgrastim is a reasonable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline C Billingsley
- *Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, †Department of Pharmacy, Richard J. Solove Research Institute, ‡Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, and §Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou Y, Shen J, Xia L, Wang Y. Curcuma zedoaria (Berg.) Rosc. essential oil and paclitaxel synergistically enhance the apoptosis of SKOV3 cells. Mol Med Rep 2015; 12:1253-7. [PMID: 25777341 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2014] [Accepted: 01/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Curcuma zedoaria (Berg.) Rosc. essential oil (CZEO) is the major component of Curcuma zedoaria (Berg.) Rosc., a traditional medicine with antitumor activity. Paclitaxel (PTX) is a first-line chemotherapeutic agent used to treat patients with ovarian cancer. These compounds directly target nuclear DNA, in order to suppress or inhibit tumor cell growth. The present study aimed to determine the synergistic antitumor effects of CZEO and PTX on the SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cell line. SKOV3 cells were treated with CZEO, PTX or a combination of the two and cell viability was detected using cell counting kit-8. In addition, flow cytometry was used to determined cell apoptosis as well as for cell cycle analysis. The morpho-logical changes of apoptosis were assessed using Hoechst 33342 staining and the expression levels of apoptotic pathway proteins, including caspase-3 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), were quantified using western blot analysis. The cell viability assay indicated that either of these compounds alone or in combination suppressed the growth of SKOV3 cells. Furthermore, flow cytometric analysis indicated that treatment with a combination of CZEO and PTX resulted in increased inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis of SKOV3 cells, as compared with treatment with either of the compounds alone. In addition, the protein expression levels of caspase-3 were increased following treatment with a combination of CZEO and PTX. The results of the present study suggested that CZEO and PTX synergistically enhanced the inhibition of SKOV3 proliferation, and the possible underlying mechanism may be the induction of cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. This therefore indicated that PTX supplemented with CZEO may be an effective treatment strategy to decrease the dose and toxicity of PTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxiao Zhou
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
| | - Jie Shen
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
| | - Liqun Xia
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
| | - Yanli Wang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Y, Herrstedt J, Havsteen H, DePoint Christensen R, Mirza MR, Lund B, Maenpaa J, Kristensen G. A multicenter, non-randomized, phase II study of docetaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks as second line chemotherapy in patients with first relapse of platinum sensitive epithelial ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:937. [PMID: 25494701 PMCID: PMC4295274 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with ovarian cancer relapsing at least 6 months after end of primary treatment, the addition of paclitaxel to platinum treatment has been shown to improve survival but at the cost of significant neuropathy. In the first line setting, the carboplatin-docetaxel combination was as effective as the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel but with less neurotoxicity. This study was initiated to evaluate the feasibility of carboplatin with docetaxel as second line treatment in patients with ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. Methods Patients with stage IC-IV epithelial ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer were enrolled at the first relapse after at least 6 months since completion of the first line treatment. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 was given as an one hour IV infusion followed immediately by carboplatin (AUC = 5) given as a 30–60 min. IV infusion on day 1 and repeated every 3 weeks for 6–9 courses. Primary endpoint was toxicity; secondary endpoints were response rate and the time to progression. Results A total of 74 patients were included. Of these, 50 patients received 6 or more cycles, 13 received 3–5 courses and 11 received less than 3 courses. A total of 398 cycles were given. