Lessons from radiochemotherapy and modern image-guided adaptive brachytherapy followed by hysterectomy

Adjuvant Hysterectomy in Patients After Radiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective Longitudinal Study

Introduction

Residual or recurrent cervical cancer post-CCRT is a challenging clinical issue, even though there has been much effort in recent decades to increase patient survival after radiation. There is a paucity of literature regarding the role of hysterectomy in recurrent/residual disease after radiation in LACC patients. Such a procedure is controversial and not routinely performed because of difficulties in obtaining tumor-free margins and the high rate of associated morbidity.

Aims and Objectives

Evaluate outcomes and morbidities in patients who had undergone hysterectomy for residual or recurrent disease after radiation in LACC patients.

Material and Methods

This is a prospective observational study on radiotherapy-treated LACC patients (IIB-III) with residual disease or recurrent disease who have undergone adjuvant hysterectomy. This study has been conducted at AHPGIC, Cuttack, with a sample size of 30 patients.

Results

18/30 patients underwent extrafascial hysterectomy, and rest 12 patients had radical hysterectomy. No significant difference in complications, achieving tumor free margins or recurrences post adjuvant hysterectomy based on the radicality of surgery was observed. 5 cases of recurrences post-adjuvant hysterectomy were detected. Some of the factors which had significant association with recurrences post adjuvant hysterectomy were non squamous histology, no preoperative brachytherapy, deep stromal invasion and positive surgical margins. Median follow-up time was 14 months (12-27 months).

Conclusion

This study shows that adjuvant hysterectomy is feasible with good outcome and acceptable morbidity after chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients "If selection of patients for adjuvant hysterectomy is appropriate."

Debulking hysterectomy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for FIGO stage (2019) IB3/II cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

With an estimated 570,000 new cases reported globally in 2018, and increasing numbers of new cases in countries without established human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes, cervical cancer is the third most common cancer in women worldwide. The majority of global disease burden (around 85%) is in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), with estimates of cervical cancer being the second most common cancer in women in such regions. As it commonly affects younger women, cervical cancer has the greatest impact on years of life lost (YLL) and adverse socioeconomic outcomes compared to all other cancers in women. Management of cervical cancer depends on tumour stage. Radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy is the standard primary treatment modality for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (2019) 1B1 to 1B3 disease. However, for larger primary tumours, radical hysterectomy is less commonly recommended. This is mainly due to a high incidence of unfavourable histopathological parameters, which require adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (chemotherapy given with radiotherapy treatment). CCRT is the standard of care and is widely used as first-line treatment for cervical cancer considered to be not curable with surgery alone (i.e.those with locally advanced disease). However, a sizable cohort of women managed with primary CCRT will have residual disease within the cervix following treatment. Debulking' hysterectomy to remove (debulk) the primary tumour in locally advanced disease, prior to CCRT, may be an alternative management strategy, avoiding the potential need for surgery for residual cervical disease following CCRT, which may be more extensive, or have increased morbidity due to CCRT. However, this strategy may subject more women to unnecessary surgery and its inherent risks.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and harms of debulking hysterectomy (simple or radical) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone for FIGO (2019) stage IB3/II cervical cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2021, Issue 4), MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to 12 April 2021) and Embase via Ovid (1980 to 12 April 2021). We also searched other registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists up to 12 April 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs or non-randomised studies (NRSs) comparing debulking hysterectomy followed by CCRT versus CCRT alone for locally advanced FIGO (2019) stage IB3/II cervical malignancy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We applied Cochrane methodology, with two review authors independently assessing whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria. We planned to apply standard Cochrane methodological procedures to analyse data and risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not find any evidence for or against debulking hysterectomy followed by CCRT versus CCRT alone for FIGO (2019) stage IB3/II cervical cancer. We did not identify any studies assessing the validity of debulking hysterectomy for these women.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence for or against debulking hysterectomy followed by CCRT versus CCRT alone for FIGO (2019) stage IB3/II cervical cancer.

The impact of adjuvant hysterectomy on survival outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Various articles have addressed the impact of hysterectomy on survival outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). This study was designed to evaluate whether treatment modalities that include hysterectomy as an option for the treatment of LACC patients are superior to standard chemo-radiotherapy.

METHODS

Literature search was performed using the Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov databases. Observational (prospective and retrospective) and randomized trials that included adjuvant hysterectomy in at least one treatment group. A network meta-analysis was carried out in R 3.4.3 using the pcnetmeta package, which uses a Bayesian hierarchical model. The credibility of evidence was appraised with the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool.

RESULTS

Overall, 14 studies were included in the present systematic review that involved 2302 patients with LACC. Every potential combination of external beam radiotherapy, intracavitary brachytherapy, chemotherapy and surgery was considered to be eligible for inclusion. The results of the network meta-analysis suggested that the various treatment alternatives did not differ in terms of survival outcomes. Furthermore, the qualitative analysis revealed that hysterectomy was accompanied by considerable perioperative morbidity; therefore, rendering its addition to the treatment scheme of LACC patients inappropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LACC do not seem to benefit substantially by the addition of hysterectomy to standard chemo-radiotherapy. Moreover, the operation is accompanied by substantial perioperative morbidity, thus, its implementation in clinical practice should be avoided.

Adjuvant Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Chemoradiation Therapy: A Systematic Review on the Pathology-Proven Residual Disease Rate

Objective: To determine the incidence of pathology-proven residual disease in adjuvant hysterectomy specimens in patients with cervical cancer, treated with chemoradiation therapy. Secondly, to assess a possible association for pathology-proven residual disease regarding the time between chemoradiation therapy and adjuvant hysterectomy. Additionally, the survival rate and complication rate were assessed. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database were searched from inception up to 8 March 2021. Results: Of the 4601 screened articles, eleven studies were included. A total of 1205 patients were treated with chemoradiation therapy and adjuvant hysterectomy, ranging from three to twelve weeks after chemoradiation therapy. A total of 411 out of 1205 patients (34%) had pathology-proven residual disease in the adjuvant hysterectomy specimen. There was no association found in the time between chemoradiation therapy and adjuvant hysterectomy. Follow-up ranged from 2.4 to 245 months, during which 270 patients (22%) relapsed, and 298 patients (27%) were deceased. A total of 202 (35%) complications were registered in 578 patients. Conclusion: there is no association found in the time between chemoradiation therapy and residual disease on adjuvant hysterectomy specimens. The survival rates after chemoradiation therapy and adjuvant hysterectomy are suboptimal, while the risk of complications after adjuvant hysterectomy is high.

Optimal treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer

Introduction: Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009/2018 - stages IB2-IVA/IB3-IVA, respectively) is treated using a multimodal approach that includes chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the progress made over the past decade in the treatment of LACC. Prognostic factors, FIGO classification and the role of imaging staging will be discussed. Efficacy of external-beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy and chemotherapy will be detailed. Indications for para-aortic staging lymphadenectomy and adjuvant hysterectomy, as well as follow-up and special population, will be covered.Expert opinion: The initial workup is one of the most crucial steps in the optimal care of patients, which should be realized by a multidisciplinary expert team. With the implementation of modern conformal radiotherapy techniques, the local control rate has been optimized. Nevertheless, 40% of patients experience recurrence with distant metastasis and a dismal prognosis. Currently, a clear benefit of neo- and adjuvant chemotherapy has not been established. The future likely involves (1) improved selection of patients for whom treatment intensification is justified, (2) a combination of new drugs with chemoradiation that are currently being tested in trials, and (3) the development of tailored treatment based on molecular characteristics.