An analysis of reported independent prognostic factors for survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Is tumor size significance being underrated?

Surgical margin and other prognostic factors of invasive vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: A clinicopathological mono-center study

Objective

To evaluate prognostic factors in women with invasive VSCC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC).

Methods

137 patients with VSCC at SYSUCC were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method assessed the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) time. Prognostic factors were identified using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results

Only 2 out of 137 patients had positive postoperative margins after intraoperative supplemental excision. The international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III-IV (HR: 4.67, 95 % confidence intervals (CI): 2.48-8.79) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (HR: 1.86, 95 % CI: 1.08-3.23) were independent risk factors for OS. The independent risk factors affecting PFS included FIGO stage III-IV (HR: 3.72, 95 % CI: 2.10-6.60), BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (HR: 2.15, 95 % CI: 1.28-3.64), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) > 1.5 ng/ml (HR: 2.06, 95 % CI: 1.23-3.47). The survival of 12 individuals with perineural invasion (PNI) was extremely poor, with a median OS of 37 months and a median PFS of 22 months.

Conclusion

The surgical margin should be at least 1.0 cm away from the tumor edge. When the surgeons cannot ensure the negative margins, detecting surgical margins with rapid pathological examination may reduce the incidence of postoperative positive margins. FIGO stage III-IV, ILN metastases, and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 are important adverse prognostic factors in VSCC patients. Cases with PNI may have poor prognosis. SCC-Ag might be a useful marker for predicting relapse.

Survival nomograms for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma based on the SEER database and a Chinese external validation cohort

OBJECTIVE

The aim of study was to construct a nomogram to effectively predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC).

METHODS

The training cohort consisted of 5405 patients with VSCC, extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Eighty-four patients with VSCC were selected from the disease database of the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from 2014 to 2020, and enrolled as the external validation cohort. Significant independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression analysis and used to develop nomograms to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS in patients with VSCC.

RESULTS

The nomogram predicting OS was developed based on tumor size, histological grade, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, regional lymph node involvement, distant metastases, surgery, chemotherapy, age, and race. The nomogram for CSS was constructed using the similar factors, excluding race but including marital status. The nomogram for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS demonstrated robust performance with receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) exceeding 80% (0.86, 0.84, and 0.82), outperforming the FIGO staging alone (0.77, 0.75, and 0.72). Similarly, for CSS, our nomograms achieved larger AUCs of 0.89, 0.88, and 0.86 compared with FIGO staging alone (0.81, 0.79, and 0.78).

CONCLUSION

The nomograms more accurately predict prognosis than simple FIGO staging. Moreover, the nomograms developed in this study provide a convenient, operable, and reliable tool for individual assessment and clinical decision-making for patients with VSCC.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Groin Node Metastases Following Surgery for Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background: Lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer is a critical prognostic factor associated with higher recurrence and decreased survival. A survival benefit is reported with adjuvant radiotherapy but with potential significant morbidity. We aim to clarify whether there is high-quality evidence to support the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in this setting. Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy to locoregional metastatic nodal areas. Search Methods: We conducted a comprehensive and systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the National Cancer Institute. We considered only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Main Results: We identified 1,760 records and finally retrieved only one eligible RCT (114 participants with positive inguinofemoral lymph nodes). All women had undergone radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy and had been randomized to adjuvant radiotherapy or to intraoperative ipsilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. At 6 years, the overall survival (OS) was 51% versus 41% in favor of radiotherapy (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.30-1.3) without significance and with very low certainty of evidence. At 6 year, the cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 29% versus 51% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.87). Recurrence-free survival at 6 years was 59% after adjuvant radiotherapy versus 48% after pelvic lymphadenectomy (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). Three (5.3%) versus 13 (24.1%) groin recurrences were noted, respectively, in the adjuvant radiotherapy and pelvic lymphadenectomy groups. There was no significant difference in acute toxicities for pelvic lymphadenectomy compared to radiotherapy. In women with positive pelvic lymph nodes (20%), the OS at 6 year was 36% compared with 13% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy. Late cutaneous toxicity rate appeared to be greater after radiotherapy (19% vs. 15%) but with less chronic lymphedema (16% vs. 22%). Conclusion: There is only very low-quality evidence on administering adjuvant radiotherapy for inguinal lymph node metastases. Although the identified study was a multicenter RCT, there was a reasonable imprecision and inconsistency because of small study numbers, wide confidence intervals in the data, and early trial closure, resulting in downgrading of the evidence.

