1
|
Mullins E, Bresson J, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, George Firbank L, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Naegeli H, Nogué F, Rostoks N, Sánchez Serrano JJ, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Fernandez Dumont A, Moreno FJ. Scientific Opinion on development needs for the allergenicity and protein safety assessment of food and feed products derived from biotechnology. EFSA J 2022; 20:e07044. [PMID: 35106091 PMCID: PMC8787593 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This Scientific Opinion addresses the formulation of specific development needs, including research requirements for allergenicity assessment and protein safety, in general, which is urgently needed in a world that demands more sustainable food systems. Current allergenicity risk assessment strategies are based on the principles and guidelines of the Codex Alimentarius for the safety assessment of foods derived from 'modern' biotechnology initially published in 2003. The core approach for the safety assessment is based on a 'weight-of-evidence' approach because no single piece of information or experimental method provides sufficient evidence to predict allergenicity. Although the Codex Alimentarius and EFSA guidance documents successfully addressed allergenicity assessments of single/stacked event GM applications, experience gained and new developments in the field call for a modernisation of some key elements of the risk assessment. These should include the consideration of clinical relevance, route of exposure and potential threshold values of food allergens, the update of in silico tools used with more targeted databases and better integration and standardisation of test materials and in vitro/in vivo protocols. Furthermore, more complex future products will likely challenge the overall practical implementation of current guidelines, which were mainly targeted to assess a few newly expressed proteins. Therefore, it is timely to review and clarify the main purpose of the allergenicity risk assessment and the vital role it plays in protecting consumers' health. A roadmap to (re)define the allergenicity safety objectives and risk assessment needs will be required to inform a series of key questions for risk assessors and risk managers such as 'what is the purpose of the allergenicity risk assessment?' or 'what level of confidence is necessary for the predictions?'.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ladics GS. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of genetically-engineered food crops. J Immunotoxicol 2018; 16:43-53. [PMID: 30409058 DOI: 10.1080/1547691x.2018.1533904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
An extensive safety assessment process exists for genetically-engineered (GE) crops. The assessment includes an evaluation of the introduced protein as well as the crop containing the protein with the goal of demonstrating the GE crop is "as-safe-as" non-GE crops in the food supply. One of the evaluations for GE crops is to assess the expressed protein for allergenic potential. Currently, no single factor is recognized as a predictor for protein allergenicity. Therefore, a weight-of-the-evidence approach, which accounts for a variety of factors and approaches for an overall assessment of allergenic potential, is conducted. This assessment includes an evaluation of the history of exposure and safety of the gene(s) source; protein structure (e.g. amino acid sequence identity to human allergens); stability of the protein to pepsin digestion in vitro; heat stability of the protein; glycosylation status; and when appropriate, specific IgE binding studies with sera from relevant clinically allergic subjects. Since GE crops were first commercialized over 20 years ago, there is no proof that the introduced novel protein(s) in any commercialized GE food crop has caused food allergy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Que Q, Elumalai S, Li X, Zhong H, Nalapalli S, Schweiner M, Fei X, Nuccio M, Kelliher T, Gu W, Chen Z, Chilton MDM. Maize transformation technology development for commercial event generation. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2014; 5:379. [PMID: 25140170 PMCID: PMC4122164 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2014] [Accepted: 07/17/2014] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Maize is an important food and feed crop in many countries. It is also one of the most important target crops for the application of biotechnology. Currently, there are more biotech traits available on the market in maize than in any other crop. Generation of transgenic events is a crucial step in the development of biotech traits. For commercial applications, a high throughput transformation system producing a large number of high quality events in an elite genetic background is highly desirable. There has been tremendous progress in Agrobacterium-mediated maize transformation since the publication of the Ishida et al. (1996) paper and the technology has been widely adopted for transgenic event production by many labs around the world. We will review general efforts in establishing efficient maize transformation technologies useful for transgenic event production in trait research and development. The review will also discuss transformation systems used for generating commercial maize trait events currently on the market. As the number of traits is increasing steadily and two or more modes of action are used to control key pests, new tools are needed to efficiently transform vectors containing multiple trait genes. We will review general guidelines for assembling binary vectors for commercial transformation. Approaches to increase transformation efficiency and gene expression of large gene stack vectors will be discussed. Finally, recent studies of targeted genome modification and transgene insertion using different site-directed nuclease technologies will be reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiudeng Que
- Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc.Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cecil DL, Holt GE, Park KH, Gad E, Rastetter L, Childs J, Higgins D, Disis ML. Elimination of IL-10-inducing T-helper epitopes from an IGFBP-2 vaccine ensures potent antitumor activity. Cancer Res 2014; 74:2710-8. [PMID: 24778415 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Immunization against self-tumor antigens can induce T-regulatory cells, which inhibit proliferation of type I CD4(+) T-helper (TH1) and CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells. Type I T cells are required for potent antitumor immunity. We questioned whether immunosuppressive epitopes could be identified and deleted from a cancer vaccine targeting insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP-2) and enhance vaccine efficacy. Screening breast cancer patient lymphocytes with IFN-γ and interleukin (IL)-10 ELISPOT, we found epitopes in the N-terminus of IGFBP-2 that elicited predominantly TH1 whereas the C-terminus stimulated TH2 and mixed TH1/TH2 responses. Epitope-specific TH2 demonstrated a higher functional avidity for antigen than epitopes, which induced IFN-γ (P = 0.014). We immunized TgMMTV-neu mice with DNA constructs encoding IGFBP-2 N-and C-termini. T cell lines expanded from the C-terminus vaccinated animals secreted significantly more type II cytokines than those vaccinated with the N-terminus and could not control tumor growth when infused into tumor-bearing animals. In contrast, N-terminus epitope-specific T cells secreted TH1 cytokines and significantly inhibited tumor growth, as compared with naïve T cells, when adoptively transferred (P = 0.005). To determine whether removal of TH2-inducing epitopes had any effect on the vaccinated antitumor response, we immunized mice with the N-terminus, C-terminus, and a mix of equivalent concentrations of both vaccines. The N-terminus vaccine significantly inhibited tumor growth (P < 0.001) as compared with the C-terminus vaccine, which had no antitumor effect. Mixing the C-terminus with the N-terminus vaccine abrogated the antitumor response of the N-terminus vaccine alone. The clinical efficacy of cancer vaccines targeting self-tumor antigens may be greatly improved by identification and removal of immunosuppressive epitopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise L Cecil
- Authors' Affiliations: Tumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gregory E Holt
- Authors' Affiliations: Tumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyong Hwa Park
- Authors' Affiliations: Tumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ekram Gad
- Authors' Affiliations: Tumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Lauren Rastetter
- Authors' Affiliations: Tumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jennifer Childs
- Authors' Affiliations: Tumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doreen Higgins
- Authors' Affiliations: Tumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mary L Disis
- Authors' Affiliations: Tumor Vaccine Group, Center for Translational Medicine in Women's Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mirsky HP, Cressman RF, Ladics GS. Comparative assessment of multiple criteria for the in silico prediction of cross-reactivity of proteins to known allergens. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2013; 67:232-9. [PMID: 23933007 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2013] [Revised: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 08/01/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Genetically modified crops are becoming important components of a sustainable food supply and must be brought to market efficiently while also safeguarding the public from cross-reactivity of novel proteins to known allergens. Bioinformatic assessments can help to identify proteins warranting further experimental checks for cross-reactivity. This study is a large-scale in silico evaluation of assessment criteria, including searches for: alignments between a query and an allergen having ≥ 35% identity over a length ≥ 80; any sequence (of some minimum length) found in both a query and an allergen; any alignment between a query and an allergen with an E-value below some threshold. The criteria and an allergen database (AllergenOnline) are used to assess 27,243 Viridiplantae proteins for potential allergenicity. (A protein is classed as a "real allergen" if it exceeds a test-specific level of identity to an AllergenOnline entry; assessment of real allergens in the query set is against a reduced database from which the identifying allergen has been removed.) Each criterion's ability to minimize false positives without increasing false negative levels of current methods is determined. At best, the data show a reduction in false positives to ∼6% (from ∼10% under current methods) without any increase in false negatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry P Mirsky
- DuPont Pioneer, Route 141, Henry Clay Bldg, #400, Wilmington, DE 19880-0400, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Young GJ, Zhang S, Mirsky HP, Cressman RF, Cong B, Ladics GS, Zhong CX. Assessment of possible allergenicity of hypothetical ORFs in common food crops using current bioinformatic guidelines and its implications for the safety assessment of GM crops. Food Chem Toxicol 2012; 50:3741-51. [PMID: 22867756 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2012] [Revised: 07/18/2012] [Accepted: 07/20/2012] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Before a genetically modified (GM) crop can be commercialized it must pass through a rigorous regulatory process to verify that it is safe for human and animal consumption, and to the environment. One particular area of focus is the potential introduction of a known or cross-reactive allergen not previously present within the crop. The assessment of possible allergenicity uses the guidelines outlined by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization's (WHO) Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex) to evaluate all newly expressed proteins. Some regulatory authorities have broadened the scope of the assessment to include all DNA reading frames between stop codons across the insert and spanning the insert/genomic DNA junctions. To investigate the utility of this bioinformatic assessment, all naturally occurring stop-to-stop frames in the non-transgenic genomes of maize, rice, and soybean, as well as the human genome, were compared against the AllergenOnline (www.allergenonline.org) database using the Codex criteria. We discovered thousands of frames that exceeded the Codex defined threshold for potential cross-reactivity suggesting that evaluating hypothetical ORFs (stop-to-stop frames) has questionable value for making decisions on the safety of GM crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Young
- Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., DuPont Agricultural Biotechnology, Wilmington, DE 19880, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|