Performance of Makerless Tracking for Gimbaled Dynamic Tumor Tracking

Novel utilization and quantification of Xsight diaphragm tracking for respiratory motion compensation in Cyberknife Synchrony treatment of liver tumors

PURPOSE

The Xsight lung tracking system (XLTS) utilizes an advanced image processing algorithm to precisely identify the position of a tumor and determine its location in orthogonal x-ray images, instead of finding fiducials, thereby minimizing the risk of fiducial insertion-related side effects. To assess and gauge the effectiveness of CyberKnife Synchrony in treating liver tumors located in close proximity to or within the diaphragm, we employed the Xsight diaphragm tracking system (XDTS), which was based on the XLTS.

METHODS

We looked back at the treatment logs of 11 patients (8/11 [XDTS], 3/11 [Fiducial-based Target Tracking System-FTTS]) who had liver tumors in close proximity to or within the diaphragm. And the results are compared with the patients who undergo the treatment of FTTS. The breathing data information was calculated as a rolling average to reduce the effect of irregular breathing. We tested the tracking accuracy with a dynamic phantom (18023-A) on the basis of patient-specific respiratory curve.

RESULTS

The average values for the XDTS and FTTS correlation errors were 1.38 ± 0.65  versus 1.50 ± 0.26 mm (superior-inferior), 1.28 ± 0.48  versus 0.40 ± 0.09 mm (left-right), and 0.96 ± 0.32  versus 0.47 ± 0.10 mm(anterior-posterior), respectively. The prediction errors for two methods of 0.65 ± 0.16  versus 5.48 ± 3.33 mm in the S-I direction, 0.34 ± 0.10  versus 1.41 ± 0.76 mm in the A-P direction, and 0.22 ± 0.072  versus 1.22 ± 0.48 mm in the L-R direction. The coverage rate of FTTS slightly less than that of XDTS, such as 96.53 ± 8.19% (FTTS) versus 98.03 ± 1.54 (XDTS). The prediction error, the motion amplitude, and the variation of the respiratory center phase were strongly related to each other. Especially, the higher the amplitude and the variation, the higher the prediction error.

CONCLUSION

The diaphragm has the potential to serve as an alternative to gold fiducial markers for detecting liver tumors in close proximity or within it. We also found that we needed to reduce the motion amplitude and train the respiration of the patients during liver radiotherapy, as well as control and evaluate their breathing.

Markerless dynamic tumor tracking (MDTT) radiotherapy using diaphragm as a surrogate for liver targets

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of using the diaphragm as a surrogate for liver targets during MDTT.

METHODS

Diaphragm as surrogate for markers: a dome-shaped phantom with implanted markers was fabricated and underwent dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy sequences on the Vero4DRT linac. Ten patients participated in an IRB-approved, feasibility study to assess the MDTT workflow. All images were analyzed using an in-house program to back-project the diaphragm/markers position to the isocenter plane. ExacTrac imager log files were analyzed. Diaphragm as tracking structure for MDTT: The phantom "diaphragm" was contoured as a markerless tracking structure (MTS) and exported to Vero4DRT/ExacTrac. A single field plan was delivered to the phantom film plane under static and MDTT conditions. In the patient study, the diaphragm tracking structure was contoured on CT breath-hold-exhale datasets. The MDTT workflow was applied until just prior to MV beam-on.

RESULTS

Diaphragm as surrogate for markers: phantom data confirmed the in-house 3D back-projection program was functioning as intended. In patients, the diaphragm/marker relative positions had a mean ± RMS difference of 0.70 ± 0.89, 1.08 ± 1.26, and 0.96 ± 1.06 mm in ML, SI, and AP directions. Diaphragm as tracking structure for MDTT: Building a respiratory-correlation model using the diaphragm as surrogate for the implanted markers was successful in phantom/patients. During the tracking verification imaging step, the phantom mean ± SD difference between the image-detected and predicted "diaphragm" position was 0.52 ± 0.18 mm. The 2D film gamma (2%/2 mm) comparison (static to MDTT deliveries) was 98.2%. In patients, the mean difference between the image-detected and predicted diaphragm position was 2.02 ± 0.92 mm. The planning target margin contribution from MDTT diaphragm tracking is 2.2, 5.0, and 4.7 mm in the ML, SI, and AP directions.

CONCLUSION

In phantom/patients, the diaphragm motion correlated well with markers' motion and could be used as a surrogate. MDTT workflows using the diaphragm as the MTS is feasible using the Vero4DRT linac and could replace the need for implanted markers for liver radiotherapy.