A review of prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Evidence from the last decade

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare gynecologic cancer that is associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality, particularly for recurrent disease. This review summarizes the evidence and continued challenges, regarding the traditional clinicopathologic factors used to prognosticate vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Articles published within the last 10 years (2010-2020) were identified. Relevant articles concerning the following fifteen prognostic factors were reviewed: HPV/p16 status, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, tumor size, depth of invasion, stromal changes, histologic patterns of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, tumour focality, margin status and lichen sclerosus (LS). The relationship between each prognostic factor and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), including hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p-values, were extracted.

Effect of known pathological risk factors on the incidence of metastatic lymph nodes and survival in early-stage vulvar cancer: SEER analysis

OBJECTIVE

The current study was performed to evaluate the incidence of positive lymph nodes (LNs) in relation to known pathological risk factors, specifically among patients with apparent low-grade, small tumors.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to retrospectively identify patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) diagnosed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, with known tumor size and regional LN examined. A comparison between patients who had positive and negative LNs was conducted to identify risk factors for LN metastases in relation to survival. Subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with diagnosed grade 1 vulvar SCC and tumor size up to 2 cm according to the status of LNs.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis found that both grade of disease and tumor size were significant factors in predicting LN status. Among patients with low-grade small tumors up to 2 cm, the odds ratio for positive LNs was 2.5 for those with tumor size larger than 1 cm. In a multivariate survival analysis, older age, larger tumor size, and positive LNs were independently associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study confirms that among small tumors, those larger than 1 cm have a significantly increased risk for positive nodes compared with those smaller than 1 cm, and, among this specific group, patients with positive nodes have decreased survival. Future studies are needed to answer the question of whether, in the era of the sentinel node procedure, it is safe to omit LN evaluation altogether.

Observational multicenter Italian study on vulvar cancer adjuvant radiotherapy (OLDLADY 1.2): a cooperation among AIRO Gyn, MITO and MaNGO groups

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) has been shown to reduce the risk of local relapse in vulvar cancer (VC). In this multicentre study (OLDLADY-1.2), several Institutions have combined their retrospective data on VC patients to produce a real-world dataset aimed at collecting data on efficacy and safety of aRT.

METHODS

The primary study end-point was the 2-year-local control, secondary end-points were the 2-year-metastasis free-survival, the 2-year-overall survival and the rate and severity of acute and late toxicities. Participating centres were required to fill data sets including age, stage, tumor diameter, type of surgery, margin status, depth of invasion, histology, grading as well technical/dosimetric details of radiotherapy. Data about response, local and regional recurrence, acute and late toxicities, follow-up and outcome measures were also collected.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-one patients with invasive VC from 9 Institutions were retrospectively identified. The majority of patients were stage III (63%), grade 2 (62.4%) squamous carcinoma (97.2%). Positive nodes were observed in 117 patients (64.6%), moreover tumor diameter > 4 cm, positive/close margins and depth of invasion deeper than 5 mm were found in 59.1%, 38.6%, 58% of patients, respectively. Sixty-one patients (33.7%) received adjuvant chemoradiation, and 120 (66.3%) received radiotherapy alone. aRT was started 3 months after surgery in 50.8% of patients. Prescribed volumes and doses heterogeneity was recorded according to margin status and nodal disease. Overall, 42.5% locoregional recurrences were recorded. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range 1-179), the 2-year actuarial local control rate, metastasis free and overall survival were 68.7%, 84.5%, and 67.5%, respectively. In term of safety, aRT leads to a prevalence of acute skin toxicity with a low incidence of severe toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of aRT for VC the present study reports a broad spectrum of approaches which would deserve greater standardization in terms of doses, volumes and drugs used.

