Effects of single and repeated exposure to biocidal active substances on the barrier function of the skin in vitro

A comparative study of the in vitro dermal absorption of radiolabeled benzophenone through human skin

Octocrylene is a common sun filter ingredient used to protect the skin from damaging UV rays. Benzophenone is an impurity found in formulations containing octocrylene. [14C]-Benzophenone was spiked (0.1 g/L) into 2 commercial sunscreen formulations; Neutrogena® Beach Defense Sunscreen Spray Broad Spectrum SPF 70 Aerosol, Neutrogena® Ultra Sheer Body Mist Sunscreen Broad Spectrum SPF 30 Aerosol, and an acetone vehicle. The formulations were applied (ca 2 μL/cm2) to dermatomed human skin mounted in static diffusion cells in vitro. Receptor fluid was collected up to 24 h post dose. All samples were analyzed by liquid scintillation counting. The dermal delivery of [14C]-Benzophenone was 10.02, 9.04 and 5.19% for the 3 formulations. However, the [14C]-Benzophenone mass balances were low; 81.5, 85.3 and 8.02%, respectively. A volatility test was performed replacing skin with aluminum foil for the sunscreen formulations only. The [14C]-Benzophenone mass balance at dosing was 99% but fell to 56.9 and 60.6% at 24 h post dose, confirming the losses were due to [14C]-Benzophenone volatility. A conservative dermal absorption value of 12.42% was proposed to cover [14C]-Benzophenone containing formulations.

Skin barrier function for regulatory skin absorption tests and effects on testosterone and sucrose absorption

In vitro absorption through human skin is a critical component in the safety assessment of chemicals, crop protection products, consumer healthcare products and cosmetics. A barrier integrity assay is used to identify skin samples which are potentially damaged. A retrospective analysis of 9978 electrical resistance (ER) measurements generated in a single laboratory (DTL) over a 15-year period was performed. Skin absorption experiments were performed using two model penetrants, testosterone and sucrose, utilising no ER acceptance criteria, and the results assessed. Using a barrier integrity test, to remove potentially damaged samples, was offset against one that can be used to remove intact skin samples with a poorer barrier function (i.e. false positives). The previously identified barrier integrity limit (10 kΩ for a 2.54 cm2 diffusion cell; Davies et al., 2004) was demonstrated to identify half of all samples tested, many of which would be false positive samples. This retrospective analysis identified 5.0 kΩ (17.5th percentile) as an acceptance criterion for a 2.54 cm2 diffusion cell, whilst not considerably changing results generated in skin absorption studies. This was confirmed from the cumulative absorption of the model penetrants tested. Using this limit would, therefore, provide suitable skin samples for regulatory skin absorption studies.

Dermatologic reactions to disinfectant use during the COVID-19 pandemic

Infection preventive practice of using disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2 has become the new normal due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although disinfectants may not be applied directly to the human body, it remains at high risk of exposure including close skin contact on disinfected surfaces or during handling. This dermal contact, on a regular basis, can induce hazardous skin reactions like irritation, inflammation, and burning in severe conditions. Disinfectants are germicide chemicals that can penetrate the skin and create skin reactions that are usually regarded as irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. More importantly, disinfectants can react with skin components (proteins and lipids) to facilitate their skin penetration and disrupt the skin barrier function. Whereas the antimicrobial actions of disinfectants are well understood, much less is known regarding their dermatologic reactions, including but not limited to irritation and hypersensitivity. We reviewed the skin reactions created by those disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2 approved by the European Chemical Agency and the US Environmental Protection Agency.

The Tritiated Water Skin Barrier Integrity Test: Considerations for Acceptance Criteria with and Without 14C-Octanol

PURPOSE

A study was designed to assess barrier integrity simultaneously using separate compounds (probes) for polar and non-polar pathways through the skin, ³H₂O and ¹⁴C-octanol, respectively; and to determine whether the two probe approach could better define barrier integrity.

