Evaluation of in vitro chemoresponse profiles in women with Type I and Type II epithelial ovarian cancers: An observational study ancillary analysis

Durable response to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in recurrent metastatic low grade serous ovarian cancer

Low grade serous ovarian cancers (LGSOC) in an advanced setting have limited systemic treatment options. In this paper we report a case of metastatic LGSOC harboring a BRAF mutation, treated with dabrafenib. We discuss the clinical, pathologic and molecular characteristics as well as surgical considerations and ongoing investigations in LGSOC.

Lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration in omental metastases indicates poor prognosis in advance stage epithelial ovarian cancer

Objective

To investigate the prognostic value of immune cells within omental metastases originating from advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

We performed immunohistochemical analysis to determine the levels of CD4+/CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and CD68+ tumor-associated microphages (TAMs) in omental specimens from 100 patients with advanced EOC. Significant prognostic factors, including immune cells and clinical parameters, were assessed by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox models.

Results

Cox regression analysis showed that elevated levels of CD68+ TAMs and intra-islet CD4+ TILs in omental metastases were the main risk factors associated with worse survival outcomes for advanced EOC. Moreover, the survival analysis of relationships between omental immune cells and favorable clinical predictors revealed additional prognostic stratification information.

Conclusion

Omental immune cells (TAMs and TILs) provide alternative prognostic factors in advanced EOC. In contrast to markers of the EOC tumor microenvironment at the primary site, elevated CD68+ TAMs and intra-islet CD4+ TILs in omental metastases serve as negative prognostic markers in advanced EOC and imply an unfavorable outcome.

Gene Expression Subtyping Reveals Immune alterations:TCGA Database for Prognosis in Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma

Serous ovarian cancer is the most common and primary death type in ovarian cancer. In recent studies, tumor microenvironment and tumor immune infiltration significantly affect the prognosis of ovarian cancer. This study analyzed the four gene expression types of ovarian cancer in TCGA database to extract differentially expressed genes and verify the prognostic significance. Meanwhile, functional enrichment and protein interaction network analysis exposed that these genes were related to immune response and immune infiltration. Subsequently, we proved these prognostic genes in an independent data set from the GEO database. Finally, multivariate cox regression analysis revealed the prognostic significance of TAP1 and CXCL13. The genetic alteration and interaction network of these two genes were shown. Then, we established a nomogram model related to the two genes and clinical risk factors. This model performed well in Calibration plot and Decision Curve Analysis. In conclusion, we have obtained a list of genes related to the immune microenvironment with a better prognosis for serous ovarian cancer, and based on this, we have tried to establish a clinical prognosis model.

Clinical factors associated with prognosis in low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: experiences at two large academic institutions in Korea and Taiwan

Low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (LGSOC) has clinical features different from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) accounting for the majority of epithelial ovarian cancer. Because of its rarity, previous studies have only focused on the high-grade disease without considering the differences between the two subtypes. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the clinical prognostic factors known for HGSOC on survival in patients with LGSOC. Based on the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, progression-free survival (PFS) was markedly decreased in advanced disease compared with early disease. For stage I, patients with stage IC had poorer survival than those with stage IA and IB regardless of the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. For advanced disease, no gross residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery was significantly associated with longer PFS when compared with gross residual disease. In multivariate analysis for PFS and overall survival (OS), age, preoperative CA-125, time interval from surgery to chemotherapy, and the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with prognosis. Complete cytoreduction was the only independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR 2.45, p = 0.045). Our study revealed that the known prognostic factors in HGSOC did not show any effect on the survival in LGSOC except for FIGO stage and complete cytoreduction.

Semaphorin-4C is upregulated in epithelial ovarian cancer

The present retrospective study aimed to investigate the expression of semaphorin-4C (Sema4C) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and to determine the association between Sema4C expression and patient clinicopathological characteristics. Sema4C mRNA expression was detected by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the tissues of 74 cases of EOC, 20 cases of ovarian epithelial benign tumor, 20 cases of ovarian borderline epithelial tumor and 15 cases of normal ovarian tissue. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression and localization of Sema4C. The association between Sema4C expression level and patients clinicopathological characteristics was determined by χ² test. The results demonstrated that Sema4C expression level in ovarian epithelial carcinoma tissues was significantly higher compared with that in benign tumors, borderline epithelial tumors and normal ovarian tissues (P<0.05). In addition, Sema4C expression in ovarian cancer tissues was significantly associated with the clinical and pathological stages of tumors (P<0.05). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that Sema4C expression was upregulated in EOC.