Data Set for the Reporting of Carcinomas of the Vulva: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

A cogent and comprehensive pathologic report is essential for optimal patient management, cancer staging, and prognostication. This article details the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) process and the development of the vulval carcinoma reporting data set. It describes the "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in pathology reports for vulval carcinoma, inclusive of clinical, macroscopic, microscopic, and ancillary testing considerations. It provides definitions and commentary for the evidence and/or consensus-based deliberations for each element included in the data set. The commentary also discusses controversial issues, such as p16/human papillomavirus testing, tumor grading and measurements, as well as elements that show promise and warrant further evidence-based study. A summary and discussion of the updated vulval cancer staging system by the International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (FIGO) in 2021 is also provided. We hope the widespread implementation of this data set will facilitate consistent and accurate reporting, data collection, comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations, facilitate research, and serve as a platform to improve patient outcomes.

Postoperative management of vulvar cancer

The primary treatment for resectable vulvar cancer includes wide local excision of the primary tumor and surgical lymph node assessment. Following surgery, up to 40-50% of patients develop a local recurrence. Historically, the strongest predictor of local recurrence is a positive or close margin (defined as <8 mm), although recent studies question the importance of margin status. Post-operative radiotherapy to the vulva is recommended for all women with a positive margin where re-excision is not possible. Radiotherapy may also be considered in the setting of risk factors for local recurrence: close margin, lymphovascular invasion, large tumor size, and/or depth of invasion >5 mm. Nodal assessment is an important component of vulvar cancer management. A negative sentinel node is associated with a low false-negative predictive value (2% in patients with vulvar tumor <4 cm in GOG 173), 2-year groin recurrence rate of 2.3%, and 3-year disease-specific survival rate of 97% in patients with unifocal vulvar tumor <4 cm in the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar Cancer (GROINSS-V I) study. Thus, patients with tumor size <4 cm (without additional local risk factors) and negative sentinel node can be observed. Patients with sentinel node metastasis ≤2 mm can be treated with post-operative radiotherapy (2-year isolated groin recurrence rate of 1.6% in GROINSS-V II), as a safe alternative to lymphadenectomy. Patients with sentinel node metastasis >2 mm following sentinel node biopsy should undergo inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy followed by post-operative radiotherapy-based on the GROINSS-V II study, the 2-year isolated groin recurrence rate remains unacceptably high (22%) with radiotherapy alone. Retrospective studies suggest that the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy may improve survival. The ongoing GROINSS-V III study is investigating concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy dose escalation. The main goal of these post-operative treatments is to reduce the risk of local, and especially groin, recurrences, which are almost universally fatal.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-up of Vulvar Cancer

Vulvar cancer is an uncommon gynecologic tumor and one of several human papillomavirus-associated malignancies. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most prevalent histologic subtype of vulvar cancer, accounting for the majority of cases. Imaging plays an important role in managing vulvar cancer. At initial diagnosis, imaging is useful to assess the size and extent of primary tumor and to evaluate the status of inguinofemoral lymph nodes. If recurrent disease is suspected, imaging is essential to demonstrate local extent of tumor and to identify lymph node and distant metastases. In this publication, we summarize the recent literature and describe the panel's recommendations about the appropriate use of imaging for various phases of patient management including initial staging, surveillance, and restaging of vulvar cancer. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

A review of prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Evidence from the last decade

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare gynecologic cancer that is associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality, particularly for recurrent disease. This review summarizes the evidence and continued challenges, regarding the traditional clinicopathologic factors used to prognosticate vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Articles published within the last 10 years (2010-2020) were identified. Relevant articles concerning the following fifteen prognostic factors were reviewed: HPV/p16 status, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, tumor size, depth of invasion, stromal changes, histologic patterns of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, tumour focality, margin status and lichen sclerosus (LS). The relationship between each prognostic factor and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), including hazard ratios, 95% confidence intervals and p-values, were extracted.

Multidisciplinary personalized approach in the management of vulvar cancer - the Vul.Can Team experience

INTRODUCTION

Multidisciplinary treatment strategy involving adjuvant radiotherapy for advanced vulvar cancer could be useful in offering the best personalized clinical approach. In 2013, the VULvar CANcer Multi-Disciplinary Team (Vul.Can MDT) was set up in our institution, in order to share knowledge and expertise, high-quality diagnosis, and evidence-based decision making in the context of personalized medicine. The aim of this observational study was to report on our series of vulvar cancer patients managed postoperatively with radiotherapy within the framework of a formal multidisciplinary tumor board.

