1
|
Burt L, Jarboe E, Gaffney D, Suneja G, DeCesaris C, Bedell S, Brower J. Vulvar Cancer: Histopathologic Considerations and Nuances to Management. Pract Radiat Oncol 2025; 15:86-92. [PMID: 39209108 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Vulvar cancer, although rare, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and treatment because of its histopathologic complexities and nuances. This paper reviewed key aspects of the management of vulvar cancer, focusing on histopathologic diagnosis, margin status interpretation, lymph node involvement assessment, and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Burt
- University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - Elke Jarboe
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - David Gaffney
- University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Gita Suneja
- University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Cristina DeCesaris
- University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Sabrina Bedell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jeffrey Brower
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; Radiation Oncology Associates-New England, Manchester, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Macchia G, Casà C, Ferioli M, Lancellotta V, Pezzulla D, Pappalardi B, Laliscia C, Ippolito E, Di Muzio J, Huscher A, Tortoreto F, Boccardi M, Lazzari R, De Iaco P, Raspagliesi F, Gadducci A, Garganese G, Ferrandina G, Morganti AG, Tagliaferri L. Observational multicenter Italian study on vulvar cancer adjuvant radiotherapy (OLDLADY 1.2): a cooperation among AIRO Gyn, MITO and MaNGO groups. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2022; 127:1292-1302. [PMID: 36088437 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01538-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) has been shown to reduce the risk of local relapse in vulvar cancer (VC). In this multicentre study (OLDLADY-1.2), several Institutions have combined their retrospective data on VC patients to produce a real-world dataset aimed at collecting data on efficacy and safety of aRT. METHODS The primary study end-point was the 2-year-local control, secondary end-points were the 2-year-metastasis free-survival, the 2-year-overall survival and the rate and severity of acute and late toxicities. Participating centres were required to fill data sets including age, stage, tumor diameter, type of surgery, margin status, depth of invasion, histology, grading as well technical/dosimetric details of radiotherapy. Data about response, local and regional recurrence, acute and late toxicities, follow-up and outcome measures were also collected. RESULTS One hundred eighty-one patients with invasive VC from 9 Institutions were retrospectively identified. The majority of patients were stage III (63%), grade 2 (62.4%) squamous carcinoma (97.2%). Positive nodes were observed in 117 patients (64.6%), moreover tumor diameter > 4 cm, positive/close margins and depth of invasion deeper than 5 mm were found in 59.1%, 38.6%, 58% of patients, respectively. Sixty-one patients (33.7%) received adjuvant chemoradiation, and 120 (66.3%) received radiotherapy alone. aRT was started 3 months after surgery in 50.8% of patients. Prescribed volumes and doses heterogeneity was recorded according to margin status and nodal disease. Overall, 42.5% locoregional recurrences were recorded. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range 1-179), the 2-year actuarial local control rate, metastasis free and overall survival were 68.7%, 84.5%, and 67.5%, respectively. In term of safety, aRT leads to a prevalence of acute skin toxicity with a low incidence of severe toxicities. CONCLUSIONS In the context of aRT for VC the present study reports a broad spectrum of approaches which would deserve greater standardization in terms of doses, volumes and drugs used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Ferioli
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna - Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Brigida Pappalardi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Concetta Laliscia
- Department of New Technologies and Translational Research, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edy Ippolito
- Radiation Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Jacopo Di Muzio
- Dipartimento di Oncologia P.O. S. Anna - SS Radioterapia, A.O.U "Città della Salute e della Scienza", Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandra Huscher
- Fondazione Poliambulanza, U.O. di Radioterapia Oncologica "Guido Berlucchi", Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Tortoreto
- U.O.C. Radiotherapy, S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli Hospital - Amethyst Radioterapia Italia, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Boccardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Roberta Lazzari
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna - Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Angiolo Gadducci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Unità Operativa Complessa Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna - Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lukovic J, Han K. Postoperative management of vulvar cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:338-343. [PMID: 35256421 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The primary treatment for resectable vulvar cancer includes wide local excision of the primary tumor and surgical lymph node assessment. Following surgery, up to 40-50% of patients develop a local recurrence. Historically, the strongest predictor of local recurrence is a positive or close margin (defined as <8 mm), although recent studies question the importance of margin status. Post-operative radiotherapy to the vulva is recommended for all women with a positive margin where re-excision is not possible. Radiotherapy may also be considered in the setting of risk factors for local recurrence: close margin, lymphovascular invasion, large tumor size, and/or depth of invasion >5 mm. Nodal assessment is an important component of vulvar cancer management. A negative sentinel node is associated with a low false-negative predictive value (2% in patients with vulvar tumor <4 cm in GOG 173), 2-year groin recurrence rate of 2.3%, and 3-year disease-specific survival rate of 97% in patients with unifocal vulvar tumor <4 cm in the GROningen INternational Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar Cancer (GROINSS-V I) study. Thus, patients with tumor size <4 cm (without additional local risk factors) and negative sentinel node can be observed. Patients with sentinel node metastasis ≤2 mm can be treated with post-operative radiotherapy (2-year isolated groin recurrence rate of 1.6% in GROINSS-V II), as a safe alternative to lymphadenectomy. Patients with sentinel node metastasis >2 mm following sentinel node biopsy should undergo inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy followed by post-operative radiotherapy-based on the GROINSS-V II study, the 2-year isolated groin recurrence rate remains unacceptably high (22%) with radiotherapy alone. Retrospective studies suggest that the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy may improve survival. The ongoing GROINSS-V III study is investigating concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy dose escalation. The main goal of these post-operative treatments is to reduce the risk of local, and especially groin, recurrences, which are almost universally fatal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Lukovic
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathy Han
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li JY, Arkfeld CK, Tymon-Rosario J, Webster E, Schwartz P, Damast S, Menderes G. An evaluation of prognostic factors, oncologic outcomes, and management for primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Gynecol Oncol 2021; 33:e13. [PMID: 34910394 PMCID: PMC8899873 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate prognostic factors, outcomes, and management patterns of patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. METHODS One hundred sixty-four women were retrospectively identified with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at our institution between 1/1996-12/2018. Descriptive statistics were performed on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. The χ² tests and t-tests were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS Median follow-up was 52.5 months. Five-year RFS was 67.9%, 60.0%, 42.1%, and 20.0% for stage I-IV, respectively. Five-year DSS was 86.2%, 81.6%, 65.0%, and 42.9% for stage I-IV, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive margins predicted overall RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.18-10.73; p=0.025), while presence of lichen sclerosus on pathology (HR=2.78; 95% CI=1.30-5.91; p=0.008) predicted local RFS. OS was predicted by nodal involvement (HR=2.51; 95% CI=1.02-6.13; p=0.043) and positive margins (HR=5.19; 95% CI=2.03-13.26; p=0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved RFS (p=0.016) and DSS (p=0.012) in node-positive patients. Median survival after treatment of local, groin, and pelvic/distant recurrence was 52, 8, and 5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION For primary treatment, more conservative surgical approaches can be considered with escalation of treatment in patients with concurrent precursor lesions, positive margins, and/or nodal involvement. Further studies are warranted to improve risk stratification in order to optimize treatment paradigms for vulvar cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Y. Li
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christopher K. Arkfeld
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joan Tymon-Rosario
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Emily Webster
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Peter Schwartz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Shari Damast
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gulden Menderes
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|