Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138:449-456. [PMID: 26033307 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.030]

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: When Is It Indicated?

Background: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is the delivery of a single large dose of radiation to a limited volume of tissue at the time of surgery. The aim of this study is to assess outcomes in patients who underwent IORT for gynecologic malignancies and to identify parameters that can predict a good outcome. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study including all women treated with surgery and IORT for a primary or recurrent gynecologic cancer between 2014 and 2022 at the Bern University Hospital, Switzerland. Results: A total of 30 patients with gynecologic malignancies were treated with surgery and IORT. Of these patients, 63.3% presented with cervical cancer, 23.3% with sarcoma, 10% with endometrial cancer, and 3.3% with carcinosarcoma of the ovary. Seventy percent (21/30) of women had an ECOG performance status of 0 at time of IORT. There was no difference in survival among women with incomplete surgical resection (R1/2 vs. R0) at time of IORT. Fifty percent of patients suffered postoperative complication of Clavien-Dindo grade >III, but there was no significant correlation of these complications to overall survival (p = 0.58). Three-year disease-free survival was 53.3%, and five-year overall survival was 53.3%. ECOG status was a significant parameter in DSS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Surgery with IORT is potentially a good treatment option in selected patients with recurrent or locally advanced cervical or endometrial cancer. An ECOG status of 0 is a significant parameter for good outcomes and should be taken into consideration for treatment decisions.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in a Contemporary Cohort

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to describe the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for the treatment of recurrent/persistent cervical or endometrial cancer and assess predictors of postoperative complications and 3-year mortality.

METHODS

In this multi-site retrospective study, data were abstracted for recurrent/persistent endometrial or cervical cancer patients who underwent IORT from June 2004 to May 2021. Complications were graded on the six-point Accordion scale. Variables associated with complications were analyzed with univariate logistic regression, while variables associated with death within 3 years were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards modeling. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Eighty patients had planned IORT for recurrent/persistent endometrial (n = 35) or cervical cancer (n = 45). The mean age of the cohort was 56.8 years (SD = 13.7), and the median disease-free interval from primary disease to recurrence was 20.0 months (IQR 10.0-63.1). The overall survival at 3 years was 48.6% (95% CI: 38.3-61.6%) with a median survival of 2.8 years. Within 30 days postoperative, 16 patients (20.1%) had grade 3-5 complications and one death (1.3%) occurred. Factors associated with grade 3+ complication included ECOG PS 2-3 (OR 18.00, p = 0.04), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy (OR 6.98, p < 0.01), and pelvic sidewall involvement (OR 8.80, p = 0.04). Factors associated with death within 3 years of surgery included ECOG PS 2-3 (HR 8.97, p < 0.01), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy (HR 2.34, p = 0.03), whether exenteration was performed (HR 2.64, p = 0.01), and positive resection margin (HR 3.37, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In well-selected patients, IORT is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of recurrent/persistent gynecologic malignancy with an appreciable survival benefit.

Characteristics and survival of patients with gynecological cancers who refuse radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy improves survival for many cancer patients. However, some patients still refuse radiotherapy despite the recommendations of their physicians. We aimed to investigate the impact of refusing recommended radiotherapy on overall survival in patients with gynecological cancers (GC) and attempted to describe what characteristics are associated with the refusal of radiotherapy.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database for patients who were diagnosed with GC and recommended for radiotherapy between 1988 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to analyze the impact of refusal of radiotherapy on overall survival. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify characteristics associated with refusal of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

In total, 1,226 of 208,093 patients (0.6%) refused radiotherapy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that refusal of radiotherapy was associated with poorer overall survival in GC patients with stage I/II [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50-1.79], but may not affect overall survival in patients with stage III/IV (HR = 1.03; 95%CI, 0.84-1.25). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that factors such as older age (40-65 years, > 65 years), unmarried status (divorced, single, widowed), higher foreign-born rate (1.87-2.82%, 1.51-2.19), refusal of surgery (recommended but not performed), and higher grade (poorly differentiated, undifferentiated/anaplastic) may increase the likelihood of refusing radiotherapy (all P < 0.05). Factors that may reduce the likelihood of refusing radiotherapy include higher income (> 42,810$), lower grade (well-differentiated), primary site of ovarian cancer, and no/unknown chemotherapy (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Refusal of radiotherapy is related to worse overall survival in GC patients with stage I/II, and many characteristics may affect a patient's choice of refusal of radiotherapy.

The Use of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) in Multimodality Management of Cancer Patients: a Single Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a highly conformal type of radiation therapy given at time of surgery aiming for better tumor local control. It increases the tumor radiation dose without exceeding normal tissues tolerance doses.