METHODS

Coupling surgical and oncological international guidelines with "case-by-case" discussions, a multi-specialist consensus was progressively reached and internal recommendations were developed and introduced in the daily routine. Data from vulvar cancer patients who underwent primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy throughout a 5-year period were retrospectively collected. Actuarial local control was the primary endpoint, while secondary end-points were acute and late toxicities, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event v 4.0 scale.

RESULTS

The analysis included 35 patients with squamous vulvar cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy±chemotherapy, from April 2013 to September 2017. Median age was 70 years (range 18-87), all patients underwent surgery followed by concomitant chemoradiation (45.7%) or radiotherapy alone (54.3%). The median prophylactic dose on lymphatic drainage was 45 Gy, while positive nodes and perineal area received 51.2 Gy and 52.6 Gy, respectively. Chemotherapy involved the cisplatin-based regimen (45.7%)±5-fluorouracil (37.1%). Median follow-up was 32 months (range 6-72): the 24-months local control, disease-free survival, and actuarial overall survival rates were 88.6%, 82.0%, and 91.0%, respectively. Low rates of severe acute (12%) and late (3%) toxicities occurred.

DISCUSSION

The outcomes of this series support the benefit of a multidisciplinary personalized approach in the management of vulvar cancer.

Unilateral versus bilateral lymph-nodal metastases and oncologic outcome in vulvar cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in oncologic outcome between vulvar cancer patients with uni- and bilateral inguino-femoral lymph nodal involvement and to identify factors affecting their oncologic outcome MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy for vulvar cancer were classified into three groups according to their lymph nodal status at the histology analysis (negative, positive one side, positive bilaterally). PFS and OS survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze factors predicting overall survival and progression-free survival. Multivariable models were used for variables reporting a p value ≤ 0.1 at the univariate analysis. p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-six patients were considered for the analysis. Patients with bilaterally negative lymph nodes had significantly longer PFS and OS as compared to patients with unilateral and bilateral involvement. Patients with unilateral lymph nodal involvement had better PFS than patients with bilateral lymph nodal involvement. Among these patients, the difference in the OS approached but did not reach statistical significance. At the multivariate analysis, the tumor size affected PFS and lymph nodal involvement affected OS.

CONCLUSION

Vulvar cancer patients with bilateral positive lymph nodes have worse oncologic outcome as compared to patients with unilateral lymph nodal involvement; similarly, patients with unilateral lymph nodal involvement have worse oncological outcome as compared to patients with bilateral negative lymph nodes. Furthermore, tumor size and lymph nodal status are independent factors predicting recurrence rate and overall survival, respectively.

Role of adjuvant radiation or re-excision for early stage vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with positive or close surgical margins

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate whether re-excision or adjuvant radiation for stage I vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with either a close or positive surgical margin improves recurrence-free survival.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed FIGO stage I vulvar SCC who underwent primary surgical management between January 1, 1995 and September 30, 2017 and had positive or close (<8 mm) surgical margins were included. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 150 patients with stage I vulvar SCC, 47 (31.3%) had positive or close margins. Median follow-up time was 25 months (IQR 13-59 months). Twenty-one (44.6%) patients received additional treatment with re-excision (n = 17) or vulvar radiation (n = 4); 26 (55.3%) patients received no additional therapy. Patients with positive margins were more likely to receive additional therapy compared to patients with close margins (80% vs 35.1%, p = 0.03). The 2-year recurrence rates were similar between the no further therapy and the re-excision/vulvar radiation groups (11.5% vs 4.8%, p = 0.62). Local recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between patients who received re-excision/vulvar radiation and patients who received no further therapy (p = 0.10 and p = 0.16, respectively). Subgroup analysis of the 37 patients with close margins demonstrated no difference in RFS or OS when patients received re-excision or adjuvant vulvar radiation compared to no additional therapy (p = 0.74 and p = 0.82, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, any additional treatment following primary surgical resection did not improve RFS or OS in stage IA and IB vulvar SCC. Larger studies are warranted in order to definitively determine the role of re-excision and adjuvant radiation in early stage disease.

Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Background: Perineural invasion (PNI) is closely associated with poor survival in several types of malignant tumours, but whether this is true in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is unclear. The aims of this study were to determine the prognostic significance of PNI in patients with VSCC. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed clinico-pathological data on 105 patients with VSCC (stages IB-IV) treated surgically at our medical center between 2005 and 2015. Results: PNI was detected in 30 (28.6%) patients, and it was significantly associated with well-known clinical risk factors: large tumour size, depth of invasion, lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI), and intra- or extra-nodal spread. Significantly greater proportions of patients with PNI received adjuvant therapy after surgery (P=0.001) or showed local recurrence (P=0.002). Multivariable analysis indicated that risk factors for disease-free survival were tumour size (HR 3.02, 95%CI 1.75-7.75), LVSI (HR 4.82, 95%CI 1.36-17.07), depth of invasion (HR 3.11, 95%CI 1.50-6.44), lymph node metastasis (HR 3.15, 95%CI 1.14-8.96) and positive or close surgical margins (HR 4.86, 95%CI 1.67-14.19). The latter three variables were also risk factors for overall survival. PNI was associated with significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.020) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.017) based on the log-rank test. Among patients who received adjuvant treatment, Kaplan-Meier curves indicated no significant differences between PNI-positive or -negative subgroups in disease-free survival (P=0.085) or overall survival (P=0.061). Based on multivariable analysis of all patients, PNI was not a significant risk factor for either type of survival . Conclusion: PNI in VSCC is associated with significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival, though it appears to be a weak independent predictor of worse prognosis. Combining PNI with other risk factors may be useful for predicting whether postoperative adjuvant therapy will be needed.

Prognostic Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Invasion on Survival in Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The extracapsular tumor extension (ECE) of nodal metastasis is an important prognostic factor in different types of malignancies. However, there is a lack of recent data in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, the TNM staging system does not include ECE status as a prognostic factor. This systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to summarize and pool existing data to determine the prognostic role of ECE in patients with lymph node-positive NSCLC. Two authors performed an independent search in PubMed using a predefined keyword list, without language restrictions with publication date since 1990. Prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on prognostic parameters in subjects with NSCLC with positive ECE or with only intracapsular lymph node metastasis were retrieved. Data were summarized using risk ratios (RR) for the survival with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The data was analyzed using Mix 2 (ref: Bax L: MIX 2.0 - Professional software for meta-analysis in Excel. Version 2.015. BiostatXL, 2016. https://www.meta-analysis-made-easy.com ). There 2,105 studies were reviewed. Five studies covering a total of 828 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Two hundred and ninety-eight (35.9%) patients were categorized as ECE+, of whom 54 (18.1%) survived at the end of follow-up. In the ECE-negative group, 257 patients (48.4%) survived by the end of follow-up. Thus, ECE status is associated with a significantly decreased survival rate: pooled RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.35-0.59), Q ₍₄₎ = 4.06, P _value = 0.39, and I ² = 68.00% (95 CI 0.00-79.55%). In conclusion, ECE has a significant impact on survival in NSCLC patients and should be considered in diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in addition to the current TNM staging. Postoperative radiotherapy may be an option in ECE-positive pN1 NSCLC patients.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy in High-Risk Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva: A Two-Institutional Italian Experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the treatment benefit and patterns of recurrence for patients with high-risk vulvar squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1999 to June 2016, 51 patients underwent total or partial deep vulvectomy with inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant RT with 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions +/- a 4-10 Gy boost. 17 (33.3%) women received concomitant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 81 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 52 and 63%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analysis, patients aged ≤ 76 years and those receiving an RT total dose of > 54 Gy had a significantly lower risk of progression (p = 0.044 and 0.045; p = 0.012 and 0.018, respectively) and death (p = 0.015 and 0.011; p = 0.015 and 0.026, respectively). There was a trend towards a lower risk of progression for patients with tumor size ≤ 4 (p = 0.098) and negative lymphovascular space involvement (p = 0.080). Also, there was a trend towards a higher risk of death (p = 0.075) for grade 3 tumors. Concomitant chemotherapy provided no significant benefit.

CONCLUSION

Only age and RT total dose are significant prognostic variables for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with primary surgery and adjuvant RT to improve local and locoregional control.

