Therapeutic goals in Fabry disease: Recommendations of a European expert panel, based on current clinical evidence with enzyme replacement therapy

Fabry-specific treatment in Australia: time to align eligibility criteria with international best practices

BACKGROUND

Disease-specific therapy aims to improve symptoms, stabilise current disease and delay progression in patients with Fabry disease. In Australia, treatment access is subject to eligibility criteria initially established in 2004. Patients and their clinicians question why these criteria have remained unchanged despite significant progress in disease understanding.

AIMS

Appraise the clinical quality of the Australian treatment access criteria.

METHODS

The Fabry Australia Medical Advisory Committee (N = 6) used the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation Global Rating Scale (AGREE II GRS) to assess the clinical quality of the current treatment eligibility criteria. They reviewed the literature, developed 17 clinical statements to help guide reforms of the eligibility criteria and achieved consensus (achievement of ≥75% agreement in the range 5-7 on a 7-point Likert scale) through anonymous voting. The findings were applied to develop proposals for revised classification and treatment initiation criteria.

RESULTS

The current treatment eligibility criteria underperformed on the AGREE II GRS. They are pragmatic but out-of-step with contemporary data. Consensus was achieved on all 17 proposed clinical statements. There was strong agreement to differentiate classical male Fabry patients to facilitate timelier access to Fabry-specific treatment. There was also agreement on the value of adopting relevant organ involvement criteria in classical female patients and patients with non-classical disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Australian access criteria are misaligned with current clinical evidence. The clinical statements and proposed classification and initiation criteria should prompt discussions to support more equitable access to treatment and better align Australian practice with contemporary evidence and international guidelines.

Fabry Disease Nephropathy: Histological Changes With Nonclassical Mutations and Genetic Variants of Unknown Significance

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked genetic disorder that causes lysosomal storage of glycosphingolipids, primarily globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and its derivative globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3), with multiorgan dysfunction including chronic kidney disease. Affected individuals may be carriers of gene variants that are of uncertain significance (GVUS). We describe kidney pathology at the early stages of FD-related kidney disease to gain insights into its association with GVUS and sex.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-five consecutively biopsied patients (aged 48.1±15.4 years, 22 females) from among 64 patients with genetically diagnosed FD. Biopsies were retrospectively screened using the International Study Group of Fabry Nephropathy Scoring System.

OBSERVATIONS

Genetic mutation type, p.N215S and D313Y, sex, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), plasma lyso-Gb3 (pLyso-Gb3) levels, and histological parameters, including Gb3 deposits were recorded. Genetic analyses showed mostly missense mutations, p.N215S variant in 15, and the "benign polymorphism" D313Y in 4 of the biopsied patients. Morphological lesions were similar for men and women except for interstitial fibrosis and arteriolar hyalinosis being more common in men. Early in their clinical course, patients with normal/mild albuminuria had podocyte, tubular, and peritubular capillary vacuoles/inclusions, and evidence of chronicity, i.e., glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy. These findings appeared to be associated with pLyso-Gb3, eGFR, and age.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and inclusion of outpatients partially based on family pedigree.

CONCLUSIONS

In early stages of kidney disease in the setting of FD, numerous histological abnormalities are present. These observations suggest that kidney biopsies early in FD may reveal activity of kidney involvement that may inform clinical management.

Genetic Causes of Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases: A Practical Guide for Neurologists

Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) includes various entities affecting the brain and, often, systemic small arteries, arterioles, venules, and capillaries. The underlying causes of CSVD are different, and some of them are genetic. Monogenic CSVDs are responsible for 1%-5% of all strokes and for several other disturbances. Despite many genes being involved, the phenotypes of monogenic CSVD partly overlap. Given that the genetic testing for different diseases can be challenging and time-consuming, the practicing neurologist should be adequately informed of the genetic background of CSVD and should be able to select patients to undergo genetic assessment and the genes to be analyzed. The purpose of this review was to summarize clinical, neurologic and non-neurologic, and neuroimaging features of monogenic CSVD and to provide a flowchart to be used in clinical practice to guide neurologists in this field. The proposed flowchart and the relative tables can be applied to 3 different settings, depending on the presentation: (1) ischemic stroke and/or transient ischemic attack, (2) cerebral hemorrhage, and (3) other neurologic, non-neurologic, and/or neuroimaging features of monogenic CSVD, in the absence of stroke syndromes because of infarction or hemorrhage.