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 80% (59 of 74) patients with an incidence of febrile neutropenia of 16%. Grade 2/3 sensory peripheral neuropathy occurred in 7% of patients, but no grade 4 sensory peripheral neuropathy was observed. Sixty patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 70% with 28% complete responses in the response evaluable patient population. Median progression-free survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 10.4-14.4). Conclusions The three-weekly regimen of docetaxel in combination with carboplatin was feasible and active as second-line treatment of platinum-sensitive ovarian, peritoneal and Fallopian tube cancer. The major toxicity was neutropenia, while the frequency of peripheral neuropathy was low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gunnar Kristensen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, PB 4953 Nydalen 0424, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kumar A, Hoskins PJ, Tinker AV. Dose-dense paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 27:40-7. [PMID: 25455846 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Revised: 09/18/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Carboplatin and paclitaxel, delivered on a 3-weekly basis, is the historical standard for the management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC). Increased dose intensity, the inclusion of additional active cytotoxic agents and lengthening treatment duration have failed to improve the outcomes seen with standard doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel in the treatment of EOC. Dose-dense (i.e. weekly) delivery of paclitaxel may exploit anticancer mechanisms such as anti-angiogenesis and the induction of apoptosis. Tumour regrowth may be more effectively impaired by the dose-dense delivery of paclitaxel. Non-randomised studies of dose-dense chemotherapy in EOC have been promising, particularly in heavily pretreated and platinum-resistant disease, with reported response rates as high as 60%. Dose-dense paclitaxel also seems to be well tolerated. These observations led to a number of comparative trials of dose-dense paclitaxel chemotherapy, three have been reported and four are ongoing. This review explores the rationale behind dose-dense delivery of paclitaxel and evaluates the results of completed phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - P J Hoskins
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A V Tinker
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shawky H, Tawfik H, Hewidy M. Weekly dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin in recurrent ovarian carcinoma: A phase II trial. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2014; 26:139-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2014.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2014] [Revised: 05/04/2014] [Accepted: 05/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
7
|
Donovan KA, Donovan HS, Cella D, Gaines ME, Penson RT, Plaxe SC, von Gruenigen VE, Bruner DW, Reeve BB, Wenzel L. Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms and quality-of-life domains to measure in ovarian cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju128. [PMID: 25006190 PMCID: PMC4110471 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2013] [Revised: 04/01/2014] [Accepted: 04/11/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
There is no consensus as to what symptoms or quality-of-life (QOL) domains should be measured as patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in ovarian cancer clinical trials. A panel of experts convened by the National Cancer Institute reviewed studies published between January 2000 and August 2011. The results were included in and combined with an expert consensus-building process to identify the most salient PROs for ovarian cancer clinical trials. We identified a set of PROs specific to ovarian cancer: abdominal pain, bloating, cramping, fear of recurrence/disease progression, indigestion, sexual dysfunction, vomiting, weight gain, and weight loss. Additional PROs identified in parallel with a group charged with identifying the most important PROs across cancer types were anorexia, cognitive problems, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, nausea, neuropathy, pain, and insomnia. Physical and emotional domains were considered to be the most salient domains of QOL. Findings of the review and consensus process provide good support for use of these ovarian cancer-specific PROs in ovarian cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine A Donovan
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - Heidi S Donovan
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - David Cella
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - Martha E Gaines
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - Richard T Penson
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - Steven C Plaxe
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - Vivian E von Gruenigen
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - Deborah Watkins Bruner
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW)
| | - Lari Wenzel
- Affiliations of authors: Supportive Care Medicine Department, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL (KAD); Acute and Tertiary Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (HSD); Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (DC); Center for Patient Partnership, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI (MEG); Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (RTP); Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA (SCP); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH (VEvG); School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (DWB); Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (BBR); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (LW).