[Grading of gynecological tumors : Current aspects]

Histopathological assessment of the tumor grade and cell type is central to the management and prognosis of various gynecological malignancies. Conventional grading systems for squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the vulva, vagina and cervix are poorly defined. For endometrioid tumors of the female genital tract as well as for mucinous endometrial, ovarian and seromucinous ovarian carcinomas, the 3‑tiered FIGO grading system is recommended. For uterine neuroendocrine tumors the grading system of the gastrointestinal counterparts has been adopted. Uterine leiomyosarcomas are not graded. Endometrial stromal sarcomas are divided into low and high grades, based on cellular morphology, immunohistochemical and molecular findings. A chemotherapy response score was established for chemotherapeutically treated high-grade serous pelvic cancer. For non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, only Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors and immature teratomas are graded. At this time molecular profiling has no impact on the grading of tumors of the female genital tract.

Vulvar cancer in Tunisia: Epidemiological and clinicopathological features multicentric study

OBJECTIVE

To describe for the first time the epidemiologic and clinico-pathologic characteristics of vulvar cancer in Tunisia.

DESIGN

Two parts are distinguished in this study: Part1: Multicentric retrospective study about the characteristics of all cancer cases diagnosed during a 17-years period (January 1998-December 2014) in three departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics: one in south Tunisia and two in the capital. Part 2: To determine the Incidence trend of invasive vulvar cancer in North Tunisia 1994-2009, on the basis of North Cancer Registry of Tunisia.

RESULTS

A total of 76 cases of vulvar cancer were recorded. The median age at diagnosis was 65.4years and 86.9% of patients were more than 55years old. The symptomatology was dominated by vulvar pruritus in 48.7%. The average size of the tumor was 3.96cm. Stage III was the most frequent (53.7%) followed by stage II (28.3%). Only 10.4% of tumors were at stage I. The most common histologic type of vulvar malignancy was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (94.7%). Standardized incidence varied from 1.2/100 000 (1994) to 0.5/100 000 (2009). There was significant decrease of Standardized incidence (APC of -8.8% per year, 95% CI: -5.5%, -9.0%-p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Vulvar cancer in Tunisia is a rare disease, occurs mostly in elderly women, and is diagnosed at advanced stages. Our findings emphasize that a greater effort should be made to facilitate early diagnosis, as treatment in earlier stages is less extensive and potentially curative.

Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Vulvar Cancer and its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/059, November 2015

Purpose: This is an official guideline, published and coordinated by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO, Study Group for Gynecologic Oncology) of the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG, German Cancer Society) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG, German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics). The number of cases with vulvar cancer is on the rise, but because of the former rarity of this condition and the resulting lack of literature with a high level of evidence, in many areas knowledge of the optimal clinical management still lags behind what would be required. This updated guideline aims to disseminate the most recent recommendations, which are much clearer and more individualized, and is intended to create a basis for the assessment and improvement of quality care in hospitals. Methods: This S2k guideline was drafted by members of the AGO Committee on Vulvar and Vaginal Tumors; it was developed and formally completed in accordance with the structured consensus process of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF). Recommendations: 1. The incidence of disease must be taken into consideration. 2. The diagnostic pathway, which is determined by the initial findings, must be followed. 3. The clinical and therapeutic management of vulvar cancer must be done on an individual basis and depends on the stage of disease. 4. The indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy must be evaluated very carefully. 5. Follow-up and treatment for recurrence must be adapted to the individual case.

Risk factors and treatment for recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Recurrent disease occurs in 12-37% of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Decisions about treatment of recurrent VSCC mainly depend on the location of the recurrence and previous treatment, resulting in individualized and consensus-based approaches. Most recurrences (40-80%) occur within 2 years after initial treatment. Currently, wide local excision is the treatment of choice for local recurrences. Isolated local recurrence of VSCC has a good prognosis, with reported 5-year survival rates of up to 60%. Groin recurrences and distant recurrences are less common and have an extremely poor prognosis. For groin recurrences, surgery with or without (chemo) radiotherapy is a treatment option, depending on prior treatment. For distant recurrences, there are only palliative treatment options. In this review, we give an overview of the available literature and discuss epidemiology, risk factors, and prognostic factors for the different types of recurrent VSCC and we describe treatment options and clinical outcome.

Factors influencing primary treatment of midline vulvar cancers

OBJECTIVES

Advanced vulvar cancers involving midline structures pose a therapeutic challenge. Our objectives were to review the management and outcomes, and identify factors influencing primary treatment modality.

