ModelRevelator: Fast phylogenetic model estimation via deep learning

An efficient deep learning method for amino acid substitution model selection

Amino acid substitution models play an important role in studying the evolutionary relationships among species from protein sequences. The amino acid substitution model consists of a large number of parameters; therefore, it is estimated from hundreds or thousands of alignments. Both general models and clade-specific models have been estimated and widely used in phylogenetic analyses. The maximum likelihood method is normally used to select the best-fit model for a specific protein alignment under the study. A number of studies have discussed theoretical concerns as well as the computational burden of the maximum likelihood methods in model selection. Recently, machine learning methods have been proposed for selecting nucleotide models. In this article, we propose a method to measure substitution rates among amino acids (called summary statistics) from protein alignments to efficiently train a deep learning network of so-called ModelDetector for detecting amino acid substitution models. The ModelDetector network was trained from 2,246,400 alignments on a computer with eight cores (without GPU) in about 3.3 hr. Experiments on simulation data showed that the accuracy of the ModelDetector was comparable with that of the maximum likelihood method ModelFinder. It was orders of magnitude faster than the maximum likelihood method in inferring amino acid substitution models and able to analyze genome alignments with millions of sites in minutes. The results indicate that the deep learning network can play as a promising tool for amino acid substitution model selection.

Machine learning can be as good as maximum likelihood when reconstructing phylogenetic trees and determining the best evolutionary model on four taxon alignments

Phylogenetic tree reconstruction with molecular data is important in many fields of life science research. The gold standard in this discipline is the phylogenetic tree reconstruction based on the Maximum Likelihood method. In this study, we present neural networks to predict the best model of sequence evolution and the correct topology for four sequence alignments of nucleotide or amino acid sequence data. We trained neural networks with different architectures using simulated alignments for a wide range of evolutionary models, model parameters and branch lengths. By comparing the accuracy of model and topology prediction of the trained neural networks with Maximum Likelihood and Neighbour Joining methods, we show that for quartet trees, the neural network classifier outperforms the Neighbour Joining method and is in most cases as good as the Maximum Likelihood method to infer the best model of sequence evolution and the best tree topology. These results are consistent for nucleotide and amino acid sequence data. We also show that our method is superior for model selection than previously published methods based on convolutionary networks. Furthermore, we found that neural network classifiers are much faster than the IQ-TREE implementation of the Maximum Likelihood method. Our results show that neural networks could become a true competitor for the Maximum Likelihood method in phylogenetic reconstructions.

Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology

Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionize many aspects of science, including the study of evolutionary morphology. While classical AI methods such as principal component analysis and cluster analysis have been commonplace in the study of evolutionary morphology for decades, recent years have seen increasing application of deep learning to ecology and evolutionary biology. As digitized specimen databases become increasingly prevalent and openly available, AI is offering vast new potential to circumvent long-standing barriers to rapid, big data analysis of phenotypes. Here, we review the current state of AI methods available for the study of evolutionary morphology, which are most developed in the area of data acquisition and processing. We introduce the main available AI techniques, categorizing them into 3 stages based on their order of appearance: (1) machine learning, (2) deep learning, and (3) the most recent advancements in large-scale models and multimodal learning. Next, we present case studies of existing approaches using AI for evolutionary morphology, including image capture and segmentation, feature recognition, morphometrics, and phylogenetics. We then discuss the prospectus for near-term advances in specific areas of inquiry within this field, including the potential of new AI methods that have not yet been applied to the study of morphological evolution. In particular, we note key areas where AI remains underutilized and could be used to enhance studies of evolutionary morphology. This combination of current methods and potential developments has the capacity to transform the evolutionary analysis of the organismal phenotype into evolutionary phenomics, leading to an era of "big data" that aligns the study of phenotypes with genomics and other areas of bioinformatics.

Applications of machine learning in phylogenetics

Machine learning has increasingly been applied to a wide range of questions in phylogenetic inference. Supervised machine learning approaches that rely on simulated training data have been used to infer tree topologies and branch lengths, to select substitution models, and to perform downstream inferences of introgression and diversification. Here, we review how researchers have used several promising machine learning approaches to make phylogenetic inferences. Despite the promise of these methods, several barriers prevent supervised machine learning from reaching its full potential in phylogenetics. We discuss these barriers and potential paths forward. In the future, we expect that the application of careful network designs and data encodings will allow supervised machine learning to accommodate the complex processes that continue to confound traditional phylogenetic methods.

A machine-learning-based alternative to phylogenetic bootstrap

MOTIVATION

Currently used methods for estimating branch support in phylogenetic analyses often rely on the classic Felsenstein's bootstrap, parametric tests, or their approximations. As these branch support scores are widely used in phylogenetic analyses, having accurate, fast, and interpretable scores is of high importance.

RESULTS

Here, we employed a data-driven approach to estimate branch support values with a probabilistic interpretation. To this end, we simulated thousands of realistic phylogenetic trees and the corresponding multiple sequence alignments. Each of the obtained alignments was used to infer the phylogeny using state-of-the-art phylogenetic inference software, which was then compared to the true tree. Using these extensive data, we trained machine-learning algorithms to estimate branch support values for each bipartition within the maximum-likelihood trees obtained by each software. Our results demonstrate that our model provides fast and more accurate probability-based branch support values than commonly used procedures. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach on empirical datasets.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

The data supporting this work are available in the Figshare repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25050554.v1, and the underlying code is accessible via GitHub at https://github.com/noaeker/bootstrap_repo.

Common Methods for Phylogenetic Tree Construction and Their Implementation in R

A phylogenetic tree can reflect the evolutionary relationships between species or gene families, and they play a critical role in modern biological research. In this review, we summarize common methods for constructing phylogenetic trees, including distance methods, maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and tree-integration methods (supermatrix and supertree). Here we discuss the advantages, shortcomings, and applications of each method and offer relevant codes to construct phylogenetic trees from molecular data using packages and algorithms in R. This review aims to provide comprehensive guidance and reference for researchers seeking to construct phylogenetic trees while also promoting further development and innovation in this field. By offering a clear and concise overview of the different methods available, we hope to enable researchers to select the most appropriate approach for their specific research questions and datasets.

Phylogenetic reconciliation: making the most of genomes to understand microbial ecology and evolution

In recent years, phylogenetic reconciliation has emerged as a promising approach for studying microbial ecology and evolution. The core idea is to model how gene trees evolve along a species tree and to explain differences between them via evolutionary events including gene duplications, transfers, and losses. Here, we describe how phylogenetic reconciliation provides a natural framework for studying genome evolution and highlight recent applications including ancestral gene content inference, the rooting of species trees, and the insights into metabolic evolution and ecological transitions they yield. Reconciliation analyses have elucidated the evolution of diverse microbial lineages, from Chlamydiae to Asgard archaea, shedding light on ecological adaptation, host-microbe interactions, and symbiotic relationships. However, there are many opportunities for broader application of the approach in microbiology. Continuing improvements to make reconciliation models more realistic and scalable, and integration of ecological metadata such as habitat, pH, temperature, and oxygen use offer enormous potential for understanding the rich tapestry of microbial life.