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of IORT and short-term toxicities in patients with different cancer sites treated with multidisciplinary protocol including IORT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of cancer patients who received IORT as a part of their multidisciplinary treatment at King Faisal Specialized Hospital and Research center (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 2013 until December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients with 210 IORT applications were analyzed. Twenty-two patients had two applications at the same time. One hundred sixteen patients were males. Median age at time of diagnosis was 49.5 years (19-77). One hundred thirty-four patients had primary, while 54 cases had recurrent disease. Gastroesophageal cancer and soft tissue sarcoma were the most frequent diagnosis in 49 patients followed by colorectal cancer in 35 patients. Major surgeries with curative intent done in 183 patients (97.3%). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was performed in 118 (62.8%) patients. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 3.2%. Fifty-four (28.7%) patients develop grades III-IV complications according to Clavien-Dindo grading system.

CONCLUSION

The data presented discusses using of IORT treatment for different malignant tumors as a part of multimodality treatment. IORT seems safe and feasible; however, a longer follow-up period is needed for proper evaluation and to define the role of IORT in a tailored multimodality approach.

Radical Extirpation With Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Locally Recurrent Gynecologic Cancer: An Institutional Review

Objective

To report survival outcomes in patients with locally recurrent gynecologic cancers managed with curative-intent radical extirpation, perioperative external beam radiotherapy, and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT).

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 44 patients with locally recurrent gynecologic cancer treated at a single tertiary-care center (Mayo Clinic in Arizona) over a 15-year period (January 1, 2004, to July 31, 2019). This cohort included patients with uterine (n=21, 47.7%), ovarian (n=3, 6.8%), cervical (n=11, 25.0%), vaginal (n=2, 4.5%), vulvar (n=1, 2.3%), and unknown primary (n=6, 13.6%) cancer. Curative-intent radical extirpation included pelvic exenteration (n=13, 29.5%), laterally extended endopelvic resection (n=22, 50.0%), excision of para-aortic lymph node metastasis (n=8, 18.2%), and radical vaginectomy (n=1, 2.3%). Of the 44 patients in our cohort, 37 (84.1%) received IORT and 7 (15.9%) had intended to receive IORT but did not receive it.

Results

The median follow-up for the 44 patients was 12 months (range, 1 to 161 months). For patients who received IORT, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13 and 21 months, respectively, and the 3-year cumulative incidence of central, locoregional, and distant recurrence was 27.0% (10 of 37), 40.5% (15 of 37), and 37.8% (14 of 37), respectively. Surgical margins were classified as negative (28 of 44, 63.6%), microscopic (11 of 44, 25.0%), or macroscopic (5 of 44, 11.4%). Negative, microscopic, and macroscopic surgical margins resulted in 3-year PFS of 51.8%, 20.5%, and 0%, respectively (P=.01) and 3-year OS of 62.9%, 20.0%, and 0%, respectively (P=.035). Progression-free survival (P=.69) and OS (P=.88) were not different between patients with negative surgical margins who received (n=21) and did not receive (n=7) IORT. Ten of 37 patients (27.0%) had development of grade 3 or higher toxicities, with 1 death due to sepsis.

Conclusion

Complete tumor resection at the time of curative-intent radical extirpation achieved higher rates of PFS and OS regardless of IORT administration.

Efficacy and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been increasingly used for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of IORT for the treatment of rectal cancer are still controversial.

AIM

To evaluate the value of IORT for patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases, and conference abstracts and included randomized controlled trials and observational studies on IORT vs non-IORT for rectal cancer. Dichotomous variables were evaluated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), hazard ratio (HR) and 95%CI was used as a summary statistic of survival outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

In this study, 3 randomized controlled studies and 12 observational studies were included with a total of 1460 patients, who are mainly residents of Europe, the United States, and Asia. Our results did not show significant differences in 5-year overall survival (HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.60-1.06; P = 0.126); 5-year disease-free survival (HR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.73-1.22; P = 0.650); abscess (OR = 1.10, 95%CI = 0.67-1.80; P = 0.713), fistulae (OR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.33-1.89; P = 0.600); wound complication (OR = 1.21, 95%CI = 0.62-2.36; P = 0.575); anastomotic leakage (OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.59-2.02; P = 0.775); and neurogenic bladder dysfunction (OR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.31-1.55; P = 0.369). However, the meta-analysis of 5-year local control was significantly different (OR = 3.07, 95%CI = 1.66-5.66; P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The advantage of IORT is mainly reflected in 5-year local control, but it is not statistically significant for 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and complications.

