1
|
Stephens AN, Hobbs SJ, Kang SW, Bilandzic M, Rainczuk A, Oehler MK, Jobling TW, Plebanski M, Allman R. A Novel Predictive Multi-Marker Test for the Pre-Surgical Identification of Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5267. [PMID: 37958440 PMCID: PMC10650329 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal of gynecological malignancies, with the 5-year survival below 50%. Currently there is no simple and effective pre-surgical diagnosis or triage for patients with malignancy, particularly those with early-stage or low-volume tumors. Recently we discovered that CXCL10 can be processed to an inactive form in ovarian cancers and that its measurement has diagnostic significance. In this study we evaluated the addition of processed CXCL10 to a biomarker panel for the discrimination of benign from malignant disease. Multiple biomarkers were measured in retrospectively collected plasma samples (n = 334) from patients diagnosed with benign or malignant disease, and a classifier model was developed using CA125, HE4, Il6 and CXCL10 (active and total). The model provided 95% sensitivity/95% specificity for discrimination of benign from malignant disease. Positive predictive performance exceeded that of "gold standard" scoring systems including CA125, RMI and ROMA% and was independent of menopausal status. In addition, 80% of stage I-II cancers in the cohort were correctly identified using the multi-marker scoring system. Our data suggest the multi-marker panel and associated scoring algorithm provides a useful measurement to assist in pre-surgical diagnosis and triage of patients with suspected ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew N. Stephens
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton 3168, Australia; (S.-W.K.); (M.B.); (A.R.)
- Department of Molecular and Translational Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia
- Cleo Diagnostics Ltd., Melbourne 3000, Australia; (S.J.H.); (R.A.)
| | - Simon J. Hobbs
- Cleo Diagnostics Ltd., Melbourne 3000, Australia; (S.J.H.); (R.A.)
| | - Sung-Woon Kang
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton 3168, Australia; (S.-W.K.); (M.B.); (A.R.)
- Department of Molecular and Translational Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia
| | - Maree Bilandzic
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton 3168, Australia; (S.-W.K.); (M.B.); (A.R.)
- Department of Molecular and Translational Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia
| | - Adam Rainczuk
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton 3168, Australia; (S.-W.K.); (M.B.); (A.R.)
- Department of Molecular and Translational Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia
- Bruker Pty Ltd., Preston 3072, Australia
| | - Martin K. Oehler
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5000, Australia;
- Robinson Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, Australia
| | - Tom W. Jobling
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Monash Medical Centre, Bentleigh East 3165, Australia;
| | - Magdalena Plebanski
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora 3083, Australia;
| | - Richard Allman
- Cleo Diagnostics Ltd., Melbourne 3000, Australia; (S.J.H.); (R.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Certelli C, Russo SA, Palmieri L, Foresta A, Pedone Anchora L, Vargiu V, Santullo F, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Gallotta V. Minimally-Invasive Secondary Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4769. [PMID: 37835463 PMCID: PMC10571765 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) has been widely increased in recent years, especially in trying to improve the quality of life of these patients by utilising a minimally-invasive (MI) approach. However, surgery in previously-treated patients may be challenging, and patient selection and surgical planning are crucial. Unfortunately, at the moment, validated criteria to select patients for MI-SCS are not reported, and no predictors of its feasibility are currently available, probably due to the vast heterogeneity of recurrence patterns. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery and, in particular, minimally-invasive procedures, in ROC, analyzing patient selection, outcomes, criticisms, and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Certelli
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Silvio Andrea Russo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Palmieri
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Aniello Foresta
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Virginia Vargiu
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Gallotta
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pizarro D, Romero I, Pérez-Mies B, Redondo A, Caniego-Casas T, Carretero-Barrio I, Cristóbal E, Gutiérrez-Pecharromán A, Santaballa A, D'Angelo E, Hardisson D, Vieites B, Matías-Guiu X, Estévez P, Guerra E, Prat J, Poveda A, López-Guerrero JA, Palacios J. The Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, PD-L1, BRCA Mutation Status and Tumor Mutational Burden in Early-Stage High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma-A Study by the Spanish Group for Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO). Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11183. [PMID: 37446361 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241311183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Early stages are under-represented in studies on the molecular and immune features of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and specific studies focused on early-stage HGSOC are required for a better prognostic stratification and to personalize chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of CD8+ and CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumoral cell PD-L1 expression, BRCA mutational status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) in early-stage HGSOC. A retrospective study was performed on stage I and II HGSOC from the Molecular Reclassification of Early Stages of Ovarian Cancer (RECLAMO) cohort from the Spanish Group of Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO). Centralized histological typing was performed based on morphological and immunohistochemical features. Intraepithelial (i) and stromal (s) CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and PD-L1 were evaluated on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and TMB were analyzed in tumor DNA using next-generation sequencing. The study included 124 tumors. High iCD8+ (>20 TILs/core), low/intermediate CD4+ (<20 TILs/core) and high CD8+/CD4+ ratio (>35/core) were associated with favorable outcomes. Tumor cell PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1) was present in only 8% of tumors. In total, 11 (16%) and 6 (9%) out of 69 HGSOC tested carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Median TMB of 40 tumors analyzed was 5.04 mutations/Mb and only 6 tumors had 10 or more mutations/Mb. BRCA status and TMB were not associated with TILs or prognosis. When compared with studies on advanced HGSOC, our results suggested that prognostic variables differed according to stage and that more studies focused on early stages of HGSOC are needed to better stratify these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Pizarro
