Managing opioid use in the acute surgical setting: A society of gynecologic oncology clinical practice statement

Multimodal Analgesia and Outcomes in Hysterectomy Surgery-A Population-Based Analysis

Objective: We aimed to investigate the impact of multimodal analgesia on postoperative complications and opioid prescription on a national level. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included n = 1,307,923 hysterectomies (01/2006-12/2022, Premier Healthcare claims data). Multimodal analgesia was defined as opioid use with the addition of non-opioid analgesic modes, grouped into four categories: opioid-only and 1, 2, or 3 or more additional non-opioid analgesics. Multivariable regression models measured associations between multimodal categories and outcomes (composite/respiratory/cardiac/gastrointestinal/genitourinary, and CNS complications, oral morphine milligram equivalents [MME], and length of hospital stay [LOS]). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Results: Overall, 84.3% (1,102,812/1,307,923) received multimodal analgesia, of which 58.9%, 28.0%, and 13.1% received 1, 2, or 3 or more additional non-opioid analgesics, respectively. The odds of any composite complication (any ≥1 complication) decreased with the addition of 1, 2, 3, or more analgesic modalities (versus opioid-only): OR 0.66 (CI 0.64; 0.68), OR 0.63 (CI 0.61; 0.66), OR 0.65 (CI 0.62; 0.67), respectively. Similar patterns existed for respiratory, cardiac, and genitourinary complications. Opioid prescription decreased incrementally with 1,2, 3, or more non-opioid analgesic modalities by 9.51 mg (CI 11.16; 7.86) and 15.29 mg (CI 17.21; 13.37) and 29.35 mg (CI 31.79; 26.91) cumulative MME. LOS was reduced by 0.52 days (CI 0.54; 0.51), 0.49 days (CI 0.51; 0.47), and 0.40 days (CI 0.43; 0.38), respectively. Costs were reduced by $765 (CI 817; 714) or $479 (CI 539; 419) with 1 or 2 multimodal modes. Conclusions: These findings suggest substantial benefits of multimodal analgesia, including significant decreases in serious complications (especially respiratory, cardiac, and genitourinary), opioid consumption, and hospitalizations. Multimodal analgesia may facilitate safe and efficient pain management with optimized opioid consumption.

A bundle of opioid-sparing strategies to eliminate routine opioid prescribing in a urogynecology practice

BACKGROUND

Current evidence supports that many patients do not use prescribed opioids following reconstructive pelvic surgery, yet it remains unclear if it is feasible to eliminate routine opioid prescriptions without a negative impact on patients or providers.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in the proportion of patients discharged without opioids after implementing a bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol compared to usual care after minimally invasive pelvic reconstructive surgery (transvaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic). Secondary objectives include measures of patient-perceived pain control and provider workload.