Modular Peptide Probe for Pre/Intra/Postoperative Therapeutic to Reduce Recurrence in Ovarian Cancer

Even with optimal surgery, 80% of patients with ovarian cancer will have recurrence. Adjuvant therapy can reduce the recurrence of tumors; however, the therapeutic effect is still not prominent. Herein, we designed a modular peptide probe (T_CDTMP), which can be self-assembled into nanoparticles (NPs) by loading in miR-145-5p or VEGF-siRNA. In vivo, (1) preoperative administration of T_CDTMP/miR-145-5p ensured that NPs were adequately accumulated in tumors through active targeting and increased the expression of miR-145-5p in tumors, thereby inducing tumor cell apoptosis. (2) Intraoperatively, most of the tumors were removed, while the microscopic residual tumors were largely eliminated by T_CDTMP/miR-145-5p-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT). (3) Postoperatively, T_CDTMP/VEGF-siRNA were given for antiangiogenesis therapy, thus delaying the recurrence of tumors. This treatment was named a preoperative (T_CDTMP/miR-145-5p)||intraoperative (surgery and PDT)||postoperative (T_CDTMP/VEGF-siRNA) therapeutic system and abbreviated as the PIP therapeutic system, which reduced the recurrence of ovarian cancer in subcutaneous tumor models, intraperitoneal metastasis models, and patient-derived tumor xenograft models. Our findings provide a therapeutic system based on modular peptide probes to reduce the recurrence of ovarian cancer after surgery, which provides a perspective for the surgical management of ovarian cancer.

Intraoperative radiation therapy in uterine cervical cancer: A review

Locally advanced uterine cervical cancer continues to present a high number of pelvic relapses. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) allows a precise therapeutic intensification in the surgical area in cases in which removal of the tumour recurrence is feasible. At the same time, IORT excludes the radiosensitive organs from the field of irradiation. While the first gynecological IORT took place in 1905, procedures have been limited over the years and the series are retrospective, including few patients. At the same, time recurrences are located at different pelvic areas. Both heterogeneity and the long recruiting time make it difficult to correctly interpret the published results. Despite this, we have reviewed the most relevant publications. Some institutions indicated IORT as a boost on the surgical bed of the excised tumor recurrence. In others, IORT permits an extra radiation dose after radical surgery of the primary tumor, usually in stage IIB. Most studies conclude that the addition of IORT increases the local control but probably with little impact on survival. On the other hand, there is a controversy in the indication of IORT in surgically resectable primary tumours. No clear advantage over the usual scheme of chemoradiation and brachytherapy has been detected. Randomized studies that allow a breakthrough in the conclusions are highly unlikely to be performed in this area.

Commissioning, clinical implementation, and performance of the Mobetron 2000 for intraoperative radiation therapy

The Mobetron is a mobile electron accelerator designed to deliver therapeutic radiation dose intraoperatively while diseased tissue is exposed. Experience with the Mobetron 1000 has been reported extensively. However, since the time of those publications a new model, the Mobetron 2000, has become commercially available. Experience commissioning this new model and 3 years of data from historical use are reported here. Descriptions of differences between the models are emphasized, both in physical form and in dosimetric characteristics. Results from commissioning measurements including output factors, air gap factors, percent depth doses (PDDs), and 2D dose profiles are reported. Output factors are found to have changed considerably in the new model, with factors as high as 1.7 being measured. An example lookup table of appropriate accessory/energy combinations for a given target dimension is presented, and the method used to generate it described. Results from 3 years of daily QA measurements are outlined. Finally, practical considerations garnered from 3 years of use are presented.

CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer

This retrospective study was to evaluate the local control and survival of ¹²⁵I brachytherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. 52 ¹²⁵I brachytherapy procedures were performed in 47 patients with 51 recurrent ovarian cancer lesions. The follow-up period was 1-55 months (median 12 months). The local control rate (LC) of 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months was 93.3%, 77.7%, 58.9%, 38.7% and 19.3%, respectively. Patients with tumor size ≤ 4cm (85.7% vs 40.0%, P = 0.037) and actual D90 between 110 to 130Gy (47.4% vs 66.7% vs 62.5%, P = 0.029) had better LC. The 1, 2 and 3 years of overall survival (OS) was 79.3%, 63.0% and 52.5%, respectively. The poor performance status (HR 3.821, 95% CI 1.383-10.555; P = 0.010), concurrent distant metastasis (HR 9.222, 95% CI 1.710-49.737; P = 0.010) and large postoperative residual tumor size (HR 6.157, 95% CI 1.438-26.367; P = 0.014) were closely correlated with a poor OS. Our data indicate thatCT-guided ¹²⁵I brachytherapy is an effective and safe modality for the local treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Influence of tumor size on outcomes following pelvic exenteration