METHODS

Patients with midline vulvar cancers diagnosed from 1985 to 2012 were included in the analysis. Medical records were abstracted for demographics, clinico-pathological findings, treatment, and outcomes. Groin node status was defined by clinical findings or pathology. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and differences by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. Factors influencing treatment modality were evaluated using stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were identified. Twenty-one underwent primary radical vulvectomy and 21 underwent primary radiation. Median tumor diameter was 3.4cm (range 2-9cm) for primary radical vulvectomy and 5cm (range 2.3-15cm) for primary radiation. Primary radiation was significantly associated with a tumor diameter ≥5cm (p=0.02), or when 2 or more midline (p=0.008) or 1 or more mucosal structures (p=0.03) were involved. On multivariate analysis, age and tumor diameter were predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.02 and p=0.0004, respectively) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.03 and p=0.0005, respectively). Thirty-month OS for primary surgery and primary radiation was 74% and 71% (p=0.78), respectively. There were no differences in PFS or recurrence rates between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical tumor diameter and the number of midline or mucosal structures involved influence selection of primary treatment modality. Survival outcomes and recurrence rates did not differ between treatment groups. Age and tumor diameter are important prognostic factors for survival.

Prognostic implications of extranodal extension in node-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vulva is the fourth most common gynecological cancer, usually staged with the TNM or FIGO systems. Since 2009, FIGO staging has taken the extranodal extension (ENE) of lymph node metastases into account. ENE is defined as the spread of a lymph node metastasis into surrounding soft tissue. Although the TNM and FIGO systems acknowledge the importance of ENE in SCC, no comprehensive studies have analyzed the prognostic impact of this parameter. We therefore queried the PubMed and SCOPUS databases from their inception up until 04/01/2015, adopting no language restrictions: all prospective studies reporting on prognostic parameters in patients with vulvar SCC, and comparing participants with and without ENE were eligible for our analysis. Data were summarized using risk ratios (RR) for the number of deaths/recurrences and hazard ratios (HR) for the time-dependent risk related to ENE positivity, adjusting for potential confounders. Among 859 hits, 13 studies were found eligible and were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with ENE-negative (ENE-) cases, the ENE-positive (ENE+) patients had significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality (6 studies: RR = 3.18; 95%CI: 2.02-5.00, p < 0.0001, I(2) = 56%), cancer-specific mortality (3 studies: RR = 2.03; 95%CI: 1.12-3.69, p = 0.02, I(2) = 80%), and recurrence (4 studies: RR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.61-3.76, p < 0.0001, I(2) = 57%). Using HRs after adjusting for potential confounders, ENE + carried a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (6 studies: HR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.73-5.48, p < 0.0001, I(2) = 66%), and recurrence (5 studies: HR = 3.93, 95%CI: 2.33-6.62, p < 0.0001, I(2) = 28%). Our meta-analysis clarifies the prognostic significance of ENE in vulvar SCC, also pointing to its implications for gross sampling, histology and oncological staging.

Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced and recurrent vulvar cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to report our experience with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) in locally advanced and recurrent vulvar cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2014, fourteen women with locally advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer were treated using HDR-ISBT in our Centre. High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy was performed as a separate treatment or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (given prior to brachytherapy).

RESULTS

Patients were divided into: group I (n = 6) with locally advanced tumors, stages III-IVA after an incisional biopsy only, and group II (n = 8) with recurrent vulvar cancer after previous radical surgery. In group I, median follow up was 12 months (range 7-18 months); 1-year overall survival (OS) was 83%. Transient arrest of cancer growth or tumor regression was noticed in all patients but 4/6 developed relapse. Median time to failure was 6.3 months (range 3-11 months). The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 33%. In group II, median follow up was 28 months (range 13-90 months). The 1-year and 3-year OS was 100% and 80%, respectively. The arrest of cancer growth or tumor regression was achieved in all patients. In 4/8 patients neither clinical nor histological symptoms of relapse were observed but 4/8 women experienced relapse. Median time to failure was 31 months (range 13-76 months). The 1-year and 3-year PFS was 100% and 62.5%, respectively. Two patients (14.3%) in group II had severe late toxicity (G3).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy is a well-tolerated treatment option in selected patients with advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer. It is a safe and effective treatment modality for advanced and recurrent vulvar cancer, yielding good local control with acceptable late treatment related side effects. In our study, patients with recurrent vulvar cancer had better results in HDR-ISBT treatment, probably because of the smaller tumor volume. This hypothesis should be verified in a larger group of patients.