STUDY DESIGN

The bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol intervention was implemented as a division-wide evidence-based practice change on August 1, 2022. This retrospective cohort compares a 6-month postintervention (bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol) cohort to 6-month preintervention (usual care) of patients undergoing minimally invasive pelvic reconstructive surgery. A 3-month washout period was observed after bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol initiation. We excluded patients <18 years, failure to consent to research, combined surgery with other specialties, urge urinary incontinence or urinary retention procedures alone, and minor procedures not typically requiring opioids. Primary outcome was measured by proportion discharged without opioids and total oral morphine equivalents prescribed. Pain control was measured by pain scores, postdischarge prescriptions and refills, phone calls and visits related to pain, and satisfaction with pain control. Provider workload was demonstrated by phone calls and postdischarge prescription refills. Data were obtained through chart review on all patients who met inclusion criteria. Primary analysis only included patients prescribed opioids according to the bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol protocol. Two sample t tests compared continuous variables and chi-square tests compared categorical variables.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixteen patients were included in the primary analysis (207 bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol, 209 usual care). Baseline demographics were similar between groups, except a lower proportion of irritable bowel syndrome (13% vs 23%; P<.01) and pelvic pain (15% vs 24.9%; P=.01), and higher history of prior gynecologic surgery (69.1% vs 58.4%; P=.02) in the bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol cohort. The bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol cohort was more likely to be discharged without opioids (68.1% vs 10.0%; P<.01). In those prescribed opioids, total oral morphine equivalents on discharge was significantly lower in the bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol cohort (48.1 vs 81.8; P<.01). The bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol cohort had a 20.6 greater odds (confidence interval 11.4, 37.1) of being discharged without opioids after adjusting for surgery type, arthritis/joint pain, IBS, pelvic pain, and contraindication to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol cohort was also less likely to receive a rescue opioid prescription after discharge (1.4% vs 9.5%; P=.03). There were no differences in opioid prescription refills (19.7% vs 18.1%; P=.77), emergency room visits for pain (3.4% vs 2.9%; P=.76), postoperative pain scores (mean 4.7 vs 4.0; P=.07), or patient satisfaction with pain control (81.5% vs 85.6%; P=.21). After bundle of opioid-sparing strategies and tiered prescribing protocol implementation, the proportion of postoperative phone calls for pain also decreased (12.6% vs 21.5%; P=.02). Similar results were identified when nonadherent prescribing was included in the analysis.

CONCLUSION

A bundle of evidence-based opioid sparing strategies and tiered prescribing based on inpatient use increases the proportion of patients discharged without opioids after minimally invasive pelvic reconstructive surgery without evidence of uncontrolled pain or increased provider workload.

Pain nursing for gynecologic cancer patients

Gynecological malignancy remains a prevalent cause of mortality among women. Chronic cancer pain, as a severe complication of malignancy and its therapies, accounts for a substantial burden of physical and psychological distress in affected patients. Accordingly, early identification, assessment, and standardized management of such pain are crucial in the prevention or delay of its progression. In the present review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the pathological factors that contribute to pain in patients with gynecological malignancy while highlighting the underlying mechanisms of pain in this population. In addition, we summarize several treatment modalities targeting pain management in gynecologic cancer patients, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. These interventions are crucial for tumor elimination and patient survival. Chronic cancer pain exerts a significant impact on wellbeing and quality of life for patients with gynecologic cancer. Therefore, our review emphasizes the importance of addressing this pain and its psychological sequelae and advocates for a multidisciplinary approach that encompasses nursing and psychological support. In summary, this review offers valuable insights into the pathological factors underlying pain, reviews pain management modalities, and stresses the critical role of early intervention and comprehensive care in enhancing the quality of life of these patients.

Perioperative opioid dispensing and persistent use after benign hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was conducted to (1) assess the quantity and dose of perioperatively dispensed opioids for benign hysterectomy by procedure route and (2) identify the predictors of persistent opioid use after the procedure.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched from study inception to 25 March 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting data on opioid dispensing among patients undergoing benign hysterectomy were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the dosage of opioids dispensed perioperatively (from 30 preoperative days to 21 postoperative days). The secondary outcome was the predictors of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy (from 3 months to 3 years postoperatively). Total opioid dispensing was measured in morphine milligram equivalents units.

METHODS

The random-effects model was used to pool the mean differences or odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies presenting data on 377,569 women undergoing benign hysterectomy were included. Of these women, 83% (95% confidence interval, 81-84) were dispensed opioids during the perioperative period. The average amount of perioperatively dispensed opioids was 143.5 morphine milligram equivalents (95% confidence interval, 40-247). Women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy were dispensed a significantly lower amount of opioids than those undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomies. The overall rate of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy was 5% (95% confidence interval, 2-8). Younger patient age (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.63), smoking history (odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.10), alcohol use (odds ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.34-4.27), back pain (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.05), and fibromyalgia (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.83) were significantly associated with a higher risk of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy. However, there was no significant effect of hysterectomy route and operative complexity on persistent opioid use postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative opioid dispensing was significantly dependent on the route of hysterectomy, with the lowest dispensed morphine milligram equivalents of opioids for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy. Nevertheless, hysterectomy route did not significantly predict persistent opioid use postoperatively, whereas younger age, smoking, alcohol use, back pain, and fibromyalgia were significantly associated with persistent opioid use.