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is often the only curative option for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies. Despite radical surgery, recurrence risk and morbidity remain high. In this study, we sought to determine tumor size effect on perioperative outcomes and subsequent survival in patients undergoing PE.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed for female patients who underwent PE at two comprehensive cancer centers from 2000 to 2015. Demographics, complications and outcomes were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square, student's t-test, logistic regression, non-parametric tests, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

Of 151 women who underwent PE, 144 had available pathologic tumor size. Gynecologic oncology, surgical oncology, and urology performed 84, 29, and 31 exenterations, respectively. Tumor dimensions ranged from 0 to 25.5cm. Perioperative complications, 30-day mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates were not associated with tumor size. Obesity and prior radiation increased risk for major perioperative complication while anterior exenterations decreased risk. Larger tumors were more likely to undergo total pelvic exenteration (OR 1.14; 95%CI 1.03-1.27), have positive margins (OR 1.11; 95%CI 1.02-1.22), and recur (65%, 42% and 20% for tumors >4cm, ≤4cm and no residual tumor respectively, p=0.016). Tumor size >4cm and positive margins were associated with worse overall survival amongst gynecologic oncology patients.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size was not associated with perioperative morbidity. Larger tumors were associated with positive margins, more extensive resection, and worse survival in gynecologic oncology patients. Larger studies are needed to further understand tumor size impact on PE outcomes within specific tumor types.

Intraoperative radiotherapy in gynaecological and genito-urinary malignancies: focus on endometrial, cervical, renal, bladder and prostate cancers

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) refers to the delivery of a single radiation dose to a limited volume of tissue during a surgical procedure. A literature review was performed to analyze the role of IORT in gynaecological and genito-urinary cancer including endometrial, cervical, renal, bladder and prostate cancers.

Literature search was performed by Pubmed and Scopus, using the words “intraoperative radiotherapy/IORT”, “gynaecological cancer”, “uterine/endometrial cancer”, “cervical/cervix cancer”, “renal/kidney cancer”, “bladder cancer” and “prostate cancer”. Forty-seven articles were selected from the search databases, analyzed and briefly described.

Literature data show that IORT has been used to optimize local control rate in genito-urinary tumours mainly in retrospective studies. The results suggest that IORT could be advantageous in the setting of locally advanced and recurrent disease although further prospective trials are needed to confirm this findings.

Outcome of patients with local recurrent gynecologic malignancies after resection combined with intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT)

Background

Treatment of recurrent gynecologic cancer is a challenging issue. Aim of the study was to investigate clinical features and outcomes of patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies who underwent resection including IOERT (intraoperative electron radiation therapy) with regard to clinical outcome and potential predictive factors or subgroups that benefit most from this radical treatment regime.

Methods

A total of 36 patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies (cervical (n = 18), endometrial (n = 12) or vulvar cancer (n = 6)) were retrospectively identified through hospital databases in accordance with institutional ethical policies.

Patient characteristics and outcomes were assessed. Survival data was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier-method and log-rank-test, categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square-method.

Results

For the entire cohort 1-/2-/5-year Overall Survival (OS) was 65.3 %/36.2 %/21.7 %. Patients with endometrial, cervical, and vulvar carcinoma had a 1-/2-/5-year OS of 83.3 %/62.5 %/50 %, 44.5 %/25.4 %/6.4 %, and 83.3 %/16.7 %/16.7 %, respectively. Patients with endometrial carcinoma showed a significantly better OS (p = 0.038).

1-/2-/5-year Local Progression-free Survival (LPFS) for the entire cohort was 44.1 %/28 %/21 % with 76.2 %/61 %/40.6 % for endometrial, 17.2 %/0 %/0 % for cervical, and 40 %/20 %/20 % for vulvar cancer, respectively. Patients with endometrial cancer showed a significantly (p = 0.017) and older patients a trend (p = 0.059) for a better LPFS.

1-/2-/5-year Distant Progression-free Survival (DPFS) for the entire cohort was 53.1 %/46.5 %/38.7 % with 74.1 %/74.1 %/74.1 % for endometrial, 36.7 %/36.7 %/0 % for cervical, and 60 %/30 %/30 % for vulvar cancer, respectively. There was a significantly better DPFS for older patients (p = 0.015) and a trend for a better DPFS for patients with endometrial carcinoma (p = 0.075).

Conclusion

The radical procedure of resection combined with IOERT seems to be a valid curative treatment option for patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma with 5-year survival rates of 50 %. For patients with cervical or vulvar cancer this treatment should be considered a rather palliative one and must be weighted carefully against other treatment options like chemotherapy, targeted therapies or new highly conformal radiotherapy techniques.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0622-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.