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Valenzano Menada M, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. The potential of sunitinib as a therapy in ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2013; 22:1671-86. [PMID: 24070205 DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2013.841138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sunitinib malate (SU11248; Sutent®; Pfizer, Inc., New York) is a multi-kinase inhibitor currently approved for use in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), imatinib-resistant/-intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumours and progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease. AREAS COVERED This article describes the mechanism of action and of the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib; further, it summarizes Phase I and II trials on the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of this agent in the setting of ovarian cancer (OC) treatment. EXPERT OPINION On the basis of the current literature, sunitinib has shown modest antitumour activity and acceptable toxicity. Studies investigating the impact of horizontal and vertical combinations should represent a priority of future research. Although clinical Phase II trials on the use of sunitinib in the treatment of OC demonstrated an acceptable profile of AEs, a greater comprehension of the toxicity of this compound is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore
- University of Genoa, San Martino Hospital and National Institute for Cancer Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Largo R. Benzi 1, 16132 Genoa , Italy +01139 010511525 ; +01139 010511525 ;
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wenham RM, Lapolla J, Lin HY, Apte SM, Lancaster JM, Judson PL, Gonzalez-Bosquet J, Herschberger A, Havrilesky LJ, Secord AA. A phase II trial of docetaxel and bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer within 12 months of prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130:19-24. [PMID: 23623830 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2013] [Revised: 04/15/2013] [Accepted: 04/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and docetaxel were evaluated in women who developed recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer within 12 months of platinum-based therapy. METHODS Patients received docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 of a 21-daycycle. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Forty-one patients were evaluable for PFS and 38 for best response; 46% had platinum-free intervals (PFI) of <6 months and 54% between 6 and 12 months. The 6-month PFS was 43.9% (95% confidence interval (CI(95%))=28.6-58.2%). Median PFS (months) was 5.2 (CI(95%)=4.4-7.2) for all patients, 6.2 (CI(95%)=4.1-7.4) for patients with PFI <6 months, and 5.1 (CI(95%)=3.0-7.2) for those with PFI ≥ 6 months. Twenty-two patients showed overall response (CR+PR) (57.9%; CI(95%)=40.8-73.7%), and 32 showed clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD) (84.2%; CI(95%)=68.8-94.0%). For those with complete or partial responses, median duration of response was 4.8 months (0.7-14.5). Median overall survival was 12.4 months (CI(95%)=10.0-21.9). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (14.6% of patients), followed by leukopenia, fatigue, metabolic, and gastrointestinal, with 66% showing any grade 3/4 toxicity. Most common AEs of any grade were gastrointestinal (93%), fatigue (73%), and pain (73%). Four (10%) patients developed hypertension, 1 a gastrointestinal perforation, and another a colovesicular fistula. CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab and docetaxel administered in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is an active regimen without new unanticipated toxicities. This combination should be an option for further study or clinical use in recurrent ovarian cancer.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Bevacizumab
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
- Disease-Free Survival
- Docetaxel
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
- Drug Synergism
- Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Female
- Humans
- Infusions, Intravenous
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy
- Organoplatinum Compounds/therapeutic use
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Taxoids/administration & dosage
- Taxoids/adverse effects
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Wenham
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bae WK, Hwang JE, Shim HJ, Cho SH, Lee KH, Han HS, Song EK, Yun HJ, Cho IS, Lee JK, Lim SC, Chung WK, Chung IJ. Multicenter phase II study of weekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (TPS) induction chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:102. [PMID: 23497365 PMCID: PMC3599387 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2012] [Accepted: 02/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of weekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (weekly TPS) as induction chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods A total of 35 patients with previously untreated, locally advanced HNSCC were enrolled. Seven patients (20%) were diagnosed with stage III HNSCC and 28 patients (80%) were diagnosed with stage IV. Induction treatment included 30 mg/m2 docetaxel on day 1 and 8, 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, and 70 mg/m2 S-1 on days 1 to 14. The regimen was repeated every 21 days. After three courses of induction chemotherapy, patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Results Among the 35 patients, 30 (85.7%) completed induction chemotherapy. The response to induction chemotherapy was as follows: nine patients (25.7%) achieved a complete response (CR) and the overall response rate (ORR) was 85.7%. Grades 3–4 toxicity during induction therapy included neutropenia (28.5%), neutropenic fever (8.5%), and diarrhea (17.1%). After completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the CR rate was 62.8% and the partial response (PR) was 22.8%. Estimates of progression-free and overall survival at 2 years were 73.2% and 79.3%, respectively. Conclusions Weekly TPS is a promising regimen that is well-tolerated, causes minimal myelosuppression and is effective as an outpatient regimen for locally advanced HNSCC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01645748
