1
|
Bruce SF, Huysman B, Bharucha J, Massad LS, Mullen MM, Hagemann AR, Fuh KC, McCourt CK, Thaker PH, Khabele D, Powell MA, Mutch DG, Kuroki LM. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on referral to and delivery of gynecologic oncology care. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 39:100928. [PMID: 35024405 PMCID: PMC8739812 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted gynecologic cancer care. Referrals to gynecologic oncology decreased in the early months of the pandemic. Referral time to gynecologic oncology evaluation was not impacted by the pandemic. Time to cancer treatment initiation decreased significantly during the pandemic. Disparities in time to cancer treatment initiation improving during the pandemic.
Objective To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on referral to and delivery of gynecologic oncology care at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients referred for evaluation by a gynecologic oncologist at Washington University in St. Louis from October 2019 – February 2020 (pre-COVID-19), and April - August 2020 (COVID-19). The primary outcome, time from referral to evaluation by a gynecologic oncologist, was compared between the two time periods. Secondary outcomes included time from initial evaluation to treatment and delays/interruptions in care due to the pandemic. Sub-group analyses were performed on patients with a cancer diagnosis to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on treatment decision making. Results 884 patients were referred during the study period. Total referrals fell by 32% (526 to 358 patients, p < 0.001) and referrals for cancer fell by 18% (228 to 188 patients, p = 0.049). The pandemic did not impact time from referral to initial gynecologic oncology appointment overall (pre-COVID-19: 19.1 vs. COVID-19: 17.4 days, p = 0.315) or among patients with cancer (14.4 vs. 13.9 days, p = 0.662). Time from initial appointment to cancer treatment decreased by 9 days (34 days to 25 days, p = 0.001). Conclusion Referrals to gynecologic oncology decreased significantly during the early months of COVID-19. Though time from referral to evaluation was not impacted by the pandemic, time to treatment initiation decreased despite institutional changes related to COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaina F Bruce
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Bridget Huysman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jinai Bharucha
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - L Stewart Massad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Mary M Mullen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Andrea R Hagemann
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Katherine C Fuh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Carolyn K McCourt
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Premal H Thaker
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Dineo Khabele
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - David G Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Lindsay M Kuroki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zamorano AS, Wilson EM, Liu J, Leon A, Kuroki LM, Thaker PH, McCourt CK, Fuh KC, Powell MA, Mutch DG, Evanoff BA, Colditz GA, Hagemann AR. Text-message-based behavioral weight loss for endometrial cancer survivors with obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:770-777. [PMID: 34140179 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ability of a personalized text-message-based intervention to increase weight loss among endometrial cancer survivors with obesity. METHODS In this randomized, controlled trial, endometrial cancer survivors with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) were randomized to a personalized SMS text-message-based weight loss intervention or enhanced usual care. Primary outcome was weight loss at 6 months; secondary outcomes were weight loss at 12 months and changes in psychosocial measures. We also compared clinical characteristics and weight change between trial participants and non-participants. RESULTS Between May 18 and December 31, 2017, 80 endometrial cancer survivors with obesity consented to participate in the randomized trial. There were no differences in clinical characteristics between the two arms. Weight changes were similar in the two arms (P = 0.08). At 6 months, no differences in quality of life, physical activity, or body image were noted. Of 358 eligible patients, 80 became trial participants and 278, non-participants. Trial participants were younger (59.3 vs. 63.4 years, P < 0.001), more likely non-white (P = 0.02), on fewer medications (4 vs. 7, P < 0.001), and had a higher median BMI (38.7 vs. 37.6 kg/m2, P = 0.01) than non-participants. Weight change was similar between participants and non-participants (P = 0.85). At 6 months, similar percentages of participants and non-participants (47.7% vs. 44.4%) had gained weight, and similar percentages (9.2% vs. 11.2%) had lost at least 5% of their body weight. CONCLUSIONS This text-message-based intervention did not increase weight loss among endometrial cancer survivors with obesity, nor did participation in the trial. Other weight management interventions should be promoted to increase weight loss. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03169023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail S Zamorano
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Elise M Wilson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Jingxia Liu
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Andrea Leon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Lindsay M Kuroki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Premal H Thaker
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Carolyn K McCourt
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Katherine C Fuh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - David G Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Bradley A Evanoff
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Andrea R Hagemann
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|