An expert consensus on practical clinical recommendations and guidance for patients with classic Fabry disease

Fabry disease is an X-linked inherited lysosomal disorder that causes accumulation of glycosphingolipids in body fluids and tissues, leading to progressive organ damage and reduced life expectancy. It can affect both males and females and can be classified into classic or later-onset phenotypes. In classic Fabry disease, α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) activity is absent or severely reduced and disease manifestations have an early onset that can affect multiple organs. In contrast, in later-onset Fabry disease, patients have residual α-Gal A activity and clinical features are primarily confined to the heart. Individualized therapeutic goals in Fabry disease are required due to varying phenotypes and patient characteristics, and the wide spectrum of disease severity. An international group of expert physicians convened to discuss and develop practical clinical recommendations for disease- and organ-specific therapeutic goals in Fabry disease, based on expert consensus and evidence identified through a structured literature review. Biomarkers reflecting involvement of various organs in adult patients with classic Fabry disease are discussed and consensus recommendations for disease- and organ-specific therapeutic goals are provided. These consensus recommendations should support the establishment of individualized approaches to the management of patients with classic Fabry disease by considering identification, diagnosis, and initiation of disease-specific therapies before significant organ involvement, as well as routine monitoring, to reduce morbidity, optimize patient care, and improve patient health-related quality of life.

The Impact of Kidney Biopsy for Fabry Nephropathy Evaluation on Patients’ Management and Long-Term Outcomes: Experience of a Single Center

Background: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare lysosomal storage disease causing progressive loss of target organ function. All renal cell types are involved from the early stages, even before clinical signs can be detected. FD-specific therapies can stop/mitigate disease progression. Thus, it is important to validate early markers of renal lesions so that they can be adopted as criteria for timely treatment initiation. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed and extensively evaluated 21 FD case patients; this evaluation included a kidney biopsy. We looked for the influence of pathological findings on the management of FD patients. In addition, we investigated the association between general and FD-specific features and long-term patients’ outcomes. We defined a combined endpoint as being at least one of the following: 50% decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, kidney failure (KF), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or death and mortality. Results: Our cohort of 21 FD patients (11 males and 10 females) was stratified according to the presence of the combined endpoint: group 1 (n = 15) included patients without the combined endpoint, while group 2 (n = 6) patients reached the combined endpoint outcome. Patients from group 2 presented lower mean baseline eGFR (72.2 ± 38.7 mL/min/1.73 m² vs. 82.5 ± 26.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) without statistical significance (p = 0.44), but significantly (p = 0.22) higher median baseline proteinuria (2.7 g/24 h vs. 0.4 g/24 h). Specific lysosomal deposits were identified in all patients. Segmental sclerosis was present in all patients with the combined endpoint and in only 33% of patients without the combined endpoint (p = 0.009). Global sclerosis and interstitial fibrosis were present in both groups, with no significant differences. A total of 15 out of the 16 treatment-naïve patients (7 males and 9 females) started FD-specific therapy after kidney biopsy. Treatment was initiated in all male FD patients and in 8 female patients. In 2 females, pathological findings in kidney biopsy offered important reasons to start FD treatment, although specific criteria of the Romanian protocol for prescription of FD-specific therapy were still not fulfilled. Cox univariate analysis showed that every increase in 24 h proteinuria with 1 g is associated with a 65% risk of developing the combined endpoint (HR = 1.65; 95%CI: 1.05–2.58; p = 0.02), and that the presence of segmental sclerosis increased the risk of developing the combined endpoint by 51.3 times (HR = 51.3; 95% CI: 95% CI: 1.67–103.5; p = 0.01). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the cumulative risk of developing the combined endpoint was higher in patients in whom segmental sclerosis (100% vs. 0%, log-rank test, p = 0.03) was present. Conclusions: Histological evaluation is an important tool for the detection of early kidney involvement and provides additional support to the early initiation of FD-specific therapy. Presence of segmental sclerosis can predict the long-term outcomes of kidney disease deterioration and mortality and may be used as an early indicator of disease progression. Additionally, in the absence of other criteria according to current guidelines, specific FD renal lesions as revealed by kidney biopsy might become a distinct criterion to initiate FD therapy.

Gene variants of unknown significance in Fabry disease: Clinical characteristics of c.376A>G (p.Ser126Gly)

Background

Anderson–Fabry disease (FD) is an X‐linked lysosomal storage disorder with varying organ involvement and symptoms, depending on the underlying mutation in the alpha‐galactosidase A gene (HGNC: GLA). With genetic testing becoming more readily available, it is crucial to precisely evaluate pathogenicity of each genetic variant, in order to determine whether there is or might be not a need for FD‐specific therapy in affected patients and relatives at the time point of presentation or in the future.