METHODS

A 5-min dose of water containing ³H₂O and ¹⁴C -octanol was applied to ex vivo human skin mounted in Franz diffusion cells. The receptor solution was sampled at 30 min, analyzed for ³H and ¹⁴C content, and the correlation between water and octanol absorption was determined by statistical tests suitable for non-normally distributed data. This study was conducted on skin from 37 donors with from 3 to 30 replicate skin sections per donor (a total of 426 sections).

RESULTS

The correlation between ³H₂O and ¹⁴C-octanol absorption was low (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.3485). The ³H₂O absorption cutoff used in this study to select for a normal skin barrier rejected some sections in which ¹⁴C-octanol absorption was within normal limits and accepted others in which ¹⁴C-octanol absorption was abnormally high. The converse was true for ³H₂O absorption when the ¹⁴C-octanol-based cutoff was used.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the ³H₂O test or of similar tests that primarily assess the permeability of polar pathways through the skin may not necessarily provide information relevant to the absorption of highly lipophilic compounds. Octanol, or another molecule that more closely matches the physicochemical attributes of the test compound, may characterize properties of the skin barrier that are more relevant to compounds of low water solubility.

Absorption of chemicals through compromised skin

Skin is an important route of entry for many chemicals in the work place. To assess systemic uptake of a chemical in contact with the skin, quantitative information on dermal absorption rates of chemicals is needed. Absorption rates are mainly obtained from studies performed with intact, healthy skin. At the work place, however, a compromised skin barrier, although not necessarily visible is common, e.g. due to physical and chemical damage. As reviewed in this article, there are several lines of evidence that reduced integrity of the skin barrier may increase dermal absorption of chemicals in the occupational setting. An impaired skin barrier might lead not only to enhanced absorption of a specific chemical, but also to entrance of larger molecules such as proteins and nanoparticles which normally are not able to penetrate intact skin. In addition to environmental influences, there is increasing evidence that some individuals have an intrinsically affected skin barrier which will facilitate entrance of chemicals into and through the skin making these persons more susceptible for local as well for systemic toxicity. This review addresses mechanisms of barrier alteration caused by the most common skin-damaging factors in the occupational settings and the consequences for dermal absorption of chemicals. Furthermore, this review emphasizes the importance of maintained barrier properties of the skin.

Effect of chronic topical exposure to low-dose noxious chemicals and stress on skin sensitivity in mice

It has been suggested that the recent increase in inflammatory diseases is related to an increase in environmental chemicals and psychiatric stress. To investigate the effect of chronic topical exposure to chemicals and isolation stress, low-dose formalin (a mild contact sensitizer and an irritant), 2,4,6-trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB; a potent contact sensitizer) and sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS; an irritant) were applied to mouse ears at 7-d intervals under no-stress or stress conditions. Skin reactions (ear swelling) elicited by formalin and TNCB increased time dependently. At the chronic stage, a significant skin reaction peaking at 1 h after application was elicited on the formalin-treated sites, while a shift from a delayed-type hypersensitivity to an immediate-type response was observed on the TNCB-treated sites. At the formalin-treated sites, genes related to neurogenic inflammation, i.e., bradykinin (BK) B2 receptor, IL-6, and membrane metallo endopeptidase (NEP) mRNA were upregulated. In the TNCB-treated sites, marked upregulation of IFN-gamma, IL-1beta, IL-4, and IL-6 mRNA was observed in addition to B2 receptor mRNA. Pretreatment with HOE140, the B2 receptor antagonist suppressed these skin reactions. Increased skin sensitivity to an unrelated chemical, ethanol, and thermal stimuli were elicited in formalin and TNCB-treated mice. Cortisol levels in formalin-treated mice and IgE levels in TNCB-treated mice were elevated respectively. Stress markedly amplified the skin reactions and gene expression related to neurogenic inflammation. SLS did not induce any changes. It was concluded that chronic topical exposure to low-dose noxious chemicals and stress could easily induce skin sensitivity relating to the BK-B2 pathway and nociceptive sensitization reflecting neural sensitization.