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Romero
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
| | - Belén Pérez-Mies
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Andrés Redondo
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Tamara Caniego-Casas
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Carretero-Barrio
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Eva Cristóbal
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ana Santaballa
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Emanuela D'Angelo
- Department of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G.D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66013 Chieti, Italy
| | - David Hardisson
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Pathology Department, University Hospital La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Begoña Vieites
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Xavier Matías-Guiu
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Pathology and Medical Oncology Departments, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLLEIDA, University of Lleida, 25003 Lleida, Spain
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Purificación Estévez
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Seville Biomedical Research Institute (IBIS), 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Eva Guerra
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Prat
- Pathology Department, Emeritus Faculty, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Poveda
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Initia Oncología, Hospital Quironsalud Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - José Antonio López-Guerrero
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
| | - José Palacios
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer (GEICO), 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Network in Oncology (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Garcia NG, Moreno CS, Teixeira N, Lloret PE, Guibourg RL, Negre RR. Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in the Management of Early-stage Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2023; 12:83-89. [PMID: 37416098 PMCID: PMC10321349 DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_99_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer (EOC) by comparing the surgical and survival outcomes between laparoscopy and laparotomy. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective, single-center observational study that included all patients who underwent surgical staging for EOC by laparoscopy or laparotomy between 2010 and 2019. Results Forty-nine patients were included; of which 20 underwent laparoscopy, 26 laparotomy, and three conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding operative time, number of lymph nodes dissected, or intraoperative tumor rupture rate, while estimated blood loss and transfusion requirements were lower in the laparoscopy group. The complication rate tended to be higher in the laparotomy group. Patients in the laparoscopy group had a faster recovery, with earlier urinary catheter and abdominal drain removal, shorter hospital stay, and a trend toward earlier tolerance of oral diet and mobilization. At a mean follow-up of 45.7 months, 14 patients had disease recurrence, with no differences in the mean progression-free survival between the two groups (36 months for laparoscopy vs. 35.5 months for laparotomy, P = 0.22). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery performed by a trained gynecological oncologist is a safe and effective surgical approach for comprehensive staging of EOC, with the additional benefits of a faster recovery compared to laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Ginjaume Garcia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital De La Santa Creu I De Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Soler Moreno
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital De La Santa Creu I De Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natalia Teixeira
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital De La Santa Creu I De Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pia Español Lloret
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital De La Santa Creu I De Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rocío Luna Guibourg
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital De La Santa Creu I De Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramon Rovira Negre
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital De La Santa Creu I De Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Imterat M, Bizzarri N, Fruscio R, Perrone AM, Traut A, du Bois A, Rosati A, Ferrari D, De Iaco P, Ataseven B, Ergasti R, Volontè S, Tesei M, Heitz F, Perri MT, Concin N, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Harter P. Impact of substage and histologic type in stage I ovarian carcinoma survival: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:42-49. [PMID: 36104079 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This international study aimed to investigate the impact of substage, histological type and other prognostic factors on long-term survival for stage I ovarian carcinoma. METHODS Our study was a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I (IA-IC3) ovarian carcinoma treated at four European referral centers in Germany and Italy. Using Kaplan-Meier survival curves we compared overall and disease-free survival between the different stage I groups. RESULTS A total of 1115 patients were included. Of these, 48.4% (n=540) were in stage IA, 6.6% (n=73) stage IB, and 45% (n=502) stage IC, of the latter substage IC1, 54% (n=271), substage IC2, 31.5% (n=158), and substage IC3, 14.5% (n=73). Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 94% and 86%, respectively, with no difference between stage IA and IB. However, there was a significantly better overall and disease-free survival for stage IA as compared with stage IC (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed incomplete/fertility-sparing staging (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.99, and HR 3.54; 95% CI 1.83 to 6.86, respectively), and stage IC (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.63 to 3.75) as independent risk factors for inferior disease-free survival, while low-grade endometrioid (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.72) and low-grade mucinous (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.44) histology had superior disease-free survival. Considering overall survival, stage IC (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.45 to 4.01) and older age (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.46 to 3.95) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSION Although stage I ovarian carcinoma exhibited excellent outcomes, the prognosis of patients with stage IA differs significantly compared with stage IC. Sub-optimal staging as an indicator for quality of care, and tumor biology defined by histology (low-grade endometrioid/mucinous) independently impact disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majdi Imterat