End-to-end testing for stereotactic radiotherapy including the development of a Multi-Modality phantom

PURPOSE

A new insert for a commercially available end-to-end test phantom was designed and in-house manufactured by 3D printing. Subsequently, the insert was tested for different stereotactic radiation therapy workflows (SRS, SBRT, FSRT, and Multimet) also in comparison to the original insert.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Workflows contained imaging (MR, CT), treatment planning, positioning, and irradiation. Positioning accuracy was evaluated for non-coplanar x-ray, kV- and MV-CBCT systems, as well as surface guided radiation therapy. Dosimetric accuracy of the irradiation was measured with an ionization chamber at four different linear accelerators including dynamic tumor tracking for SBRT.

RESULTS

CT parameters of the insert were within the specification. For MR images, the new insert allowed quantitative analysis of the MR distortion. Positioning accuracy of the phantom with the new insert using the imaging systems of the different linacs was < 1 mm/degree also for MV-CBCT and a non-coplanar imaging system which caused > 3 mm deviation with the original insert. Deviation of point dose values was <3% for SRS, FSRT, and SBRT for both inserts. For the Multimet plans deviations exceeded 10% because the ionization chamber was not positioned in each metastasis, but in the center of phantom and treatment plan.

CONCLUSION

The in-house manufactured insert performed well in all steps of four stereotactic treatment end-to-end tests. Advantages over the commercially available alternative were seen for quantitative analysis of deformation correction in MR images, applicability for non-coplanar x-ray imaging, and dynamic tumor tracking.

The impact of organ motion and the appliance of mitigation strategies on the effectiveness of hypoxia-guided proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of organ motion on hypoxia-guided proton therapy treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hypoxia PET and 4D imaging data of six NSCLC patients were used to simulate hypoxia-guided proton therapy with different motion mitigation strategies including rescanning, breath-hold, respiratory gating and tumour tracking. Motion-induced dose degradation was estimated for treatment plans with dose painting of hypoxic tumour sub-volumes at escalated dose levels. Tumour control probability (TCP) and dosimetry indices were assessed to weigh the clinical benefit of dose escalation and motion mitigation. In addition, the difference in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) between escalated proton and photon VMAT treatments has been assessed.

RESULTS

Motion-induced dose degradation was found for target coverage (CTV V_95% up to -4%) and quality of the dose-escalation-by-contour (Q_RMS up to 6%) as a function of motion amplitude and amount of dose escalation. The TCP benefit coming from dose escalation (+4-13%) outweighs the motion-induced losses (<2%). Significant average NTCP reductions of dose-escalated proton plans were found for lungs (-14%), oesophagus (-10%) and heart (-16%) compared to conventional VMAT plans. The best plan dosimetry was obtained with breath hold and respiratory gating with rescanning.

CONCLUSION

NSCLC affected by hypoxia appears to be a prime target for proton therapy which, by dose-escalation, allows to mitigate hypoxia-induced radio-resistance despite the sensitivity to organ motion. Furthermore, substantial reduction in normal tissue toxicity can be expected compared to conventional VMAT. Accessibility and standardization of hypoxia imaging and clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings in a clinical setting.

The markerless lung target tracking AAPM Grand Challenge (MATCH) results

PURPOSE

Lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a radiation therapy success story with level 1 evidence demonstrating its efficacy. To provide real-time respiratory motion management for lung SABR, several commercial and preclinical markerless lung target tracking (MLTT) approaches have been developed. However, these approaches have yet to be benchmarked using a common measurement methodology. This knowledge gap motivated the MArkerless lung target Tracking CHallenge (MATCH). The aim was to localize lung targets accurately and precisely in a retrospective in silico study and a prospective experimental study.

METHODS

MATCH was an American Association of Physicists in Medicine sponsored Grand Challenge. Common materials for the in silico and experimental studies were the experiment setup including an anthropomorphic thorax phantom with two targets within the lungs, and a lung SABR planning protocol. The phantom was moved rigidly with patient-measured lung target motion traces, which also acted as ground truth motion. In the retrospective in silico study a volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment was simulated and a dataset consisting of treatment planning data and intra-treatment kilovoltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) images for four blinded lung motion traces was provided to the participants. The participants used their MLTT approach to localize the moving target based on the dataset. In the experimental study, the participants received the phantom experiment setup and five patient-measured lung motion traces. The participants used their MLTT approach to localize the moving target during an experimental SABR phantom treatment. The challenge was open to any participant, and participants could complete either one or both parts of the challenge. For both the in silico and experimental studies the MLTT results were analyzed and ranked using the prospectively defined metric of the percentage of the tracked target position being within 2 mm of the ground truth.

RESULTS

A total of 30 institutions registered and 15 result submissions were received, four for the in silico study and 11 for the experimental study. The participating MLTT approaches were: Accuray CyberKnife (2), Accuray Radixact (2), BrainLab Vero, C-RAD, and preclinical MLTT (5) on a conventional linear accelerator (Varian TrueBeam). For the in silico study the percentage of the 3D tracking error within 2 mm ranged from 50% to 92%. For the experimental study, the percentage of the 3D tracking error within 2 mm ranged from 39% to 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

A common methodology for measuring the accuracy of MLTT approaches has been developed and used to benchmark preclinical and commercial approaches retrospectively and prospectively. Several MLTT approaches were able to track the target with sub-millimeter accuracy and precision. The study outcome paves the way for broader clinical implementation of MLTT. MATCH is live, with datasets and analysis software being available online at https://www.aapm.org/GrandChallenge/MATCH/ to support future research.

