Survival disparities in vulvar cancer patients in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities

Prevalence and impact of vulvar lesions diagnosed prior to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To systematically explore vulvar pathology diagnosed prior to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), as well as the association with tumor characteristics, stage and survival outcome, with the aim of improving vulvar cancer prevention strategies.

METHODS

VSCC diagnosed between 2005 and 2019 were identified from a population-based cohort provided by the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank. Pathology reports were reviewed to identify vulvar pathology diagnosed before primary VSCC. Data on treatment, tumor stage and survival were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Prior vulvar pathology was correlated to tumor characteristics and stage. Cox's proportional hazards model was used to assess the impact of clinicopathological variables on survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1036 VSCC patients were identified, of whom most (73 %) had no prior biopsy-confirmed vulvar pathology. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) were diagnosed prior to VSCC in only 8 % and 2 % of cancer patients, respectively, while adjacent HSIL and adjacent dVIN were reported in 35 % and 22 % of surgical VSCC resection specimens, respectively. The remaining 17 % had a benign vulvar pathology diagnosis prior to cancer. Patients showed advanced staged tumors in 15 % and 9 % of patients with prior HSIL and dVIN, respectively, as compared to 32 % in patients without prior vulvar pathology (p < 0.001). There was no independent association between prior vulvar pathology and survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of VSCC patients were not preceded by a pre-malignant lesion or other benign vulvar pathology, although such lesions were frequently identified adjacent to VSCC in resection specimens. Patients without prior vulvar pathology showed more advanced-stage tumors, which may contribute to less favorable outcomes.

Overall survival associated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in metastatic vulvar cancer: A retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database

Background

Large cancer registries help analyze the prognosis of rare malignancies, such as advanced vulvar cancer. This study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) rates of patients with metastatic vulvar cancer who had undergone chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone and identify prognostic factors using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we used the SEER database to identify patients with metastatic vulvar cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the covariates. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models were used to analyze OS.

Results

A total of 685 patients were included and divided into chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy groups, and 400 patients were included after propensity score matching. The chemoradiotherapy group had higher OS in the matched cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7367; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5906-0.9190; P = 0.0049) than the radiotherapy group, which was similar to that in the pre-matched cohort (P < 0.0001). Patients who had undergone surgery + radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy showed higher OS rates than those who had received radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for patients aged <75 years and local tumor excision/destruction or surgical removal of the primary site was the recommended surgical choice (P < 0.05). Chemoradiotherapy is sufficient for patients ≥75 years of age.

Conclusions

Patients with metastatic vulvar cancer should undergo surgery if they can tolerate it. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be encouraged because this treatment modality was associated with higher OS than radiotherapy alone.

Surgery as primary treatment improved overall survival in vulvar squamous cancer: A single center study with 108 women

OBJECTIVE

To describe a single-center experience managing women with vulvar squamous cancer and analyze factors influencing their survival.

STUDY DESIGN

It is an observational longitudinal retrospective study that reviewed medical records of patients admitted for treatment at the University of Campinas between 2010 and 2019, followed up until June 2022. The final sample was 108 cases. The main outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Other variables were age, stage, relapse, and race. Vital status was accessed by medical records, active search, or public online register. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank Test, and Regression Cox-Model assessed risks.

RESULTS

The mean age in stages IA and IB were 65.0 years, and in stages II + III + IVA 71.1 years. Women 70 years or older were more related to diagnosis in stages II + III + IVA (p = 0.019). Progression was observed in 7 (16.7 %) patients in stage IB and 30 (65.2 %) in stage II + III + IVA. Both five-year (5y) DFS and OS were significantly different in stage IB and II + III + IVA (5y-DFS 70.5 % and 39.3 %, p = 0.024; 65.1 % and 24.3 %, p < 0.001). In stages II + III + IVA, most deaths happened before 24 months of follow-up. The primary treatment was surgery in 81.0 % of stage IB and 47.8 % of stage II + III + IVA. A higher OS was observed in patients treated primarily by surgery compared to radiotherapy in stage IB (p = 0.008), and in stages II + III + IVA (p = 0.013). Surgery followed or not by adjuvant radiotherapy was independently associated with a 60 % adjusted death protection compared to radiotherapy alone as primary treatment (0.40, 0.23;0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the patients have been diagnosed in stage I. The progression rate was high in the advanced stages of the disease. Overall survival by stage was improved when surgery was the primary treatment. Surgery was independently associated with death.

Guideline-Discordant Care in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant inguinofemoral lymph node (LN) evaluation in individuals with early-stage vulvar cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified patients with T1b and T2 vulvar squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between 2012 and 2018 using the National Cancer Database. Factors associated with LN evaluation were examined using logistic regression analyses, adjusting for patient, disease, and facility-level characteristics. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using log rank test and Cox regression was performed for the entire cohort and a subgroup of older patients , defined as individuals aged 80 years or older.

RESULTS

Of the 5,685 patients with vulvar cancer, 3,756 (66.1%) underwent guideline-concordant LN evaluation. In our adjusted model, age 80 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% CI 0.22-0.42) and Black race (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.54-0.95) were associated with lower odds of LN evaluation. High-volume hospitals were associated with increased odds of LN evaluation compared with low-volume hospitals (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.28-2.05). Older individuals who did not undergo LN evaluation had significantly worse overall survival than those with pathologically negative LNs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45; 95% CI 0.37-0.55) and similar overall survival as those with pathologically positive LNs (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.77-1.43).