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Kyun Bae
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sorbe B, Graflund M, Nygren L, Horvath G. A study of docetaxel weekly or every three weeks in combination with carboplatin as first line chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer: Hematological and non-hematological toxicity profiles. Oncol Lett 2013; 5:1140-1148. [PMID: 23599753 PMCID: PMC3629213 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2012] [Accepted: 12/28/2012] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the toxicity profiles of docetaxel administered on a weekly schedule and the standard three-week schedule in the treatment of advanced primary ovarian carcinoma. Eligible patients were treated with intravenous docetaxel (30 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15, and carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1 or with docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1; Q21 days for 6 cycles. This study was a pooled study of two primary phase II studies. A total of 108 patients received the weekly schedule and 59 patients received the three-week schedule. All patients were evaluated for toxicity. The overall response rate was 79% and the biochemical response 93% for the weekly schedule. The median overall survival rate was 35.3 months. Neutropenia was significantly more common (ANOVA; p<0.0001) in the three-week group than in the weekly group during all six courses of chemotherapy. Fever and infections were also more common in this group. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were slightly more common in the weekly group. Fatigue, epiphora, nail changes and taste disturbances were specific side-effects following weekly docetaxel. Peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 1–2) increased with every cycle of treatment, but in a similar manner in the two groups. Grade 3–4 neuropathy was not recorded. Oral mucositis and myalgia were two side-effects associated with the three-week schedule. Nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and dyspnea were a limited problem in both groups. Cardiac toxicity was rare and did not differ between the two docetaxel schedules. The weekly administration was favored due to the lower rates of neutropenia, fever, infections, oral mucositis and myalgia. However, epiphora and nail changes were specific side-effects of the weekly treatment. Both regimens appeared to be rather well tolerated with similar compliance (66 and 70%) with regard to completion of the planned six courses of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Sorbe
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Örebro
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dizon DS, Damstrup L, Finkler NJ, Lassen U, Celano P, Glasspool R, Crowley E, Lichenstein HS, Knoblach P, Penson RT. Phase II activity of belinostat (PXD-101), carboplatin, and paclitaxel in women with previously treated ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012; 22:979-86. [PMID: 22694911 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e31825736fd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preclinical data show that belinostat (Bel) is synergistic with carboplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. To further evaluate the clinical activity of belinostat, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BelCaP), a phase 1b/2 study was performed, with an exploratory phase 2 expansion planned specifically for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Thirty-five women were treated on the phase 2 expansion cohort. BelCap was given as follows: belinostat, 1000 mg/m² daily for 5 days with carboplatin, AUC 5; and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m² given on day 3 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR), using a Simon 2 stage design. RESULTS The median age was 60 years (range, 39-80 years), and patients had received a median of 3 prior regimens (range, 1-4). Fifty-four percent had received more than two prior platinum-based combinations, sixteen patients (46%) had primary platinum-resistant disease, whereas 19 patients (54%) recurred within 6 months of their most recent platinum treatment. The median number of cycles of BelCaP administered was 6 (range, 1-23). Three patients had a complete response, and 12 had a partial response, for an ORR of 43% (95% confidence interval, 26%-61%). When stratified by primary platinum status, the ORR was 44% among resistant patients and 63% among sensitive patients. The most common drug-related adverse events related to BelCaP were nausea (83%), fatigue (74%), vomiting (63%), alopecia (57%), and diarrhea (37%). With a median follow-up of 4 months (range, 0-23.3 months), 6-month progression-free survival is 48% (95% confidence interval, 31%-66%). Median overall survival was not reached during study follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Belinostat, carboplatin, and paclitaxel combined was reasonably well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit in heavily-pretreated patients with EOC. The addition of belinostat to this platinum-based regimen represents a novel approach to EOC therapy and warrants further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Don S Dizon
