The effect of art therapy on the quality of life in patients with a gynecologic cancer receiving chemotherapy

Can arts-based interventions improve health? A conceptual and methodological critique

Can art improve health and wellbeing? The claim that there is strong evidence that engaging with art ameliorates symptoms of mental and physical disorders and increases wellbeing is gaining acceptance among researchers and clinicians. This claim deserves thorough scrutiny, as it is used to justify a broad range of arts-based clinical interventions and health policies. Here we show that the evidence cited in favor of the efficacy of arts-based interventions is far weaker than it is claimed to be. First, we examined the methodological and statistical quality of studies that have been cited as proof for the efficacy of arts-based interventions. This analysis found that many of these studies lack key clinical trial features, such as defining the therapeutic agent, randomizing group assignment, controlling for patient or researcher allegiance, controlling for the effects of other concurrent interventions and medications, comparing art-based interventions to other kinds of interventions, or conducting and reporting statistical analyses appropriately. Second, in a broader examination of experiments on arts-based interventions, we looked for the experimental designs that would actually allow demonstrating that the putative health benefits owe to the effect of art. This analysis revealed that (i) most studies fail to define what art is, making it impossible to compare the effects of "art" and "non-art" stimuli and activities on health and wellbeing; (ii) fail to demonstrate that art stimuli and activities elicit a distinct class of art-induced physiological processes capable of modulating the cause of targeted disorders; (iii) and fail to manipulate neural processes believed to be mechanisms of action that could prove that arts-based interventions directly affect the etiology of disorders. These methodological weaknesses and inappropriate experimental designs cast serious doubt on claims that engaging with art can induce physiological changes that improve health and wellbeing. We discuss why arts-based interventions have neglected these problems and the ethical implications for patients who are treated with them.

The effectiveness of art-based interventions for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of art-based interventions on anxiety, depression, fatigue, and overall quality of life (QoL), including its physical, psychological, and social dimensions in cancer patients.

METHODS

The literature search included all studies published up to March 2024. Searches were conducted in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and PubMed databases considering the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. Data were analysed using the MAJOR package in JAMOVI 2.3.28.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies conducted with 1113 cancer patients were identified and included in this study. Ten of the studies included women with breast cancer. The remaining studies involved chemotherapy patients with various cancers (n = 3), cancer patients in a blood and marrow transplantation unit (n = 1), and nasopharyngeal cancer patients (n = 1). Meta-analysis indicated that art-based interventions had a significant effect on anxiety, depression and physical aspects of QoL but no significant impact on fatigue, overall QoL, or the psychological and social dimensions of QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided clinical support for pursuing art-based research on anxiety, depression, and the physical QoL in cancer patients. However, the effect of art-based interventions on cancer patients' fatigue and their overall QoL, including its social and psychological dimensions, was insignificant.

REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in advance in the PROSPERO (CRD42024531397/April 13, 2024).

Intervention and application of drawing therapy in cancer patients: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cancer itself and its treatment process cause a range of physical and psychological discomforts to patients. Drawing therapy, as a form of complementary alternative medicine, has been proven to be effective in alleviating the physical and psychological discomforts of cancer patients, such as chemotherapy-associated nausea and vomiting, and negative emotions such as anxiety and depression.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to organize and describe the literature on drawing therapy in cancer patients, including implementers, intervention methods, and effects. It strives to provide a reference for future research on this topic.

METHODS

The methodological framework proposed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) was used to guide the scoping review. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched from inception until October 31, 2023. Literature screening, information extraction, and cross-checking were conducted independently by two researchers with experience in evidence-based nursing. The inclusion criteria were all peer-reviewed published studies on drawing therapy in cancer patients. The exclusion criteria were studies in which participants were primary caregivers of cancer patients, studies without full text, and articles published in languages other than Chinese or English. Information extraction mainly included basic information about the literature, sample information, intervention methods, and outcome indicators.

