Identification of structure–activity relationships for adverse effects of pharmaceuticals in humans. Part A: Use of FDA post-market reports to create a database of hepatobiliary and urinary tract toxicities

MultiCASE Platform for In Silico Toxicology

Predictive and computational toxicology, a highly scientific and research-based field, is rapidly progressing with wider acceptance by regulatory agencies around the world. Almost every aspect of the field has seen fundamental changes during the last decade due to the availability of more data, usage, and acceptance of a variety of predictive tools and an increase in the overall awareness. Also, the influence from the recent explosive developments in the field of artificial intelligence has been significant. However, the need for sophisticated, easy to use and well-maintained software platforms for in silico toxicological assessments remains very high. The MultiCASE suite of software is one such platform that consists of an integrated collection of software programs, tools, and databases. While providing easy-to-use and highly useful tools that are relevant at present, it has always remained at the forefront of research and development by inventing new technologies and discovering new insights in the area of QSAR, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. This chapter gives the background, an overview of the software and databases involved, and a brief description of the usage methodology with the aid of examples.

In Silico Models for Hepatotoxicity

In this chapter, we review the state of the art of predicting human hepatotoxicity using in silico techniques. There has been significant progress in this area over the past 20 years but there are still some challenges ahead. Principally, these challenges are our partial understanding of a very complex biochemical system and our ability to emulate that in a predictive capacity. Here, we provide an overview of the published modeling approaches in this area to date and discuss their design, strengths and weaknesses. It is interesting to note the diversity in modeling approaches, whether they be statistical algorithms or evidenced-based approaches including structural alerts and pharmacophore models. Irrespective of modeling approach, it appears a common theme of access to appropriate, relevant, and high-quality data is a limitation to all and is likely to continue to be the focus of future research.

In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: current status and future needs in predicting liver toxicity

Hepatotoxicity is one of the most frequently observed adverse effects resulting from exposure to a xenobiotic. For example, in pharmaceutical research and development it is one of the major reasons for drug withdrawals, clinical failures, and discontinuation of drug candidates. The development of faster and cheaper methods to assess hepatotoxicity that are both more sustainable and more informative is critically needed. The biological mechanisms and processes underpinning hepatotoxicity are summarized and experimental approaches to support the prediction of hepatotoxicity are described, including toxicokinetic considerations. The paper describes the increasingly important role of in silico approaches and highlights challenges to the adoption of these methods including the lack of a commonly agreed upon protocol for performing such an assessment and the need for in silico solutions that take dose into consideration. A proposed framework for the integration of in silico and experimental information is provided along with a case study describing how computational methods have been used to successfully respond to a regulatory question concerning non-genotoxic impurities in chemically synthesized pharmaceuticals.

Machine-Learning Prediction of Oral Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) via Multiple Features and Endpoints

Drug discovery is a costly process which usually takes more than 10 years and billions of dollars for one successful drug to enter the market. Despite all the safety tests, drugs may still cause adverse reactions and be restricted in use or even withdrawn from the market. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the major adverse drug reactions, and computational models may be used to predict and reduce it. To assess the computational prediction performance of DILI, we curated DILI endpoints from three databases and prepared drug features including chemical descriptors, therapeutic classifications, gene expressions, and binding proteins. We trained machine-learning models to predict the various DILI endpoints using different drug features. Using the optimal feature sets, the top-performing models obtained areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) around 0.8 for some DILI endpoints. We found that some features, including therapeutic classifications and proteins, have good prediction performance towards DILI. We also discovered that the severity of DILI endpoints as well as the selection of negative samples may significantly affect the prediction results. Overall, our study provided a comprehensive collection, curation, and prediction of DILI endpoints using various drug features, which may help the drug researchers to better understand and prevent DILI during the drug discovery process.