Groin surgery and risk of recurrence in lymph node positive patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of groin metastasis in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) patients consists of surgery, often combined with (chemo)radiotherapy, and is associated with significant morbidity. Our aim was to compare the risk of groin recurrence and morbidity in patients with lymph node positive VSCC after standard full inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) versus less radical debulking of clinically involved lymph nodes or removal of sentinel nodes only followed by radiotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 68 patients with primary VSCC and proven lymph node metastasis to the groin(s) was conducted. Patients were divided into three subgroups by type of initial groin surgery (84 groins): sentinel node (SN), IFL, and debulking of clinically involved nodes. Most patients (82%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall survival was analyzed using time dependent cox regression. Analysis of morbidity and groin recurrence-free time was performed per groin with the generalized estimating equation model and Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the risk of developing a groin recurrence (SN 25%, debulking 16%, IFL 13%, p=0.495). Despite the fact that more patients received radiotherapy after debulking (90% vs 67%), the complication rate was significantly lower (p=0.003) compared to IFL, especially regarding lymphocysts and lymphedema (p=0.032 and p=0.002 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of groin recurrence was similar in all treatment groups. Debulking of clinically involved lymph nodes was related to a significant lower risk of complications compared to IFL. These findings support that the preferred treatment of patients with clinically involved lymph nodes is debulking followed by radiotherapy.

Vulvar cancer: a review for dermatologists

Vulvar malignancies are important tumors of the female reproductive system. They represent a serious health issue with an incidence between 2 and 7 per 100,000 and year. We provide a review about most important cancer entities, i.e., melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine cancer, and skin adnexal malignancies.Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common vulvar malignancy that can develop from vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia or de novo. Basal cell carcinoma represents only 2% of all vulvar cancers. Melanoma of the vulva exists in two major types-superficial spreading and acral lentiginous. A special feature is the occurrence of multiple vulvar melanomas. Of the adnexal cancer types Paget's disease and carcinoma are seen more frequently than other adnexal malignancies. The dermatologist should be aware of this problem, since he might be the first to be consulted by patients for vulvar disease. Treatment should be interdisciplinary in close association to gynecologists, oncologists, and radiologists.

Defining the concept of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a new perspective based on standardization of criteria and current evidence

The phrase "locally advanced carcinoma of the vulva" has often been mentioned in the literature, though not accurately defined, or even leading to the interpretation overlapping. Grounded on cervical cancer experience, we are able to state that designing a tailored primary strategy based on clinically measurable adverse prognostic factors represents the cornerstone of therapy. This fact urged us to rethink about the real usefulness of the concept of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. We will refer to this concept as a clinical entity emerging from a rigorous workup which is a valuable guiding tool in the context of a thorough debate about the best primary treatment approach to be used. Furthermore, bulky tumors of the vulva have been associated with a worse prognosis on several occasions. Some authors have questioned the fact that tumor size has not been considered in the staging system. Finally, a standardized definition will help us compare the results obtained, which is extremely necessary given the worldwide low prevalence of this disease.

Vulvar cancer in the north of Israel

PURPOSE

This is a population study of patients who were treated for vulvar cancer in a tertiary center in northern Israel, aimed to report clinical findings, treatment, and outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all medical records of consecutive patients who were treated for vulvar cancer in the years 1993-2012 was conducted. Data extracted from the medical records included demographics, histology, size of lesion, stage of disease at diagnosis, type of treatment, radiation dose, follow-up, recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

The study included 44 patients with a median age of 69.8 years (range, 42-93 years). Thirty-five (79.5%) of the patients were of Jewish descent, five were Arabic, and four were of other descent. The most common histology type was squamous cell carcinoma in 35 (79.5%) patients. Most patients were staged FIGO II-III at time of diagnosis. Surgery was the most common primary treatment modality (54.2%). Twenty-three (52.2%) patients had recurrent disease. Older age and more advanced stage at diagnosis were associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSION

Vulvar cancer is common among elderly women with co-morbidities who present in advanced disease stage; all these factors are significant for survival.