Dosimetry in molecular nuclear therapy

A comparison of four radionuclide dose calibrators using various radionuclides and measurement geometries clinically used in nuclear medicine

PURPOSE

Reliable quantification of radioactivity in nuclear medicine is becoming increasingly important in various therapeutic applications requiring a high accuracy of nuclear medicine measuring equipment, such as radionuclide calibrators. In this study the accuracy of four different radionuclide calibrators was assessed for ^99mTc, ¹¹¹In, ⁶⁸Ga and ¹⁸F for measurement geometries clinically used.

METHODS

Syringes and vials were prepared with a reference activity using a stock solution of which the activity concentration was determined using gamma-ray spectroscopy. The accuracy of four different radionuclide calibrator systems, ISOMED 2000, ISOMED 2010, VIK-202 and Capintec CRC-25R, was assessed by comparing the measured activity to the reference activity.

RESULTS

Deviations in measured activity from reference values were found up to 12.5%, 32.0%, 29.0% and 12.6% for ^99mTc, ¹¹¹In, ⁶⁸Ga and ¹⁸F, respectively. For ⁶⁸Ga all radionuclide calibrators systematically overestimated the activity by 10-20%. For ¹¹¹In, large differences in activity measurements were observed between different source geometries, in particular between syringes and vials. Deviations between radionuclide calibrator systems were found up to 11.8%, 44.4%, 14.4% and 8.7% for ^99mTc, ¹¹¹In, ⁶⁸Ga and ¹⁸F, respectively. When comparing similar syringe types of different brands filled with identical stock solution volume, deviations up to 1.8%, 5.8%, 10.2% and 3.2% were found for ^99mTc, ¹¹¹In, ⁶⁸Ga and ¹⁸F.

CONCLUSION

Substantial deviations in measured activity were found for all radionuclides and radionuclide calibrators, which may result in erroneous activity dosing and image quantification. This underlines the importance of thorough validation of radionuclide calibrators for all measurement geometries and radionuclides clinically used.

The NUKDOS software for treatment planning in molecular radiotherapy

The aim of this work was the development of a software tool for treatment planning prior to molecular radiotherapy, which comprises all functionality to objectively determine the activity to administer and the pertaining absorbed doses (including the corresponding error) based on a series of gamma camera images and one SPECT/CT or probe data. NUKDOS was developed in MATLAB. The workflow is based on the MIRD formalism For determination of the tissue or organ pharmacokinetics, gamma camera images as well as probe, urine, serum and blood activity data can be processed. To estimate the time-integrated activity coefficients (TIAC), sums of exponentials are fitted to the time activity data and integrated analytically. To obtain the TIAC on the voxel level, the voxel activity distribution from the quantitative 3D SPECT/CT (or PET/CT) is used for scaling and weighting the TIAC derived from the 2D organ data. The voxel S-values are automatically calculated based on the voxel-size of the image and the therapeutic nuclide ((90)Y, (131)I or (177)Lu). The absorbed dose coefficients are computed by convolution of the voxel TIAC and the voxel S-values. The activity to administer and the pertaining absorbed doses are determined by entering the absorbed dose for the organ at risk. The overall error of the calculated absorbed doses is determined by Gaussian error propagation. NUKDOS was tested for the operation systems Windows(®) 7 (64 Bit) and 8 (64 Bit). The results of each working step were compared to commercially available (SAAMII, OLINDA/EXM) and in-house (UlmDOS) software. The application of the software is demonstrated using examples form peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and from radioiodine therapy of benign thyroid diseases. For the example from PRRT, the calculated activity to administer differed by 4% comparing NUKDOS and the final result using UlmDos, SAAMII and OLINDA/EXM sequentially. The absorbed dose for the spleen and tumour differed by 7% and 8%, respectively. The results from the example from radioiodine therapy of benign thyroid diseases and the example given in the latest corresponding SOP were identical. The implemented, objective methods facilitate accurate and reproducible results. The software is freely available.

Comparison of somatostatin receptor agonist and antagonist for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: a pilot study

Preclinical and clinical studies have indicated that somatostatin receptor (sst)-expressing tumors demonstrate higher uptake of radiolabeled sst antagonists than of sst agonists. In 4 consecutive patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors, we evaluated whether treatment with (177)Lu-labeled sst antagonists is feasible.

METHODS

After injection of approximately 1 GBq of (177)Lu-DOTA-[Cpa-c(DCys-Aph(Hor)-DAph(Cbm)-Lys-Thr-Cys)-DTyr-NH2] ((177)Lu-DOTA-JR11) and (177)Lu-DOTATATE, 3-dimensional voxel dosimetry analysis based on SPECT/CT was performed. A higher tumor-to-organ dose ratio for (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11 than for (177)Lu-DOTATATE was the prerequisite for treatment with (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11.

RESULTS

Reversible minor adverse effects of (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11 were observed. (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11 showed a 1.7-10.6 times higher tumor dose than (177)Lu-DOTATATE. At the same time, the tumor-to-kidney and tumor-to-bone marrow dose ratio was 1.1-7.2 times higher. All 4 patients were treated with (177)Lu-DOTA-JR11, resulting in partial remission in 2 patients, stable disease in 1 patient, and mixed response in the other patient.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumors with radiolabeled sst antagonists is clinically feasible and may have a significant impact on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Differentiated thyroid cancer: a new perspective with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues for imaging and treatment of patients

BACKGROUND

The expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) in thyroid cells may offer the possibility to identify metastatic lesions and to select patients for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). We investigated (68)Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to select patients with progressive differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) for PRRT as well as treatment response and toxicity in treated patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 41 patients with progressive radioiodine-negative DTC (24 women and 17 men; mean age=54.3 years, median=59 years, range=19-78 years). In all patients, [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT was performed to determine recurrent disease with enhanced glucose metabolism, and (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT was used to identify SSTR expression. Dosimetric evaluation was performed with (111)In-DOTATOC scintigraphy. Eleven patients were treated with PRRT receiving a fractionated injection of 1.5-3.7 GBq (90)Y-DOTATOC/administration. Serial (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans were performed in all treated patients to evaluate treatment response. Parameters provided by (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT were analyzed as potential therapeutic predictors to differentiate responding from nonresponding. In all treated patients, adverse events and toxicity were recorded.

RESULTS

(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT were positive in 24/41 of radioiodine-negative DTC patients. Based on the high expression of SSTR detected by (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, 13 patients were suitable for PRRT. Two out of 13 patients were not treated due to the lack of fulfillment of other study inclusion criteria. PRRT induced disease control in 7/11 patients (two partial response and five stabilization) with a duration of response of 3.5-11.5 months. Objective response was associated with symptoms relief. Functional volume (FV) over time obtained by PET/CT was the only parameter demonstrating a significant difference between lesions responding and nonresponding to PRRT (p=0.001). Main PRRT adverse events were nausea, asthenia, and transient hematologic toxicity. One patient experienced permanent renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, SSTR imaging provided positive results in more than half of the cases with radioiodine-negative DTC, and about one third of patients were eligible for PRRT. (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT seems a reliable tool both for patient selection and evaluation of treatment response. In our experience, FV determination over time seems to represent a reliable parameter to determine tumor response to PRRT, although further investigations are needed to better define its role.