Assessment of the cardiovascular adverse effects of drug-drug interactions through a combined analysis of spontaneous reports and predicted drug-target interactions

Adverse drug effects (ADEs) are one of the leading causes of death in developed countries and are the main reason for drug recalls from the market, whereas the ADEs that are associated with action on the cardiovascular system are the most dangerous and widespread. The treatment of human diseases often requires the intake of several drugs, which can lead to undesirable drug-drug interactions (DDIs), thus causing an increase in the frequency and severity of ADEs. An evaluation of DDI-induced ADEs is a nontrivial task and requires numerous experimental and clinical studies. Therefore, we developed a computational approach to assess the cardiovascular ADEs of DDIs. This approach is based on the combined analysis of spontaneous reports (SRs) and predicted drug-target interactions to estimate the five cardiovascular ADEs that are induced by DDIs, namely, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, ventricular tachycardia, cardiac failure, and arterial hypertension. We applied a method based on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression to SRs for the identification of interacting pairs of drugs causing corresponding ADEs, as well as noninteracting pairs of drugs. As a result, five datasets containing, on average, 3100 potentially ADE-causing and non-ADE-causing drug pairs were created. The obtained data, along with information on the interaction of drugs with 1553 human targets predicted by PASS Targets software, were used to create five classification models using the Random Forest method. The average area under the ROC curve of the obtained models, sensitivity, specificity and balanced accuracy were 0.837, 0.764, 0.754 and 0.759, respectively. The predicted drug targets were also used to hypothesize the potential mechanisms of DDI-induced ventricular tachycardia for the top-scoring drug pairs. The created five classification models can be used for the identification of drug combinations that are potentially the most or least dangerous for the cardiovascular system.

A critical review of adverse effects to the kidney: mechanisms, data sources, and in silico tools to assist prediction

INTRODUCTION

The kidney is a major target for toxicity elicited by pharmaceuticals and environmental pollutants. Standard testing which often does not investigate underlying mechanisms has proven not to be an adequate hazard assessment approach. As such, there is an opportunity for the application of computational approaches that utilize multiscale data based on the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) paradigm, coupled with an understanding of the chemistry underpinning the molecular initiating event (MIE) to provide a deep understanding of how structural fragments of molecules relate to specific mechanisms of nephrotoxicity. Aims covered: The aim of this investigation was to review the current scientific landscape related to computational methods, including mechanistic data, AOPs, publicly available knowledge bases and current in silico models, for the assessment of pharmaceuticals and other chemicals with regard to their potential to elicit nephrotoxicity. A list of over 250 nephrotoxicants enriched with, where possible, mechanistic and AOP-derived understanding was compiled. Expert opinion: Whilst little mechanistic evidence has been translated into AOPs, this review identified a number of data sources of in vitro, in vivo, and human data that may assist in the development of in silico models which in turn may shed light on the interrelationships between nephrotoxicity mechanisms.

Predicting drug-induced liver injury in human with Naïve Bayes classifier approach

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the major safety concerns in drug development. Although various toxicological studies assessing DILI risk have been developed, these methods were not sufficient in predicting DILI in humans. Thus, developing new tools and approaches to better predict DILI risk in humans has become an important and urgent task. In this study, we aimed to develop a computational model for assessment of the DILI risk with using a larger scale human dataset and Naïve Bayes classifier. The established Naïve Bayes prediction model was evaluated by 5-fold cross validation and an external test set. For the training set, the overall prediction accuracy of the 5-fold cross validation was 94.0 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 97.1, 89.2, 93.5 and 95.1 %, respectively. The test set with the concordance of 72.6 %, sensitivity of 72.5 %, specificity of 72.7 %, positive predictive value of 80.4 %, negative predictive value of 63.2 %. Furthermore, some important molecular descriptors related to DILI risk and some toxic/non-toxic fragments were identified. Thus, we hope the prediction model established here would be employed for the assessment of human DILI risk, and the obtained molecular descriptors and substructures should be taken into consideration in the design of new candidate compounds to help medicinal chemists rationally select the chemicals with the best prospects to be effective and safe.

Key Challenges and Opportunities Associated with the Use of In Vitro Models to Detect Human DILI: Integrated Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plans

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major cause of late-stage clinical drug attrition, market withdrawal, black-box warnings, and acute liver failure. Consequently, it has been an area of focus for toxicologists and clinicians for several decades. In spite of considerable efforts, limited improvements in DILI prediction have been made and efforts to improve existing preclinical models or develop new test systems remain a high priority. While prediction of intrinsic DILI has improved, identifying compounds with a risk for idiosyncratic DILI (iDILI) remains extremely challenging because of the lack of a clear mechanistic understanding and the multifactorial pathogenesis of idiosyncratic drug reactions. Well-defined clinical diagnostic criteria and risk factors are also missing. This paper summarizes key data interpretation challenges, practical considerations, model limitations, and the need for an integrated risk assessment. As demonstrated through selected initiatives to address other types of toxicities, opportunities exist however for improvement, especially through better concerted efforts at harmonization of current, emerging and novel in vitro systems or through the establishment of strategies for implementation of preclinical DILI models across the pharmaceutical industry. Perspectives on the incorporation of newer technologies and the value of precompetitive consortia to identify useful practices are also discussed.

