How contextual issues can distort shared decision making

A survey on critical health competences among diabetes educators using the Critical Health Competence Test (CHC Test)

BACKGROUND

Diabetes associations claim to have a patient-centered approach in diabetes care including shared decision-making (SDM). Diabetes educators are important healthcare professionals for implementing the concept of informed SDM in diabetes care. They need critical health competences (CHC) in order to provide evidence-based information and to support patients in understanding the risks of the disease and also the possible benefits or harm of the healthcare options. Therefore, we surveyed the CHC of diabetes educators.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional survey using the validated Critical Health Competences (CHC) Test to measure CHC of certified diabetes educators and trainees in Germany. Diabetes educators were approached via newsletter, mailing lists or in person during the conference of the German Diabetes Association. Trainees were approached during their training sessions. We applied scenario 1 of the CHC test, which comprises 17 items with open-ended and multiple-choice questions. Mean person parameters with a range from 0 to 1000 were calculated to assess the levels of critical health competences and a multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine correlations between sociodemographic variables and levels of CHC.

RESULTS

A total of 325 participants, mean age 38.6 (±11.1) years, completed the CHC test; n = 174 (55.5%) were certified diabetes educators and n = 151 (46.5%) were trainees. The participants achieved a mean score of 409.84 person parameters (±88.10) (scale from 0 to 1000). A statistically significant association was found only between the level of education and the level of CHC (b = 0.221; p-value 0.002). Participants with grammar school education achieved higher mean scores compared to participants with secondary school education (432.88 ± 77.72 vs. 396.45 ± 85.95; mean difference 36.42 ± 9.29; 95%CI 18.15 to 54.71; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Diabetes educators achieved low competence scores and it can be assumed that they do not have sufficient CHC to conduct consultations based on the SDM principles. Poor CHC among healthcare providers are a major barrier for the implementation of SDM. Core concepts of evidence-based medicine should be implemented into the curricula for diabetes educators in order to increase their levels of CHC.

"Nobody's Ever Told Me That:" Women's Experiences with Shared Decision-making when Accessing Contraception

Half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended. Contraceptive methods are effective in reducing unintended pregnancy burden. The shared decision-making model serves as best practice when choosing among healthcare options, and may be appropriate when considering contraceptive options. This study examined women's experiences with shared decision-making in contraceptive use dynamics. Researchers analyzed 38 interviews with women of reproductive age (range: 19-50 years) living in South Carolina (May-November 2016). Researchers completed a constant comparative method of data analysis using HyperRESEARCH 3.7.3 to explore reproductive-aged women's contraceptive decision-making. Shared decision-making provided a conceptual framework for analysis. Gaps in contraceptive knowledge, especially method effectiveness, impacted participants' experiences with contraception. Although participants believed they had adequate information, findings suggest they may not be fully informed about existing contraceptive options. Participants wanted options; however, results indicated women may not be actively involved in choosing contraception. Nuanced beliefs about contraception demonstrated preferences for patient-provider communication within the broader context of reproductive health and individual lifestyle needs. Findings from this study offer theoretical and practical recommendations to guide shared decision-making during contraceptive consultations to empower women in making informed and lifestyle-appropriate contraceptive choices.

Patient coaching in specialist consultations. Which patients are interested in a coach and what communication barriers do they perceive?

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patients interested in support by a patient coach to guide them in medical specialist consultations.

METHODS

We compared 76 patients interested in a patient coach with 381 patients without such an interest, using a representative panel of patients with a chronic disease in the Netherlands. Independent variables were demographic factors, socio-economic status, perceived efficacy in patient-provider interaction, communication barriers, health literacy, (duration and type of) disease(s) and activation level.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, patients who are interested in a coach were significantly older, had lower health literacy skills and less self-efficacy and, overall, experienced more communication barriers (>4), than patients without such interest (1-2 barriers). Multivariate analyses indicated three communications barriers as determinants of patient interest in a coach: feeling tense, uncertainty about own understanding, and believing that a certain topic is not part of a healthcare providers' task.

CONCLUSION

Patients interested in a coach perceive specific barriers in communicating with their medical specialist. In addition, patients who are > = 65 years, have lower health literacy and low self-efficacy may have interest in a coach.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Characterizing patients interested in a patient coach facilitates identification of those who could benefit from such a coach in clinical practice.