- Program in Women's Oncology, Women & Infants' Hospital/Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02905, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sorbe B, Graflund M, Horvath G, Swahn M, Boman K, Bangshöj R, Lood M, Malmström H. Phase II study of docetaxel weekly in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks as first-line chemotherapy in stage IIB to stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012; 22:47-53. [PMID: 22193643 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e318234fa3a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess the response rate, toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival in a series of patients with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma treated with a first-line weekly docetaxel and 3 weekly carboplatin regimen. METHODS All eligible patients were treated with intravenous docetaxel (30 mg/m) on days 1, 8, and 15, and carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on day 1; every 21 days for at least 6 cycles. RESULTS One hundred six patients received at least one cycle of primary chemotherapy (median, 6.0; range, 1-9), and they were evaluable for toxicity assessment. Eighty-five patients had evaluable (measurable) disease and received at least 3 courses of chemotherapy and were evaluable for clinical response rate. The overall response rate was 78.8% (95% confidence interval, 70.1%-87.5%), and the biochemical response 92.8% (95% confidence interval, 87.2%-98.4%). The median progression-free survival was 12.0 months and the median overall survival was 35.3 months. Thirty-six patients (34.0%) experienced grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, which resulted in the removal of 3 patients. Six patients (5.7%) experienced grades 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. No patients experienced grade 3 to grade 4 sensory neuropathy. Epiphora, nail changes, and fatigue were frequently recorded nonhematologic adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS The tolerable hematologic toxicity (no need for colony-stimulating factors) and the low rate of neurotoxicity (only grades 1-2) and response rates in line with the standard 3-week paclitaxel-carboplatin regimen for advanced primary ovarian carcinoma after suboptimal cytoreductive surgery make this regimen an interesting alternative in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Sorbe
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alvarez Secord A, Berchuck A, Higgins RV, Nycum LR, Kohler MF, Puls LE, Holloway RW, Lewandowski GS, Valea FA, Havrilesky LJ. A multicenter, randomized, phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination docetaxel and carboplatin and sequential therapy with docetaxel then carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Cancer 2011; 118:3283-93. [PMID: 22072307 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2011] [Revised: 06/20/2011] [Accepted: 07/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination (cDC) and sequential (sDC) weekly docetaxel and carboplatin in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Participants were randomized to either weekly docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 6 on day 1, every 3 weeks or docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for 6 cycles followed by carboplatin AUC = 6 on day 1, every 3 weeks for 6 cycles or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was measurable progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Between January 2004 and March 2007, 150 participants were enrolled. The response rate was 55.4% and 43.2% for those treated with cDC and sDC, respectively. The median PFS was 13.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.9-16.8) for cDC and 8.4 months (95% CI, 7.1-11.0) for sDC. On the basis of an exploratory analysis, patients treated with sDC were at a 62% increased risk of disease progression compared to those treated with cDC (hazard ratio = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.08-2.45; P = .02). The median overall survival time was similar in both groups (33.2 and 30.1 months, P = .2). The incidence of grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was higher with cDC than with sDC (11.7% vs 8.5%; 36.8% vs 11.3%). The sDC group demonstrated significant improvements in the Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy-Ovarian, Quality of Life Trial Outcome Index scores compared with the combination cohort (P = .013). CONCLUSIONS Both cDC and sDC regimens have activity in recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC with acceptable toxicity profiles. The cDC regimen may provide a PFS advantage over sDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu K, Solimando DA, Waddell JA. Docetaxel and Carboplatin (DC) for Ovarian Cancer. Hosp Pharm 2010. [DOI: 10.1310/hpj4508-607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Wu
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dominic A. Solimando
- Oncology Pharmacy Services, Inc., 4201 Wilson Blvd #110-545, Arlington, VA 22203
| | - J. Aubrey Waddell