Computational Models for Human and Animal Hepatotoxicity with a Global Application Scope

Hepatic toxicity is a key concern for novel pharmaceutical drugs since it is difficult to anticipate in preclinical models, and it can originate from pharmacologically unrelated drug effects, such as pathway interference, metabolism, and drug accumulation. Because liver toxicity still ranks among the top reasons for drug attrition, the reliable prediction of adverse hepatic effects is a substantial challenge in drug discovery and development. To this end, more effort needs to be focused on the development of improved predictive in-vitro and in-silico approaches. Current computational models often lack applicability to novel pharmaceutical candidates, typically due to insufficient coverage of the chemical space of interest, which is either imposed by size or diversity of the training data. Hence, there is an urgent need for better computational models to allow for the identification of safe drug candidates and to support experimental design. In this context, a large data set comprising 3712 compounds with liver related toxicity findings in humans and animals was collected from various sources. The complex pathology was clustered into 21 preclinical and human hepatotoxicity endpoints, which were organized into three levels of detail. Support vector machine models were trained for each endpoint, using optimized descriptor sets from chemometrics software. The optimized global human hepatotoxicity model has high sensitivity (68%) and excellent specificity (95%) in an internal validation set of 221 compounds. Models for preclinical endpoints performed similarly. To allow for reliable prediction of "truly external" novel compounds, all predictions are tagged with confidence parameters. These parameters are derived from a statistical analysis of the predictive probability densities. The whole approach was validated for an external validation set of 269 proprietary compounds. The models are fully integrated into our early safety in-silico workflow.

Data Mining FAERS to Analyze Molecular Targets of Drugs Highly Associated with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome

Drug features that are associated with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) have not been fully characterized. A molecular target analysis of the drugs associated with SJS in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) may contribute to mechanistic insights into SJS pathophysiology. The publicly available version of FAERS was analyzed to identify disproportionality among the molecular targets, metabolizing enzymes, and transporters for drugs associated with SJS. The FAERS in-house version was also analyzed for an internal comparison of the drugs most highly associated with SJS. Cyclooxygenases 1 and 2, carbonic anhydrase 2, and sodium channel 2 alpha were identified as disproportionately associated with SJS. Cytochrome P450 (CYPs) 3A4 and 2C9 are disproportionately represented as metabolizing enzymes of the drugs associated with SJS adverse event reports. Multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP-1), organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1), and PEPT2 were also identified and are highly associated with the transport of these drugs. A detailed review of the molecular targets identifies important roles for these targets in immune response. The association with CYP metabolizing enzymes suggests that reactive metabolites and oxidative stress may have a contributory role. Drug transporters may enhance intracellular tissue concentrations and also have vital physiologic roles that impact keratinocyte proliferation and survival. Data mining FAERS may be used to hypothesize mechanisms for adverse drug events by identifying molecular targets that are highly associated with drug-induced adverse events. The information gained may contribute to systems biology disease models.

In Silico Models for Hepatotoxicity

In this chapter we review the challenges of predicting human hepatotoxicity. Principally, this is our partial understanding of a very complex biochemical system and our ability to emulate that in a predictive capacity. We give an overview of the published modeling approaches in this area to date and discuss their design, strengths, and weaknesses. It is interesting to note the shift during the period of this review in the direction of evidenced-based approaches including structural alerts and pharmacophore models. Proposals on how best to utilize the data emerging from modeling studies are also discussed.

