Myocardial infarction, ventricular remodeling, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: where we stand today

Pharmacologic inhibition of intracellular caspases after myocardial infarction attenuates left ventricular remodeling: a potentially novel pathway

OBJECTIVE

Myocyte death occurs by necrosis and caspase-mediated apoptosis in the setting of myocardial infarction. In vitro studies suggest that caspase activation within myocytes causes contractile protein degradation without inducing cell death. Thus, caspase activation may evoke left ventricular remodeling through 2 independent processes post-myocardial infarction. However, the effects of caspase activation on left ventricular geometry post-myocardial infarction remain unclear. This project applied broad-spectrum caspase inhibition to a chronic porcine model of myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Coronary snares and sonomicrometry crystals in remote and area-at-risk regions were placed in pigs (n = 22, 34 kg). Geometric measurements at end diastole and end systole, including left ventricular area by echocardiography and interregional distance by sonomicrometry, were obtained at baseline. Coronary occlusion was instituted for 60 minutes, followed by reperfusion and repeated geometric measurements at 7 days, including left ventriculography. At reperfusion, pigs were randomized to saline (n = 12) or caspase inhibition (n = 10, IDN6734, 2 mg/kg intravenously, then 2 mg x kg x h for 24 hours) at a dose that achieved desired plasma concentrations (790 +/- 142 ng/mL) as predicted by prior pharmacokinetic studies.

RESULTS

Infarct size and 24-hour troponin-I values were not significantly different between the saline and caspase inhibition groups (51% +/- 8% vs 42% +/- 6% and 189 +/- 20 ng/mL vs 152 +/- 26 ng/mL, respectively, P >.10). At 7 days, end-diastole volume was increased in both groups compared with reference control values (47 +/- 1 mL, P <.05), but it was decreased with caspase inhibition (72 +/- 4 mL) compared with saline (84 +/- 4 mL, P <.05). Similarly, end-diastole and end-systole areas increased by 32% +/- 3% and 81% +/- 16% in the saline group but were attenuated with caspase inhibition (19% +/- 3% and 31% +/- 10%, respectively, P <.05). End-diastole interregional distance increased by 30% +/- 7% in the saline group but was attenuated with caspase inhibition (12% +/- 5%, P <.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite equivalent degrees of myocardial injury, caspase inhibition reduced post-myocardial infarction left ventricular remodeling as evidenced by multiple, independent assessments of left ventricular dilation. Thus, caspase activation alters left ventricular geometry in the absence of significant effects on myocardial injury.

Prospective evaluation comparing the effects of enalapril and losartan in left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have compared angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with heart failure, but there are few data about the effect of these drugs regarding left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients with first anterior wall myocardial infarction within 24 hours of evolution were randomized to receive enalapril (as much as 20 mg; mean, 14.6 mg), or losartan (as much as 50 mg; mean, 48 mg). Left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular volumes were analyzed in 2 serial radionuclide ventriculograpies, carried out within 4 days after the infarction (mean, 97.4 +/- 114.2 hours) and after 6 months (mean, 177.7 +/- 16.7 days). Ventriculographies were analyzed by a single blinded observer. Mainly because of the unexpected large SD values obtained, the power of the study to demonstrate equivalence between the groups was only 15.7%.

RESULTS

The differences obtained between the first and the second ventriculographies, for the enalapril and losartan groups, were: for left ventricular ejection fraction, -0.4% +/- 6.6% versus -1.1% +/- 5.9% (P =. 67; 95% CI, 2.77-4.23); for final systolic volume, 0.07 +/- 7.7 mL/m(2) versus -0.2 +/- 6.1mL/m(2) (P =. 85; 95% CI, -3.57-4.26); for final diastolic volume -0.7 +/- 12.1 mL/m(2) versus -3.6 - 9.9 mL/m(2) (P =. 34; 95% CI, -3.22-9.17).

CONCLUSION

This study, although underpowered, suggests that neither enalapril nor losartan was superior as compared with each other for left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction; however, powerful evidence of equivalence was not provided.