RESULTS

3318 literature were initially obtained after searching, of which 30 were finally included. Among them, 19 were in English and 11 were in Chinese. The study identified variations in the implementers and intervention methods of drawing therapy across different countries. Drawing therapy significantly alleviated symptoms caused by the disease and treatment, such as pain, fatigue, and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, while also assisting patients in coping with anxiety and fear. Additionally, drawing therapy bolstered social adaptability and skills. Consequently, drawing therapy improved cancer patients' overall quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

Drawing therapy demonstrates positive effects in cancer patients. Future studies should consider extending the intervention period to obtain more lasting effects and improving the evaluation system to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the assessment. From a clinical application perspective, interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses and art therapists to implement drawing therapy can promote professionalism and comprehensiveness in the implementation process.

Effectiveness of creative arts therapy for adult patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of creative arts therapy (CAT) interventions on the health outcomes of adult patients with cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in six databases from their inception to June 10, 2023, with no restrictions on sex, age, cancer type, cancer stage, or treatment type. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2) tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the equivalent tool for non-RCTs (ROBINS-I) were used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool estimates of the effects of CAT on patients' health-related outcomes. A narrative synthesis of outcomes was performed where meta-analysis was not appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies (8 RCTs and 17 quasi-RCTs) involving 1489 cancer patients and survivors were included in the final data analysis. Most studies focused on patients with mixed cancer diagnoses who were undergoing active chemotherapy treatment. Most studies utilized painting, drawing, and/or sculpting as CAT interventions. The overall risk of bias in the included studies was moderate to high. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life (SMD with 95% CI = 17.50, 10.05-24.95, P =.0000) and the social aspect of quality of life in cancer patients (SMD with 95% CI = 03.1 (0.06-0.55), P = .01), but no significant effects were found for depressive symptoms and coping strategies among patients who participated in CAT compared to control groups. Narrative analysis and non-RCTs suggested the potential of CAT in reducing levels of depression and anxiety, as well as improving self-image, hope, emotional expression/state, and processing in patients with cancer. However, inconsistent findings were reported regarding the effectiveness of CAT interventions on fatigue, spirituality, and psychosomatic distress/symptom intensity.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicated significant and potential benefits of CAT for individuals with cancer, primarily related to quality of life. However, caution is needed in interpreting these findings due to limitations in the methodologies utilized in the included studies. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to examine the effectiveness of CAT on health outcomes, particularly in relation to self-image, hope, and emotional expression/state and processing among patients with cancer or those in palliative care.

The effectiveness of therapeutic artmaking on depression, anxiety, quality of life, and psychological distress in cancer patients on chemotherapy: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence of art therapy on depression, anxiety, quality of life, and mental distress in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted. A systematic search of online electronic databases including, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus Web of Science, PsycINFO, and EMBASE was performed using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as "Art Therapy," and "Neoplasms," "Cancer," and "Chemotherapy" from the earliest to January 11, 2023. A total of 3890 publications were assessed for relevance by title and abstract. The remaining 1298 articles were examined using three inclusion criteria: interventions were guided by an artist or art therapist, participants were actively involved in the creative process, and anxiety, depression, and/or quality of life were included as outcome measures. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using specific checklists.

RESULT

A total of 495 patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy participated in ten studies. Among the participants, 87.21% were female and 63.43% of them were in the intervention group. The mean age of the participants was 53.93 in five studies that reduced depression in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Six studies investigated the effect of different art therapy methods on the anxiety of patients, which in four studies reduced their anxiety. Also, three studies investigated the effect of different art therapy methods on patients' distress, which in two studies reduced their distress.

CONCLUSION

Art therapy had positive effects on depression, anxiety, quality of life, and psychological distress of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Meanwhile, research on art therapy in cancer patients on chemotherapy is insufficient. We cannot conclude that art therapy benefits cancer patients on chemotherapy. More rigorous research is needed.

The effects of art-making intervention on mind-body and quality of life in adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of art-making interventions on physical and psychological outcomes, as well as quality of life (QOL), in adult patients with cancer.

METHODS

Seven English-language databases (PubMed, Academic Search Premier, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and three Chinese-language databases (CNKI, WanFang, and VIP) were searched up to and including May 1, 2023. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions to evaluate the certainty of evidence. The data were analyzed using Review Manager software 5.4. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022321471).

