Multi-level analysis of intrinsically disordered protein docking methods

The "DDVF" motif used by viral and bacterial proteins to hijack RSK kinases mimics a short linear motif (SLiM) found in proteins related to the RAS-ERK MAP kinase pathway

Proteins of pathogens such as cardioviruses, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus, varicella zoster virus and bacteria of the genus Yersinia were previously shown to use a common "DDVF" (D/E-D/E-V-F) short linear motif (SLiM) to hijack cellular kinases of the RSK (p90 ribosomal S6 kinases) family. Notably, the leader (L) protein of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV), a cardiovirus, and protein YopM of Yersinia species were shown to act as adapters to retarget RSKs toward unconventional substrates, nucleoporins and pyrin, respectively. Remarkable conservation of the SLiM docking site targeted by pathogens' proteins in RSK sequences suggested a physiological role for this site. Using SLiM prediction tools and AlphaFold docking, we screened the human proteome for proteins that would interact with RSKs through a DDVF-like SLiM. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that two candidates previously known as RSK partners, FGFR1 and SPRED2, as well as two candidates identified as novel RSK partners, GAB3 and CNKSR2 do interact with RSKs through a similar interface as the one used by pathogens, as was recently documented for SPRED2. FGFR1 employs a DSVF motif to bind RSKs and phosphorylation of the serine in this motif slightly increased RSK binding. FGFR1, SPRED2, GAB3 and CNKSR2 act upstream of RSK in the RAS-ERK MAP kinase pathway. Analysis of ERK activation in cells expressing a mutated form of RSK lacking the DDVF-docking site suggests that RSK might interact with the DDVF-like SLiM of several partners to provide a negative feed-back to the ERK MAPK pathway. Moreover, after TMEV infection, ERK phosphorylation was altered by the L protein in a DDVF-dependent manner. Taken together, our data suggest that, in addition to retargeting RSKs toward unconventional substrates, pathogens' proteins carrying a DDVF-like motif can compete with endogenous DDVF-containing proteins for RSK binding, thereby altering the regulation of the RAS-ERK MAP kinase pathway.

Binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins: Insights from experimental studies and structural predictions

Advances in the characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) have unveiled a remarkably complex and diverse interaction landscape, including coupled folding and binding, highly dynamic complexes, multivalent interactions, and even interactions between entirely disordered proteins. Here we review recent examples of IDP binding mechanisms elucidated by experimental techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer, and stopped-flow fluorescence. These techniques provide insights into the structural details of transition pathways and complex intermediates, and they capture the dynamics of IDPs within complexes. Furthermore, we discuss the growing role of artificial intelligence, exemplified by AlphaFold, in identifying interaction sites within IDPs and predicting their bound-state structures. Our review highlights the powerful complementarity between experimental methods and artificial intelligence-based approaches in advancing our understanding of the intricate interaction landscape of IDPs.

A deep learning method for predicting interactions for intrinsically disordered regions of proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs/IDRs) adopt diverse binding modes with different partners, ranging from ordered to multivalent to fuzzy conformations in the bound state. Characterizing IDR interfaces is challenging experimentally and computationally. Alphafold-multimer and Alphafold3, the state-of-the-art structure prediction methods, are less accurate at predicting IDR binding sites at their benchmarked confidence cutoffs. Their performance improves upon lowering the confidence cutoffs. Here, we developed Disobind, a deep-learning method that predicts inter-protein contact maps and interface residues for an IDR and a partner protein, given their sequences. It outperforms AlphaFold-multimer and AlphaFold3 at multiple confidence cutoffs. Combining the Disobind and AlphaFold-multimer predictions further improves the performance. In contrast to most current methods, Disobind considers the context of the binding partner and does not depend on structures and multiple sequence alignments. Its predictions can be used to localize IDRs in integrative structures of large assemblies and characterize and modulate IDR-mediated interactions.