Markerless Real-Time 3-Dimensional kV Tracking of Lung Tumors During Free Breathing Stereotactic Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Accurate verification of tumor position during irradiation could reduce the probability of target miss. We investigated whether a commercial gantry-mounted 2-dimensional (2D) kilo-voltage (kV) imaging system could be used for real-time 3D tumor tracking during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Markerless tumor tracking on kV fluoroscopic images was validated using a life-like moving thorax phantom and subsequently performed on kV images continuously acquired before and during free-breathing VMAT lung SBRT.

Methods and Materials

The 3D-printed/molded phantom containing 3 lung tumors was moved in 3D in TrueBeam developer mode, using simulated regular/irregular breathing patterns. Planar kV images were acquired at 7 frames/s during 11 Gy/fraction 10 MV flattening filter free VMAT. 2D reference templates were created for each gantry angle using the planning 4D computed tomography inspiration phase. kV images and templates were matched using normalized cross correlation to determine 2D tumor position, and triangulation of 2D matched projections determined the third dimension. 3D target tracking performed on cone beam computed tomography projection data from 18 patients (20 tumors) and real-time online tracking data from 2 of the 18 patients who underwent free-breathing VMAT lung SBRT are presented.

Results

For target 1 and 2 of the phantom (upper lung and middle/medial lung, mean density –130 Hounsfield units), 3D results within 2 mm of the known position were present in 92% and 96% of the kV projections, respectively. For target 3 (inferior lung, mean density –478 Hounsfield units) this dropped to 80%. Benchmarking against the respiratory signal, 13/20 (65%) tumors (10.5 ± 11.1 cm³) were considered successfully tracked on the cone beam computed tomography data. Tracking was less successful (≤50% of the time) in 7/20 (1.2 ± 1.5 cm³). Successful online tracking during lung SBRT was demonstrated.

Conclusions

3D markerless tumor tracking on a standard linear accelerator using template matching and triangulation of free-breathing kV fluoroscopic images was possible in 65% of small lung tumors. The smallest tumors were most challenging.

Dense feature-based motion estimation in MV fluoroscopy during dynamic tumor tracking treatment: preliminary study on reduced aperture and partial occlusion handling

Quality assurance solutions to complement available motion compensation technologies are central for their safe routine implementation and success of treatment. This work presents a dense feature-based method for soft-tissue tumor motion estimation in megavoltage (MV) beam's-eye-view (BEV) projections for potential intra-treatment monitoring during dynamic tumor tracking (DTT). Dense sampling and matching principles were employed to track a gridded set of features landmarks (FLs) in MV-BEV projections and estimate tumor motion, capable to overcome reduced field aperture and partial occlusion challenges. The algorithm's performance was evaluated by retrospectively applying it to fluoroscopic sequences acquired at ∼2 frames s^-1 (fps) for a dynamic phantom and two lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) patients treated with DTT on the Vero SBRT system. First, a field-specific train image is initialized by sampling the tumor region at, S, pixel intervals on a grid using a representative frame from a stream of query frames. Sampled FLs are locally characterized in the form of descriptor vectors and geometric attributes representing the target. For motion tracking, subsequent query frames are likewise sampled, corresponding feature descriptors determined, and then patch-wise matched to the training set based on their descriptors and geometric relationships. FLs with high correspondence are pruned and used to estimate tumor displacement. In scenarios of partial occlusions, position is estimated from the set of correctly (visible) FLs on past observations. Reconstructed trajectories were benchmarked against ground-truth manual tracking using the root-mean-square (RMS) as a metric of positional accuracy. A total of 19 fluoroscopy sequences were analyzed. This included scenarios of field aperture obstruction during three-dimensional conformal, as well as step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivery assisted with DTT. The algorithm resolved target motion satisfactorily. The RMS was <1.2 mm and <1.8 mm for the phantom and the clinical dataset, respectively. Dense tracking showed promising results to overcome localization challenges at the field penumbra and partial obstruction by multi-leaf collimator (MLC). Motion retrieval was possible in ∼66% of the control points studied. In addition to MLC obstruction, changes in the external/internal breathing dynamics and baseline drifts were a major source of estimation bias. Dense feature-based tracking is a viable alternative. The algorithm is rotation-/scale-invariant and robust to photometric changes. Tracking multiple features may help overcome partial occlusion challenges by the MLC. This in turn opens up new possibilities for motion detection and intra-treatment monitoring during IMRT and potentially VMAT.