RESULTS

The studies predominantly focused on visual art (n = 21), two specifically used performing art (n = 2), and five integrated both forms of art-making (n = 5). The pooled results showed that art-making significantly improved anxiety (SMD =  - 1.12, 95% CI [- 1.43, - 0.81], p < 0.01), depression (SMD =  - 0.91, 95% CI [- 1.16, - 0.65], p < 0.01), distress (SMD =  - 1.19, 95% CI [- 1.43, - 0.95], p < 0.01), psychological well-being (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI [0.02, 0.80], p = 0.04), societal well-being (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI [0.04, 0.54], p = 0.03), nausea (SMD =  - 1.81, 95% CI [- 2.84, - 0.78], p < 0.01), physical well-being (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI [0.02, 0.20], p = 0.02), and QOL (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI [0.29, 1.33], p < 0.01). However, it did not significantly improve fatigue (SMD =  - 0.28, 95% CI [- 0.75, 0.19], p = 0.24) and pain (SMD =  - 0.18, 95% CI [- 1.97, 1.60], p = 0.84) in patients with cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Art-making interventions may boost psychological well-being, physical symptoms, and QOL among patients with cancer. More robust studies are necessary to overcome methodological limitations and promote wider adoption of these interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospero registration number: CRD42022321471.

The Effect of Music on Anxiety, Pain Levels, and Physiological Parameters in Women Undergoing Brachytherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of music on anxiety, pain, and physiologic parameters in women undergoing brachytherapy.

DATA SOURCES

The study was conducted with a randomized controlled design between June and December 2022. Music intervention was practiced to the patients in the experimental group (n = 30), while no practice was given to the control group (n = 25). In the study, the data were collected using the Descriptive Information Form, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, visual analog scale, and vital signs (temperature, pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, SpO2) recording form. Intergroup and intragroup averages were evaluated by the mixed-design analysis of variance. Variables with pre-post intervention designs were evaluated with the one-way analysis of covariance. There was no significant difference in physiological parameters between the groups (P > . 05). Although the mean anxiety scores decreased in the music group and increased in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference (P > .05). A significant difference was found in the pain levels of the patients in repeated measurements made in intragroup evaluations (P < .001). The depression mean of the music intervention group was significantly lower than the control group (P ≤ .05).

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that the music played during the brachytherapy process had positive effects on feeling less pain and management of depressive symptoms but did not affect anxiety and physiological parameters. Since each patient is different, the effects of music therapy can vary individually.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses should apply different strategies to investigate session frequencies and durations for different patient groups and treatment stages in cancer care.

Factors influencing the supportive care needs of female patients with genital cancer in South Korea

Genital cancers are particularly important compared to other cancers because of the psychological impact they have on the individual. This study investigated the complexity in illness and quality of life among female genital cancer patients and determined the effects of these factors on supportive care needs to provide evidential data for the development of nursing intervention strategies to reduce supportive care needs in female genital cancer patients. This cross-sectional study collected data from July 22 to August 17, 2021. The study subjects were 103 female outpatients and inpatients aged 19 years or older who were treated for cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, or other female genital cancers such as vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer in a university hospital in Korea. The data were analyzed with t-tests and Scheffé's test using SPSS 26.0. The factors affecting supportive care needs were examined using hierarchical regression. The average age of the subjects was 56.41 (±9.91) years. Cervical cancer was the most common diagnosis at 42.7%, followed by ovarian cancer at 34.0%, and endometrial cancer at 21.4%. The factors affecting supportive care needs included a middle school education or below (β = 0.21, P = .028), unemployment (β = 0.23, P = .018), complexity in illness (β = 0.32, P < .001), and quality of life (β = -0.68, P < .001). Developing a strategy for managing the complexity in illness and quality of life caused by various variables including disease stage and type of treatment is necessary to reduce the supportive care needs of female genital cancer patients. Improving their quality of life through effective communication with healthcare providers is essential.

Hotspots, trends, and advice: a 10-year visualization-based analysis of painting therapy from a scientometric perspective

Purpose

Research on painting therapy is available worldwide and painting therapy is widely applied as a psychological therapy in different fields with diverse clients. As an evidence-based psychotherapy, previous studies have revealed that painting therapy has favorable therapeutic effects. However, limited studies on painting therapy used universal data to assemble in-depth evidence to propose a better recommendation on it for the future use. Large-scale retrospective studies that used bibliometric methodology are lacking. Therefore, this study presented a broad view of painting therapy and provided an intensively analytical insight into the structure of knowledge regarding painting therapy employing bibliometric analysis of articles. CiteSpace software was used to evaluate scientific research on painting therapy globally published from January 2011 to July 2022.