Two decades of advances in sequence-based prediction of MoRFs, disorder-to-order transitioning binding regions

INTRODUCTION

Molecular recognition features (MoRFs) are regions in protein sequences that undergo induced folding upon binding partner molecules. MoRFs are common in nature and can be predicted from sequences based on their distinctive sequence signatures.

AREAS COVERED

We overview 20 years of progress in the sequence-based prediction of MoRFs which resulted in the development of 25 predictors of MoRFs that interact with proteins, peptides, and lipids. These methods range from simple discriminant analysis to sophisticated deep transformer networks that use protein language models. They generate relatively accurate predictions as evidenced by the results of a recently published community-driven assessment.

EXPERT OPINION

MoRFs prediction is a mature field of research that is poised to continue at a steady pace in the foreseeable future. We anticipate further expansion of the scope of MoRF predictions to additional partner molecules, such as nucleic acids, and continued use of recent machine learning advances. Other future efforts should concentrate on improving availability of MoRF predictions by releasing, maintaining, and popularizing web servers and by depositing MoRF predictions to large databases of protein structure and function predictions. Furthermore, accurate MoRF predictions should be coupled with the equally accurate prediction and modeling of the resulting structures of complexes.

Assessment of Protein-Protein Docking Models Using Deep Learning

Protein-protein interactions are involved in almost all processes in a living cell and determine the biological functions of proteins. To obtain mechanistic understandings of protein-protein interactions, the tertiary structures of protein complexes have been determined by biophysical experimental methods, such as X-ray crystallography and cryogenic electron microscopy. However, as experimental methods are costly in resources, many computational methods have been developed that model protein complex structures. One of the difficulties in computational protein complex modeling (protein docking) is to select the most accurate models among many models that are usually generated by a docking method. This article reviews advances in protein docking model assessment methods, focusing on recent developments that apply deep learning to several network architectures.

Characterization of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins in Healthy and Diseased States by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

INTRODUCTION

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) are active in different cellular procedures like ordered assembly of chromatin and ribosomes, interaction with membrane, protein, and ligand binding, molecular recognition, binding, and transportation via nuclear pores, microfilaments and microtubules process and disassembly, protein functions, RNA chaperone, and nucleic acid binding, modulation of the central dogma, cell cycle, and other cellular activities, post-translational qualification and substitute splicing, and flexible entropic linker and management of signaling pathways.

METHODS

The intrinsic disorder is a precise structural characteristic that permits IDPs/IDPRs to be involved in both one-to-many and many-to-one signaling. IDPs/IDPRs also exert some dynamical and structural ordering, being much less constrained in their activities than folded proteins. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a major technique for the characterization of IDPs, and it can be used for dynamic and structural studies of IDPs.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

This review was carried out to discuss intrinsically disordered proteins and their different goals, as well as the importance and effectiveness of NMR in characterizing intrinsically disordered proteins in healthy and diseased states.

Molecular Docking of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Challenges and Strategies

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are a novel class of proteins that have established a significant importance and attention within a very short period of time. These proteins are essentially characterized by their inherent structural disorder, encoded mainly by their amino acid sequences. The profound abundance of IDPs and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in the biological world delineates their deep-rooted functionality. IDPs and IDRs convey such extensive functionality through their unique dynamic nature, which enables them to carry out huge number of multifaceted biomolecular interactions and make them "interaction hub" of the cellular systems. Additionally, with such widespread functions, their misfunctioning is also intimately associated with multiple diseases. Thus, understanding the dynamic heterogeneity of various IDPs along with their interactions with respective binding partners is an important field with immense potentials in biomolecular research. In this context, molecular docking-based computational approaches have proven to be remarkable in case of ordered proteins. Molecular docking methods essentially model the biomolecular interactions in both structural and energetic terms and use this information to characterize the putative interactions between the two participant molecules. However, direct applications of the conventional docking methods to study IDPs are largely limited by their structural heterogeneity and demands for unique IDP-centric strategies. Thus, in this chapter, we have presented an overview of current methodologies for successful docking operations involving IDPs and IDRs. These specialized methods majorly include the ensemble-based and fragment-based approaches with their own benefits and limitations. More recently, artificial intelligence and machine learning-assisted approaches are also used to significantly reduce the complexity and computational burden associated with various docking applications. Thus, this chapter aims to provide a comprehensive summary of major challenges and recent advancements of molecular docking approaches in the IDP field for their better utilization and greater applicability.Asp (D).