- University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy; Oncology Pharmacist, Pharmacy Department, Blount Memorial Hospital, 907 E. Lamar Alexander Parkway, Maryville, TN 37804
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Seliger G, Mueller LP, Kegel T, Kantelhardt EJ, Grothey A, Groe R, Strauss HG, Koelbl H, Thomssen C, Schmoll HJ. Phase 2 trial of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in platinum- and paclitaxel-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19:1446-53. [PMID: 20009905 DOI: 10.1111/igc.0b013e3181b62f38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin for platinum- and paclitaxel-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Heavily pretreated patients (N = 30; median age, 61 years) received docetaxel, 55 mg/m2; gemcitabine, 500 mg/m2 (day 1); and oxaliplatin, 70 mg/m2 (day 2) biweekly. Twelve patients had platinum-sensitive disease, and 18 patients had platinum-resistant disease. RESULTS Median follow-up was 18.6 months. No differences in patient characteristics were observed between patients with carboplatinum-sensitive and carboplatinum-resistant disease. In patients with carboplatin-sensitive disease, an overall response (OR) of 83.3%, a progression-free survival of 10.6 months, and an overall survival of 18.9 months were observed. In patients with carboplatinum-resistant disease, an OR was seen in 38.9% with a progression-free survival of 5.3 months and an overall survival of 16.3 months. Patients with platinum-refractory disease (progression under previous carboplatinum therapy, n = 13) had an OR of 23%, whereas patients with objective response but relapse less than 6 months after carboplatinum therapy had an OR of 80.0%. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were only observed for anemia (6.7%), neutropenia (20.0%), thrombopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and diarrhea (16.7%). No neutropenic fever or treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS In comparison with current standard protocols, a combination of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin showed considerably higher efficacy without remarkable increased toxicity; particularly for patients with early relapse after a platinum-containing therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Seliger
- Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kajiwara Y, Panchabhai S, Liu DD, Kong M, Lee JJ, Levin VA. Melding a New 3-Dimensional Agarose Colony Assay with the E(max) Model to Determine the Effects of Drug Combinations on Cancer Cells. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2009; 8:163-76. [PMID: 19334798 PMCID: PMC5481785 DOI: 10.1177/153303460900800210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The goal of our study was two-fold: (i) develop a robust 3D colony assay methodology to interrogate drug combinations using GelCount and (ii) to develop 2-drug combinations that might be useful in the clinic for the treatment of high-grade gliomas. We used three glioma cell lines (U251MG, SNB19, and LNZ308) and two adenocarcinoma cell lines (MiaPaCa and SW480) grown as colonies in a two-tiered agarose cultures. We evaluated two-drug combinations of difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), carboplatin, vorinostat (SAHA), and docetaxel. To analyze for antitumor efficacy we used GelCount to measure the area under the curve for tumor colony volumes (microm(2) x OD) in each plate. The non-linear dose-response E(max) model and the interaction index based on the Loewe additivity are applied to calculate two-drug synergy, additive, and antagonistic interactions. For glioblastoma cell lines, (i) carboplatin followed by DFMO was synergistic or additive in 2/3 cell lines, (ii) carboplatin before SAHA was synergistic in 1 cell line, (iii) carboplatin before docetaxel was synergistic in 2/3 cell lines and partially additive in the third, (iv) SAHA before docetaxel was synergistic in 1/3 cell lines, (v) docetaxel before DFMO was additive or partially active in 3/3 cell lines, and (vi) DFMO plus SAHA was inactive regardless of order. In the MiaPaCA cell line, synergy occurred when DFMO followed carboplatin and, at short exposure times, when SAHA was combined with carboplatin (regardless of order). In the SW480 cell line synergy occurred only in short exposures for carboplatin followed by docetaxel; additive and mixed partial effects were also seen with DFMO plus carboplatin or docetaxel (regardless of order), carboplatin before DFMO, carboplatin before SAHA, and docetaxel before carboplatin. In conclusion, by applying the Gelcount automated counting and sizing of colonies and the use of E(max) and Loewe models to define drug interactions, we can reliably define drug combination efficacy as a function of log dose and duration of drug exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Kajiwara
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA
| | - Sonali Panchabhai
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA
| | - Diane D. Liu
- Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA
| | - Maiying Kong
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA
| | - J. Jack Lee
- Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA
| | - Victor A. Levin
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nakabayashi M, Sartor O, Jacobus S, Regan MM, McKearn D, Ross RW, Kantoff PW, Taplin ME, Oh WK. Response to docetaxel/carboplatin-based chemotherapy as first- and second-line therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008; 101:308-12. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07331.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|