Methods

Publications related to painting therapy from 2011 to 2022 were searched using the Web of Science database. This study employed bibliometric techniques to perform co-citation analysis of authors, visualize collaborations between countries/regions as network maps, and analyze keywords and subjects relevant to painting therapy by using CiteSpace software.

Results

In total, 871 articles met the inclusion criteria. We found that the number of painting therapy publications generally trended incrementally. The United States and United Kingdom made the most contributions to painting therapy research and had the greatest impact on the practical application in other countries. Arts in Psychotherapy and Frontiers in Psychology occupied key publishing positions in this research field. The application groups were mainly children, adolescents, and females, and Western countries paid high attention to painting therapy. The main areas of application of painting therapy were Alzheimer's disease and other psychosomatic disease fields. Identified research priorities for painting therapy were emotion regulation and mood disorder treatment, personality disorder treatment, personal self-esteem enhancement, and medical humanistic care. Three keywords, "depression," "women," and "recovery," had the strongest citation bursts, which emphasized the research trends.

Conclusion

The general trend for painting therapy research is positive. Our findings provide useful information for researchers on painting therapy to determine new directions in relate to popular issues, collaborators, and research frontiers. Painting therapy holds a promising future, and further studies could explore the clinical implications of this therapy in terms of mechanisms and criteria for assessing efficacy.

Art therapy and social function in palliative care patients: a mixed-method pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of art therapy in reducing palliative symptoms, on social availability and on perceptions of aesthetics in hospitalised palliative care patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate its influence on bereaved families.

METHODS

A mixed-method quasi-experimental before and after study comprising a follow-up postal survey of bereaved families. All patients who were keen to have art therapy sessions were eligible. We used patient-reported outcome scales 5 min before and after the session. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale has been used for pain, anxiety, well-being, fatigue and depression. Ten-point visual analogue scales were used for social availability, lack of desire and wishes, and perceptions of aesthetics based on the Beautiful-Well-Good model. A postal survey was sent to bereaved families. Correlations and data mining analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In all, 24 patients were recruited for a total of 53 art therapy sessions analysed. Seven families completed the survey. Art therapy significantly reduced the assessed symptoms and overall symptom distress by 54.4% (p <0.001, d = 1.08). It also decreased the feeling of social unavailability (-59%, d = 0.67) and the lack of desire and wishes (-60%, d=0.86). The analysis of the family questionnaires indicates the positive effects regarding support, artwork and feelings during illness and grief.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest an overall improvement in the symptoms experienced and social functioning of palliative patients. Based on our findings, we propose a model for the potential mechanism of action of art therapy.

1 Impact of creative art therapy on fatigue and quality of life in patients treated for localized breast cancer: A randomized study

BACKGROUND

Art therapy (AT) as supportive care may help patients cope with cancer treatments. This non-blinded randomized trial assessed the impact of creative AT on severe fatigue and quality of life (QoL) in localized breast cancer patients undergoing irradiation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

320 patients were randomized to an AT group (ATG) (8 weekly sessions starting during irradiation) or to a standard group (SG). The primary endpoint was severe global fatigue (FACIT-F score <37) at 1 month post-irradiation. QoL (Fact-B), anxiety/depression (HADS) and different dimensions of fatigue (MFI-20) were assessed at 1, 6 and 12 months post-irradiation. The secondary endpoints, fatigue among patients treated with chemotherapy, QoL (Fact-B), anxiety/depression (HADS) and different dimensions of fatigue (MFI-20) at 1, 6 and 12 months post-irradiation (with post hoc analysis in patients with treated with chemotherapy) were also assessed.