Improved Peptide Docking with Privileged Knowledge Distillation using Deep Learning

Protein-peptide interactions play a key role in biological processes. Understanding the interactions that occur within a receptor-peptide complex can help in discovering and altering their biological functions. Various computational methods for modeling the structures of receptor-peptide complexes have been developed. Recently, accurate structure prediction enabled by deep learning methods has significantly advanced the field of structural biology. AlphaFold (AF) is among the top-performing structure prediction methods and has highly accurate structure modeling performance on single-chain targets. Shortly after the release of AlphaFold, AlphaFold-Multimer (AFM) was developed in a similar fashion as AF for prediction of protein complex structures. AFM has achieved competitive performance in modeling protein-peptide interactions compared to previous computational methods; however, still further improvement is needed. Here, we present DistPepFold, which improves protein-peptide complex docking using an AFM-based architecture through a privileged knowledge distillation approach. DistPepFold leverages a teacher model that uses native interaction information during training and transfers its knowledge to a student model through a teacher-student distillation process. We evaluated DistPepFold's docking performance on two protein-peptide complex datasets and showed that DistPepFold outperforms AFM. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the student model was able to learn from the teacher model to make structural improvements based on AFM predictions.

Computational prediction of disordered binding regions

One of the key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is their ability to interact with a broad range of partner molecules. Multiple types of interacting IDRs were identified including molecular recognition fragments (MoRFs), short linear sequence motifs (SLiMs), and protein-, nucleic acids- and lipid-binding regions. Prediction of binding IDRs in protein sequences is gaining momentum in recent years. We survey 38 predictors of binding IDRs that target interactions with a diverse set of partners, such as peptides, proteins, RNA, DNA and lipids. We offer a historical perspective and highlight key events that fueled efforts to develop these methods. These tools rely on a diverse range of predictive architectures that include scoring functions, regular expressions, traditional and deep machine learning and meta-models. Recent efforts focus on the development of deep neural network-based architectures and extending coverage to RNA, DNA and lipid-binding IDRs. We analyze availability of these methods and show that providing implementations and webservers results in much higher rates of citations/use. We also make several recommendations to take advantage of modern deep network architectures, develop tools that bundle predictions of multiple and different types of binding IDRs, and work on algorithms that model structures of the resulting complexes.

AI-Based Protein Interaction Screening and Identification (AISID)

In this study, we presented an AISID method extending AlphaFold-Multimer's success in structure prediction towards identifying specific protein interactions with an optimized AISIDscore. The method was tested to identify the binding proteins in 18 human TNFSF (Tumor Necrosis Factor superfamily) members for each of 27 human TNFRSF (TNF receptor superfamily) members. For each TNFRSF member, we ranked the AISIDscore among the 18 TNFSF members. The correct pairing resulted in the highest AISIDscore for 13 out of 24 TNFRSF members which have known interactions with TNFSF members. Out of the 33 correct pairing between TNFSF and TNFRSF members, 28 pairs could be found in the top five (including 25 pairs in the top three) seats in the AISIDscore ranking. Surprisingly, the specific interactions between TNFSF10 (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, TRAIL) and its decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2 gave the highest AISIDscore in the list, while the structures of DcR1 and DcR2 are unknown. The data strongly suggests that AlphaFold-Multimer might be a useful computational screening tool to find novel specific protein bindings. This AISID method may have broad applications in protein biochemistry, extending the application of AlphaFold far beyond structure predictions.