Relationships Between Pharmacovigilance, Molecular, Structural, and Pathway Data: Revealing Mechanisms for Immune-Mediated Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Immune-mediated drug-induced liver injury (IMDILI) can be devastating, irreversible, and fatal in the absence of successful transplantation surgery. We present a novel approach that combines the methods of pharmacoepidemiology with in silico molecular modeling to identify specific features in toxic ligands that are associated with clinical features of IMDILI. Specifically, from pharmacovigilance data multivariate logistic regression identified 18 drugs associated with IMDILI (P < 0.00015). Eleven of these drugs, along with their known and proposed metabolites, constituted a training set used to develop a four-point pharmacophore model (sensitivity 75%; specificity 85%). Subsequently, this information was combined with information from immune-pathway reviews and genetic-association studies and complemented with ligand-protein docking simulations to support a hypothesis implicating two putative targets within separate, possibly interacting, immune-system pathways: the major histocompatibility complex within the adaptive immune system and Toll-like receptors (TLRs), in particular TLR-7, which represent pattern recognition receptors of the innate immune system.

In silico assessment of adverse drug reactions and associated mechanisms

During recent years, various in silico approaches have been developed to estimate chemical and biological drug features, for example chemical fragments, protein targets, pathways, among others, that correlate with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and explain the associated mechanisms. These features have also been used for the creation of predictive models that enable estimation of ADRs during the early stages of drug development. In this review, we discuss various in silico approaches to predict these features for a certain drug, estimate correlations with ADRs, establish causal relationships between selected features and ADR mechanisms and create corresponding predictive models.

In Silico Solutions for Predicting Efficacy and Toxicity

This chapter describes a variety of in silico methods that provide support for research decisions on efficacy and toxicity. It reviews the use of two-dimensional chemical structures and their associated biological data, including biological activity data generated from human cell lines, in computational methods and explains how the data is typically represented for import into these tools. Searching databases of historical information helps to answer precise research questions and common approaches to querying these databases based on both chemical structures as well as the associated data are outlined. In silico methods used to analyse the relationships between the biological and chemical data require the generation of molecular descriptors, which are then used in advanced data mining methods, such as clustering or decision trees. Encoding the relationships between the chemical structures and activity or toxicity as mathematical models enables the application of this historical experience to support both current and future research directions. Two case studies are used to illustrate how these approaches can be used to support regulatory decisions on impurities and how these approaches can be used to predict human-based adverse events.

Estimation of the chemical-induced eye injury using a weight-of-evidence (WoE) battery of 21 artificial neural network (ANN) c-QSAR models (QSAR-21): part I: irritation potential

Evaluation of potential chemical-induced eye injury through irritation and corrosion is required to ensure occupational and consumer safety for industrial, household and cosmetic ingredient chemicals. The historical method for evaluating eye irritant and corrosion potential of chemicals is the rabbit Draize test. However, the Draize test is controversial and its use is diminishing - the EU 7th Amendment to the Cosmetic Directive (76/768/EEC) and recast Regulation now bans marketing of new cosmetics having animal testing of their ingredients and requires non-animal alternative tests for safety assessments. Thus, in silico and/or in vitro tests are advocated. QSAR models for eye irritation have been reported for several small (congeneric) data sets; however, large global models have not been described. This report describes FDA/CFSAN's development of 21 ANN c-QSAR models (QSAR-21) to predict eye irritation using the ADMET Predictor program and a diverse training data set of 2928 chemicals. The 21 models had external (20% test set) and internal validation and average training/verification/test set statistics were: 88/88/85(%) sensitivity and 82/82/82(%) specificity, respectively. The new method utilized multiple artificial neural network (ANN) molecular descriptor selection functionalities to maximize the applicability domain of the battery. The eye irritation models will be used to provide information to fill the critical data gaps for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredient chemicals.

Construction and analysis of a human hepatotoxicity database suitable for QSAR modeling using post-market safety data

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most common drug-induced adverse events (AEs) leading to life-threatening conditions such as acute liver failure. It has also been recognized as the single most common cause of safety-related post-market withdrawals or warnings. Efforts to develop new predictive methods to assess the likelihood of a drug being a hepatotoxicant have been challenging due to the complexity and idiosyncrasy of clinical manifestations of DILI. The FDA adverse event reporting system (AERS) contains post-market data that depict the morbidity of AEs. Here, we developed a scalable approach to construct a hepatotoxicity database using post-market data for the purpose of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. A set of 2029 unique and modelable drug entities with 13,555 drug-AE combinations was extracted from the AERS database using 37 hepatotoxicity-related query preferred terms (PTs). In order to determine the optimal classification scheme to partition positive from negative drugs, a manually-curated DILI calibration set composed of 105 negatives and 177 positives was developed based on the published literature. The final classification scheme combines hepatotoxicity-related PT data with supporting information that optimize the predictive performance across the calibration set. Data for other toxicological endpoints related to liver injury such as liver enzyme abnormalities, cholestasis, and bile duct disorders, were also extracted and classified. Collectively, these datasets can be used to generate a battery of QSAR models that assess a drug's potential to cause DILI.