RESULTS

82% of patients completed ≥8 sessions. Severe initial global fatigue was observed in 43% of patients in each group, and among in 64% of patients whose treatment protocol contained chemotherapy. At 1 month post-irradiation, 45% in the ATG and 57% of patients in the SG reported severe global fatigue (p=0.37); among patients with initial severe mental fatigue (MFF), 79% and 44% had improved MFF (p=0.007) respectively; similarly 79% and 44% with initial poor motivation had better mental motivation (p=0.03). At 6 and 12 months, social well-being scores in the ATG were higher (21.3 and 21.4 vs. 19.8 and 19.2, p=0.05 and p<0.01) with a significant improvement for patients who had chemotherapy (41% vs. 18%, p=0.017). A positive association was observed between the number of AT sessions, fatigue and QoL (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

AT did not significantly improve global severe fatigue among all cancer participants one month after radiation therapy, however it had a positive impact on social well-being and may improve mental fatigue and motivation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Expressive Arts Therapy Combined with Progressive Muscle Relaxation following Music for Perioperative Patients with Gynecological Malignancies: A Pilot Study

Objective

We aimed to assess the impact of an expressive arts therapy combined with progressive muscle relaxation following music on mental health (anxiety and hope) in patients with gynecological malignancies undergoing surgery.

Methods

This was a nonrandomized controlled trial. Eligible patients had a primary or recurrent gynecological malignancy scheduled to be treated with surgery. The intervention consisted of three sessions (preoperation, postoperation, and predischarge) during the perioperative period. Firstly, before starting the first session of intervention, all patients completed three questionnaires including a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a Herth Hope Index (HHI), and a State Anxiety Inventory (SAI), and the intervention group patients also had to complete the SAI questionnaire again after completing the intervention. Secondly, after the second session of intervention, all patients completed the SAI questionnaire, with the intervention group completed the SAI questionnaire before the intervention. Thirdly, after the third session of intervention, all patients completed HHI and SAI questionnaires, with the intervention group completed the SAI questionnaire before the intervention. Also, to subjectively rate the benefit of expressive arts therapy, the intervention group additionally completed a separate, supplemental questionnaire.

Results

A total of 116 patients were enrolled and 110 included in the final analysis. No group differences were found for HHI scores between the intervention and control participants (Cohen's d = 0.19, P=0.31), although there was a substantial improvement in intervention participants' HHI scores compared to the standard care control participants. There was a statistically significant improvement in intervention participants' SAI from preintervention to postintervention of preoperation (Cohen's d = −0.23, P=0.002) and postoperation (Cohen's d = −0.34, P ≤ 0.001). However, no differences were observed for the predischarge period (Cohen's d = −0.09, P=0.118). Besides, a supplemental questionnaire indicated that 52 (98%) patients felt that expressive arts therapy was beneficial.

Conclusions

Expressive art therapy combined with progressive muscle relaxation under music may be of some effect on alleviating perioperative anxiety in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Therefore, further relevant studies with large samples and multicenters are urgently needed to provide a reliable evidence-based basis for perioperative psychological care of patients with gynecologic malignancies and to promote rapid recovery of patients. It is recommended that further art therapy studies to examine the impact of patient-tailored arts therapy interventions on spiritual well-being in patients with gynecological malignancies, especially in the perioperative period.

Art Making as a Health Intervention: Concept Analysis and Implications for Nursing Interventions

Art making has been adopted across multiple disciplines as a health intervention. However, our understanding of art making as a health intervention and how it differs from art therapy is still limited. Therefore, we conducted a concept analysis to better understand art making as a health intervention guided by Walker and Avant's approach. We examined 85 studies in which we found 4 defining attributes, 4 antecedents, and physical, cognitive, emotional, and psychological consequences. We suggest several nursing research and practical implications for nurse researchers and clinicians to aid in designing and implementing art making health interventions.

Analysis of Lung Imaging Intelligent Diagnosis System for Nursing Intervention of Lung Cancer Patients' Quality of Life

In order to explore the influence of intelligent imaging diagnosis systems on comprehensive nursing intervention for patients with late-stage lung cancer, the system uses ITK and VTK toolkit to realize image reading, display, image marking, and interactive functions. The optimal threshold method and regional connectivity algorithm were used to segment the lung region, and then, the cavity filling algorithm and repair algorithm were used to repair the lung region. A variable ring filter was used to detect suspected shadows in the lungs. Finally, the classifier proposed in this paper is used to classify benign and malignant. The system has good sensitivity by detecting the images of real patients. 100 patients with advanced lung cancer were randomly divided into control group and nursing intervention group 50 cases each. Patients in the control group received routine radiotherapy and chemotherapy and routine nursing intervention. Patients in the nursing intervention group were given comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of routine intervention in the control group for 2 consecutive months. Pittsburgh sleep quality index, pain degree, quality of life, and complications after intervention were compared between the 2 groups before and after intervention. The experimental results showed that the sleep quality, pain degree, quality of life, and complications in 2 groups were significantly improved after intervention (P < 0.05), and the improvement degree in the nursing intervention group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). It is proved that comprehensive nursing intervention has a good effect on improving sleep quality, relieving physical pain, improving the quality of life, and reducing complications of lung cancer patients and can effectively improve the quality of life of lung cancer patients.