Perioperative opioid management for minimally invasive hysterectomy

Given the high volume of hysterectomies performed, the contribution of gynecologists to the opioid crisis is potentially significant. Following a hysterectomy, most patients are over-prescribed opioids, are vulnerable to developing new persistent opioid use, and can be the source of misuse, diversion, or accidental exposure. People who misuse opioids are at risk of an overdose related death, which is now one of the leading causes of death in the United States and is rising in other countries. It is the physician's responsibility to reduce opioid use by making impactful practice changes, such as 1) using pre-emptive opioid sparing strategies, 2) optimizing multimodal nonopioid pain management, 3) restricting postoperative opioid prescribing, and 4) educating patients on proper disposal of unused opioids. These changes can be implemented with an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, shared decision-making, and patient education strategies related to opioids.

Implementation of a restrictive opioid prescription protocol after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery

OBJECTIVES

Opioids are routinely prescribed after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery, with minimal data to inform the ideal dose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a restrictive opioid prescription protocol on the median morphine milligram equivalents prescribed and pain control in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery.

METHODS

A restrictive opioid prescription protocol was implemented from January through December 2020 at a single tertiary cancer center in Ontario, Canada. Consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for suspected malignancy were included. Simultaneously, we implemented use of multimodal analgesia, patient and provider education, pre-printed standardized prescriptions, and tracking of opioid prescriptions. Total median morphine milligram equivalents prescribed were compared between pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Patients were surveyed regarding opioid use and pain control at 30 days post-surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 101 women in the post-intervention cohort were compared with 92 consecutive pre-intervention controls. Following protocol implementation, median morphine milligram equivalents prescribed decreased from 50 (range 9-100) to 25 (range 8-75) (p<0.001). In the post-intervention cohort, 75% (76/101) used 10 median morphine milligram equivalents or less and 55 patients (54%) used 0 median morphine milligram equivalent. There was no additional increase in opioid refill requests after implementation of our strategy. Overall, patients reported a median pain score of 3/10 at 30 days post-surgery; the highest pain scores and most of the pain occurred in the first week after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a restrictive opioid prescription protocol led to a significant reduction in opioid use after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery, with over 50% of patients requiring no opioids postoperatively.

Optimization of postoperative opioid prescriptions in gynecologic oncology: Striking a balance between opioid reduction and pain control

OBJECTIVE

To implement a quality-improvement initiative to assess the impact various patient and procedural factors have on postoperative opioid use. To develop a tailored opioid prescribing algorithm for gynecologic oncology patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who underwent a laparoscopy or laparotomy procedure for a suspected or known gynecologic malignancy between 3/2019-9/2020. Patients were assessed preoperatively for the presence of suspected risk factors for opioid misuse (depression, anxiety, chronic pain, current opioid use, or substance abuse). Patients completed a 30-day postoperative questionnaire assessing for total opioid pill use and refills requests. Multivariate models were developed to estimate the independent effect of sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors for opioid misuse and procedural factors on patient reported postoperative opioid use.

RESULTS

A total of 390 patients were analyzed. Thirty-nine percent (N = 151/390) of patients reported not using opioids after discharge and 5% (N = 20/390) received an opioid refill. For both minimally invasive procedures and laparotomy procedures, body mass index, comorbidities, intraoperative or postoperative complications and final diagnosis of malignancy were not associated with the amount of opioid consumption. However, younger age and history of risk factors for opioid misuse significantly impacted postoperative opioid use. In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.038) and risk factors (p < 0.001) remained significant after controlling for other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Two out of every five patients did not use opioids after surgery. Younger patients and those with risk factors for opioid misuse need a tailored approach to prescribing opioids to balance the need for adequate pain control with the risk of misuse.