Predictive computational toxicology to support drug safety assessment

Use of predictive technologies is an important aspect of many efforts in today's research, development, and regulatory landscapes. Computational methods as predictive tools for supporting drug safety assessments is of widespread interest as the field of in silico assessments rapidly changes with emerging technologies and the large amount of existing data available for modeling. There are challenges associated with application of in silico analyses for drug toxicity predictions and need for strategies and harmonization to enable an acceptable in silico evaluation for prediction of specific toxicity assay outcomes. This chapter will provide an overview focused on computational tools using structure-activity relationships and will highlight initiatives for use of computational assessments and realistic applications for predictive modeling in evaluating potential toxicities of drug-related molecules.

Review of current and "omics" methods for assessing the toxicity (genotoxicity, teratogenicity and nephrotoxicity) of herbal medicines and mushrooms

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

The increasing use of traditional herbal medicines around the world requires more scientific evidence for their putative harmlessness. To this end, a plethora of methods exist, more or less satisfying. In this post-genome era, recent reviews are however scarce, not only on the use of new "omics" methods (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabonomics) for genotoxicity, teratogenicity, and nephrotoxicity assessment, but also on conventional ones.

METHODS

The present work aims (i) to review conventional methods used to assess genotoxicity, teratogenicity and nephrotoxicity of medicinal plants and mushrooms; (ii) to report recent progress in the use of "omics" technologies in this field; (iii) to underline advantages and limitations of promising methods; and lastly (iv) to suggest ways whereby the genotoxicity, teratogenicity, and nephrotoxicity assessment of traditional herbal medicines could be more predictive.

RESULTS

Literature and safety reports show that structural alerts, in silico and classical in vitro and in vivo predictive methods are often used. The current trend to develop "omics" technologies to assess genotoxicity, teratogenicity and nephrotoxicity is promising but most often relies on methods that are still not standardized and validated.

CONCLUSION

Hence, it is critical that toxicologists in industry, regulatory agencies and academic institutions develop a consensus, based on rigorous methods, about the reliability and interpretation of endpoints. It will also be important to regulate the integration of conventional methods for toxicity assessments with new "omics" technologies.

In silico models for drug-induced liver injury--current status

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most important reasons for drug attrition at both pre-approval and post-approval stages. Therefore, it is crucial to develop methods that will detect potential hepatotoxicity among drug candidates as early and quickly as possible. However, the complexity of hepatotoxicity endpoint makes it very difficult to predict. In addition, there is still a lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers for DILI that consequently leads to a scarcity of reliable hepatotoxic data, which are the key to any modelling approach.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores the current status of existing in silico models predicting hepatotoxicity. Over the past decade, attempts have been made to compile hepatotoxicity data and develop in silico models, which can be used as a first-line screening of drug candidates for further testing.

EXPERT OPINION

Most of the predictive methods discussed in this review are based on the structural properties of chemicals and do not take into account genetic and environmental factors; therefore, their predictions are still uncertain. To improve the predictability of in silico models for DILI, it is essential to better understand its mechanisms as well as to develop sensitive toxicogenomics biomarkers, which show relatively good differentiation between hepatotoxins and non-hepatotoxins.

Predicting in vivo safety characteristics using physiochemical properties and in vitro assays

There is increasing pressure on the pharmaceutical industry to deliver safer and more effective medicines while constraining research and development costs. In order to meet these demands, the industry is looking for basic design principles in terms of physicochemical properties as well as the use of higher throughput in vitro assays to select and evaluate new molecular entities for further development. Recent advances in understanding the relationships between a chemical’s properties and its propensity for adverse events, as well as the development of new in vitro screening technologies, have enhanced our ability to potentially select molecules more likely to succeed in becoming drugs. However, these approaches are still limited by the availability of data and our lack of understanding of the mechanisms by which compounds can cause toxicity.