A pilot study of improved psychological distress with art therapy in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy

Background

Art therapy may improve the physical, mental, and emotional wellbeing of individuals for a variety of purposes. It remains understudied and underutilized in cancer care. We sought to determine the ability of a pilot art therapy program to improve the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of cancer patients.

Methods

Chemotherapy-recipients, age 18 years and older, diagnosed with any type or stage of cancer, were considered eligible to participate in this single arm, pilot study, using four visual analog scales (VAS) with visually-similar, 0–10 scale (10 being worst) thermometers assessing: 1) pain, 2) emotional distress, 3) depression, and 4) anxiety. Participants were asked to complete all 4 metrics, pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 48–72 h follow-up, after an hour-long art therapy session. Primary endpoints included post-intervention changes from baseline in the 4 VAS metrics.

Results

Through a reasonable pilot sample (n = 50), 44% had breast cancer, 22% gastrointestinal cancers, 18% hematological malignancies, and 20% had other malignancies. A decrease in all VAS measures was noted immediately post-treatment but remained low only for pain and depression, not for emotional distress and anxiety upon follow up. There was a significant difference between the depression VAS scores of Hispanics (32%) compared to non-Hispanics (56%) (p = 0.009) at baseline. However, compared to non-Hispanics, Hispanics exhibited higher levels of depression after art therapy (P = 0.03) and during the follow-up intervals (p = 0.047).

Conclusion

Art therapy improved the emotional distress, depression, anxiety and pain among all cancer patients, at all time points. While depression scores were higher pre-intervention for Hispanic patients, Hispanic patients were noted to derive a greater improvement in depression scores from art therapy over time, compared to non-Hispanics patients. Discovering simple, effective, therapeutic interventions, to aid in distress relief in cancer patients, is important for ensuring clinical efficacy of treatment and improved quality of life.

The Effect of Art Therapy in Women with Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence of art therapy on the psychological outcome, quality of life (QOL), and cancer-related symptoms in women with gynecological cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted. The randomized controlled trials, quasiexperimental studies, case reports, and qualitative studies were all included.

RESULT

1,587 articles were retrieved. A total of 9 articles met the inclusion criteria. The existing studies provided initial evidence to suggest that art therapy may benefit gynecological cancer patients with respect to improving psychological outcome and QOL, reducing fatigue related to cancer, and improving subjective overall health condition. However, the quality of the current evidence limits the efficacy of these findings.

CONCLUSION

Research on art therapy of gynecologic cancer patients is insufficient. We cannot draw the conclusion that art therapy benefits gynecological cancer patients in the psychological outcome, QOL, and cancer-related symptoms. More rigorous research is needed.

Outcomes of Therapeutic Artmaking in Patients Undergoing Radiation Oncology Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study

A cancer diagnosis can be extremely stressful and life-altering for patients. Chronically high levels of stress can increase inflammation and affect the progression of the cancer. Psychosocial interventions could reduce stress and address cancer patients’ emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs. This mixed-methods pilot study compared 2 single-session arts-based approaches for patients in active radiation treatment in a large urban hospital. Participants were assigned to either the active control of independent coloring or the therapeutic intervention of open studio art therapy. Participants completed pre-session and post-session saliva samples and standardized psychosocial measures of stress, affect, anxiety, self-efficacy, and creative agency. Both conditions significantly increased participants’ positive affect, self-efficacy, and creative agency, and decreased negative affect, perceived stress, and anxiety. No changes of note were seen in the salivary measures. Participants’ narrative responses corroborated the quantitative findings and highlighted additional benefits such as supporting meaning-making and spiritual insights. Both arts-based interventions can support the emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs of cancer patients while each has features that may be more suited to the needs of certain patients. Further replication of these findings could support our initial findings that suggest that patients could benefit from having art studio spaces with art therapists and choices of art materials available on the oncology unit.