Methods

This case series investigates the clinical impact of the specific GLA gene variant c.376A>G (p.Ser126Gly) in five (one heterozygous and one homozygous female, three males) individuals from different families, who visited our center between 2009 and 2021. Comprehensive neurological, nephrological and cardiac examinations were performed in all cases. One patient received a follow‐up examination after 12 years.

Results

Index events leading to suspicion of FD were mainly unspecific neurological symptoms. However, FD‐specific biomarkers, imaging examinations (i.e., brain MRI, heart MRI), and tissue‐specific diagnostics, including kidney and skin biopsies, did not reveal evidence for FD‐specific symptoms or organ involvement but showed normal results in all cases. This includes findings from 12‐year follow‐up in one patient with renal biopsy.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that p.Ser126Gly represents a benign GLA gene variant which per se does not cause FD. Precise clinical evaluation in individuals diagnosed with genetic variations of unknown significance should be performed to distinguish common symptoms broadly prevalent in the general population from those secondary to FD.

Treatment of Anderson-Fabry Disease

Fabry disease is an X-linked disorder of glycosphingolipid metabolism that results in progressive accumulation of neutral glycosphingolipids, predominantly globotriaosylsphingosine (Gb3) in lysosomes, as well as other cellular compartments of several tissues, causing multi-organ manifestations (acroparesthesias, hypohidrosis, angiokeratomas, signs and symptoms of cardiac, renal, cerebrovascular involvement). Pathogenic mutations lead to a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme alpha-galactosidase A (GLA). In the presence of high clinical suspicion, a careful physical examination and specific laboratory tests are required. Finally, the diagnosis of Fabry's disease is confirmed by the demonstration of the absence of or reduced alpha-galactosidase A enzyme activity in hemizygous men and gene typing in heterozygous females. Measurement of the biomarkers Gb3 and Lyso Gb3 in biological specimens may facilitate diagnosis. The current treatment of Anderson-Fabry disease is represented by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and oral pharmacological chaperone. Future treatments are based on new strategic approaches such as stem cell-based therapy, pharmacological approaches chaperones, mRNA therapy, and viral gene therapy. This review outlines the current therapeutic approaches and emerging treatment strategies for Anderson-Fabry disease.

[Fabry disease: A review]

Fabry disease is the second most frequent lysosomal storage disorder. It is a X-linked genetic disease secondary to alpha-galactosidase A enzyme deficiency. This is a progressive and systemic disease that affects both males and females. Classical symptoms and organ involvements are acral pain crisis, cornea verticillata, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stroke and chronic kidney disease with proteinuria. Nevertheless, organ damages can be missing or pauci-symptomatic and other common symptoms are poorly recognised, such as gastrointestinal or ear involvement. In classical Fabry disease, symptoms first appear during childhood or teenage in males, but later in females. Patients may have non-classical or late-onset Fabry disease with delayed manifestations or with single-organ involvement. Recognition of Fabry disease is important because treatments are available, but it may be challenging. Diagnosis is easy in males, with dosage of alpha-galactosidase A enzyme activity into leukocytes, but more difficult in females who can express normal residual activity. Other plasmatic biomarkers, such as lyso-globotriaosylceramide (lyso-Gb3), are interesting in females, but need to be associated with GLA gene analysis. In this review, we aimed at summarize the main clinical manifestations of Fabry disease and propose a practical algorithm to know how to diagnose this complex disease.

When and How to Diagnose Fabry Disease in Clinical Pratice

Fabry disease is a frequent lysosomal storage disorder secondary to the deficiency of alpha-galactosidase A enzyme. This X-linked genetic disease realizes progressive and systemic manifestations that affect both male and female. Fabry disease may present as "classical", as "late-onset" or "non-classical" forms. Symptoms and organ involvements of classical Fabry disease are acral pain crisis, cornea verticillata, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stroke and chronic kidney disease with proteinuria. Other common symptoms are often poorly recognized, such as gastrointestinal or ear involvements. In classical Fabry disease, symptoms first appear during childhood or during teenage years in males, but later in females. Patients with non-classical or late-onset Fabry disease have delayed manifestations or a single-organ involvement. Diagnosis is therefore difficult when classical organ involvements are missing, in paucisymptomatic patients or in late-onset forms. Recognition of Fabry disease is important because effective treatments are available. They have to be prescribed early. In male, diagnosis is made with alpha-galactosidase A enzyme activity dosage in leukocyte, that is very low or null in classical forms and under 30 percent in late-onset forms. Diagnosis is more challenging in females who may express normal residual enzyme activity. Other plasmatic biomarkers, such as lyso-globotriaosylceramide are interesting, especially in females. In this review, we aimed to summarize main clinical manifestations of Fabry disease to know when to evoke Fabry disease and propose a practical diagnosis algorithm to know how to diagnose.