CONCLUSION

Guideline-concordant LN evaluation for early-stage vulvar squamous cell carcinoma is low. Lower utilization is associated with older age, Black race, and care at a low-volume hospital.

Time to completion of radiation treatment in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and the impact on survival

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether radiation completion within a planned timeframe in locally advanced squamous cell vulvar cancer impacts overall survival (OS).

METHODS

The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2017 was used to identify women ≥18 years old with stage II-IVA squamous cell vulvar cancer. We included women who received radiation alone (RT) or concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) for initial vulvar cancer treatment. Primary outcome was overall survival associated with time of delay in radiation completion.

RESULTS

There were 2378 women identified (n = 856 RT and n = 1522 CRT). Median age was 67 (IQR 56-78), majority (88.35%) were white with advanced stage III or IVA (72.29%) disease. Median radiation dose was 5720 c-Gray (IQR 5040-6300). Radiation completion with delay ≥7 days resulted in reduction in survival compared to delay of <7 days (unadjusted HR 1.183 [95%CI: 1.066-1.313], p = 0.0016). When delays extended to ≥14 days compared to <14 days there was increased hazard of death (unadjusted HR: 1.263 [95%CI:1.126-1.416], p < 0.0001). Survival improved for patients with <7 versus ≥7 days delay whether treatment was with RT (median OS: 34.9 months versus 21.6 months, p < 0.01) or CRT (Median OS:58 months versus 41.3 months, p < 0.01). Stage IVA disease was associated with the greatest increase in hazard of death (HR 1.759 [95%CI 1.517-2.039], p < 0.0001) compared to stage II.

CONCLUSION

Radiation completion with <7 days delay is associated with improved overall survival, independent of concurrent chemotherapy. This suggest that strategies to minimize delays in radiation are crucial in locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Fertility-sparing treatment of locally advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in a young patient

•

Locally advanced vulvar cancer has been diagnosed in a young patient who desires fertility.

•

Treatment of vulvar cancer in young patients will need to consider future reproductive planning.

•

Fertility-sparing radiation techniques for treatment of vulvar cancer are effective in achieving long-term disease control.

Trends in incidence and survival of patients with vulvar cancer in an Asian country: Analysis of the Korean Central Cancer Registry 1999-2018

OBJECTIVE

To report 20-year trends in incidence and survival of vulvar cancer in Korea.

METHODS

Using data from the Korean Central Cancer Registry, age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percentage changes (APCs) were calculated. Net survival (NS) was estimated by the Pohar-Perme method, and conditional net survival (CNS) was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 2221 patients was diagnosed with vulvar cancer during the 1999-2018 period, with an ASR of 0.32 per 100,000 person-years. Among the cases, 51.4% were squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), 21.3% were Paget disease, and 8.6% were basal cell carcinoma (BCC). There was an increase in incidence for all vulvar cancer (APC 2.4%, 95% CI 1.8-3.0). However, although BCC (APC 7.0%, 95% CI 3.3-10.8) and Paget disease (APC 5.9%, 95% CI 4.2-7.6) increased, SqCC did not (APC 0.2%, 95% CI -0.8-1.2). There was an increase in incidence in all age groups. The 5Y NS was 74.0% overall, and it did not improve significantly during the study period. The 5Y CNS of vulvar cancer increased continuously with time survived: from 74.0% (71.4-76.4) at baseline to 98.1% (95% CI, 85.4-99.8) at 5 years after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of vulvar cancer in Korea showed a different pattern from those in the US and Europe: SqCC incidence was relatively low and remained stable, but the incidence of BCC and Paget's disease increased. Survival did not improve in the past two decades. Patients can be considered cured after surviving for 5 years.

Comparison of two types of the triple incision technique in the treatment of patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer

Objective: In 2012, we proposed and described a modified triple incision technique (MTIT) for vulvar cancer patients with locally advanced disease. The MTIT has undergone a series of modifications, and a modified MTIT (M-MTIT) has been developed. The purpose of this study was to introduce the M-MTIT and compare it with the MTIT. Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Fifty-seven vulvar cancer patients with clinical stage T2 (≥ 4 cm) or T3 disease were included. Of these patients, 28 underwent the MTIT and 29 underwent the M-MTIT. Data on surgery-related complications and survival outcomes were compared. Results: Patients who were treated with the M-MTIT developed significantly less surgery-related morbidities than patients treated with the MTIT (24.1% vs. 60.7%, P = 0.005). Wound breakdown was the most common complication in our cohort, which occurred less frequently in the M-MTIT group than in the MTIT group (10.3% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.022). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the M-MTIT as an independent predictor of a reduced risk of wound breakdown. The incidence of other complications, including lymphedema, wound infection and cellulitis, was lower in the M-MTIT group than in the MTIT group; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance. The median follow-up time of this study was 33 months. Kaplan-Meier survival graphs did not show significant differences in recurrence-free survival or overall survival between the two groups. Conclusions: The M-MTIT correlates with lower morbidity rates than the MTIT and does not compromise oncological safety. The M-MTIT can be considered a safe and feasible option for vulvar cancer patients with locally advanced disease.