A patient group at negligible risk of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer

Clinical study of the clinical characteristics and prognosis of 1219 cases of endometrial cancer with lymph node metastasis

To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of endometrial cancer patients with lymph node metastasis to provide a reference for lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. The data used in this study were extracted from a tertiary hospital in Guangxi, China based on the hospital information system. 1219 patients with endometrial malignancy who were treated in our hospital. The lymph node metastasis rate was 9.8%. The metastasis rate of the abdominal aorta + pelvic lymph nodes (56.7%) was significantly higher than that of the pelvic (24.2%) or para-aortic (19.2%) lymph nodes alone. The proportion of postmenopausal patients with lymph node metastasis was higher than that of premenopausal patients. The proportion of patients with lymph node metastasis with vaginal and uterus involvement, HPV detection, Thinprep Cytologic Testresults, CRP level <10 ug/mL, G3 tumor grade, postoperative pathology indicating cervical invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and muscular infiltration depth > 1/2 was higher than that of patients without lymph node metastasis. The proportion of endometrial cancer patients with lymph node metastasis with CA125 ≥ 35 U/ml was higher than that of those with CA125 < 35 U/ml. The lymph node-positive rate is related to tissue differentiation, lymphangitic infiltration, cervical invasion, muscle infiltration depth > 1/2, and CA125 level. The metastasis rate of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes is higher than that of pelvic lymph nodes or para-aortic lymph nodes alone. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival rate among the three groups.

The Perspectives of Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometrial Cancer

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancer is a common gynecological malignant disease. Its incidence in women of reproductive age in developed countries is increasing. The standard treatment is surgical in the form of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which has a significant impact on the quality of women’s lives and precludes further fertility. Conservative management to preserve reproductive function and delay final surgery can today be considered in carefully selected women. We analyze the current approaches to select appropriate candidates and current medical regimens for fertility sparing management. We elaborate on the future perspectives of management. With better characterization of the disease and implementation of molecular biomarkers, more women should be able to benefit from conservative approaches to management of endometrial cancer.

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. The disease is diagnosed with increasing frequency in younger women, commonly also in their reproductive age. The standard treatment of endometrial cancer is surgical in the form of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and this precludes future fertility in younger women. The current challenge is to identify the group of women with endometrial cancer and low-risk features that would benefit from more conservative treatment options. More focus in management needs to be aimed towards the preservation of quality of life, without jeopardizing oncological outcomes. In this review, we analyze the current approaches to identification of women for conservative management and evaluate the success of different medical options for treatment and surgical techniques that are fertility sparing. We also elaborate on the future perspectives, focusing on the incorporation of molecular characterization of endometrial cancer to fertility preservation algorithms. Future studies should focus specifically on identifying reliable clinical and molecular predictive markers in this group of young women. With improved knowledge and better risk assessment, the precision medicine is the path towards improved understanding of the disease and possibly widening the group of women that could benefit from treatment methods preserving their fertility.

Prospective study of sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for endometrial cancer, using radioisotope and indocyanine green (ICG) injections.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted between April 1, 2014, and December 27, 2017, among women with endometrial cancer, excluding those with suspected peritoneal dissemination and lymph node metastasis, at a University hospital in Kagoshima, Japan. Patients with low-risk endometrial cancer underwent pelvic SLN mapping using uterine cervix radioisotope injections; intermediate/high-risk patients underwent pelvic SLN with/without intraoperative para-aortic SLN mapping with ICG subserosal injections. Primary endpoints were estimated detection rates, sensitivity, and negative predict values (NPV) of SLN mapping.

RESULTS

Of 113 patients evaluated, comprehensive pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed after SLN detection in all patients; additional para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 38 (34%) patients. The detection rates for pelvic SLN (≥1), bilateral pelvic SLN, and para-aortic SLN (≥1) were 96%, 80%, and 55%, respectively. Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were found in (10%) (12/113) and 18% (6/33) patients, respectively. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis was not observed. In pelvic SLN analysis, sensitivity was 91% and NPV was 99%. In para-aortic SLN analysis, sensitivity and NPV were 100%.

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy may be useful to avoid comprehensive pelvic lymphadenectomy in low-risk patients. In high-risk patients, SLN mapping revealed high detection rates, sensitivity, and NPV, including those for para-aortic SLN.

The Impact of Sentinel Node-Mapping in Staging High-Risk Endometrial Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-mapping on the staging of high-risk endometrial cancer (endometrioid grade 3, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, deep myometrial invasion, or angiolymphatic invasion).

METHODS

The study analyzed a series of 236 patients treated at AC Camargo Cancer Center from June 2007 to February 2017. The compared 75 patients who underwent SLN-mapping (SLN group) with 161 patients who received pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy (N-SLN group). Patients with adnexal, peritoneal, or suspicious node metastases were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

The groups did not differ in terms of age, histologic type, or presence of deep myometrial invasion. The overall detection rate for SLNs was 85.3%, and bilateral SLNs were observed in 60% of the patients. Of 20 positive SLNs, 8 (40%) were detected only after immunohistochemistry (IHC). The findings showed an overall sensitivity of 90%, a negative predictive value of 95.7%, and a false-negative predictive value of 4.3%. The SLN group had more pelvic node metastases detected than the N-SLN group (26.7 vs 14.3%; p = 0.02). However, the rate of para-aortic node metastases did not differ between the two groups (13.5 vs 5.6%; p = 0.12). Five patients (3.5%) in the N-SLN group had isolated para-aortic node metastases versus none in the patients with SLN mapped. Additionally, the SLN group received more adjuvant chemotherapy (48 vs 33.5%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that SLN-mapping identifies more pelvic node metastases than lymph node dissection alone and increases the node detection rate by 12.5% after IHC. Furthermore, no isolated para-aortic node metastases are observed when SLN is detected.

Implications of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer without pelvic lymph node metastasis

Objective

The aim of this study was to confirm the incidence and implications of a lymphatic spread pattern involving para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis in the absence of pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective chart review of 380 patients with endometrial cancer treated by surgery including PLN dissection and PAN dissection at Hokkaido Cancer Center between 2003 and 2016. We determined the probability of PAN metastasis in patients without PLN metastasis and investigated survival outcomes of PLN−PAN+ patients.

Results

The median numbers of PLN and PAN removed at surgery were 41 (range: 11–107) and 16 (range: 1–65), respectively. Sixty-four patients (16.8%) had lymph node metastasis, including 39 (10.3%) with PAN metastasis. The most frequent lymphatic spread pattern was PLN+PAN+ (7.9%), followed by PLN+PAN− (6.6%), and PLN−PAN+ (2.4%). The probability of PAN metastasis in patients without PLN metastasis was 2.8% (9/325). The 5-year overall survival rates were 96.5% in PLN−PAN−, 77.6% in PLN+PAN−, 63.4% in PLN+PAN+, and 53.6% in PLN−PAN+ patients.

Conclusion

The likelihood of PAN metastasis in endometrial cancer patients without PLN metastasis is not negligible, and the prognosis of PLN−PAN+ is likely to be poor. The implications of a PLN−PAN+ lymphatic spread pattern should thus be taken into consideration when determining patient management strategies.