Evolution of Chemosensitivity and Resistance Assays as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is responsible for more cancer-related deaths than any other malignancy of the female reproductive system. The standard of care for advanced EOC involves a combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Although a majority of patients respond to a platinum-containing regimen, many fail to respond to first-line treatment (platinum-refractory disease) or experience disease progression within 6 months of completing treatment (platinum-resistant disease). Even in patients who initially respond to platinum-based therapy, secondary development of platinum resistance is common. Many chemotherapeutic regimens with comparable efficacy and toxicities are available, leaving the determination of optimal therapy to the physician's discretion. There have been many efforts over the years to develop accurate predictors of outcomes in patients treated with chemotherapy to help inform treatment decisions. Predictive treatment markers are particularly relevant in a disease such as EOC, where a large number of similarly efficacious chemotherapy regimens are available. Chemosensitivity and resistance assays (CSRAs) are attractive approaches to interrogate the efficacy and complex biology of EOC. Some early predictive cellular tests, such as the early clonogenic assays, were limited by technical and logistical issues. Over time, changes in these assays have improved their prognostic and predictive value, but there is still a lack of widespread adoption due to methodological difficulties or limited clinical validation. Herein, we provide an overview of the evolution of CSRAs used to predict outcomes in patients treated with chemotherapy that have been evaluated for use in EOC, with a focus on the latest generation chemoresponse assay.

Analysis of in vitro chemoresponse assays in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: an observational ancillary analysis

Background

Chemotherapy plays a role in the treatment of endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC); however, tumor grade may affect response. Our objective was to evaluate associations between tumor grade and in vitro chemoresponse.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of primary tumor samples from women with EEC undergoing in vitro chemoresponse testing. Results were classified as sensitive (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) to each drug tested. Correlations between tumor grade and response were examined.

Results

Data was collected from 159 patients: 28 with grade 1 (18%), 52 with grade 2 (32%), and 79 (50%) with grade 3 tumors. Median age of patients was 62 (range 31–92). Most patients were Caucasian (83%) with advanced disease (Stage III: 50.9%; Stage IV: 13.2%). Overall chemoresponse was similar across all grades. Fifty percent, 56 and 51% for grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors, respectively, demonstrated S results to at least 1 agent. There was no association between grade and in vitro response to chemotherapy agents (p > 0.05) except a marginal association between grade and doxorubicin response (p = 0.08). Grade 1 and 2 cancers were more likely to demonstrate R results for doxorubicin compared to grade 3 cancers (G1: 19% vs G2: 25% vs G3: 8%; p = 0.08). In a subset tested for all 7 agents, only one patient tumor was pan-R and 4 were pan-S.

Conclusions

Based on our data, grades 1–3 EEC have similar in vitro chemoresponse. These findings suggest that chemotherapy may be useful in advanced low grade EECs, but further clinical correlation is needed.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: A review

Epithelial ovarian cancers can be divided into the more common, aggressive type II cancers and the less common, slow-growing type I cancers. Under this model, serous ovarian carcinomas can be subdivided into high-grade (type II) and low-grade (type I) tumours. The two-tier system for grading serous ovarian carcinomas is superior to more detailed grading systems in terms of predicting survival. Low-grade serous carcinomas typically present in young women and have a relatively good prognosis, despite being resistant to chemotherapy. Low-grade serous cancers have a high prevalence of KRAS and BRAF mutations, but a low prevalence of TP53 mutations (which are characteristic of high-grade serous cancers). Among women with low-grade serous ovarian cancer, the presence of a KRAS/BRAF mutation is a favorable prognostic factor. Studies of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor in low-grade serous ovarian cancer suggest that identifying MAPK mutations might eventually be useful in guiding treatment.

In vitro chemosensitivity in ovarian carcinoma: Comparison of three leading assays

OBJECTIVE

An alternative approach to the current therapy of ovarian carcinoma is the individualization of treatment by determining the sensitivity of tumoral tissue to chemotherapeutic agents before the initiation of chemotherapy. The objectives of the study are to determine the efficacy of in vitro chemosensitivity assays in ovarian carcinoma and to measure the correlation of three leading assays.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fresh tumoral tissue samples of 26 newly diagnosed primary ovarian cancer patients were studied with 3-(4,5-dimeth-ylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolyum bromide (MTT) assay, adenosine triphosphate-tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) and differential staining cytotoxicity (DISC) assays. Chemosensitivity of tumors were studied for paclitaxel, carboplatin, docetaxel, topotecan, gemcitabine, and doxorubicin with each of the three assays. Subgroup analysis was performed for stage, grade, and histologic type.

RESULTS

The in vitro chemosensitivity results of MTT, ATP, and DISC assays were found to be similar. The subgroups in which in vitro assays would be more useful were encountered for patients with advanced stage and serous histology ovarian carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro chemosensitivity can be determined in ovarian carcinoma with ATP, MTT, or DISC assays before the initiation of chemotherapy. These three assays correlate well with each other and are particularly useful for serous and advanced cancers. Large prospective studies comparing standard versus assay-directed therapy with an endpoint of overall survival are required before routine clinical utilization of these assays.