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Andrea Rosati
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Debora Ferrari
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raffaella Ergasti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Volontè
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Marco Tesei
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria Teresa Perri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Watrowski R, Obermayr E, Wallisch C, Aust S, Concin N, Braicu EI, Van Gorp T, Hasenburg A, Sehouli J, Vergote I, Zeillinger R. Biomarker-Based Models for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Mass: A Multicenter Validation Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071780. [PMID: 35406551 PMCID: PMC8997061 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal genital malignancy in women. We aimed to develop and validate new proteomic-based models for non-invasive diagnosis of OC. We also compared them to the modified Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA-50), the Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) and our earlier Proteomic Model 2017. Biomarkers were assessed using bead-based multiplex technology (Luminex®) in 356 women (250 with malignant and 106 with benign ovarian tumors) from five European centers. The training cohort included 279 women from three centers, and the validation cohort 77 women from two other centers. Of six previously studied serum proteins (CA125, HE4, osteopontin [OPN], prolactin, leptin, and macrophage migration inhibitory factor [MIF]), four contributed significantly to the Proteomic Model 2021 (CA125, OPN, prolactin, MIF), while leptin and HE4 were omitted by the algorithm. The Proteomic Model 2021 revealed a c-index of 0.98 (95% CI 0.96, 0.99) in the training cohort; however, in the validation cohort it only achieved a c-index of 0.82 (95% CI 0.72, 0.91). Adding patient age to the Proteomic Model 2021 constituted the Combined Model 2021, with a c-index of 0.99 (95% CI 0.97, 1) in the training cohort and a c-index of 0.86 (95% CI 0.78, 0.95) in the validation cohort. The Full Combined Model 2021 (all six proteins with age) yielded a c-index of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97, 0.99) in the training cohort and a c-index of 0.89 (95% CI 0.81, 0.97) in the validation cohort. The validation of our previous Proteomic Model 2017, as well as the ROMA-50 and CPH-I revealed a c-index of 0.9 (95% CI 0.82, 0.97), 0.54 (95% CI 0.38, 0.69) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.85, 0.98), respectively. In postmenopausal women, the three newly developed models all achieved a specificity of 1.00, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 1.00, and a sensitivity of >0.9. Performance in women under 50 years of age (c-index below 0.6) or with normal CA125 (c-index close to 0.5) was poor. CA125 and OPN had the best discriminating power as single markers. In summary, the CPH-I, the two combined 2021 Models, and the Proteomic Model 2017 showed satisfactory diagnostic accuracies, with no clear superiority of either model. Notably, although combining values of only four proteins with age, the Combined Model 2021 performed comparably to the Full Combined Model 2021. The models confirmed their exceptional diagnostic performance in women aged ≥50. All models outperformed the ROMA-50.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Watrowski
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.O.); (S.A.)
| | - Eva Obermayr
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.O.); (S.A.)
| | - Christine Wallisch
- Section for Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Stefanie Aust
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.O.); (S.A.)
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.I.B.); (J.S.)
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (T.V.G.); (I.V.)
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.I.B.); (J.S.)
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (T.V.G.); (I.V.)
| | - Robert Zeillinger
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.O.); (S.A.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gallotta V, Jeong SY, Conte C, Trozzi R, Cappuccio S, Moroni R, Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Kim TJ, Fagotti A. Minimally invasive surgical staging for early stage ovarian cancer: A long-term follow up. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1698-1704. [PMID: 33573854 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The standard treatment for epithelial early stage ovarian cancer (eEOC) includes laparotomic surgical staging, according to ESGO-ESMO guidelines. In the last decade, many investigators have assessed the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) staging in properly selected patients. However, survival data related to different surgical approaches (open versus MIS) are extremely limited. The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term oncological outcomes in eEOC patients treated with MIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a multicenter observational retrospective study conducted in two tertiary oncological centers. We selected all consecutive women who underwent a laparoscopic or robotic staging for eEOC. RESULTS From January 2008 to December 2016, 254 eEOC patients underwent a MIS staging (188 laparoscopic staging and 66 robotic staging). Overall, 18.1% of patients were upstaged due to pathological findings. A total of 203 (79.9%) patients received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 61 months (range 13-118), 39 (15.3%) patients experienced recurrence. The 5-years progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 84.0% and 93.8%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, favorable variables influencing PFS were young age (≤45 years), non-serous histotype, tumor grade 1-2, and FIGO stage IA/IB. In the multivariate analysis, only grade 3 was shown to keep its negative independent prognostic value (HR = 3.47; p = 0.004), whereas FIGO stage ≥ IC showed a trend toward significance (HR = 1.75; p = 0.099). CONCLUSION This retrospective study represents the longest follow-up of eEOC patients managed by MIS. The MIS is a valuable therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients, although a randomized controlled trial is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Gallotta
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
| | - Soo Young Jeong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Carmine Conte
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Rita Trozzi
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Serena Cappuccio
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Rossana Moroni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Tae-Joong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|