Drug repurposing and adverse event prediction using high-throughput literature analysis

Drug repurposing is the process of using existing drugs in indications other than the ones they were originally designed for. It is an area of significant recent activity due to the mounting costs of traditional drug development and scarcity of new chemical entities brought to the market by bio-pharmaceutical companies. By selecting drugs that already satisfy basic toxicity, ADME and related criteria, drug repurposing promises to deliver significant value at reduced cost and in dramatically shorter time frames than is normally the case for the drug development process. The same process that results in drug repurposing can also be used for the prediction of adverse events of known or novel drugs. The analytics method is based on the description of the mechanism of action of a drug, which is then compared to the molecular mechanisms underlying all known adverse events. This review will focus on those approaches to drug repurposing and adverse event prediction that are based on the biomedical literature. Such approaches typically begin with an analysis of the literature and aim to reveal indirect relationships among seemingly unconnected biomedical entities such as genes, signaling pathways, physiological processes, and diseases. Networks of associations of these entities allow the uncovering of the molecular mechanisms underlying a disease, better understanding of the biological effects of a drug and the evaluation of its benefit/risk profile. In silico results can be tested in relevant cellular and animal models and, eventually, in clinical trials.

Modeling liver-related adverse effects of drugs using knearest neighbor quantitative structure-activity relationship method

Adverse effects of drugs (AEDs) continue to be a major cause of drug withdrawals in both development and postmarketing. While liver-related AEDs are a major concern for drug safety, there are few in silico models for predicting human liver toxicity for drug candidates. We have applied the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approach to model liver AEDs. In this study, we aimed to construct a QSAR model capable of binary classification (active vs inactive) of drugs for liver AEDs based on chemical structure. To build QSAR models, we have employed an FDA spontaneous reporting database of human liver AEDs (elevations in activity of serum liver enzymes), which contains data on approximately 500 approved drugs. Approximately 200 compounds with wide clinical data coverage, structural similarity, and balanced (40/60) active/inactive ratios were selected for modeling and divided into multiple training/test and external validation sets. QSAR models were developed using the k nearest neighbor method and validated using external data sets. Models with high sensitivity (>73%) and specificity (>94%) for the prediction of liver AEDs in external validation sets were developed. To test applicability of the models, three chemical databases (World Drug Index, Prestwick Chemical Library, and Biowisdom Liver Intelligence Module) were screened in silico, and the validity of predictions was determined, where possible, by comparing model-based classification with assertions in publicly available literature. Validated QSAR models of liver AEDs based on the data from the FDA spontaneous reporting system can be employed as sensitive and specific predictors of AEDs in preclinical screening of drug candidates for potential hepatotoxicity in humans.

Identification of structure-activity relationships for adverse effects of pharmaceuticals in humans: Part C: use of QSAR and an expert system for the estimation of the mechanism of action of drug-induced hepatobiliary and urinary tract toxicities

This report describes an in silico methodology to predict off-target pharmacologic activities and plausible mechanisms of action (MOAs) associated with serious and unexpected hepatobiliary and urinary tract adverse effects in human patients. The investigation used a database of 8,316,673 adverse event (AE) reports observed after drugs had been marketed and AEs noted in the published literature that were linked to 2124 chemical structures and 1851 approved clinical indications. The Integrity database of drug patent and literature studies was used to find pharmacologic targets and proposed clinical indications. BioEpisteme QSAR software was used to predict possible molecular targets of drug molecules and Derek for Windows expert system software to predict chemical structural alerts and plausible MOAs for the AEs. AEs were clustered into five types of liver injury: liver enzyme disorders, cytotoxic injury, cholestasis and jaundice, bile duct disorders, and gall bladder disorders, and six types of urinary tract injury: acute renal disorders, nephropathies, bladder disorders, kidney function tests, blood in urine, and urolithiasis. Results showed that drug-related AEs were highly correlated with: (1) known drug class warnings, (2) predicted off-target activities of the drugs, and (3) a specific subset of clinical indications for which the drug may or may not have been prescribed.